Iyad Taleb Abu Awad and Dr. Abdul-Jalil Hamdan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is an EABs Favorite Meal and Why is it Important? Therese M. Poland Deborah G. McCullough Andrea C. Anulewicz Deepa S. Pureswaran.
Advertisements

LILY LEAF BEETLE RESISTANCE AMONG LILY HYBRIDS Caitlyn MacGlaflin 1, Lisa Tewksbury 1, Dr. Richard Casagrande 1. 1 Department of Plant Sciences, University.
Unit 3 Lesson 4 How Do Animals Reproduce?
Life Cycles Vocabulary 3-5 Grade. Birth The beginning of life.
Tachinid Fly (Lespesia archippivora) Parasitism of Monarch Butterfly Larvae (Danaus plexippus) Kaitlyn Creasey February 14, 2007.
Susceptibility of the African bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) to endosulfan, chlorpyrifos, carbosulfan and fenpropathrin using different bioassay.
Insects and Diseases.  EGG-LARVA-PUPA-ADULT  Larva: ◦ Several instars ◦ Molt between each ◦ Most growth in final stages ◦ All growth occurs as larva.
Abstract This project reports laboratory studies conducted to evaluate the effects of organic pesticides on the survival and reproduction of a predatory.
1st Planning Lab- The effect of testing your variable on brine shrimp cyst hatching.
Biology and Demography of Ephestia kuehniella (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) Z. Moghadamfar 1, M. Amir-Mafi 2 and H. pakyari 1 1- Department of plant protection,
The life cycle of insects.
Reproduction Growth and Development
Insect Metamorphosis. INCOMPLETE Metamorphosis Has THREE stages COMPLETE Metamorphosis Has FOUR stages.
Effects of soybean foliage grown under elevated CO 2 on the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica (Newman) Bridget F. O’Neill*, Evan H. DeLucia 1, Arthur.
Entomology Kit Climate Data & Calculations Analysis Tutorial.
STRUCTURED POPULATION MODELS
Organisms at different life stages can have vastly different reproduction and mortality rates: Juveniles: often high mortality risk and no reproduction.
INSECTS ARE EVERYWHERE!
Mass Rearing and Augmentative Releases of Bracon hebetor to Suppress Indianmeal Moth, Plodia interpunctella Populations in Stored Wheat Mukti N. Ghimire.
Drosophila melanogaster Life cycle and introduction to genetics.
1 Semiochemical Mediated Host Plant Preference in the Yellowmargined Leaf beetle, Microtheca ochroloma Rammohan Rao Balusu and Henry Fadamiro Department.
6.2. ExternalInternal  Sperm and Egg cell unite outside of the bodies of the parents.  If a sperm cell comes in contact with an egg cell of the species,
Effects of a begomovirus on tritrophic interaction of tomato, whitefly Bemisia tabaci and its parasitoid Eretmocerus hayati Yin-Quan Liu Institute of Insect.
Studies on the Interaction of TSAMV and G. boliviana.
Impact of Fall Armyworm Survival in Bt Crops on Survival and Damage Potential of Subsequent Generations Ryan Jackson USDA-ARS SIMRU.
Presented by Todd Stout Utah Lepidopterists’ Society April 8, 2006 Tips on Raising North American Limenitis (Basilarchia) species
Progress in evaluating converted cotton race stocks for resistance to whiteflies and aphids Mary M. Toothaker Dr. Marvin Harris Dr. C. Wayne Smith Texas.
© Copyright 2006 President and Fellows of Harvard College Bed Bugs - They’re Back! Cimex lectularius of the family Cimicidae.
Abstract The life cycle of holometabolous insects is distinctly divided into three life stages: the larval, pupal, and adult stages. During the larval.
The Life Cycle of a Butterfly Estella Raya 2 nd Grade.
Bed Bugs : Life Cycle and Feeding Behavior © Copyright 2006 President and Fellows of Harvard College.
 Involves the fusion of egg cell (ovum) and sperm cell (sperm)  Union of gametes occurs in two ways ◦ internal fertilization– occurs inside the female.
The Chesapeake Bay and the Blue Crab
Metamorphosis Insect Life Cycle.
Free Science Videos for Kids
Complete and Incomplete Metamorphosis
Life-cycles.
Rearing of Oleander Hawk Moth
Infection dose of the parasite Echinostoma paraensei (Trematoda, Platyhelminthes):and cercarial output by the intermediate host snail Biomphalaria glabrata.
Determination of fecundity rate Determination of survivorship rate
Development and reproductive potential of a generalist predator, Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Aspionae) feeding with adult of Angoumois grain moth.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Prof. Tawfiq Al-Antary The University of Jordan
Population density of the eucalyptus redgum lerp psyllid,
Entomology Kit Climate Data Analysis Tutorial
Complete and Incomplete Metamorphosis
Metamorphosis of an insect Prepared by; Ms. Maria Mae Timtiman.
Reproductive Rates of Nezara viridula (L
Stages of development of living things
Entomology Kit Climate Data Analysis Tutorial
Fig. 1. Bacterial colonization of mosquitoes and larva breeding water
Complete Or Incomplete Metamorphosis ?.
Hui-Min Guo, Hai-Chao Li, Shi-Rong Zhou, Hong-Wei Xue, Xue-Xia Miao 
Tips on Raising North American Limenitis (Basilarchia) species
Drosophila melanogaster
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Pest management.
First-instar thrips larvae Second-instar thrips larvae
Hui-Min Guo, Hai-Chao Li, Shi-Rong Zhou, Hong-Wei Xue, Xue-Xia Miao 
INSECT PEST OF CASSAVA (i) Zonocerus variegatus (Elegant Grasshopper) The nymphs are black with yellow ringed legs and antennae. The adults (3.5cm long)
Cultivar-dependent facilitation of other aphids by M. sacchari
Forensic “Pigology” (Time of Colonization?)
Insect Succession.
Entomology Kit Climate Data Analysis Tutorial
Entomology Kit Climate Data Analysis Tutorial
Neil F. Milan, Balint Z. Kacsoh, Todd A. Schlenke  Current Biology 
Fig. 4. Effect of royal jelly on silkmoth fat body cells and eggs.
The developmental stages investigated in this study.
Fig. 1. Effects of royal jelly on silkmoth body size.
Egg Deposition, Development, and Survival
BED BUGS DESCRIPTION Adult bedbugs are oval, wingless insects, which are about 5-7 mm long. They are flattened dorsoventrally and this particular feature.
Presentation transcript:

