HERE Seminar, Warsaw, 19 September 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 IMPLEMENTING THE MALTA QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR LIFELONG LEARNING THE KEY CHALLENGES TIPTOE Conference: Working on EQF – From Framework to Practice.
Advertisements

Aligning national against European qualifications frameworks: the principles of self-certification Professor John Scattergood Pro-Chancellor, Trinity.
What is the relationship between the HE qualifications framework and quality assurance? Stephen Adam, June 2011.
State of Play and Main Challenges Related to Armenian National Qualifications Framework (ANQF) Armen Ashotyan Minister of Education and Science Strasbourg,
Chalmers University of Technology A COMPARISON OF THE CDIO AND EUR-ACE QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS Johan Malmqvist Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg,
NQF SERBIA 2009 NQF SERBIA 2009 current state and SWOT analyses Ljubljana, June 2009.
Bologna Process in Albania and its NQF versus EQF Bratislava 2008 by Aleksander Xhuvani Rajmonda Buhaljoti Miranda Kullolli.
Dr. Dukagjin Pupovci Kosovo Bologna Promoters Team NEW QUALIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR KOSOVO Seminar on ECTS?DS & EQF?NQF February 2008 Bratislava,
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
IMPROVING THE RECOGNITION SYSTEM Developments along subject lines and their impact on Recognition December 3rd, University of Latvia, Riga Dr. Julia González,
Tuning IV: European Physics Education Network (EUPEN) Julia González & Robert Wagenaar (Joint coordinators of the Socrates-Erasmus, Tempus.
A regional perspective: South East European Network on QF Prof. Mile Dželalija, PhD Bologna Process: Development of Qualifications Framework Meeting of.
Developing the National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience Case of Georgia Lali Bakradze Expert University Curriculum Development Programme.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Developing a National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience General Overview Nodar Surguladze Deputy Minister Ministry of Education and Science.
NQF TURKEY current state, developments, ıssues and challenges Prof. Dr. Selda Önderoğlu Bologna Expert Turkish National Team of Bologna Experts Cetinje,8-9.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
REFORMING CROATIAN LEGAL EDUCATION TEMPUS PROJECT 2005/06.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Azerbaijan Seminar Baku, 12th June 2007 Stuart Garvie National Qualifications Authority.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
National Qualification Frameworks: The Case of the Hungarian Higher Education József Temesi, Corvinus University of Budapest Qualification Framework Embodiment.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
The Andorran higher education diplomas framework (MATES) and the National qualifications framework (MAQ) Àrea d’ordenació acadèmica i titulacions (Academic.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Learning outcomes based Higher education The Flemish Community experience ASEM Seminar Berlin 15/16 April 2010.
Designing and implementing of the NQF in RM 2nd seminar, Linköping University, 7-9 October 2009 Presentation by Elizabeta Bahtovska & Zamir Dika.
Maiki Udam Tallinn University of Technology Estonia.
Bologna Process Information Briefing Tbilisi, Georgia 22 July 2008  Cynthia Deane  Ireland (With thanks to Prof Andejs Rauhvergers, Chairman of Stocktaking.
Current developments in the ECTS/DS - Good Practice in Finland Bratislava 22 – 23 February 2008 Matti Isokallio.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
NQF in Flanders. 2 UGent today - Ghent’s mission education, research & service to society in a pluralistic environment - A comprehensive/fully-fledged.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
Poland - the development of the NQF, taking into account all aspects of education Ewa Chmielecka Meeting of the NQF National Correspondents Dublin, 16.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Qualifications frameworks and qualifications standards Bryan Maguire Quality and Qualifications Ireland Conference on National Qualifications Framework.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
Sectoral Qualifications Frameworks Marek Frankowicz Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland TEMPUS „ELFRUS” Meeting September 2015, Moscow.
Tempus project UM JEP “QUASYS” University of Zagreb Prof. Helena Jasna Mencer, Ph. D. Coordinator “Development of Quality Assurance System in.
1 Elaborating a national qualifications framework: the experience of Hungary Eva Gonczi Collegium Budapest COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONFERENCE ON QUALIFICATIONS.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
For learning and competence The Finnish approach to NQF/EQF Dr. Carita Blomqvist, Head of Unit, Counsellor of Education Finnish National Board of Education.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Latest developments in the referencing process in Latvia: challenges and strong points Gunta Kinta Baiba Ramina Academic.
National Qualifications Framework Silesian University of Technology Faculty of Transport Ph.D. Rafał Burdzik.
1 The Irish Experience Dr. Norma Ryan Director, Quality Promotion Unit University College Cork- National University of Ireland Cork Sarajevo 5 th December.
Prof. dr. Luc François Chief International Officer
From Quality Control to Quality Development
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
XXIV Konferencja Metodyczna
Yerevan, 7 December 2010 Katia Dolgova-Dreyer
Progress of the referencing process in the Czech republic
EU instruments to support the Bologna Process
Making use of Qualification Frameworks
Student Study and Work Placement Mobility
Academic curricula in Finnish universities Case: University of Turku
Status of National Qualifications Framework in Georgia
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Lali Bakradze Expert University Curriculum Development Programme MoES
The process of self-certification The Romanian Experience
Introduction to the training
Prof. Dražena Gašpar, PhD Ivana Zovko, prof.
Status of National Qualifications Framework in Georgia
Key Results of the Twinning Project AZ-ad-EHEA Baku 29 August 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Heli Mattisen, PhD Project Leaders.
Main steps in designing a national qualifications framework
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
Presentation transcript:

