High Energy and Prompt Neutrino Production in the Atmosphere

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
London Collaboration Meeting September 29, 2005 Search for a Diffuse Flux of Muon Neutrinos using AMANDA-II Data from Jessica Hodges University.
Advertisements

Atmospheric neutrino fluxes Teresa Montaruli, Paolo Desiati, Aya Ishihara, UW, IceCube Meeting, Mar 2005 A background and an interesting measurement How.
ATLAS LHCf Detector 140m away from the interaction point LHCf: calibration of hadron interaction models for high energy cosmic-ray physics at the LHC energy.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
May 26, 2002Thomas K. Gaisser Atmospheric neutrino fluxes Status of the calculations based on work with M. Honda.
Ultra high energy cosmic rays: highlights of recent results J. Matthews Pierre Auger Observatory Louisiana State University 19 August August.
Chiba, July 29, 2003Tom Gaisser Comments on atmospheric muon and neutrino backgrounds in neutrino telescopes Use semi-analytic estimates to display some.
Constraints of hadronic interaction models from the cosmic muon observations. L.G. Dedenko, A.V. Lukyashin, G.F. Fedorova, T.M. Roganova M.V. Lomonosov.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Humberto Salazar (FCFM-BUAP) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, CTEQ- Fermilab School Lima, Peru, August 2012 Ultrahigh Cosmic Rays: The highest energy.
AMANDA. Latest Results of AMANDA Wolfgang Rhode Universität Dortmund Universität Wuppertal for the AMANDA Collaboration.
Measurement of the atmospheric lepton energy spectra with AMANDA-II presented by Jan Lünemann* for Kirsten Münich* for the IceCube collaboration * University.
Muon Vertical Depth Intensity Distribution at the South Pole with AMANDA-II Kimberly Moody 1 August 2003.
The muon component in extensive air showers and its relation to hadronic multiparticle production Christine Meurer Johannes Blümer Ralph Engel Andreas.
Mumbai, August 1, 2005 Tom Gaisser Atmospheric neutrinos Primary spectrum Hadronic interactions Fluxes of muons and neutrinos Emphasis on high energy.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
School of Cosmic-ray Astrophysics, Erice, July 4, 2004 Thomas K. Gaisser Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics Uncorrelated fluxes.
QUARKS-2014 Suzdal 7 June 2014 Testing High Energy Cosmic Ray Interaction Models with the Atmospheric Muon Data L.G. Dedenko, G.F. Fedorova, T.M. Roganova.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
STUDY OF HIGH ENERY HADRONIC INTERACTION MODELS USING CORSIKA SIMULATION Raghunath Ganugapati (Newt), John Kelley, Teresa Montaruli, and Albrecht Karle.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Phenomenology and Detection p 00 ++  e+e+ e-e- ++  Michelangelo D’Agostino Physics C228 October 18, 2004.
Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector Vladimir Kulikovskiy The ANTARES Collaboration 3-9 August 2014ANTARES diffuse flux.
Influence of diffractive interactions on cosmic rays air showers ABSTRACT: A comparative study of commonly used hadronic collision simulation packages.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
Search for a Diffuse Flux of TeV to PeV Muon Neutrinos with AMANDA-II Detecting Neutrinos with AMANDA / IceCube Backgrounds for the Diffuse Analysis Why.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara Chiba University.
Jan Ridky and Petr Travnicek Inst. of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague for DELPHI collaboration Muon Bundles from Cosmic Ray Showers Detected.
Downgoing Muons in the IceCube experiment: Final presentation for Phys 735, Particle, Prof. Sridhara Dasu L.Gladstone 2008 Dec 3.
Cosmic Ray Composition Primary cosmic particles collide with atoms in the Earth's atmosphere and produce a cascade of short lived particles, which can.
I have 6 events (Nch>=100) on a background of ?
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
Cosmogenic Muon Background
Measurement of high energy cosmic rays by the new Tibet hybrid experiment J. Huang for the Tibet ASγCollaboration a a Institute of high energy physics,
Imaging the Neutrino Universe with AMANDA and IceCube
Atmospheric neutrinos with Deep Core
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Andrea Chiavassa Universita` degli Studi di Torino
M. V. Chizhov DESY/Sofia University, Bulgaria
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Theoretical status of high energy cosmic rays and neutrinos
Remarks on astrophysical origin of the knee in cosmic ray spectrum
John Kelley for the IceCube Collaboration
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Charge Ratio by Using a Cosmic Ray Telescope Soheila Abdollahi (Imam Khomeini International University, Sharif University.
08/27/04 Strategies for the search for prompt muons in the downgoing
Instrumentation and Methods in Astroparticle Physics Physics 801
Brennan Hughey for the IceCube Collaboration
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
science with 40 IceCube strings
Latest Results from the KASCADE-Grande experiment
Atmospheric neutrino fluxes
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
University of South Alabama
Diffuse neutrino flux J. Brunner CPPM ESA/NASA/AVO/Paolo Padovani.
HADRONIC INTERACTION MODELS AND DPMJET-CHARM MODEL
Alexander Kappes Francis Halzen Aongus O’Murchadha
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
Brennan Hughey for the IceCube Collaboration
Hadronic Interaction Model Analysis Air Shower Development
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Predictions of Ultra - High Energy Neutrino fluxes
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Studies and results at Pierre Auger Observatory
Presentation transcript:

High Energy and Prompt Neutrino Production in the Atmosphere P. Berghaus, R. Birdsall, P. Desiati, T. Montaruli (1) and J. Ranft (2) (berghaus, rbirdsall, desiati, tmontaruli @icecube.wisc.edu, ran@cern.ch) (1) University of Wisconsin, Madison (2) UGH Siegen Abstract: Atmospheric neutrinos and muons have been extensively measured by underground experiments in the region below 10GeV. The AMANDA neutrino telescope has measured the spectrum of atmospheric neutrinos up to 100 TeV and IceCube, which has about 100 times higher acceptance, is expected to collect unprecedented statistics at even higher energies in the near future. Since high energy atmospheric neutrinos are the foreground for extraterrestrial events, their study is of fundamental importance. With IceCube it will be possible to investigate the high energy tail above 1TeV, where kaon and charm physics become relevant. We are working on understanding high energy hadronic models and compare Monte-Carlo data generated with the CORSIKA air shower simulation package to results from particle physics experiments. We also show the effect of improving the simulation of charm production within CORSIKA after calibrating the hadronic model DPMJET against experimental data. The main goal of Neutrino Telescopes is the detection of high energy neutrinos from extraterrestrial sources such as Supernova Remnants, Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), and Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) [1]. However, extraterrestrial neutrinos are concealed by the intense flux of neutrinos produced through interactions of cosmic rays in the Earth's atmosphere via decays of  and K mesons. This foreground has to be understood In order to allow its separation from a potential extraterrestrial neutrino signal. One way to model the atmospheric neutrino flux is to use the air shower simulation package CORSIKA, which is a standard tool in cosmic ray experiments [2]. The plot below shows the atmospheric neutrino spectrum as measured by AMANDA [3] compared to Monte-Carlo simulations using CORSIKA with different high-energy hadronic interaction models. Most commonly, CORSIKA is used to simulate muons in air showers. Here, we investigate the applicability of CORSIKA to atmospheric neutrino simulations. CORSIKA MC and AMANDA Data (E-2-weighted) The hadronic interaction package SIBYLL [4] predicts a more significant fraction of  and  from K decays than other interaction models. This results from the fact that in SIBYLL K mesons are produced with higher multiplicities than in e.g. QGSJET [5]. Since p meson production varies little between interaction models, this is the main source of discrepancies in the final lepton spectra. Above, we show comparisons of neutrino spectra generated with the two packages as implemented in CORSIKA are compared to phenomenological flux models [6,7]. Of the currently available models, SIBYLL most accurately reproduces the predicted spectra, both for neutrinos and antineutrinos. Muon from  Muon from  Neutrino from  Neutrino from  SIBYLL QGSJET01 QGSJETII Benchmarking high energy interaction models with muons is very effective, but the kinematics of ± and K± decays are different for muons and neutrinos. The figure on top shows the fractional contribution of p and K decays to m and nm fluxes (from [8]), superimposed on Monte-Carlo data. Above 100GeV, neutrinos are mostly produced by K decays, whereas for muons p decays remain dominant up to the highest energies. Neutrinos are therefore more affected by the higher uncertainties on K production cross sections than muons. K physics is consequently the major factor in understanding the neutrino spectrum up to about 100 TeV, after which charm production starts to play an important role. Of the CORSIKA hadronic interaction models, SIBYLL produces the most pronounced K+/K- asymmetry. This excess in K+ multiplicity produces a slightly higher +/- than experimentally measured by MINOS and L3+Cosmic, as shown below [9,10]. This asymmetry should express itself in a corresponding excess of  over anti . An important component to the atmospheric neutrino flux comes from prompt decay of Charm hadrons. Located at the high end of the energy spectrum, it forms a persistent background in searches for diffuse extraterrestrial neutrino fluxes. Recently, charm production was updated in the DPMJET hadronic simulation package for CORSIKA [11]. The top plot shows the differential production cross sections for Lc production in proton-nucleus interaction as generated with the new version, in comparison with the old version and experimental data from SELEX [12]]. It can be seen that the new simulation accurately reproduces the “leading quark” effect, resulting in an asymmetry of production cross sections between particle and antiparticle. The plot below shows the first result for the prompt atmospheric neutrino spectrum simulated with the new DPMJET version. In general, spectrum and flux agree reasonably well with current phenomenological models [13,14], the drop at the high end is most likely due to low statistics of the Monte-Carlo sample. Influences of cosmic ray composition on the final result, especially at the high end of the spectrum are currently under investigation. REFERENCES [1] See e.g. the talk by F. Halzen at this conference. [2] CORSIKA : http://www-ik.fzk.de/corsika/, Comput.Phys.Commun. 56 (1989) 105-113 [3] K.M.Muenich and J.Luenemann, IceCube collaboration, 30th ICRC (Merida, Mexico) (2007) [4] R.Engel et al., Proc. 26th ICRC (Salt Lake City, U.S.A.) 1 (1999) 415 [5] S.Ostapchenko,Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) (2005), hep-ph/0412332; hep-ph/0501093 [6] G.D.Barr et al., astro-ph/0403630v1 [7] M.Honda et al., Phys.Rev.D75:043006,2007 [8] T.K.Gaisser, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 118:109-117,2003 [9] P.Adamson et al., Phys.Rev. D 76 (2007) 052003, arXiv:0705.3815 [10] M.Aglietta et al., Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 092005 [11] P.Berghaus, T.Montaruli and J.Ranft, arXiv:0712.3089 (to be published) [12] F. G. Garcia et al. [SELEX Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B, 49 (2002). [13] A. D. Martin et al. , hep-ph/0302140 [14] E.V. Bugaev, V.A. Naumov, S.I. Sinegovsky, E.S. Zaslavskaya - Il Nuovo Cimento 12C, No.1 (1989) 41 PRELIMINARY