Iyad Taleb Abu Awad and Dr. Abdul-Jalil Hamdan Laboratory study on the predatory-prey relationship between the predatory bug, Orius laevigatus (Fiber) and the tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). 9th Arab Congress of Plant Protection, 19-23 Nov., 2006, Damascus, Syria, Poster NE 30. By: Iyad Taleb Abu Awad and Dr. Abdul-Jalil Hamdan

objectives: To study the predator-prey relationships between the predatory bug O. laevigatus and the tobacco whitefly, B. tabaci as prey. To study the effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the predatory bug, O. laevigatus when offered the B. tabaci infestation as food.

List of Experiments: Four Experiments were conducted: 2004 : 1st Exp Preliminary Study On The Predator Prey Relationship Between The Predatory Bug, O. laevigatus And The Tobacco Whitefly, B. Tabaci 2005: 2nd Exp.: The effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the adults O. laevigatus obtained from Bio Bee Company. 3rd Exp.: The effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the nymphs of the predatory bug, O. laevigatus. 4th Exp.: The effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the adults O. laevigatus obtained from the previous host plant leaf discs reared in Hebron University laboratory

Materials and methods: 2004: 1st Exp: Preliminary Study On The Predator Prey Relationship Between The Predatory Bug, O. laevigatus And The Tobacco Whitefly, B. tabaci Materials and methods: Sixty adults, one day old of O. laevigatus (32 females + 28 males) provided by BioBee Company were used in this experement. Each bug was relased onto a tomato leaf disc heavily infested with B. tabaci and were kept for its adult longevity in a ventilated Petri dish cage 5cm diameter in an incubater under the standardized conditions of 25±1°C, 75±5% R.H. and 24L:0D. Each dish was prepared with 2 cm diameter hole in the middle of the led, which was covered by 50 mesh cloth to provide ventilation.

Results Table 1: Adult longevity of O. laevigatus fed on B. tabaci eggs and larvae under standard conditions of 25±1°C, 75 ±5% R.H. and continuous light (24L: 0D). Mean (days) ± S.E. Sex Replications Adult Longevity Males 28 19.07 ±±1.74 Females 32 17.13 ±±2.36 P value 0.520 NS Males + Females 60 18.03 ±±1.94 NS: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

Figure 1: Survival curve for O Figure 1: Survival curve for O. laevigatus during its adult longevity when fed on B. tabaci infestation on tomato.

