Fadiea Al-Aieshy   PhD-student, MSc Pharm

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dose Escalating Safety Study of a New Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Dabigatran Etexilate, in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: BISTRO I Eriksson.
Advertisements

Educational Event 23rd & 24th January 2013
Atrial Fibrillation – TIMI 48
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
The Changing Landscape of Anticoagulation William D. Cahoon, Jr., PharmD, BCPS Cardiology Clinical Pharmacist VCU Health System April 12, 2012.
Update on the New Oral Anticoagulants
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Anti-thrombotic agents. New and Emerging Anticoagulants  Anti – Xa : direct  Rivaroxaban (oral)  Apixaban (oral)  Betrixiban (oral)  Edoxaban (oral)
The New Oral Anticoagulants: Handle with Care Philip C. Comp, M.D., Ph.D. October 18, 2013.
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
Prof. Alberto Corsini Università degli Studi di Milano
Adam M. Levine, DO, FACC Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine Rowan University September 12 th, 2015.
A New Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Dabigatran Etexilate, Compared With Enoxaparin for Prevention of Thromboembolic Events Following Total Hip or Knee.
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
Le basse dosi dei NAO: uso ed abuso Giuseppe Patti Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome.
Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition with Rivaroxaban for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Replacement Eriksson BI, Borris L, Dahl.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Rivaroxaban: A Comparison of Once- and Twice-daily Dosing in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement.
A Screening Test for Xa based DOACs Uzma Ahmad BMS Haematology at The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust Introduction A study was undertaken to investigatie.
Net clinical benefit of OAC
Response to An Initial Dose of Warfarin in Thai Patients Undergoing Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy Weerayuth Saelim R.Ph. 2 nd year Pharmacy resident.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart DiseaseClinical Perspective by Michael D. Ezekowitz, Rangadham.
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
How to Navigate the New Oral Anticoagulants and Deal With Triple Therapy Dr. Morteza Safi Professor of interventional cardiology Cardiovascular Research.
Nguyen Ngoc Tu1,2, Marie-Christine Morel-Kopp3, Chris Ward 3, Robert G
Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization 2016
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
The role of PK and PD measurements in the era of DOACs
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Thromboprophylaxis
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Japanese Patients—Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Data 
AUB:Iatrogent Coagulopathy
You can never be too Thin…. An Update on NOACs
Effects of rivaroxaban and apixaban on routine coagulation screening tests Sean Platton1*, Louise Bowles1, Peter MacCallum2 The Royal London Hospital,
Kenneth Todd Moore, MS, Dino Kröll, MD 
Establishment of reference intervals for sex hormone binding globulin, LC-MS/MS derived free androgen index and calculated free testosterone SN Duignan,
A comparison of dabigatran etexilate with warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves: The Randomized, phase II study to Evaluate the sAfety and.
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs
…driving discovery An improved potent direct thrombin inhibitor shows efficacy with low bleeding risk Anirban Datta et al.
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Use of NOACs is contraindicated for AF patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate- severe mitral stenosis (usually of rheumatic origin). Although.
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
Click here for title Click here for subtitle
Oral Anticoagulation and Preventing Stent Thrombosis
Anticoagulant Review Morning Report – April 25, 2018
Kenneth Todd Moore, MS, Dino Kröll, MD 
Truman J. Milling, MD, Scott Kaatz, DO, MSc 
Timing the First Postoperative Dose of Anticoagulants
Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)
“Reversing Direct Oral Anticoagulants”
NOACS: Emerging data in ACS/IHD
Timing the First Postoperative Dose of Anticoagulants
John Fanikos, RPh, MBA, Allison E. Burnett, PharmD, Charles E
Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Effect of rivaroxaban on thrombin generation in vivo
Oral Anticoagulant Reversal Agents
Anticoagulant Reversal
New European Anticoagulant Approvals Will They Affect Practical Guidance?
by Hideki Yoshioka, Hiromi Sato, Hiroto Hatakeyama, and Akihiro Hisaka
Periprocedural Management of Patients on Anticoagulation
Which NOAC and When for Stroke Prevention in AF?
Concentrations of abemaciclib in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Antithrombotic strategies in patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. ACS: acute coronary syndrome;
RE-ALIGN Randomized, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Dabigatran Etexilate in Patients after Heart Valve Replacement.
Gianluigi Savarese et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Follow-up: considerations
Drug Summary Info Document Request / monitor Goal of therapy Action
Presentation transcript:

Rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentrations at trough in patients with atrial fibrillation Fadiea Al-Aieshy   PhD-student, MSc Pharm Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden Conflict of interest: none to declare

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Direct thrombin inhibitor - Dabigatran Direct factor Xa inhibitors -Rivaroxaban -Apixaban -Edoxaban

Optimal Safety and Efficacy Dose (concentration) of Anticoagulant Effect-Safety Optimal Safety and Efficacy Thrombosis Bleeding Dose (concentration) of Anticoagulant

Concentration correlated to effect and safety Factors affecting concentration Age Weight Compliance Renal function (particularly dabigatran) Interactions Pgp: ex dronedaron, verapamil CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers, ex antimycotics, part rivaroxaban, apixaban PPIs - dabigatran

Concentration-effect: RE-LY

Concentration-safety: RE-LY

Effect – safety : RE-LY Sthlm 10-90e percentil min-max (median 52), Skeppholm et al., Thromb Res 2014

Aims To show the typical exposure range of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with AF Evaluate different laboratory methods

Methods A total of 141 AF patients treated with either apixaban 2.5 mg/5 mg (n=10/60) twice daily or rivaroxaban 15 mg/20 mg (n=10/61) once daily. Trough plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and Anti-FXa assays calibrated with apixaban/rivaroxaban.

Results apixaban

weaker but still highly significant y = 2.321 + 0.944x r2 = 0.96, p<0.001 There were highly significant correlations between directly measured apixaban in plasma and estimated by anti-FXa activity Anti-Xa Apixaban (ng/mL) y = 6.114 + 0.827x r2 = 0.78, p<0.001 Anti-Xa Apixaban (ng/mL) For patients with apixaban concentration by LC-MS/MS ≤ 50 ng/mL the correlation was weaker but still highly significant Apixaban by LC-MS/MS (ng/mL)

Results rivaroxaban Analytical results All patients n=71 Rivaroxaban 15 mg OD n=10 20 mg OD n=61 LC-MS/MS, ng/ml Median (range) 34 (5 – 84) 30 (22 – 66) (10th-90th percentile) 13 – 63 22 – 65 13 – 62 Geometric mean 36 38 Anti-FXa, ng/ml 28 (4 - 67) 23 (16 - 66)

Trough rivaroxaban concentration by LC/MS-MS y=-1.668+0.85x r2=0.92, p<0.001 Trough Anti-Xa rivaroxaban (ng/ml) Median (range) Trough (n=71) LC-MS/MS ng/mL 34 (5-84) Anti-FXa assay ng/mL 28 (4-67) Trough rivaroxaban concentration by LC/MS-MS y=2.170+0.64x r2=0.79, p<0.001 Trough Anti-Xa rivaroxaban (ng/ml) Trough rivaroxaban concentration by LC/MS-MS ≤ 30 (ng/ml) 14/10/2015

Apixaban summary Plasma concentration varied 12-fold overall. The median trough apixaban plasma concentration measured by LC-MS/MS was 75 ng/ml (range 15-186 ng/ml). The typical exposure range (10–90th percentile) observed was roughly between 40 and 120 ng/ml at trough. Patients receiving the higher dose had significantly higher apixaban concentrations than the low dosed. Anti-FXa assays correlated strongly with LC-MS/MS but further studies may be needed to evaluate sensitivity and accuracy of the assay in the low plasma concentration range.

Rivaroxaban summary Plasma concentrations varied 17-fold at trough. The median trough rivaroxaban plasma concentration measured by LC-MS/MS was 34 ng/ml (range 5-84 ng/ml).The typical exposure range (10–90th percentile) observed was roughly between 10 and 60 ng/ml at trough. No significant differences in exposure levels between the high- and low-dose group were found. Anti-FXa assays correlated strongly with LC-MS/MS, however, at very low concentrations ≤30 ng/ml, the method is less reliable and might underestimate the actual concentrations.

Conclusions Apixaban and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations varied substantially in AF patients. We here describe the range of exposures as well as typical exposure intervals for both drugs. We suggest that these typical exposure intervals may be used for dose guidance.

Thank you for your attention