HERE Seminar, Warsaw, 19 September 2016 Development of NQF in Poland Andrzej Krasniewski HERE Seminar, Warsaw, 19 September 2016

NQF for Higher Education: formal introduction

Legal regulations Amendments to Law on Higher Education (2011) shift to Learning Outcomes (LOs) as a means to describe study programmes and resulting qualifications formal introduction of the National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (NQF-HE) all study programmes offered in academic year 2012/2013 and later must comply with NQF-HE

§ Legal regulations – learning outcomes QF-EHEA EQF international generic level descriptors (learning outcomes) EQF QF-EHEA (Dublin Descriptors) level descriptors (learning outcomes) for subject domain of ... level descriptors (learning outcomes) for subject domain of engineering § international standards ministerial regulation humanities social sciences exact sciences life sciences agricultural sciences engineering and technology medical and health sciences fine arts 8 large subject domains corresponding (mostly) to OECD/EUROSTAT/UNESCO science&technology classification

§ Legal regulations – learning outcomes QF-EHEA EQF international generic level descriptors (learning outcomes) EQF QF-EHEA level descriptors (learning outcomes) for subject domain of ... level descriptors (learning outcomes) for subject domain of engineering § international standards developed by teams of subject domain experts for each subject domain, LOs for - two cycles (Bachelor, Master) - two profiles (academically- and practically-oriented)

defining LOs for a subject domain – example ENGINEERING SBS Bologna Process ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, USA) JABEE (Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education) SBS (Subject Benchmark Statements, UK) IEA (International Engineering Alliance) EUR-ACE (EURopean ACcredited Engineer project) CDIO (Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate initiative)

defining LOs for a subject domain – examples Level of detail in defining LOs Number of LOs (LO statements) = [knowledge, skills, social competences] 1st level (Bachelor) 2nd level (Master) humanities A: 26 = [10,10,6] P: 30 = [10,14,6] A: 27 = [10,11,6] engineering & technology A: 34 = [11,16,7] P: 37 = [11,19,7] A: 37 = [11,19,7]

LOs for degree programmes generic level descriptors (learning outcomes) EQF QF-EHEA (Dublin Descriptors) NQF-HE level descriptors (learning outcomes) for subject domain of ... level descriptors (learning outcomes) for subject domain of engineering international standards Tuning, SBS, ... learning outcomes for programme ... learning outcomes for programme Electronics university (faculty) institutional regulations

Implementation of NQF-HE in higher education institutions

System-level support phase 1: 2009 – June 2011 (preceding legal changes) promoting and consulting NQF dedicated web site many (> 100) events – conferences, seminars, workshops, ... organised by HEIs, open to members of academic staff from other HEIs instructors - national team of Bologna Experts (ca. 20 people), representatives of the Ministry, ... total no. of participants – ca. 16 000

LOs for 8 subject domains Ministry website www.nauka.gov.pl Szkolnictwo Wyższe Krajowe Ramy Kwalifikacji LOs for 8 subject domains