Table 2: Total number of whitefly stages consumed by adult O Table 2: Total number of whitefly stages consumed by adult O. laevigatus offered heavy infestation of B. tabaci during its adult longevity. Mean ±S.E. Sex of O. laevigatus Rep. Total B. tabaci Eggs Consumed/Adult Longevity Total B. tabaci Larvae Consumed/Adult Longevity P value Total E+L Consumed/Adult Longevity. Males 28 580.0 ±± 68.9 57.36 ±± 7.36 0.0001** 637.4 ± 76.0 Females 32 538.7 ±± 88.5 52.62 ±± 8.67 591.3 ± 97.0 0.719NS* 0.684NS* 0.715NS* Males + Females 60 558.0 ±±56.7 54.83 ±±5.72 612.8 ±62.3 NS*: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis) **: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

NS*: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis). Table 3: Average number of whitefly eggs and larvae consumed/day by adult O. laevigatus offered heavy infestation of B. tabaci under standard conditions of 25±1°C, 75 ±5% R.H. and continuous light (24L: 0.0D). Mean* ± S.E. Sex Rep. Average Eggs Consumed/Day Average Larvae Consumed/Day P value Average E+L Consumed/Day Males 28 29.56 ±±1.99 2.83 ±± 0.22 0.0001** 32.39 ±± 2.19 Females 32 29.95 ±± 2.34 3.01 ±± 0.33 32.97 ±± 2.64 0.899NS* 0.676NS* Males + 60 29.77 ±±1.54 2.93± ± 0.20 32.70 ±±1.73 NS*: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis). **: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

Conclusions Adults O. laevigatus found to be a promising natural enemy to B. tabaci as it was able to live for an adult longevity of 18.03 days feeding on eggs and larvae of B. tabaci when offered on tomato leaf discs. O. laevigatus adults were observed to be with significant preference for feeding on B. tabaci eggs more than on larvae.

2005: 2nd Exp.: The effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the adults O. laevigatus obtained from Bio Bee Company. Materials & Methods: Twenty replicates were reared on each host plant (tomato and eggplant) Each replicate consisted of couple of newly emerged adults O. laevigatus and were offered heavy infestation of B. tabaci eggs and larvae on either tomato and eggplant leaf discs and reared in 5cm diameter Petri dish cages. Each couple were transferred to freshly prepared cages every day and the previous leaf discs from each cages were kept in the incubator under the standardized conditions during incubation period of eggs and observed for hatching nymphs.

Results Table 4: Adult longevity of O. laevigatus obtained from Bio Bee Company fed on B. tabaci infestation offered on either tomato or eggplant. Mean (days) ± S.E. Host plant Rep. Adult longevity of males Adult longevity of females P value Oviposition period/ female Postoviposition period/ female Tomato 20 16.60±± 2.80 20.10 ±3.19 0.41NS 18.35 ±2.49 2.25 ± 0.72 Eggplant 13.95 ±1.76 16.50 ±2.32 0.39NS 15.35 ± 1.94 1.65± 0.54 0.43 NS 0.367NS 0.35NS 0.51NS NS: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

Table 5: Total consumption of O Table 5: Total consumption of O. laevigatus obtained from Bio Bee company during its adult longevity when fed on B. tabaci infestation offered on either tomato or eggplant. (Mean ± S.E.) Host plant Rep. Egg consumption/ adult O.laevigatus Larvae consumption/ P value E +L consumption/ Tomato 20 706 ± 131 64.4 ±±10.7 0.001* 770 ± 141 Eggplant 453 ± 72.6 32.33 ±±3.78 485.3 ±±76.3 0.099NS 0.008* 0.084NS NS: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis *: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis

Table 6: Daily consumption of adult O Table 6: Daily consumption of adult O. laevigatus obtained from Bio Bee Company when fed on B. tabaci infestation offered on either tomato or eggplant. Mean ± S.E Host plant Rep. Egg consumption/ adult O.laevigatus Larvae consumption/ P value E +L consumption/ Tomato 20 30.44 ±±1.84 3.20 ±±0.15 0.001* 33.65 ±±1.87 Eggplant 27.61 ± 0.65 2.45 ± 0.15 30.06 ± 0.56 0.154NS 0.074NS *: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis). NS: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

Average nymph/ female/day Table 7: Total number of nymphs hatched per O. laevigatus female obtained from Bio Bee Company when fed on B. tabaci infestation offered on either tomato or eggplant. Mean ±S.E. Host plant Pep. Total nymph/ female Average nymph/ female/day Tomato 20 64.55 ±±8.83 3.67 ±±0.21 Eggplant 34.85 ±±4.05 2.37 ±±0.15 P value 0.005* 0.001* *: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

