Learning Into Practice Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Regional training activities planning discussion.
Managing SEN: Monitoring and Evaluation – Gathering Evidence: Making Judgements Day 1.
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Training Trainers at James Watt College Flexible, certificated training programmes for work-based trainers and coaches.
Performance management guidance
‘Colin, I need to speak to you some time about my own CPD - I’ve been so busy that I just haven’t had time to think about myself… ’. ‘The most important.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Ofsted Feedback & Quality Dissemination W elcome June 10.
TRANSFORMING CAPABILITY SUPPORT MATERIALS LEARNING DESIGN Learning Design Development Plan DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMITMENT: LINE MANAGERS SHOULD: AGREEDREVIEWED.
O VERVIEW OF SETA R ESOURCES A LISON S UMPTER & S EAN E RRINGTON F EBRUARY 2015 Commissioned and funded by.
Generic Employability Skills Centre for Developing and Evaluating Lifelong Learning (CDELL)
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
ACJRD 16 th Annual Conference 4 th October  2007: Prevention and Early Intervention Programme, funded by DYCA and The Atlantic Philanthropies;
HND Social Services Sector Briefing Session 23rd March 2007.
New Standard. Aim  To recognise and celebrate the best organisations delivering training and development solutions to employers Creating a quality mark.
Rosie Lusznat/ Richard Weaver 11 January 2013 GMC Recognising and approving trainers.
Unpacking and Implementing Training Packages Linda Hopkins.
Evaluation Workshop Self evaluation – some workable ideas and approaches.
Becoming a trainer – training needs analysis
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
3-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Hill, Hill, Perlitz, Professional Training & Assessment, 1e C HAPTER 3 TAEDES505A Evaluate.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland The Oral Health Improvement Team Supporting Caring for Smiles.
1 An introductory workshop for new governors 2005 Becoming a governor.
Induction The Diploma for the Children and Young People’s Workforce.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
Rights in Reality Development of training resources to promote and raise awareness of children’s and young people’s rights and.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Hampshire FA Equality Action Plan Overview
Subject specialist mentoring on the DET
Training for Taught Postgraduate Course Representatives
More Able and Talented Learners –
SLP Training Day 3 30th September 2016
Customer Service Excellence Standard – adding value for your students
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Foster Carers: at the heart of a world class children’s workforce
Introduction to the Victorian state disability plan 2013–2016
EDPRAC 102B September/October 2011.
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Partnership Forum 2017 Partner Institution Survey 2016 :
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Empowering Schools A Scottish Government Consultation on the Provisions of the Education (Scotland) Bill These slides have been prepared to support your.
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Starting Points Planning for progress.
Presentation on the Drigg and Carleton Community Led Plan
Linking assurance and enhancement
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities
Starting Points Planning for progress.
Regulation 4 - Elements of the Plan
Using Data to Assess High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department.
Empowering Schools A Scottish Government Consultation on the Provisions of the Education (Scotland) Bill These slides have been prepared to support your.
Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS
Induction Training Design
TITLE TEXT.
Introducing Assessment For Learning
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
Jackie Maley (HMI) Lead Officer, ELC
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Steph Kirkham, Development Consultant, sparqs
Leading the way in Europe
Mentor training update
Planning a cross- curricular topic
Workplace Wellbeing Programme
Trainee and training officer responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Learning Into Practice Plan Nicola Creighton – Early Years and Childcare Development Officer On behalf of the Workforce Development and Training Standing Action Group The Development, Design, and Delivery of the annual Early Learning and Childcare Training Programme is the responsibility of the Workforce Development Group. Each year a training programme is produced which provides core mandatory training and a wide range of CPD courses. In each year more than 2000 training attendances are recorded. The key question for the Group is “What difference does this extensive and varied training actually make to standards of childhood practice?” Moreover, feedback from Development Officers and SVQ Assessors whilst observing practice in childcare settings, suggests it is hard to define or identify change or improvement in practice following a participant’s attendance at a particular training course. The existing practice of gathering learner feedback only extends to using learner evaluation at the end of each training session: Trainers gauge learner satisfaction on course content, trainer style and effectiveness, and next steps for learning. This has prompted the Group to look at ways of encouraging learner engagement with the course and also line manager monitoring post training. The Group designed a Learning Into Practice Plan and consulted on its use with trainers, and employers. It is designed for the participants to use self reflection during and after training sessions and use these reflections to make positive changes to their practice. We also recognised that participants will need support from their line managers to do this effectively. If achieved we will observe improved practice and better outcomes for children within settings and be able to back this up with appropriate data. Project Aims: 80% of the sample group will have identified specific learning gained from the training session along with improvements they intend to make to their practice. 80% of the sample group of line managers will have discussed these intended improvements and any support needed with participants. Method Discussions at the strategic group concluded that a form with relevant questions to promote professional discussion in the workplace following training attendance should be piloted.. A form was devised and circulated for feedback from the strategic groups and the wider community of managers through Forum meetings resulting in the Learning Into Practice Plan It was agreed to test it out on a small group initially with the project being taken forward with Aberlour Futures’ Development Officers’ Team Process map, Aim and Driver Diagram collated PDSA Cycle took place with improvements identifies but overall positive results PDSA Cycle two took place again with positive results Following further discussions as strategic level plan was put into place for all training providers to use. Achievements In both cycle one and two our project aims had been achieved. Feedback was sought from Managers and Line Supervisors during the cycles by telephone and email. This was all positive. Feedback has also been sought through Managers and Lead Practitioner forum meetings which again has all been positive. Process Change Extra time was allocated to the beginning of the training session in order to explain the purpose of the Learning Into Practice Plan and its intended use. Responses after cycle one although met targeted aim percentage were felt to be of varying levels of understating on how to detail specific learning. The course used does cover a wide range of practice areas so it was felt that cycle two should be carried out for a training session focused on the specific skills area of messy play. Responses after cycle 2 was then easier to see understanding of how to identify specific changes to practice Cycle 2: Use LIPP form during Skills Workshop: Messy Play Prediction: 80% of sample group will identify learning and use to improve practice Study: Gain data asking for forms to be returned Act: Bring Findings to Workforce Development Group The Workforce Development Group felt satisfied after two cycles to put the plan into full implementation stage. Cycle 1: Use LIPP form during Common Induction session Prediction: 80% of sample group will identify learning and use to improve practice Study: Gain data asking for forms to be returned Act: Carry out next cycle for a skills workshop instead Key Learning Points Participants may need further training on what it means to be a reflective practitioner Next steps How will we ensure Learning Into Practice Plan is implemented by all training providers? Develop a smarter system of collecting feedback data in order to continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the Learning Into Practice Plan Further information contact: nicola.creighton@aberlour.org.uk 01224764719 or 07717535879