GIS for Arizona 9-1-1 Meeting Arizona’s Emergency Response Needs for Today and Tomorrow AGIC Education and Training Symposium September 2016 Prescott, AZ

Today’s Discussion Arizona’s NG9-1-1 What is NG9-1-1? Preparation Challenges/First Decisions Participation and Education GIS Data Creation Statewide Networks Accuracy Today’s Status

What is Next Generation 9-1-1? (NG9-1-1) ESInet (IP Network) Call-Taking Equipment Next Generation 9-1-1 Core Services (NGCS) Legacy: analog phone network, CTE, and a tabular database (MSAG) NG9-1-1: IP network, IP-capable CTE, and GIS

Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) Preparation for the Future

NG9-1-1 Preparation: Challenges/First Decisions GIS is Local in Arizona Incomplete GIS Data Local GIS view vs. Statewide View Lack of national standards or best practices GIS is Local in Arizona Local business needs (not all 9-1-1) Ripple effect Incomplete GIS Data Road Network for 3 counties Emergency Service Zone and Community Boundaries for 3 counties Address Points for 7 counties Local GIS view vs. Statewide View No statewide datasets Lack of national standards or best practices

NG9-1-1 Preparation: Data Comparison 12 out of 15 Counties with GIS Data 12 Different Ways of Doing Business Assessment performed in 2012

NG9-1-1 Preparation: Participation and Education Creation of 9-1-1 Working Group (Aug 2012) Creation of 911WG Technical Committee (Feb 2013) 9-1-1 sessions at AGIC Education and Training Symposium Creation of 9-1-1 Working Group (Aug 2012) 9-1-1 Systems’ GIS personnel Interested government agencies such as ADOT/ADOR/DEMA/AZ Forestry/ASU Private sector Creation of 911WG Technical Committee (Feb 2013) Focus on NG9-1-1 standards for AZ PSAPs Development of NG9-1-1 Manuals 9-1-1 sessions at AGIC Education and Training Symposium

9-1-1 Working Group Technical Committee Jack Avis Pima County ITD-GIS Brian Bond Yavapai County GIS Dept Brian Brady Yuma ITS-GIS Joe Breyer Works Consulting Matthew Deveney Gila River Indian Community GIS Sandra Dyre Arizona 9-1-1 Program Office Sarah Hess Pinal County IT/GIS Tom Homan Gila County Public Works Shea Lemar Arizona State University - ISSR James Meyer Arizona Dept of Transportation Curtis Pulford Arizona State Cartographer Gene Trobia University of Arizona Howard Ward TerraSystems Southwest

NG9-1-1 Preparation: USER GUIDES Best Practices Guide Data Model Administrative Guide Compilation of national standards Highlights information from standards Best practices and consistent testing Examples/Recommendations Data Development Accuracy Processes and Testing *** Add local processes! ***

NG9-1-1 Data Creation: Developing GIS Data For Arizona 9-1-1 Data Development, Assessment and Lessons Learned

GIS Data Creation Leveraging Projects & Partnerships to Meet Arizona’s Needs Arizona Broadband Mapping and Planning Project Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Arizona State Land and the Arizona Geographic Information Council (AGIC) Drive for the partnerships (address point and centerline data) for AZ Broadband and ADOT federal requirements. Partnerships fulfilled a multitude of requirements for various Arizona government needs (federal/state/public demand) as well as local 911 needs.

GIS Data Creation: Arizona Road Network ADOT provided road network; combines and edgematches ADOT Ticketing System For NG9-1-1, QA/QC: Gaps Overlaps Duplicates Parity

GIS Data Creation: Address Point Network Completion of address points to support 9-1-1 Additional grant funds 477,643 total points for project 3.2 million points statewide USDOT National Address Database (NAD) Pilot Project Arizona and Arkansas Selected 15 of 16 9-1-1 Systems Participating Project Parameters 6 week completion Structure point placement Focused on parcels 20,000 sq. ft. or larger with situs address Utilized university student intern workforce No addresses created NAD Two states selected to participate in NAD project AR presented a top-down approach AZ provided a bottom-up approach County Address Point Totals Apache Graham Greenlee La Paz Mohave Navajo Yuma 58,446 10,759 4,880 16,147 262,787 95,392 29,232

GIS Data Creation: PSAP Boundary Layer NG9-1-1 Call Routing Attention needed to Gaps/Overlaps Legitimate Errors Boundary Agreement Common Framework ALRIS County File IGA’s/MOU’s

NG9-1-1 Data Assessment: Preparing Arizona for NG9-1-1 Assessment, Accuracy and Lessons Learned

Data Assessment QA Tests for 9-1-1 System GIS Gaps Overlaps Address Density Schema/Content Geocoding Match Rates Gaps Overlaps Some as simple as clipping at the boundary Others more complicated such as EMS boundaries issued by AZBEMS and 9-1-1 Authority/PSAP boundaries Address Density Number of addresses per mile Based on the address range on road network Schema/Content Accuracy