2005: 3rd Exp.: The effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the nymphs of the predatory bug, O. laevigatus. Materials & Methods: Fifty newly hatched nymphs collected from cages where the previous experiment was reared on tomato cages were used for this experiment and each nymph was reared in 5cm diameter. Petri-dish on B .tabaci infestation offered on tomato leaf-discs. And another fifty newly hatched nymphs collected from cages where the previous experiment was reared on eggplant cages were used for this experiment and each nymph was reared in 5cm diameter. Petri-dish on Bemisia infestation offered on eggplant leaf-discs. Those nymphs were daily observed and transferred by a fine paint brush while observing them down a binocular dissecting microscope (40X) to freshly prepared cages.

Results O. laevigatus stages Plate 1: First-instar nymph Plate 2: Second- instar nymph

Plate 3: Third-instar nymph Plate 4: Fourth-instar nymph

Plate 5: Fifth-instar nymph Plate 6: Moulting shell of Fifth instar

Plate 7: adult of O. laevigatus

Table 8: Duration of development of O. laevigatus stages fed on B Table 8: Duration of development of O. laevigatus stages fed on B. tabaci infestation offered on either tomato or eggplant. Mean (days)±S.E(n*) Nymphal Instars Host Plant Tomato Eggplant P value Eggs 4.26 ±±0.06(50) 4.30 ±0.07(50) 0.66NS N1 2.25 ±±0.06(48) 2.43 ±0.09(30) 0.11NS N2 2.10 ±±0.04(46) 2.07 ±0.05(27) 0.62NS N3 2.05 ±±0.03(38) 2.25 ±0.09(20) 0.08NS N4 2.60 ±±0.08(38) 2.22 ±0.10(18) 0.005** N5 3.46 ±±0.09(30) 4.70 ±0.15(10) 0.001** Total nymphal development 12.43 ±±0.11(30) 13.20 ±0.24(10) 0.016** Total development Egg-Adult 16.76 ±±0.14(30) 17.50 ±0.26(10) 0.032** *: n = number of replications **: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis). NS: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

% Mortality During Each Nymph % of females surviving to adult Table 9: % Mortality of O. laevigatus during its nymphal stages when reared on tomato or eggplant leaf discs heavily infested with B. tabaci stages. O. laevigatus Stage (n* =50) % Mortality During Each Nymph % Survival To The Next Stage (% Survival ± S.E**) Tomato Eggplant N1 4 40 96 ±±2.77 60 ±±6.92 N2 6 92 ±±3.83 54 ±±7.04 N3 16 14 76 ±±6.03 40 ±±6.92 N4 36 ±±6.78 N5 20 ±±5.65 Total mortality % 80 Total Number 20 30 10 % of females surviving to adult 50 ±±10.19 40 ±±7.07 n* = starting number **: S.E for the % = 100 √ p q/n, p = proportion died, q = 1-p.

Figure 2: Survival curves of O. laevigatus females fed on B Figure 2: Survival curves of O. laevigatus females fed on B. tabaci infestation on either tomato or eggplant leaf discs.

O.laevigatus nymphal instar Table 10: Total consumption of O. laevigatus nymphs fed on B. tabaci infestation offered on different host plants.Mean ±S.E (n*). O.laevigatus nymphal instar Prey Host Plant B. tabaci stage Tomato Eggplant P value N1 Eggs 40.08 ±±1.09(48) 40.10 ±±1.62(30) 0.99NS Larvae 4.06 ±±0.44(48) 4.13 ±±0.26(30) 0.89NS 0.001** E+L 44.15 ±±1.16(48) 44.23 ±±1.70(30) 0.97NS N2 41. 56 ±±0.81(46) 34.03 ±±0.75(27) 3.65 ±±0.19(46) 3.59 ±±0.17(27) 0.82NS 45.21 ±±0.78(46) 37.63 ±±0.72(27) N3 45.34 ±±0.80(38) 39.70 ±±0.88(20) 3.68 ±±0.23(38) 5.60 ±±0.49(20) 0.002** 49.02 ±±0.82(38) 45. 30 ±±1.15(20) 0.012** N4 77.28 ±±0.95(38) 41.83 ±±1.44(18) 8.28 ±±0.31(38) 4.72 ±±0.48(18) 85. 58 ±±1.03(38) 46.44 ±±1.79(18) N5 121.27 ±±1.31(30) 99.80 ± ±2.01(10) 19.47±1.20(30) 9.90±0.60(10) 140.73±1.71(30) 109.70±2.43(10) Total consumption/ all nymphs Eggs 325. 53 ±±15.2(48) 255.46 ±±15.1(30) 0.001** Larvae 39.15 ±±2.16(48) 28 ±±1.82 P value E+L 364.68 ±±17.1(48) 283.46 ±±16.8

