Testing the Difference Between Means (Small Independent Samples)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill, Bluman, 7th ed., Chapter 9
Advertisements

Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Small Samples)
Hypothesis Testing 7.
Chapter 10 Chi-Square Tests and the F- Distribution 1 Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Hypothesis Testing for Variance and Standard Deviation
Section 7.3 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Small Samples) 2 Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Testing the Difference Between Means (Small Independent Samples)
Unit 8 Section 8-6.
8.2 Testing the Difference Between Means (Small, Independent Samples)
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Larson/Farber 4th ed.1.
Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Small Samples)
Section 7.2 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Large Samples) Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Section 10.3 Comparing Two Variances Larson/Farber 4th ed1.
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing with Two Samples 1. Chapter Outline 8.1 Testing the Difference Between Means (Large Independent Samples) 8.2 Testing the.
Hypothesis Testing with Two Samples
Chapter Hypothesis Testing with Two Samples 1 of 70 8 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Section 7.4 Hypothesis Testing for Proportions Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Comparing Two Variances
Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Small Samples)
GOODNESS OF FIT Larson/Farber 4th ed 1 Section 10.1.
SECTION 7.2 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Large Samples) 1 Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Welcome to MM207 – Statistics Hypothesis Testing with One Sample Chapter – 7.4 Anthony J. Feduccia.
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample 1 Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Introduction to Inference Tests of Significance. Proof
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample 1 Larson/Farber 4th ed.
Section 7.3 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Small Samples) © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 of 101.
Chapter Hypothesis Testing with One Sample 1 of 35 7  2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Two-Sample vs. Matched Pairs The following data indicates the average age of registered voters before and after the 2004 election. Choose 6 counties.
Hypothesis Testing – Two Means(Small, Independent Samples)
Chapter 10 Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution
Hypothesis Testing with One Sample
Ch06 Hypothesis Testing.
10 Chapter Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution Chapter 10
Hypothesis Testing with Two Samples
Unit 8 Section 7.4.
Testing the Difference Between Proportions
Quantitative Methods Varsha Varde.
Unit 8 Section 7.5.
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample.
10 Chapter Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution Chapter 10
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample.
Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Between Two Means, Two Proportions, and Two Variances.
Testing the Difference Between Means (Large Independent Samples)
Statistics Chapter 7 Review.
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample.
10 Chapter Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution Chapter 10
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing with Two Samples.
SIN502S Week 6.
Chapter 10 Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution
Hypothesis Testing: Two Sample Test for Means and Proportions
Sections 8-1 and 8-2 Independent and Dependent Samples
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
EXAMS Mon. Tues. Wed. Thur. Fri. 5/7 (Odd) 5/8 (Even) 5/9 (Odd)
Section 10-4 – Analysis of Variance
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample.
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
LESSON 20: HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
Normal Probability Distributions
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
Tests About a Population Mean
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
WARM UP The maker of a new tire claims that his Tires are superior in all road conditions. He claims that with his tires there is no difference in stopping.
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Exercise - 1 A package-filling process at a Cement company fills bags of cement to an average weight of µ but µ changes from time to time. The standard.
Normal Probability Distributions
Hypothesis Testing for Proportions
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing: Single Population
Use invNorm (2nd VARS 3) functions: Use invT (2nd VARS 4) functions:
Presentation transcript:

Testing the Difference Between Means (Small Independent Samples) Section 8.2 Testing the Difference Between Means (Small Independent Samples) Section 8.2 Objectives Perform a t-test for the difference between two means μ1 and μ2 using small independent samples Larson/Farber 4th ed

Two Sample t-Test for the Difference Between Means If samples of size less than 30 are taken from normally-distributed populations, a t-test may be used to test the difference between the population means μ1 and μ2. Three conditions are necessary to use a t-test for small independent samples. The samples must be randomly selected. The samples must be independent. Each population must have a normal distribution. Larson/Farber 4th ed

Example: Two-Sample t-Test for the Difference Between Means The braking distances of 8 Volkswagen GTIs and 10 Ford Focuses were tested when traveling at 60 miles per hour on dry pavement. The results are shown below. Can you conclude that there is a difference in the mean braking distances of the two types of cars? Use α = 0.01. Assume the populations are normally distributed.(Adapted from Consumer Reports) GTI (1) Focus (2) s1 = 6.9 ft s2 = 2.6 ft n1 = 8 n2 = 10 Larson/Farber 4th ed

Solution: Two-Sample t-Test for the Difference Between Means Ha:   μ1 = μ2 μ1 ≠ μ2 0.01 Decision: Reject H0 At the 1% level of significance, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean braking distances of the cars are different. Larson/Farber 4th ed

Example: Two-Sample t-Test for the Difference Between Means A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 2.4-GHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. You perform a study using 14 randomly selected phones from the manufacturer and 16 randomly selected similar phones from its competitor. The results are shown below. At α = 0.05, can you support the manufacturer’s claim? Assume the populations are normally distributed. Manufacturer (1) Competition (2) s1 = 45 ft s2 = 30 ft n1 = 14 n2 = 16 Larson/Farber 4th ed

Solution: Two-Sample t-Test for the Difference Between Means Ha:   μ1 ≤ μ2 μ1 > μ2 0.05 Decision: Reject H0 At the 5% level of significance, there is enough evidence to support the manufacturer’s claim that its phone has a greater calling range than its competitors. Larson/Farber 4th ed

Section 8.2 Summary Performed a t-test for the difference between two means μ1 and μ2 using small independent samples Larson/Farber 4th ed