How Affirmative Action Varies Across Law Schools in the U.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Lessons from the University of Michigan Decisions: Diversity Counts and Context Matters Prepared for The College Boards Regional Seminars on Diversity.
Advertisements

What is Affirmative Action? 1961 – President Kennedy implements affirmative action executive orders directing federal agencies to pursue a policy of minority.
Civil Rights in the Courts
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Rights
Affirmative Action. DISCLAIMER This presentation does not imply any racial agenda or discrimination. The views that are going to be presented in this.
Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 438 U.S. 265, 98 S.Ct Argued October 12, 1977 Decided June 28, 1978.
SEATTLE DECISION: SCHOOL INTEGRATION SURVIVES WHAT’S NEXT? WHAT’S NEXT? John C. Brittain Chief Counsel, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
Dred Scott vs. Sandford Background Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master (a doctor) from Missouri (slave state) to Illinois (free state)
Affirmative Action in Higher Education A Case Study of the Effects the Courts Have Had on the Admissions Processes of Higher Education Institutions.
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Affirmative Action 1. Why it was started: The earliest implementation of affirmative action policies, before Kennedy coined the phrase, began under President.
Equal Protection of the Law Fourteenth Amendment Jessica Stickel Ashley Pollack Shannan Petchul.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management The Future of Incarceration Christopher Stone February.
Asian Americans and Affirmative Action. What is Affirmative Action? Institutional efforts to increase the number of underrepresented minorities in U.S.
Affirmative Action. Under Federal Affirmative Action laws and regulations, public universities receiving federal funds must: o Maintain minority admissions.
Equality of Results vs Equality of Opportunity Andrew Adair x Michael Dotson.
Affirmative Action “Positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in area of employment, education, and business from which.
Affirmative Action Debate 2009 Topic: A pro and a con position on the question of affirmative action as a tool for making college admission decisions will.
BY Jaquille Douarnynney Justin Cotto Corey Singleton Brittany Lewonka Lezeny Nunez.
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Affirmative Action Has there been a move away from Affirmative Action in Recent Years?
The Struggle for Equality. Path to Abolishing Slavery The Constitutional Convention would have failed without a compromise on slavery. Counted slaves.
Undergraduate Admissions & Affirmative Action Maintaining Excellence In A Changing Environment Fall Executive Board Meeting August 19, 2003.
Aim: How is the Selection of Supreme Court Justices a Political Process Do Now: The Supreme Court is said to be above politics – can this truly be the.
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
Objective 30d Understand the application and significance of the Equal Protection clause of the 14 th Amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Regents of The University of California v. Bakke By Alicia M.
Civil Rights Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights.
L EGAL I SSUES IN H IGHER E DUCATION : T HE S TUDENTS LS 517 Admissions & Diversity.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978.
Issue: Affirmative Action Group Names TITLE SLIDE.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Lorraine Jones Yu Sun.
Objective: Students will identify how the US government has attempted to alleviate discrimination in order to evaluate if certain groups need more assistance.
Affirmative Action and Mismatch at Selective Colleges Tameka Porter, Associate Researcher Research Question: To what extent do academic qualifications.
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Supreme Court Case Project Created by: Christina Dork.
Chapter 7 Section 2 A Flexible Framework. The Role of the Supreme Court Overturning a Decision – Court decisions set important precedents, but can be.
1. Circle the correct answer from the choices in the sentences below. a) The theory that Americans, even though we come from different backgrounds, come.
Chapter 28 Our Enduring Constitution
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
GOOD AFTERNOON, 8TH PERIOD! PLEASE PICK UP A SHEET FROM THE TABLE
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Korematsu V. United States
Affirmative Action.
Lecture 42 Discrimination VI
Lecture 41 Discrimination V
Fisher v. Univ. of Texas (2013)
Bakke v. Board of Regents of California
Affirmative Action: Unequal Protection
In a Time of Tension, Universities Craft New Free-Speech Policies
Civil Rights.
Affirmative Action.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? CPUSH Agenda for Unit 14.4:  Important.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
The Civil Rights Struggle
Ap u.s. government & politics
Where do our lawyers of color come from?
Turbulent Times (The 1960s and 1970s
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
New Approaches to Civil Rights in 70s
Warm UP Is the Supreme Court a vehicle for change?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Presentation transcript:

How Affirmative Action Varies Across Law Schools in the U.S. By Zachary Jackson

Background Affirmative Action was first publicly used by John F. Kennedy in 1962 It was then signed into law by Larry B. Johnson with the Civil Rights Act in 1964.

Literature on the Subject California v. Bakke (1978) Allan Bakke was denied entry into California Davis Medical School. Hopwood v. Texas (1996) The Fifth Circuit Court in Texas came to the conclusion that the school’s admission system was not tailored or systematic enough and should be abolished. Made race preferences in the 5th district unconstitutional.

Literature (Cont.) Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Justices of this case debunked some of the opinions of the Justices in the California v. Bakke case. Justice Powell specifically. Richard Sander-“A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools” (2005) 20%-30% of four year colleges are able to pick among applicants. 1992- study of 1,956 students (126 black). 51.6% placed in lowest decile. David L Chambers, Timothy Clydesdale, William Kidder, and Richard Lempert- The Real Impact of Eliminating Affirmative Action in American Law Schools: An Empirical Critique of Richard Sander's Study. (2005) Jesse Rothstein and Albert H. Yoon- Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?

Hypothesis In a comparison of institutions of higher education, law schools that receive more applications will have a higher diversity rate than those law schools which receive less applications.

Methods Datasets: Law School Admissions Council (LSAC); Institution Class Profiles; and USNEWS Ranking. DV- The Diversity Rate IV: Geographic Location (Institutions chosen) Application’s received

Results Those of color applicants: 23,660 (2015) Those of white applicants: 33,540 (2015) Those of color admitted: 15,790 (2015) White applicants admitted: 28, 400

Results School Applications Received 5,485 2,801 5,336 4,811 4,303 Harvard Yale University of California Berkley University of Virginia University of Texas-Austin Northwestern University University of Chicago-Illinois Applications Received 5,485 2,801 5,336 4,811 4,303 4,625 4,003 Diversity Rate 44% 42% 38% 24% 29% 32% 30%

Discussion My hypothesis was not fully supported. Yale had the second highest diversity rate, yet received the least amount of applications. University of New York (Excluded) Affirmative Action may not vary due to application size among law schools. Instead, the policies of the admissions office and what level of priority diversity plays in those policies.

So Now What? Lawyers of color are significantly disproportionate to those who are white. Find new ways to make legal careers that are dominated by white seem more interesting to those of color. Affirmative Action has increased the amount of lawyers of color since its implementation. Future studies should not address the effectiveness of Affirmative Action.