2005: 4th Exp.: The effect of tomato and eggplant as host plants on the life history parameters of the adults O. laevigatus obtained from the previous host plant leaf discs reared in Hebron University laboratory. Materials & Methods: Upon molting to adult, each O. laevigatus was observed for its sex, and each group of adults (males and females) that emerged at each certain day, were caged together for one day in 10cm diameter Petri dish and offered heavy infestation of B. tabaci on tomato or eggplant leaf discs. On the second day, each male and female were separated and each was transferred to freshly prepared 5cm diameter Petri dish and offered heavy infestation of B. tabaci on tomato or eggplant leaf discs. Each adult O. laevigatus was daily transferred to freshly prepared cages and the previous leaf discs for each female were also transferred to freshly prepared cages and kept for the incubation period in the incubator under the standardized conditions.

Adult longevity of males 22.33 ±±4.45(9) 14.00 ±±2.48(6) 0.13NS Table 11: Adult longevity of O. laevigatus obtained from Hebron University lab and fed on B. tabaci infestation on Tomato or Eggplant. Mean (days) ± S.E. (n*) Adult O. laevigatus Host Plant Tomato Eggplant P value Adult longevity of males 22.33 ±±4.45(9) 14.00 ±±2.48(6) 0.13NS Adult longevity of females 25.6 ±± 2.7(15) 15.00 ±±2.97(4) 0.029** Pre-oviposition period 1.0 ±±0.0(15) 1.0 ±±0.0(40 1.0NS Oviposition period 18.33 ±±1.24(15) 12.75 ±±1.93(4) 0.059NS Post oviposition period 7.20 ±±1.98(15) 2.25 ±± 1.31(4) 0.055NS *: n= number of replication **: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis). NS: Not significant at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

Table 12: Consumption of adult O Table 12: Consumption of adult O. laevigatus obtained from Hebron University lab and fed on B. tabaci infestation. Mean ± S.E. (n)*. O. laevigatus stage Prey Host Plant Bemisia stage Tomato Eggplant P value Total consumption/ Adult male Eggs 686 ±148(9) 374.7 ± ±80.1(6) 0.092NS Larvae 58.8 ±±16.4(9) 27.17 ± ±5.51(6) 0.10NS 0.0030** 0.0075** E+L 745 ±±164(9) 401.8 ± ±85.4(16) Adult female 817.9 ± ±96.9(15) 423. 5 ± ±94.7(4) 0.016** 65. 33 ± ±7.63(15) 31.75 ± ±7.40(4) 0.010** 0.001** 0.0062** 883 ± ±104(15) 455 ± 102(4) 0.015** Daily cons/ 32.62 ± ±0.87(9) 25.14 ± ±0.44(6) 2.50 ± ±0.27(9) 1.87 ± ±0.11(6) 0.059 35.12 ± ±0.98(9) 27.02 ± ±0.45(6) Daily consumption/ 32.99 ± ±0. 59(15) 25.78 ± ±0.29(6) 2.67 ± ±0.06(15) 1.80 ± ±0.07(4) 35.67 ± ±0.60(15) 27.68 ± ±0.26(4)

Table 13: Total number of nymphs hatched per each O Table 13: Total number of nymphs hatched per each O. laevigatus female obtained from colony reared in Hebron University lab. Mean ± S.E. Host plant Rep. Total nymphs/female Daily nymphs/female Tomato 15 71.47 ± ±4.79 3.99 ± ±0.15 Eggplant 4 30.25 ± ±4.01 2.56 ± 0.19 P value 0.0001* *: with significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05 (using t-test analysis).

Conclusions O. laevigatus nymphs and adult were able to live and reproduce when feed on B. tabaci infestation offered on either tomato or eggplant. O. laevigatus nymphs and adults preferred feeding on B. tabaci eggs more than on larvae when reared on tomato or eggplant. The fertility of O. laevigatus was higher when reared on tomato than when reared on eggplant. Nymphal mortality of O. laevigatus found to be highest on eggplant (80%) than that on tomato (40%). The adult longevity of O. laevigatus reared on tomato found to be longer than that reared on eggplant.