Final Report of the Campus Expectations Task Force

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P romoting A ction on R esearch I mplementation in H ealth S ervices Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Project Team Jo Rycroft-Malone.
Advertisements

Present and future context of national STI in Europe Manfred Horvat Mid-term Evaluation of the Implementation of the National Strategy for RTDI
Evaluating Outcomes of Federal Grantee Collaborations Patricia Mueller, Chair AEA Conference 2014 Denver, CO The National Center on Educational Outcomes-National.
Keynote on the CPA Review Process Evolution of the CPA Consolidates science and technology programmes of the AU Guiding policy document for STI in Africa.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
Co-op Development Training Program Starting September, 2011 Information Session July 8, 2011.
Korea Environment Institute KEI Introduction Government-sponsored research institute, under the Prime Minster’s office involved in policy development.
The “R” in R&E Networks GPN Survey and Observations Quilt Member Meeting Boston Ma. Sept Claude Garelik and Myron Lowe.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA 1 The Government of Canada and the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector: Moving Forward Together Presentation to Civil Society Excellence:
Campus Expectations Task Force Status Report William F. Decker The University of Iowa Chair, CETF 20 September 2005.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
The Internet Society (ISOC) Sebastián Bellagamba Manager – Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean
Strengthening Public Health Practice: Using Core Competencies for Public Health Canadian Public Health Association 2008 Annual Conference.
Final Report of the Campus Expectations Task Force William F. Decker The University of Iowa Chair, CETF.
Responsible Research and Innovation as a part of Regional Innovation Eco-system Rhys Thomas Head of Innovation System and Engagement Pennaeth System Arloesi.
6 February 2004 Internet2 Priorities 2004 Internet2 Industry Strategy Council Douglas Van Houweling.
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. 2  Result-Based Management (RBM) - setting goals and objectives, monitoring, learning and decision making 
Internet2 Strategic Directions October Fundamental Questions  What does higher education (and the rest of the world) require from the Internet.
1 Kostas Glinos European Commission - DG INFSO Head of Unit, Géant and e-Infrastructures "The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
Announcing the 2014 National Digital Stewardship Agenda.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
Kentucky college & career connection coalition
New American University
National Public Health Performance Standards Program: A Users Perspective Judy Monroe, MD Indiana State Health Commissioner APHA Annual Meeting November.
Updating the Value Proposition:
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Influencing the Progress of Advanced Core Technologies
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
National planning for Open Research euroCRIS 2017, 30 May 2017
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
ADB’s Initiatives and Strategies for a New Vision of Education Development and Cooperation Jouko Sarvi Practice Leader Chair, Education Sector Community.
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
TSMO Program Plan Development
Overview Daneen Calvin, Director
The IEPI Framework: Integrated Planning and Disaggregating Data
IT Governance Planning Overview
Background to The Conference
Information Technology (IT)
What’s New at ACCJC? PRESENTERS
Regional Cyberinfrastructure Planning
Jordan’s Principle Summit Winnipeg, MB September 13, 2018
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
Archives and Records Professionals for Research Data IG
Portuguese Presidency
ESS Vision 2020.
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Resource Directors Group Introduction
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
25-27 April 2018 Nairobi, Kenya Pan-African High-level Conference Co-convened by UNESCO and the Government of Kenya in collaboration w the African Union.
Core Value Statement Workshops – February 2019
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
ESS Vision 2020.
TELECENTRE EUROPE ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2014 MARA JAKOBSONE Chair
EQAVET Annual Network meeting Bucharest 13/06/2019
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
European collaboration for knowledge exchange & Innovation
Presentation transcript:

Final Report of the Campus Expectations Task Force William F. Decker The University of Iowa Chair, CETF

Online Access to the Report http://www.internet2.edu/cetf/

Many Thanks to… Rick Adrion Lois Brooks Jacqueline Brown Laurie Burns Steve Corbato Mark Ellisman Ray Ford Ron Hutchins Stuart Kippelman Thomas Knab Jorg Liebeherr Marilyn McMillan Henry Neeman Kevin Thompson Susan Topol

Sponsors Applications Strategy Council Network Planning and Policy Advisory Council

Charge “…principle purpose is to articulate a current set of expectations for what it means to be an Internet2 member campus, in light of the Internet2 community’s goal to promote and enable advanced applications.” Why are we members of this community? What is it that we are trying to accomplish? Who is expecting what of whom?

Context Expectations on the part of the research and education community Collaboration Access to unique resources Distributed problem solving approaches Federal agency directions Grand challenge or “big science” problems Growing dependence on interdisciplinary teams

Community, Organization, Member, Expectation, Commitment A community forms around a set of common/shared interests The community may form an organization to assist in working toward the shared interests Members of the community will have expectations for the organization Members of the community will have expectations for each other Members make commitments to each other to work toward community goals

Recommended Commitments To innovation in the methods, tools, and collaborative approaches required for the advancement of research and education, To the shared infrastructure required to enable this innovation, and To the community contributions required to sustain the innovation and the future and availability of the related infrastructure.

Commitment to Innovation Catalyze and extend the uses of new methods, tools, and collaborative approaches in the advancement of research, education, and service Stimulate the transformation of the knowledge created by these enterprises into useful outcomes Engage the campus and with the community in advancing these interests

Commitment to Shared Infrastructure At national, regional, and local levels, seek to provide: An effective physical plant Effective communication, cooperation, and collaboration between and among infrastructure managers and users Ongoing quality assessment and quality control as tested by high-stress applications

Commitment to Community Time, talent, and money Resource access and best practices Integration of enabling middleware and standards A “Golden Rule of Networking”

Elevator Speech “If we are to advance our competitive position as a research university, we must find new and innovative ways to advance the opportunities, productivity, and output associated with our research and educational activities. To do this, we must exploit the technologies and methodologies that are represented by the national and international cyberinfrastructure and the collaborative environment that it supports. Moreover, we must be committed to further evolution of this very cyberinfrastructure. Internet2 is one of the organizations through which we are meeting these challenges.”

Evaluating Commitments Requirements or guidelines? Inclusive, but with “stretch goals” A framework of high level guidelines with a community-developed and community-supported process for self-assessment

Translating Commitments into Practice Ongoing evolution of best practices Vetting and endorsement of results through formal review Publication and presentation of instruments, case studies, lessons learned, and best practices at annual member meetings A formal track on “Meeting Member Commitments”

Recommended Next Steps Further promulgation of the report--expanded audiences Possible adoption of the commitments as a condition of membership Periodic reaffirmation of commitment by all members Full development of processes for translating commitments into practice Reassessment and reaffirmation by the Internet2 organization of its own core purposes--alignment with the recommended commitments

Questions? Answers?