Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
Dubai Conference May 2004 Molengraaff Institute Center for Intellectual Property Law (CIER) 2 OVERVIEW Domain Concepts Methodologies Problematic Issues.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Should the names of the States be included in Article 6ter of the Paris Convention?
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
RED DE PROPIEDAD INTELLECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL EN LATINOAMÉRICA PILA-Network is a project co-funded by the European Union in the framework of the ALFA programme.
Dr. Özlem Döğerlioğlu IŞIKSUNGUR Yaşar Üniversity Lecture Notes
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
BEIJING BOSTON BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY.
The Protection of Geographical Indications in Brazil Cristina Ninô Biscaia LL.M Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
Agreement on TRIPS TRIPS Agreement  When the WTO was established, it led to 18 specific agreements to which all members need to adhere. Members necessarily.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
” Promoting the Use of IP in the Agri- Business and Trade Industry: "Branding” By Getachew Mengistie, Intellectual Property Consultant and Attorney Presented.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
Current trends in EPA negotiations in relation to IPRs Fleur Claessens.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
Trademarks and Brands The Role of WIPO
The Importance of IP in the Global Context Colloquium on IP Rights Bratislava 25 June 2012 John Tarpey Director of Communications.
National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti Istanbul, Turkey May, 2011 Current Situation on Nation Branding Issues in Georgia.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
1 Seminar on the Internal Market Acquis for the Eastern Partnership Countries Nevena Mateeva Unit D2 - Industrial Property Rights, Internal Market & Services.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
Recent Developments at the International Level
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:PROTECTION & ENFORCEMENT
Geographical Indications
Geographical Indications
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
IP Protection under the WTO
Intellectual Property Rights
Department Of Commerce
Global Business & Legal Issues
Intellectual Property Rights in a Global Economy
Presentation transcript:

Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON DISTINCTIVE SIGNS FOR COLLECTIVE USE Versailles, June 12 and 13, 2008 Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels Marcus Höpperger

Distinctive Signs Trademarks Trademark Functions Owned individually Distinguish goods and services Trademark Functions Source indication (abstract) Distinguishing function Guarantee function (abstract) Communication function (“branding”)

Collectively Used Signs Collective ownership Who is the collectivity? How is the ownership expressed? What is the function of collectively used distinctive signs? Examples

Distinctive Signs for Individual Use Trademarks (goods & services) Registered Unregistered (passing off)

Distinctive Signs for Collective Use Collective marks Certification marks Guarantee marks Geographical indications Sui generis (appellations of origin, indications of source, registered geographical indications0 Tort law (passing off, unfair competition) Administrative law (labeling regulations)

MEMBERS OF THE PARIS CONVENTION (173)

Paris Convention Article 1(2) and (3) Article 6ter (State emblems) Indications of source or appellations of origin “manufactured or natural products, for example, wines, grain, tobacco leaf, fruit, cattle, minerals, mineral waters, beer, flowers, and flour.” Article 6ter (State emblems) Article 7bis (Collective marks) Article 10 (Indications of source) Article 10bis (Unfair competition)

MADRID AGREEMENT (Indications of Source ) (35)

Madrid Union 82 members Agreement only 7 Protocol only 26 Agreement and Protocol 49 (Including EC)

STATES PARTY TO THE LISBON AGREEMENT (26)

The TRIPS Agreement WTO Members (152) Protection of Geographical Indications TRIPS Article 22 to 24 Negotiations Article 23.4 Doha Round

Preliminary Conclusion Individually owned distinctive signs Trademarks Broad common ground Collectively owned distinctive signs Different legal categories Variety of approaches Indication of geographical origin Big emotional potential

Emotion Geographical Indication = Emotion Branding = Emotion Branding with Geographical Indication = readily available emotion Second layer Quality “terroir”

The Issue Distinctive signs for collective use Collective use How is the use attributed? Who has the right to administer attribution? Can it be monopolized by an individual? Collective use Who defines conditions of use? Who looks after it? Quality control? Enforcement?

The Specification Boundaries of use Conditions of use Control of use Raw materials Processing Control of use Investment Emotion Positive Negative

The Big Challange Regulation of collective use at local, national and international levels Fair and equitable manner Prior users Prior rights Enable producers To trade on emotion To improve products Important spin-off effects Gastro tourism, regional identification, preservation of traditional knowledge

Collectively used signs Conclusion Collectively used signs Present challenges and potential Signs indicating geographical origin: Room for policy making multifunctionality Potenial Readily available emotion Emotion is the basis for reputation Reputation needs stewardship Reputation = Intangible Asset = (collective) Intellectual Property

INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON DISTINCTIVE SIGNS FOR COLLECTIVE USE THANK YOU!