ABN PROC - ECAM PROCEDURES - ECAM PHILOSOPHY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Schedule three Assessment Scenarios Discussion Groups Discussion Groups.
Advertisements

International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing.
1 LASER LIGHT ENCOUNTERS Several Florida West pilots have reported that the cockpit of their aircraft was illuminated by a laser light in the vicinity.
Emergency Evacuation Zayed University, Dubai Campus.
Engine Systems J-52-P408 &J-52-P6/P8
Go-Around.
JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures
NPA 53b JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures
Tailwinds Flying Club Spring Safety Session Engine Takeoff Lake Elmo Airport (21D)
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
737 PNEUMATICS MENU PRINCIPAL.
Adrian BĂRZOI, Pilot SFO (A320,A330,A33X),BEng
Left and Right Wing Leak Message.  In high temperatures, there is a high frequency and instances of “nuisance messages”. This is caused by hot air in.
OPSG 1 JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-4.
Landing in CONF 3 – Use of reversers Hélène REBEL Head of A330/A340 Operational Standard Presented by:
Transport Railways Incident Procedures. Aim To give students information about the emergency procedures to be adopted at incidents involving railways.
Office of Aviation Safety American Airlines Flight 1400 St. Louis, Missouri Captain David Tew Operational Factors.
Because a go-around is not a frequent occurrence, the importance of being go- around-prepared and go-around-minded must be emphasized. To be go-around-prepared.
CL - 65 Limitations Updated: 10/5/03 Send comments/suggestions to
AIRCRAFT HANDLING Part 4 Flight Preparation.
Operational Landing Distances
Send comments/suggestions to
PERFORM MULTIAIRCRAFT OPERATIONS TASK 2010 CONDITIONS: In an H-60 helicopter. STANDARDS: Appropriate common standards plus the following additions/modifications:
AIRCRAFT HANDLING Part 5 Pre-Take Off Checks. Starting Engines Starting engines is a team procedure between the pilot and the ground handling team. The.
B757 Review Questions.
SWA MEMORY ITEMS.
Emergency Procedures for Beech Bonanzas and Debonairs
Civil Air Patrol CITIZENS SERVING COMMUNITIES Flight Release Officer Refresher Training Course.
SPUD TC (OCT 07) REVISION ACADEMICS. SPUD TASK 1114 PERFORM A ROLLING TAKEOFF.
1 World Dispatch Summit Toronto, Canada May 2002 ETOPS Presentation Ralph Webster Transport CanadaTransports Canada Safety & SecuritySécurité et sûreté.
CL - 65 Other Limitations, Notes, and Cautions Last update 8/01/03 Please send any comments/suggestions to
Initial Ground Training
Functional Check Flight Symposium Andre Tousignant C.I.M. Director Air Safety Investigation Office (ASIO) Bombardier Aerospace Vancouver Feb 8, 2011.
AIRTANKER BASE MANAGER (ATBM).
Phenom Program Manager
Office of Aviation Safety Airspeed Selection and Stall Training Procedures Operations presentation.
Lecture 4: Take-off Performance Speeds
Lecture 11: Flight Management System (FMS)
Approach funnel GENERAL REVIEW PERFORMANCE THEORY
Rev: 00Page 1 A 320 PERFORMANCE COURSE TOF : TAKE OFF PERFORMANCE BEL PERFORMANCE – NORMAL FCOM REF QRH REF OM REF 1. Introduction 2. Dry Runway Weightbook.
Initial Pilot Ground School
Air Line Pilots Association, International EMB 145 Oral Questions Center Pedestal Select “Slide Show” Use the space bar on your computer to advance the.
Air Line Pilots Association, International EMB 145 Oral Questions Emergency/Abnormal Procedures Select “Slide Show” Use the space bar on your computer.
MENU PRINCIPAL. THIS PRESENTATION INCLUDES THE SOURCES OF AIR, THE MAJOR SYSTEM COMPONENTS AND THE WAY THE CONTROLS AND INDICATORS ARE USED TO OPERATE.
Landing in CONF 3 – Use of reversers
Flight Operations.
FAA NAVAID Rationalization / Resiliency Overview
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
Recent Aviation Safety Events:
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
LIMITATIONS.
Dealing with Unreliable Speed at Recurrent Training
Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions
B777 CABIN ALTITUDE AND RAPID DESCENT
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
ETOPS PRESENTATION p1 TM-2.
Performance Documentation Overview
Protecting your landing against overruns
How to Create and Start a Test Session
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
ENGINE-OUT PROCEDURES
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
High Altitude and Terrain Effects
Agenda • Classroom • Lab –System Configuration – Flight scenario 1
Flight Test Mishap Red Flag Analysis
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
AUTO FLIGHT QUIZ.
Presentation transcript:

ABN PROC - ECAM PROCEDURES - ECAM PHILOSOPHY END PF PNF DETECTION FLY THE A/C NAVIGATE COMMUNICATE ECAM ACTIONS ECAM PROCEDURE SYSTEM DISPLAY STATUS SITUATION ASSESSMENT DECISION SYNTHESIS A320 – REV05

First pilot who notices: DETECTION PF PNF First pilot who notices: MASTER CAUTION/MASTER WARNING……………RESET ANNOUNCE………………………...…..”TITLE OF FAILURE” MASTER MASTER WARN WARN MASTER MASTER CAUT CAUT FLY THE AIRCRAFT NAVIGATE CONSIDER AUTOMATION USE : A/THR, AP If failure at takeoff: NO ACTION until 400ft AGL , with safe flight path established.

PF PNF COMMUNICATE Actions to be confirmed by both pilots : ECAM ACTIONS PF PNF ECAM……..CONFIRM using SD and Overhead panel ORDER…………………………….…”ECAM ACTIONS” COMMUNICATE when necessary…………………….. ECAM ACTION…………………….…………PERFORM REQUEST……………………CLEAR “name of SYS”? ECAM……………………….……………………..CLEAR ECAM ACTIONS COMPLETE……………..….CHECK CONFIRM…………….….….. CLEAR “name of SYS” LAND ASAP This is to be repeated for each failure displayed on the ECAM. Example : As soon as he announced “ECAM ACTIONS”, the PF is in charge of communications, until all the ECAM actions have been completed. PF COMMUNICATE Actions to be confirmed by both pilots :

PF PNF This is to be repeated for each failure displayed on the ECAM. SYSTEM DISPLAY ANALYSIS PF PNF If a SYSTEM page is displayed on the lower ECAM screen: SYSTEM PAGE DISPLAYED……….ANALYSE REQUEST…………...CLEAR “name of SYS”? SYSTEM DISPLAY…………….………..CLEAR CONFIRM………… CLEAR “name of SYS” This is to be repeated for each failure displayed on the ECAM.

PF PNF Landing distance and approach speed computation: STATUS REQUEST….………………………………..STATUS? STATUS …………………………………...……..READ LIMITATIONS DEFERRED PROC INFOS INOP SYS CONFIRM………………..……………READ STATUS After STATUS page consultation and if required : VAPP & LANDING DIST…………….……COMPUTE REQUEST………………………… Remove STATUS ? STATUS…………………………………………Remove ANNOUNCE………ECAM ACTIONS COMPLETED CONFIRM……………………………Remove STATUS RETURN TO NORMAL TASK SHARING Landing distance and approach speed computation: Landing distance Approach speed computation QRH 1.00

DECISION Taking into account : Limitations Weather SITUATION ASSESSMENT / DECISION Taking into account : Limitations Weather Operational & Commercial considerations DECISION NOTIFY ATC PURSER / PAX OPS …

ECAM DEFERRED PROC (if any) SYNTHESIS PF PNF FLY / NAV TEAM WORK ECAM ACTIONS (until STATUS page) COM Consider: Normal C/L OEB Computer resets ENGINE FIRE EXAMPLE CONTINUE ECAM (STATUS page) DECISION APPROACH PREPARATION Briefing APPROACH C/L ECAM DEFERRED PROC (if any)

ENGINE FIRE EXAMPLE PF PNF

THE END...

