Lukas Chrostowski Carlos Mateus Tal Lavian

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. IP over DWDM NANOG May 24, 1999 Larry McAdams
Advertisements

Data Communications and Networking
S Digital Communication Systems Fiber-optic Communications - Supplementary.
LambdaDriver ™ family Wave Division Multiplexing.
Optical Networks Optical Circuit Switching (OCS).
SMUCSE 8344 Optical Networks Introduction. SMUCSE 8344 Why Optical? Bandwidth Low cost ($0.30/yard) Extremely low error rate ( vs for copper.
6/10/2003 – J.J. Hogenbirk VLVnT Wavelenght Multipexing 1 EFNI H K Wavelength Multiplexing Design a MAN* like fiber network for high data transmission.
Compatibility of multivendor Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing System Master Thesis Jan Waldén, Helsinki Supervisor PhD Timo Korhonen.
EE 230: Optical Fiber Communication Lecture 16 From the movie Warriors of the Net Active WDM Components and Networks.
11/7/2000EE228A Lecture1 Problem We need more bandwidth –Data traffic doubles every 4 (up to 12) months –More users connect to the Internet … –And stay.
SKA and Optical Fibre Links R.E. Spencer JBO Dec 2001 Fibre links Fibre optics and link design Array configurations Cost implications.
Fiber-Optic Communications
AtacamaLargeMillimeterArray Back End Preliminary Design Review, 2002 April 24-25, Granada, Spain Fibre Optic Links for IF DTS Roshene McCool Jodrell Bank.
Optical Network Link Budgets EE 548 Spring Reference Model.
An introduction to: WDM for IP/MPLS service provider networks Anders Enström Product Manager Transmode Systems.
Metrocore/Vesper Field Trial Pisa (Italy) Marconi PMA32 Metropolitan fiber optic ring located in the town of Pisa (Italy) Links based on G.652 fiber, 22.
System Performance Stephen Schultz Fiber Optics Fall 2005.
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Theory. What we will cover WDM Overview Optical Fiber Transmission Characteristics Key technologies of DWDM Technical.
Introduction to Optical Communication Dr. Manoj Kumar Professor & Head, Dept. of Electronics & Comm. Engg.
Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Analysis of Phase Noise in a fiber-optic link
A Combined Effort of OptiCal & LUMOS NETWORKS EE 290Q Lukas Chrostowski, Carlos Mateus, Fan Mo, Lixia Zhou.
SJD/TAB1 EVLA Fiber Selection Critical Design Review December 5, 2001.
1 | Infinera Copyright 2013 © Intelligent Transport Network Manuel Morales Technical Director Infinera.
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Technology
NOBEL WP5 Meeting Munich – 14 June 2005 WP5 Cost Study Group Author:Martin Wade (BT) Lead:Andrew Lord (BT) Relative Cost Analysis of Transparent & Opaque.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 8 Multiplexing.
XOA LiComm Compact Pluggable EDFA Optical Fiber Amplifier
Fotonica in SURFnet6 Wouter Huisman Netwerkdiensten, SURFnet.
Page 2 Small confidentiality text on every page, Arial 10pt, white – Change on MASTER PAGE ONLY Understanding DWDM.
TTM1 – 2013: Core networks and Optical Circuit Switching (OCS)
1 Razali Ngah, and Zabih Ghassemlooy Optical Communication Research Group School of Engineering & Technology Northumbria University, United Kingdom http:
2001 Altamar Networks. All rights reserved Designing US Scale Networks By Paul Tomlinson.
Optical telecommunication networks.  Introduction  Multiplexing  Optical Multiplexing  Components of Optical Mux  Application  Advantages  Shortcomings/Future.
Internet 3 Optimizing Optical Networks with Multi-Haul Networks
Center for Excellence in Engineering Education Photonic Generation of Millimeter Wave Signals for Wireless Applications Mehdi Shadaram Department of Electrical.
Generation of Spurious Signals in Nonlinear Frequency Conversion Tyler Brewer, Russell Barbour, Zeb Barber.
Optoelectronics dr Konstanty Marszałek Dense Wavelength Demultiplexing – DWDM Gain Flattening Filter – GFF Coarse Wavelength Demultiplexing – CWDM Microoptics.
Terascale Network Technology Workshop - Solutions for Lightpaths - Architecture, Control and Cost Kim Roberts, & Michel Belanger Optical Systems July 17,
Rob Adams, VP Product Marketing/Product Line Management From Infrastructure to Equipment to Ongoing Operations Reducing the Cost of Optical Networking.
Photonic Components Rob Johnson Standards Engineering Manager 10th July 2002 Rob Johnson Standards Engineering Manager 10th July 2002.
Altamar study of the Q west Q 3 network 2002 and 2004 demand one & two responses plus follow-up to the 11/29 meeting Jan. 22, 2002 Proprietary and Confidential.
Presented by, G.RajMohan I Year M-Tech. WHY WDM? Capacity upgrade of existing fiber networks (without adding fibers) Transparency: Each optical channel.
Deploying 40Gbps Wavelengths and Beyond  Brian Smith.
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO Nortel Networks Institute University of Waterloo.
Optical Communications for Future Trackers ANL/FNAL/UC/VWS Meeting Nov., 2011 Alan Prosser CD/ESE Fermilab 1.
Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Architecture of the proposed wavelength division multiplex-radio over fiber-passive.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The variation of BER when the relative phase and delay between channels are randomly.
Simulation-assisted design of future optical communication systems
Network Resources.
Optical Networking.
Chapter 4 Circuit-Switching Networks
Optical Amplifier.
Design and Simulation of Photonic Devices and Circuits
Sandis Spolitis, Inna Kurbatska, Vjaceslavs Bobrovs
Figure 2WDM transmission over a FMF link experiment
DWDM TECHNOLOGY PALTEL TOPLOGY FOR PALESTINE
Making Networks Light March 29, 2018 Charleston, South Carolina.
The Role of Light in High Speed Digital Design
CT1303 LAN Rehab AlFallaj.
INTRODUCTION TO DWDM 19-Nov-18 ALTTC/TX-I/DWDM.
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Problem We need more bandwidth
Flexible Transport Networks
IP over DWDM NANOG May 24, 1999 Larry McAdams
Optical communications
S OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND INSTRUMENTS
Back End & LO PDR April 2002 FIBRE-OPTIC LINKS -An Introduction Ralph Spencer Jodrell Bank Observatory University of Manchester UK --The use of.
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Transmission System Design
Presentation transcript:

