g g s An Inclusive Search for HWW at CDF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron Bob Olivier, LPNHE Paris XXXVI ème Rencontre de Moriond Mars Search for Large Extra Dimensions.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
The elusive agent of electroweak symmetry breaking - an experimentalist point of view - Ulrich Heintz Brown University.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
1 g g s Richard E. Hughes The Ohio State University for The CDF and D0 Collaborations Low Mass SM Higgs Search at the Tevatron hunting....
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
Study of Higgs boson production in bosonic decay channels at the LHC (including off-shell production) Susumu Oda Kyushu University On behalf of the ATLAS.
Standard Model Higgs Searches at the Tevatron (Low Mass : M H  ~140 GeV/c 2 ) Kohei Yorita University of Chicago The XLIIIrd Rencontres de Moriond EW.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Higgs Searches at Tevatron Makoto Tomoto 戸本 誠 Fermilab/Nagoya University On behalf of the DØ & CDF Collaborations Tsukuba, April 21 st, 2006.
M. Herndon, FNAL Theory Seminar, August An Inclusive Search for H  WW at CDF Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison FNAL Theory Group.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
M. Herndon, Collider Physics May Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison Collider Physics 2009,
Hiroshima Higgs Workshop 2006, Jan. 17 – 19, 2006 Higgs Searches at the Tevatron Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Osaka City University) for the CDF Collaboration 1.Tevatron.
Alexei Safonov (Texas A&M University) For the CDF Collaboration.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Searching for the Higgs boson in the VH and VBF channels at ATLAS and CMS Dr. Adrian Buzatu Research Associate.
On the Brink of Revelation and Revolution: Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in 2008 Rick St. Denis – Glasgow University.
Summary of Moriond 2010 Part I. Tevatron 이강영 ( 건국대학교 연세대학교
Marc M. Baarmand – Florida Tech 1 TOP QUARK STUDIES FROM CMS AT LHC Marc M. Baarmand Florida Institute of Technology PHYSICS AT LHC Prague, Czech Republic,
Search for the Standard Model Higgs in  and  lepton final states P. Grannis, ICHEP 2012 for the DØ Collaboration Tevatron, pp √s = 1.96 TeV -
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Latest Collider Results Aidan Robson University of Glasgow IOP HEPP/APP, 30 March 2010.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Studies of the Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Koji Sato On Behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations 25th Rencontres de Blois Chateau Royal de Blois, May 29, 2013.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Gavin Hesketh Northeastern University On behalf of the CDF and D ⊘ Collaborations Hadron Collider.
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
Satish Desai - 20 July Resonant Higgs Searches at DØ Satish Desai -- Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration 20 July 2007 European Physical Society.
Tevatron Combination of SM Higgs Searches and Fourth Generation Limits Satish Desai – Fermilab For the CDF and DØ Collaborations 19 th International Conference.
on behalf of the DØ experiment
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
The Top Quark at CDF Production & Decay Properties
Searches for the SM Higgs Boson
Search for SM Higgs in WW* channel at CDF
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
First Evidence for Electroweak Single Top Quark Production
Search for a High Mass SM Higgs Boson at the Tevatron
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Search for WHlnbb at the Tevatron DPF 2009
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
g g s High Mass Higgs at the Tevatron
陶军全 中科院高能所 Junquan Tao (IHEP/CAS, Beijing)
g g s Searches for the Higgs Boson at the Tevatron
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Higgs Vector Boson Fusion Production and Detection at the Tevatron
ATLAS Standard Model Higgs Results
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Greg Heath University of Bristol
g g s … Searches for the Higgs Boson
Tim Scanlon Imperial College, London on behalf of the DØ Collaboration
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
Presentation transcript:

g g s An Inclusive Search for HWW at CDF Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison University of Wisconsin Seminar, November 2009

Electroweak Symmetry Breaking An experimentalist’s conception Consider the Electromagnetic and the Weak Forces Coupling at low energy: EM: ~, Weak: ~/(MW,Z)2 Fundamental difference in the coupling strengths at low energy, but apparently governed by the same dimensionless constant Difference due to the massive nature of the W and Z bosons SM postulates a mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking via the Higgs mechanism Results in massive vector bosons and mass terms for the fermions Directly testable by searching for the Higgs boson A primary goal of the Tevatron and LHC

Electroweak Constraints Higgs couples strongly to massive particles Introduces corrections to W and top masses - sensitivity to Higgs mass SM LEP Direct search: mH > 114GeV SM indirect constraint: mH < 157GeV @ 95% CL We know where to look!