Data Assessment: QA/QC Checklist

Data Assessment: Schema Comparison and Field Mapping Road Centerlines [2] FIELD LENGTH TYPE LOCAL EQUIVALENT FIELD Source 75 TEXT   DateUpdate 20 DATE Effective Expire RCL_NGUID 100 STREETID (LONG) Country_L 2 Country_R State_L State_R County_L 40 County_R IncMuni_L IncMuni_R UnincCom_L UnincCom_R NbrhdCom_L NbrhdCom_R AdNumPre_L 15 AdNumPre_R FromAddr_L 6 LONG LEFTFROMADDR (LONG) ToAddr_L LEFTTOADDR (LONG) FromAddr_R RIGHTFROMADDR (LONG) ToAddr_R RIGHTTOADDR (LONG) Parity_L 1 Parity_R

Accuracy Today Future Tied to the funding of Wireless Phase 2 Costs ALI to GIS Comparison 95% for the 9-1-1 system Centerline Only Learned varying ways this report is done Tied to the funding of the NG9-1-1 System Costs ALI to GIS Comparison Need for more comprehensive databases (*) 98% to the ESN/ESZ System-wide accuracy veiled problems Centerline and Address Point Full Address plus Community Full Address plus ESN Four (4) Reports Tied to the funding of Wireless Phase 2 Costs ALI to GIS Comparison 95% for the 9-1-1 system Centerline Only Learned varying ways this report is done Tied to the funding of the NG9-1-1 System Costs Need for more comprehensive databases (*) 98% to the ESN/ESZ System-wide accuracy veiled problems Centerline and Address Point Full Address plus Community Full Address plus ESN Four (4) Reports * Utility Data, USPS Data, etc.

Example of Accuracy Test Results Overall Match Rate Using ESN as Zone Field [1] Dataset Match Tied UnMatched % Match/Tied Road Network 98.90% 0.60% 0.45% 99.50% Address Points 75.70% 18.70% 5.60% 94.40% Overall Match Rate Using MSAG Community Field as Zone Field [1] % Match/Tied  93.60% 0.44% 5.90% 94.04% 71.30% 18.50% 10.10% 89.80% [1] The address locator parameters for Minimum Match Score, Minimum Candidate Score and Spelling Sensitivity, were all set to 100.

Examples of Accuracy Test Results Percent Match of TN Records By ESN [2] ESN Road Network Address Points Match Tie Unmtch Ma/Tie 9000 99.19% 0.81% 0.00% 100.00% 79.56% 0.89% 19.55% 80.45% 9001 90.27% 1.33% 8.41% 91.59% 72.12% 9.29% 18.58% 81.42% 9002 96.65% 2.47% 0.87% 99.13% 90.68% 4.22% 5.09% 94.91% 9003 9004 88.80% 11.20% 84.80% 15.20% 9005 9006 9007 99.09% 0.77% 0.14% 99.86% 96.96% 0.63% 2.40% 97.60% 9008 9009 98.59% 1.41% 78.40% 21.60% 9010 95.79% 0.96% 3.25% 96.75% 76.48% 21.22% 2.29% 97.71% 9011 97.39% 2.61% Percent Match of TN Records By MSAG Community [2] MSAG Comm. Road Network Address Points Match Tie Unmtch Ma/Tie ANYWHERE 100.00% 0.00% BOUNTIFUL COLORFUL DYNAMIC 86.67% 13.33% 82.86% 17.14% EXTRAORDINARY 99.50% 0.50% 96.35% 3.65%

GIS Data Creation/Accuracy: FIRE Boundary Effect of Legal Boundaries: Do I have a response unit? Legal/Authoritative Sources Taxing Districts Municipal Boundaries Annexations/De-Annexations Legal Agreements Discuss “Willing to Respond” areas

GIS Data Creation/Accuracy: EMS Boundary Need Map Locally driven AZBEMS CON Boundaries Fire/EMS response How do I build EMS boundaries for my 9-1-1 system?

Arizona NG9-1-1: Today’s Status Focus on Accuracy! Managed Services: NG9-1-1 Network IP-Capable Equipment NG 9-1-1 Core Services (Geospatial Routing) Phase 1 Network Completion 2016 First PSAP Turn-Ups 1Q17

Next Steps Review QA/QC Results with 9-1-1 Systems 9-1-1 System(s) Work Towards NG9-1-1 Preparedness Pilot Project for NG9-1-1 Core Services

QUESTIONS OR SUGGESTIONS

Sandra Dyre 9-1-1 Project Manager 100 N. 15th Ave., Suite 400 Phoenix, AZ 85007 602-771-3911 Sandra.Dyre@azdoa.gov