Monitoring Working Group Meeting #3

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Lessons Learned from MICS1 and MICS2. MID-DECADE - INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF MICS1 High level of satisfaction with quick information at low cost Exceeded.

Advertisements

Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.

SWEDISH AGENCY FOR ECONOMIC AND REGIONAL GROWTH 1 LEARNING through ongoing EVALUATION -Ongoing evaluation of the eight ERDF programs and in major strategic.

© 2009 Berman Group. Evidence-based evaluation RNDr. Jan Vozáb, PhD partner, principal consultant Berman Group.

Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.

Bid-Writing Seminar Mena Gainpaulsingh International Fundraising Consultancy

Research Workgroup. Data are needed for: Framing the issue Identification of the problem Identification of what policy solutions are needed Determining.

Disability Rights Expanding Accessible Markets Kick-off Meeting 23 rd -25 th November, 2011 Brussels, Belgium.

 The process or set of processes that links the consumers, customers, and end users to the marketer through information — information used to identify.

PRM 702 Project Risk Management Lecture #28

BSBPMG508A Manage Project Risk 11.4 Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis Adapted from PMBOK 4 th Edition InitiationPlanning ExecutionClose Monitor Control.

Walking on two legs: LEARNING EVALUATION 1 Göran Brulin, Senior Analyst and professor, Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth Sven Jansson, National.

Exploring the use of QSR Software for understanding quality - from a research funder’s perspective Janice Fong Research Officer Strategies in Qualitative.

MBA7020_05.ppt/June 27, 2005/Page 1 Georgia State University - Confidential MBA 7020 Business Analysis Foundations Time Series Forecasting June 27, 2005.

DevInfo Monitoring The Regional Environmental Reconstruction Programme – Workshop Belgrade, 8 June 2005.

2010 Framework for Action on ICT For Development in the Pacific (FAIDP) Review Sakaio Manoa ICT Outreach Coordinator USP.

Learning about learning The GEC approach to M&E UKFIET Conference Joseph Holden & Jason Calvert 15 th September 2015 © PEAS.

CHAPTER 10 Choosing a Research Method. Choosing a research method What are research methods? Research methods are means through which you undertake the.

Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento 1 The articulation of the Spanish Food Innovation System: measurement of the impacts fostered.

Information commitments, evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning evnironments Ying-Tien Wu & Chin-Chung Tsai Institute.

Understanding the market: Using LMI Hilary Stevens, Researcher Marchmont Observatory Marchmont Observatory.

HRP is the process by which an organization ensures that it has the right number and kind of people, at the right places, at the right time. HR planning:

RHODA MEADOR, PHD ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OUTREACH AND EXTENSION, COLLEGE OF HUMAN ECOLOGY CORNELL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ON AGING Project Home.

Examinations Planning: Monitoring, Evaluation and Support TVET College Strategic and Operational Planning.

FNR Foresight: Evaluating Phase 1 and Prospects for Phase 2 Dr. Michael Keenan PREST, University of Manchester, UK FNR Foresight Workshop Luxembourg, 16.

The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.

Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.

Agenda Interthink – 2003 Organizational Project Management Baseline Study –Industry Profile –Country Profile –Organization Size –Data On Schedule –Data.

SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Feedback from Peer Review on 'Counterfactual Impact Evaluation' Tamara SMETANOVÁ Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, Czech Republic Kamil VALICA DG.

Grant Management Seminar Session 1 1 Session 1 Designing a Project 10/13/2012.

Grant Management Seminar Session 1 1 Session 1 Designing a Project 10/12/13.

Documentation, Data, and Monitoring Section 9 Page 38 1.

Market Research Market Research – What is it? Gathering information on (for example)… …finding new markets …evaluating public opinion …gaining insight.

Quality Development in ETUI activities Proposals from the Working Group 1st October 2012.

Universities Scotland Retention Project Emerging findings Jane W. Denholm Project Consultant.

Business Forecasting. Used to try to predict the future Uses two main methods: Qualitative – seeking opinions on which to base decision making – Consumer.

Interviews, Questionnaires, and control flowcharts Chapter 19.

Towards the RIS3CAT Ricard Esparza Masana, PhD Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Chisinau (Moldova), February 19th 2016.

Consultation on Scottish Social Housing Charter Indicators John Jenkins Mark Gibson.

Monitoring and evaluation of disability-inclusive development

Using Logic Models for SSSP, Student Equity, And BSI Activities

Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process

Chapter 2 Doing Sociological Research

Plan Risk Management Outputs T &T Inputs Project Management Plan

Different sources and methods for monitoring indicators: the role of stakeholders Elisabetta Marinelli Barcelona, 4 May, 2017.

Moving from Promising Practice to Evidence-Based Practice

Strengthening Economic Statistics in Lao PDR

Community program evaluation school

National Benchmarking

Tatiana Fernández Sirera (Barcelona, 4 May 2017)

JRC Monitoring Working Group

Juvenile Justice Planning Committee

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.

Working Group Five Indicators and Measurement: demonstrating and improving impact After deliberating the definition of "success" for a transparency regime,

RIS3 in North-East Romania Monitoring system

Identifying Inquiry and Stating the Problem

إستراتيجيات ونماذج التقويم

QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN COLOMBIA AND LATIN AMERICAN

NFI Working Group 2016 Review

1-1 What is Science? What Science Is and Is Not

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.

Evaluating the Impact of WHO Publications

Strengthening Economic Statistics in Lao PDR

A 100% Peer Run Organization

Business in South Africa –

Metrics for process and Projects

Classified Evaluations -DRAFT

Interim evaluation of RIS3 in

Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Working Group Meeting #3 M. Lucila Castro Rovillard Extremadura’s RIS3 Technical Office

RIS3 Governance Structure

RIS3 Monitoring and Evaluation Mid-term evaluation THEMATIC WORKING GROUPS OUTPUT INDICATORS CONTEXT & RESULT INDICATORS [QUALITATIVE APPROACH] MAIN OBJECTIVES OF ANALYSIS: Degree of specialisation of Extremadura so far Influence of actions/instruments in the specialisation process Trends and potentialities [QUANTITATIVE APPROACH] 1ST EVALUATION REPORT

Questions HOW TO ENSURE THE PROPER “USE” OF THE INFORMATION GATHER IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS IN ORDER TO TRANSLATE IT IN A BETTER DESIGN OF INSFRUMENTS? - Main barriers? - Best approach? HOW TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEM OF LACK OF OFFICIAL STATISTICAL DATA? PEER REVIEW OF THE EVALUATION PROCESS ???