Confirmation from both pilots is required, when the action concerns… …Any guarded switch …Any Irreversible actions on …Any actions on Thrust levers ADIRS PF action Given that it may influence flight path, actions on thrust levers have to be done by the PF MASTER SWITCH PNF action……PF confirmation PF action……PNF confirmation Confirmation task-sharing ? Confirmation task-sharing ?

Confirmation from both pilots is required, when the action concerns… …Any guarded switch …Any Irreversible actions on …Any actions on Thrust levers ADIRS PF action Given that it may influence flight path, actions on thrust levers have to be done by the PF MASTER SWITCH PNF action……PF confirmation PF action……PNF confirmation Confirmation task-sharing ? Confirmation task-sharing ? PF PNF Hand on related control: REQUEST……………….………..CONFIRM ? ACTION…………………………….PERFORM RELATED CONTROL…………CHECK ANSWER.……………………CONFIRM

Confirmation from both pilots is required, when the action concerns… …Any guarded switch …Any Irreversible actions on …Any actions on Thrust levers ADIRS PF action Given that it may influence flight path, actions on thrust levers have to be done by the PF MASTER SWITCH PNF action……PF confirmation PF action……PNF confirmation Confirmation task-sharing ? Confirmation task-sharing ? PNF Hand on related control: REQUEST……………….………..CONFIRM ? ACTION…………………………….PERFORM RELATED CONTROL…………..….CHECK ANSWER………………..………..CONFIRM

PF PNF RED : Land at the next suitable airport. ECAM ACTIONS PF PNF ECAM……..CONFIRM using SD and Overhead panel ORDER…………………………….…”ECAM ACTIONS” COMMUNICATE when necessary…………………….. ECAM ACTION…………………….…………PERFORM REQUEST……………………CLEAR “name of SYS”? ECAM……………………….……………………..CLEAR ECAM ACTIONS COMPLETE……………..….CHECK CONFIRM…………….….…. .CLEAR “name of SYS” LAND ASAP LAND ASAP Depending on the failure, , or , may be displayed, in the right column of the ECAM procedure. RED : Land at the next suitable airport. AMBER : Assess the seriousness of the situation and consider the selection of a suitable airport. LAND ASAP LAND ASAP This is to be repeated for each failure displayed on the ECAM. Example : LAND ASAP As soon as he announced “ECAM ACTIONS”, the PF is in charge of communications, until all the ECAM actions have been completed. PF LAND ASAP COMMUNICATE Actions to be confirmed by both pilots :

PF PNF Landing distance and approach speed computation: STATUS PF PNF REQUEST….………………………………..STATUS? STATUS …………………………………...……..READ LIMITATIONS DEFERRED PROC INFOS INOP SYS CONFIRM………………..……………READ STATUS CONFIRM………………..……………READ STATUS The PNF should not start reading the STATUS before confirmation from the PF. For any priority reason Status analysis can be postponed by PF e.g. C/L, ATC communication… In some cases, some other checks or actions may have to be performed, before reading the STATUS: In case of failure at takeoff, the NORMAL TAKEOFF C/L has to be performed OEB (if applicable) is to be applied at that time (Refer to QRH 6.00), Computer resets may be considered (Refer to QRH 2.00) After STATUS page consultation and if required : VAPP & LANDING DIST…………….……COMPUTE REQUEST…………………………CLEAR STATUS ? STATUS…………………………………………CLEAR ANNOUNCE………ECAM ACTIONS COMPLETED QRH CONFIRM……………………………CLEAR STATUS 6.00 QRH 2.00 RETURN TO NORMAL TASK SHARING Landing distance and approach speed computation: For complex procedures (dual hydraulic failure or electrical emergency configuration): Use SUMMARY For other cases: Landing distance Approach speed computation Review FCOM procedure if time permits : Applying ECAM procedure ensures flight safety. However, referring to FCOM, if time permits, may provide useful additional information. 02 – ABN- EMER QRH 3 1.00