System-level support phase 2: October 2011 - (following legal changes) informing, advising, consulting explaining and interpreting legal regulations (Law on HE, ministerial regulations) advising on implementation of NQF at HEI level next round of open conferences, seminars, workshops, ... consultations dedicated to individual HEIs/faculties awards for the leaders

supporting material How to develop degree programmes compliant with requirements of NQF-HE? „handbook” of 240 pages 13

awards for the leaders Initiative of the Ministry (June 2012): Competition for best practice in the implementation of quality enhancement systems and the NQF at the faculty level 202 submissions - by individual faculties (Sept. 2012) 62 faculties awarded - each 250 000 euro (Dec. 2012)

of NQF-HE implementation: Benchmarking of NQF-HE implementation: lessons learned

NQF-HE benchmarking Benchmarking of NQF-HE implementation Project (2012-2013) Benchmarking of NQF-HE implementation part of programme BENCHMARKING IN HIGHER EDUCATION coordinated by the Polish Rectors Foundation (think-tank linked to the Polish Rectors Conference - CRASP) participants 46 HEIs 327 faculties 16

NQF-HE benchmarking http://www.frp.org.pl 17

Attitude towards NQF-HE UNIVERSITY LEVEL (46 HEIs) positive moderately positive 4.2% authorities (rectors, vice-rectors) 41.3% 52.2% 2.3% academic staff (opinion of authorities) 28.3% 19.6% 45.7% 6.5% moderately negative difficult to say moderately positive negative positive difficult to say moderately negative FACULTY LEVEL (327 faculties) academic staff (opinion of authorities) authorities (deans, vice-deans) 25.7% 53.5% 7.6% 9.8% 3.4% 40.7% 14.1% 32.7% 4.9% 18

Benefits redesigned curricula LOs orientation increased flexibility (more elective courses) shift towards student-centred teaching (fewer lectures, more project-based learning modules, etc.) new, more comprehensive methods for verification of LOs achieved by students, especially in the category of skills

Problems and challenges inconsistent terminology and unclear statements in legal acts, combined with a limited support by the Ministry in resolving controversial issues unnecessary overregulations, resulting in excessive bureaucracy significant time pressure, resulting in limited opportunities to thoroughly consult the proposed solutions with stakeholders (employers etc.) insufficient engagement (resistance?) of some members of academic staff however, a shift from an openly demonstrated resistance to at least partial acceptance observed at many HEIs

Another study report of General Council of Science and Higher Education (2015) recommendations simplification of legal regulations de-bureaucratisation of implementation procedures at HEIs de-bureaucratisation of accreditation procedures

as a pilot for PQF development NQF-HE as a pilot for PQF development

PQF NQF-HE – part of PQF Polish Qualifications Framework (PQF) for LLL EQF level descriptors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 universal level descriptors general education detailed level descriptors vocational education higher education PQF

Recent developments Act on the Integrated Qualifications System PQF (passed in Dec. 2015) formal introduction of PQF (NQF-HE – part of it) definition of universal level descriptors delegation for Minister to define detailed level descriptors (learning outcomes) PQF universal level descriptors Act on Integrated Qualifications System 5 6 7 8 level in PQF ministerial regulations (draft) NQF-HE detailed level descriptors 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 level in NQF-HE (Bologna cycle)

Recent developments Act on the Integrated Qualifications System - opportunity to improve/simplify NQF-HE new ministerial regulations (draft versions) on NQF-HE concise general descriptors – for level 6 (Bachelor), 7 (Master) and 8 (Doctor) additional descriptors (short) for 8 subject domains – for levels 6 and 7 on principles for accreditation (less bureaucratic, based on ESG 2015)

Conclusion

Summary almost 10 years of experience in development and implementation of NQF-HE (and PQF for LLL) quite successful NQF-HE implementation (not without problems) international recognition of our achievements Prof. Ewa Chmielecka: leader of pilot project „Horizontal comparison of levelled qualifications" carried out by EQF Advisory Group (established by European Commission) Dr. Agnieszka Chlon-Dominczak, Revision of the European Qualifications Framework: Lessons from research, Workshop on New Skills Agenda, European Parliament, 8 September 2016 membership of expert groups that support development of NQFs in many countries

More information A. Krasniewski, “Development of the National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in Poland”, Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 1/2012 library of Educational Research Institute http://www.kwalifikacje.edu.pl/en/publications https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/documentation#documentation_73

HERE Seminar, Warsaw, 19 September 2016 Development of NQF in Poland Andrzej Krasniewski HERE Seminar, Warsaw, 19 September 2016