SM Higgs Production and Decay High mass: HWWll decay available Take advantage of large ggH production cross section Alternative production mechanisms WHWWW, ZHZWW, VBF: qqHqq->WWjj Significant contribution in events with 1, 2 or more jets and same sign events

Colliders and Experiments Tevatron: 2TeV pp collider with two general purpose detectors: CDF properties Excellent lepton Id Good calorimeters for jet and MET reconstruction Excellent silicon detector for b jet identification (top rejection) Higgs analysis uses full capabilities of the detectors Results in this talk uses 4.8(DØ 5.4)fb-1 Given a SM Higgs Higgs mass exclusions or evidence High mass Higgs the most interesting with current dataset 

Tools: Triggers and Leptons Extract handful of Higgs events from a background 11 orders of magnitudes larger Higgs couples, decays to heavy particles H W l  Primary triggers: High pTe and  Triggers upgraded to use previously non triggerable areas of the muon system Lepton Id Optimize lepton Id on large samples of W, Z bosons Lepton Id and trigger performance calibrated to high precession on Z samples 1 Higgs ggH 0.03-0.3 Maximizing Higgs acceptance

Tools: Backgrounds SM processes create a variety backgrounds to Higgs detection Discovery analyses: WW, WZ, ZZ, from run 1 - top pairs Total and differential cross section measurements QCD dijets, W+jets, Z(γ*)+jets Critical to Higgs Some backgrounds cannot be predicted using MC. W+jets with a fake lepton Constrain background predictions Testing ground for tools and techniques Control regions Higgs search built on a foundation of the entire collider physics program

SM Higgs: HWW HWWll - signature: Two high pT leptons and MET Primary backgrounds: WW and top in di-lepton decay channel Key issue: Maximizing signal acceptance Excellent physics based discriminants H μ+ ν W- W+ e- Spin correlation: Charged leptons go in the same direction

HWW:  Analysis Initial analysis: PRL 97, 081802 (2006) gg  H production only Purely based on signal vs. background discrimination of  variable Used standard CDF high pT lepton Id Results: mH = 160GeV : 95%CL Limits/SM Analysis Lum (fb-1) Higgs Events Exp. Limit Obs. Limit CDF:  0.36 0.58 8.9 8.2 Compared to current 4.8fb-1 analysis Higgs acceptance improved: ~x3.8 3 years, 15 people, 8FTE, 1 paper Interestingly acceptance improvement and new data almost accounts for current sensitivity: Naive expectation: 1.3xSM

HWW Improvements Lepton acceptance: x2.5 effective statistics Based on lepton selection of WZ and ZZ discovery analyses: x2.2 Electrons in calorimeter gaps Muons in forward region and detector gaps Further improvements New muon triggers in partially instrumented regions (pioneered in single top analysis): x1.1 Electron likelihood, more efficient for same fake rate: x1.1 8 μ , 2 e and 1 e/μ type Performance validated in 31 DY and 14 Zττ control regions

HWW Improvements Higgs production processes: x1.55 effective statistics WH: +24% ZH: +8.6% VBF: +8.8% Same sign region for WH and ZH 2+ Jets region for all processes including ggH: +13.6% Required re-optimization of analysis in jet bins Some sensitivity lost to theory errors on per jet bin cross sections Low dilepton mass region: +3.8% Required understanding of new control regions and backgrounds as a function of jet multiplicity

HWW Improvements Multivariate discriminants Neural Net: x1.2. Typically 10 most discriminating variables also considering 2D correlations by examining profile plots Matrix Element likelihood ratio: x1.2 Final analysis combining NN/ME discriminants: x1.3 sensitivity Signals and backgrounds categorized by lepton quality and jet multiplicity Specific backgrounds and types of signal occur in each jet multiplicity bin Fake lepton background primarily in categories with low lepton quality Simplifies identification of physics based discriminating variables Matrix elements used in 0 jet bin only Adds 10% over use of NN or Matrix Element alone Requires extensive validation

SM Higgs: HWW Inclusive HWW analysis: ll MET – signature Channel Signal Primary background Primary discriminants 0 Jets ggH WW, DY /R,MET,ME 1 Jet ggH, VH, VBF /R,MET,mTH 2+ Jets Top dilepton MET,HT,mTH 1+ Jets SS lepton VH W+Jets Good lepton ID, MET Low mll γ conv. Lepton pT

Control Regions Channel Signal Primary background Primary discriminants 0 Jets ggH WW, DY /R,MET,ME 1 Jet ggH, VH, VBF /R,MET,mTH 2+ Jets Top dilepton MET,HT,mTH 1+ Jets SS lepton VH W+Jets Good lepton ID, MET Low mll γ conv. Lepton pT At least one control region for every primary background Control regions Low MET: Understand DY, lepton Id efficiencies Large MET aligned along jet of lepton: False MET SS: W+false leptons (0 jet bin only) High WW ME likelihood: Measure WW cross section b tagged jets, top dilepton: Measure ttbar cross section Low dilepton mass low MET OS and SS: Photon conversion backgrounds

