Language Services and Products Subcommittee F43.04 Language Testing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Advertisements

Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed Consultant.
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
Texas Observation Protocols (TOP) TOP Rater Holistic Rating Training: TOP Overview Summer-Fall 2006 Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division.
Chap. 3 Designing Classroom Language Tests
1 Who, What, Where, WENS? The Native Speaker in the ILR ECOLT 2010 October 2010 ILR Testing Committee ECOLT 2010 October 2010 ILR Testing Committee.
ASTM Main Committee F43 “Language Services and Products” Bill Rivers, Chief Linguist March 18, 2011.
Welcome Families Portland Public Schools English as a Second Language ESL.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
NV AHEC – How It All Began IMIA Conference Boston, MA October 10 – 12, 2008 Dallice Joyner, M.Ed.
Testing English for Specific Purposes in Science By Ruth Wolff.
U.S. Government ILR Summits on Listening Sponsored by DLIFLC An Interagency Effort to Expand, Supplement, Define and Revise the ILR Listening Proficiency.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
STAMP (Standards-based Measurement of Proficiency)
E-Governance Readiness in Europe UN E-participation index 2008.
ACPS Manufacturing Subcommittee July Standards for Pharmaceutical Applications of PAT Don Marlowe FDA Standards Coordinator Office of the Commissioner.
ASTM F43: Consensus Standards for the Language Industry Interagency Language Roundtable September 30, 2011 William P. Rivers, Ph.D. Chair, ASTM Main Committee.
Machine Language Computer languages cannot be directly interpreted by the computer – they are not in binary. All commands need to be translated into binary.
ASTM F43: Consensus Standards for the Language Industry GALA 2012 March 27, 2012 Monaco William P. Rivers, Ph.D. Chair, ASTM Main Committee F43, Language.
Can You “Can-do?” Using Can-do Statements in World Language Instruction Maryland CCR Conference 2015.
TOEFL Training Prosperoverseas. Study Abroad Consultants.
Does my student have accommodations?
WIDA Standards and CAN DO Descriptors
ATIS’ Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Activity
Building Committee Update 5/21/17
Cheryl aschenbach, north representative
FAQs Q: Is my command required to have a Command Language Program (CLP) and/or a CLP Manager (CLPM)? A: If you answer ‘yes’ to either of the following.
Today I prepared a presentation on the international examinations of English proficiency: KET, PET, FCE, CAE, CPE, IELTS in two categories: - exams in.
50 Years of BILC: The Evolution of STANAG – 2016 and the first Benchmark Advisory Test Ray Clifford 24 May 2016.
Functional Area Assessment
CIS 212 Microcomputer Architecture Day 3
Overview of Course Assessment Higher
SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
SPECIALIZED TRANSLATION This presentation is brought to you by Dr Ho Dac Tuc of TVU School of Foreign Languages.
Professor of Education
EL (English Language) Students and WIDA Standards
Measurement Characteristics of Client Assessment
Standards for Pharmaceutical Applications of PAT
Frameworks, Standards, and Scales in the USG
FAQs Q: Is my command required to have a Command Language Program (CLP) and/or a CLP Manager (CLPM)? A: If you answer ‘yes’ to either of the following.
Aligning Curricula and Examinations to the CEFR Malta 2015 – 2017
Innovation and Score Reporting
Identification of Infrastructure Gaps to
Out of Region Market Assumptions
Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs
TERMINOLOGY AND TRANSLATION
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Roadmap Towards a Validity Argument
An international context in higher education – outside the ENL world
FAQs Q: Is my command required to have a Command Language Program (CLP) and/or a CLP Manager (CLPM)? A: If you answer ‘yes’ to either of the following.
New Guides on social security where are we now?
The National Academies
Building a Network for Impact
Sub-Committee F43.01 on Language Interpreting
PROVIDING COMMUNICATION ACCESS AROUND THE GLOBE
Monitoring Children’s Progress
Test format Total test time:
TOEFL.
Leverage Bilingualism
Curricular Goals Language proficiency Foreign Cultural Literacy
Chair of the Local Registration Services Association Donna Sharp
Unified Communications Things to Consider…
Year of Instruction 2.0.
MALTA Language Proficiency Requirements Implementation MAY 2011
National 3 Units.
FAQs Q: Is my command required to have a Command Language Program (CLP) and/or a CLP Manager (CLPM)? A: If you answer ‘yes’ to either of the following.
Why do we assess?.
ATIS’ Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Activity
FAQs Q: Is my command required to have a Command Language Program (CLP) and/or a CLP Manager (CLPM)? A: If you answer ‘yes’ to either of the following.
FAQs Q: Is my command required to have a Command Language Program (CLP) and/or a CLP Manager (CLPM)? A: If you answer ‘yes’ to either of the following.
Presentation transcript:

Language Services and Products Subcommittee F43.04 Language Testing Genesis Subcommittee F15.64 – Foreign Language Proficiency Began in February, 2009 Over 70 participants representing more than 30 organizations: producers, users, and general interest F2889-11 published in July, 2011

Language Services and Products Subcommittee F43.04 Language Testing F2889-11 Standard Practice for Assessing Language Proficiency Purpose— Best practices for the development and use of tests for assessing language proficiency according to ILR scale. Modalities – Speaking, listening, reading, and writing Limitations—Does not address testing and test development in the specialized areas of: Translation, Interpretation, Audio Translation, Transcription, Performance tests, or Diagnostic Assessment

Language Services and Products Subcommittee F43.04 Language Testing First New Standard From ASTM Committee F43 on Language Services and Products Expands the testing capacity of the United States by leveraging commercial and existing government test development and delivery capability through standardization of these processes Intended to be used by contract officers, program managers, supervisors, managers, and commanders. Intended to serve the language test developer, test provider, and language test user communities in their ability to provide useful, timely, reliable, and reproducible tests of language proficiency for general communication purposes.

Language Services and Products Subcommittee F43.04 Language Testing Development of New Standards Standard Terminology for Language Testing Translation Testing Interpretation Testing Diagnostic Assessment Formative Assessment Performance Testing