Lukas Chrostowski Carlos Mateus Tal Lavian OptiCal Inc. Kwest Proposal Lukas Chrostowski Carlos Mateus Tal Lavian The Light at the end of the Tunnel

OptiCal Outline Design Link Analysis Financing OptiCal Proposal

Goal Design OADM network. Compare purchasing this network all at once, vs. purchasing the regeneration-based network all at once. OptiCal Proposal

Network Diagram 1st year B OA Huts 10 Gb/s 320 2.5 Gb/s T 80 A S X U C 80 240 160 400 OptiCal Proposal

Network Diagram 2nd year B OA Huts 10 Gb/s 320 2.5 Gb/s T 80 A S X U C 80 240 160 400 OptiCal Proposal

Network Diagram 3rd year B OA Huts 10 Gb/s 320 2.5 Gb/s T 80 A S X U C 80 240 160 400 OptiCal Proposal

Network Diagram 3rd year /w OADMs (a) B OA Huts 10 Gb/s 320 2.5 Gb/s OADMs T 80 A S X U C 80 240 160 400 OptiCal Proposal

Network Diagram 3rd year /w OADMs (b) OA Huts 10 Gb/s 320 2.5 Gb/s OADMs T 80 A S X U C 80 240 160 400 OptiCal Proposal

Link SX comparison (a) (b) EDFAs 3 extra OC48-192 0 extra (12) 2.5 lasers Same same 10 laser/det 12 extra CHEAPER! OptiCal Proposal

Electrical Regeneration Don’t need to use transponders. Use cheaper line cards (Line-O-192) 2.5 – 10 conversion (both 2.5 and 10 line cards) From A,S through X: 5+5 2.5-10 at nodes T,U: 2+2 Data from B-C: 3 OptiCal Proposal

OADM Restrictions Choose wavelength based on minimum dispersion (1530, 1550 nm) Eye closure < 0.3 Dispersion restrictions: BC: too much dispersion. BU: 1548.5 <  < 1550.5 CX:  < 1539 BX: 1538 <  < 1561 TC:  < 1536 TU:  < 1552 OptiCal Proposal

From Node S OptiCal Proposal

Link TX OptiCal Proposal

Link BT OptiCal Proposal

Link XU OptiCal Proposal

Link UC OptiCal Proposal

Link B-T-X-U-C Power Budget OA Huts 10 Gb/s 2.5 Gb/s OADMs B T X U C (-14 fiber+ EDFA) (-16 fiber) (-7 fiber+ EDFA) (-5 fiber+ EDFA) +3 (modulated), -4 (muxed) -18 (input), -22 (after OADM) +3 (amplified) -13 (input), -21 (after OADM) -28 (input), -3 (amplified), -7 (after OADM) -12 (input), -19 (after mux) +3 (modulated), -4 (muxed) -19 (input), -23 (after OADM) +2 (amplified) +5 (input), -3 (after OADM) -9 (input), -13 (after OADM), +12 (amplified) -12 (input), -19 (after mux) OptiCal Proposal

EDFAs, Channel Spacing System uses only EDFA-32 C-Band Channel spacing 100 Ghz. Chosen to allow 10 Gb/s transmission. System is symmetric for easier bi-directionality. OptiCal Proposal

Equipment Needed OptiCal Proposal

Finance (updated 3 year Solution) *** note: O-E-O conversion doesn't require transponders. Actual total line card cost should be lower. OptiCal Proposal

Finances for one-time purchase *** note: O-E-O conversion doesn't require transponders. Actual total line card cost should be lower. OptiCal Proposal

Cost Distribution? Over 60% is for line cards -  Line card w/ transp048 $11.5M Line card w/ transp192 $9M OC-48-192 $3.7 EDFA-32 $3.5M Bonus -  $3M OptiCal Proposal

OADM Solution *** note: $1.4M more if we used only Line-T-xxx OptiCal Proposal

Cost Distribution? Over 80% is for: Line-T-048 $10M Line-T-192 $5.2M Elec-Mux-048-4 $2.7M Amplifiers $2.7M OptiCal Proposal

Questions Provision costs for OADM? OptiCal Proposal

Price Summary Solution Price 3 Year Plan (incl. depreciation) $23,038,264 One time purchase (with regeneration) $33,593,400 One time purchase (OADM Solution) $24,543,800 OptiCal Proposal