Control Regions 2+ jets b tagged Control regions, further examples Large MET aligned along jet or lepton: False MET region Here we observe muon pT mis-measurement. Not an issue since result is highly un-signal like and MET selection designed to remove these events SS: W+false leptons region b tagged jets: top dilepton region 2+ jets b tagged

Variable Modeling Check modeling of 10 NN and 10 kinematic MC vs data in signal and relevant control regions Also check 2D profile plots With NN divide plots into signal like and background like regions and check modeling in both regions separately These checks have led to discarding variables and systematic uncertainty studies Angle between jets in 2 jet events not well modeled. Not surprising since MC is Pythia Total vector sum Jet Et is fine N Jet distribution in DY poorly modeled. Systematic check done by reweighing DY MC to correct distribution

Shape Systematics Check effects that influence the shape of discriminating distributions. Uncertainties if necessary Primary concern is NN output Higgs scale and pdf variations (NNLO). Now checked in jet multiplicity bins. Pythia vs. NL0(NNL0) kinematics Signal/Bkg: Jet energy scale Lepton fake rate vs. pt B tag efficiency (top rejection) DY pt/Njet reweighing to match data WW background scale, pdf, kinematics gluon fusion production fraction (in progress, first look using histograms from DØ indicated that this is not a severe effect).

HWW Result Approaching SM sensitivity! 30 Higgs Events for both CDF and DØ!

Combined Limits Limit calculation and combination CDF Exp. 2.5 @ 115 Combination necessary in HWW similar to the full CDF combination Using Bayesian methodology. Incorporate systematic uncertainties using pseudo-experiments (shape and rate included) (correlations taken into account between channels) Backgrounds can be constrained in the fit CDF Exp. 2.5 @ 115 DØ Exp. 2.8

HWW Some Details Previous NNLL cross section: Include two loop EW diagrams: 2009 MSTW PDFs Integrated together into the latest state of the art predictions Latest gluon PDF, full treatment of EW contribution, better treatment of b quark masses S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason, JHEP 07, 028 (2003), hep-ph/0306211 CTEQ5L U. Aglietta, B. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vivini (2006), hep-ph/0610033. Martin Sterling Thorne Watt hep-ph/0901.0002 C Anastasiou, R Boughezal, F Petriello, hep-ph/0811.3458 hep-ph/0905.3529 D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, hep-ph/0901.2427 Example systematic table Rates and shapes considered Shape: Scale variations (in jet bins), ISR, gluon pdf, Pythia vs. NNL0 kinematics, DY pt distribution, jet energy scale, lepton fake rate shapes: for signal and backgrounds. Included in limit setting if significant. Treatment developed jointly by CDF and DØ

HWW Result Exp. 1.26 @ 160, 1.21 @ 165, 1.45 @ 170 GeV DØ Exp. 1.35 OBS 1.53 Obs. 1.27 @ 160, 1.23 @ 165, 1.64 @ 170 GeV

Tevatron Higgs Combination Exp. 0.96 @ 160, 0.86 @ 165 GeV Exp. 1.8 @ 115 Obs. 0.94 @ 165 GeV: Exclusion 163-166

Projections Goals for increased sensitivity achieved Goals set after 2007 Lepton Photon conference First stage target was sensitivity for possible high mass Tevatron exclusion Second stage goals: target is CDF only exclusion or large Tevatron exclusion. In progress Trileptons (Jason Nett) Lower missing et Tau channels Overlapping leptons

Discovery Discovery projections: chance of 3 or 5 discovery Two factors of 1.5 improvements examined relative to summer Lepton Photon 2007 analyses, low and high mass First 1.5 factor achieved for summer ICHEP 2008 analysis Result: exclusion! Now have expected exclusion and observed 163-166 Second set of improvements now well studied Expect large exclusion (or evidence): Full Tevatron dataset/improvements

Conclusions The Higgs boson search is in its most exciting era ever The Tevatron experiments have achieved sensitivity to the SM Higgs boson production cross section CDF will reach sensitivity for single experiment exclusion soon We exclude at 95% C.L. the production of a SM Higgs boson of 163-166 GeV Expect large exclusion, or evidence, with full Tevatron data set and improvements SM Higgs Excluded: mH = 163-166 GeV

Extra

Combination CLs Results

D0 Combination

Combination Moriond 2009 Exp. 1.1 @ 160/165, 1.4 @ 170 GeV Obs. 0.99 @ 160/170, 0.86 @ 165 GeV