SYS LANDING DISTANCE COMPUTATION QRH Determine the landing distance coefficient. APPR SPD-LDG DIST CORRECTIONS FOR FAILURES 2.00 SYS FAILURE A NORM (1) - 1.1 FAILURE A 3 10 1.2 QRH LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT AUTOBRAKE – CONF FULL 4.00 Determine the landing distance in CONF FULL without failure Apply the coefficient determined above to this distance. (1) If NORM is indicated for landing configuration, and if CONF 3 is used, apply an additional 1.1 coefficient to the landing distance.

Δ Δ Δ APPROACH SPEED COMPUTATION VAPP = VREF + ΔVREF + WIND CORRECTION (if applicable) When applicable, ΔVREF is given on the QRH. In this case: Δ Δ MCDU PERF APPR page Δ Select CONF FULL Read VREF = VLS CONF FULL Add ΔVREF to VREF Add wind correction, if applicable Enter VAPP manually LDG CONF VAPP VLS FULL Wind correction only applies when ΔVREF is lower than 20 kts. LDG CONF Note: This computation must be done according to the appropriate weight at destination, so, with F-PLN properly updated. CONF 3 If LDG in CONF 3 : Select CONF 3 If the ECAM shows a ΔVLS :

APPROACH SPEED COMPUTATION when landing conf is selected The ECAM shows a ΔVLS, while the QRH shows a ΔVREF . Shown on PFD, when landing conf is selected ΔVLS shown on ECAM ΔVREF shown on QRH Speed increase for handling qualities VLS OF THE LANDING CONF VLS increase due to the actual configuration VREF = VLS CONF FULL

RETURN TO NORMAL TASK SHARING STATUS PF PNF STATUS page REQUEST….………………………………..STATUS? STATUS …………………………………...……..READ LIMITATIONS DEFERRED PROC INFOS INOP SYS CONFIRM………………..……………READ STATUS Limitations If required : VAPP & LANDING DIST…………….……COMPUTE Deferred PROC REQUEST…………………………CLEAR STATUS ? STATUS…………………………………………CLEAR ANNOUNCE………ECAM ACTIONS COMPLETED INOP systems CONFIRM……………………………CLEAR STATUS Limitations corrections to apply for landing Infos RETURN TO NORMAL TASK SHARING Landing distance and approach speed computation: For complex procedures (dual hydraulic failure or electrical emergency configuration): Use SUMMARY For other cases: Landing distance Approach speed computation Review FCOM procedure : Applying ECAM procedure ensures flight safety. However, referring to FCOM, if time permits, may provide useful additional information. 02 – ABN- EMER QRH 3 1.00

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example FLY Consider automation use Ensure safe flight path and sufficient height/altitude

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “ECAM actions” PF

“Engine Fire in Flight” example PF “ECAM actions” “Confirm” “Confirmed”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Confirm” “Confirmed”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Confirm” “Confirmed”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Clear Engine Shutdown?” “Clear”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Clear Air?” “Clear”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Clear HYD?” “Clear”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Clear ELEC?” “Clear”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Clear HYD?” “Clear”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “Clear F/CTL?” “Clear”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example Check OEB if any (OEB reminder ) * Review FUEL imbalance limitations (FCOM) 3.01.28 Review Landing distance QRH (2.27 - 4.03) Consider APU start Review INOP SYS “Remove STS?” “Remove”

“Engine Fire in Flight” example “ECAM actions completed” Situation assessment Captain’s Decision Information Crew, ATC, Ops Further strategy and/or Briefing Return to normal task sharing Review FCOM if time permits