Management of Earthquake Risk using Condition Indicators Determination of vulnerability functions Jens Ulfkjaer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural reliability analysis with probability- boxes Hao Zhang School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Michael Beer Institute.
Advertisements

An-Najah National University
1 UH-Contribution Ravi Mullapudi Parnak Charkhchi Ashraf Ayoub NEES - Jan 23, 2008.
Reliable Dynamic Analysis of Structures Using Imprecise Probability Mehdi Modares and Joshua Bergerson DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND EVIRONMENTAL.
Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model based on Measured Experimental Behavior M.J. Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda University.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
Experimental Study on the Damage Evolution of Re-bar Concrete Interface Lu Xinzheng SCE, THU CSE, NTU 1999/2000.
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
SYSTEMS Identification Ali Karimpour Assistant Professor Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Reference: “System Identification Theory For The User” Lennart.
ENGR 220 Section
A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement Behdeen Oraee-Mirzamani Imperial College London,
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
Application of the Direct Optimized Probabilistic Calculation Martin Krejsa Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering VSB - Technical.
Msc. eng. Magdalena German Faculty of Civil Engineering Cracow University of Technology Budapest, Simulation of damage due to corrosion in RC.
Structural Analysis and Design of
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
Estimating  0 Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses with the method of moments By Jose M Muino.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project Prepared by : 1- Areej Melhem 2- Jawad Ateyani 3-Rasha.
Dealing with Uncertainty in Statics 1. Outline Uncertainty in statics Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis in statics Examples.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
Machine Design Under Uncertainty. Outline Uncertainty in mechanical components Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis for.
Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.
Compressive Strength of Concerete- filled Thin Steel Stubs: Theoretical and Experimental Study Dr. Jahid Zeghiche Univesity of Al-Baha K.S.A.
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence Section 8.1 Confidence Intervals: The.
RELIABILITY-BASED CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF WATER STORAGE SYSTEM
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Sampling Distributions
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
Mohammad Maher Jaradat Raghad Abdel-Salam Owaidat
Extreme Value Prediction in Sloshing Response Analysis
Outline: Introduction: a ) General description of project b) Materials
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
Management of Earthquake Risks using Condition Indicators
Determination of Fragility Curves
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
Plain & Reinforced Concrete-1 CE3601
An-Najah National University
PreOpenSeesPost: a Generic Interface for OpenSees
Chapter 3 Component Reliability Analysis of Structures.
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
CE : Structural fire Engineering
What does it mean to say that the results of an experiment are (or are not) statistically significant? The significance level,  (conventionally set to.
Nikhil Keshav Raut Michigan State University
Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building
Seismic Design of Fatima Al Zahra Mosque
CHAPTER 1 Force Analysis. Deformation Analysis.
Finite element analysis of effects of asphalt pavement distresses on FWD dynamic deflection basin Qinglong You Jinglian Ma Xin Qiu Chang’an University.
Supervisor: Dr. Mahmoud Dweikat.
CE-401 Reinforced Concrete Design-II
Plain & Reinforced Concrete-1 CE3601
CE : Structural fire Engineering
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
An Najah National University Submitted to : Dr.Munther Diab .
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Design of reinforced concrete cores and walls in AxisVM X5
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Dr. Arslan Ornek MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Presentation transcript:

Management of Earthquake Risk using Condition Indicators Determination of vulnerability functions Jens Ulfkjaer

Outline What is the project MERCI about What is a vulnerability function? Six steps for determination of the vulnerability function for a structural class. Choice of the Attenuation function and intensity of the load Simulation of a set of time histories Simulation of a set of materials parameters Structural analysis Determination of the structural damage Calculations of the damage probabilities and the vulnerability function Example

What is a vulnerability function? A vulnerability function is a function that describes the probability of obtaining a certain level of damage dependent on the intensity of the load.

Deterministic example

Stochastic problem The load in it self is stochastic The structure class will compromise many structures with different sizes, irregularities, and material parameters Even at the single house level the strength parameters are only known with a certain probability

In general

1) Choice of the Attenuation function and intensity of the load The are many different available attenuation relationships in the literature and particular attention should be paid to the choice. For the moment, as a rough choice, we have chosen Boore et al. 1997.

2) Set of acceleration time histories Basically two types exist: real records and simulated records

3) Simulation of a set of materials parameters The material and the structural parameters should be simulated with certain statistical parameters.

4) Structural analysis The structural response can be calculated in many different ways: analytically and numerically We are at the moment using the Finite Element Method and the program openSees

5) Determination of the structural damage The damage should be determined from the response calculated by openSees. Many possibilities could be imagined but as a beginning we will use the maximal drift during the earthquake.

The damage will be categorized in different levels (normally four) 6) Calculations of the damage probabilities and the vulnerability function The damage will be categorized in different levels (normally four) The vulnerability is then the probability of having a certain level of damage

Example The following house is used 6m 4m mass1 Sec1 Sec2 B y x Mass 1 2.5cmmm Section A-A: 25cmmm 45cmmm As = 493mm2 A’s = 226mm2 y z All rebars 16 (201mm2) Section B-B: 35cmmm 2.5cmmm z x Mass 1 Mass x-direction : 1.53 tons

Concrete fc (MPa) epsc fu (MPa) epsu Cover Concrete 21 0.002 0.01 0.015 Sec1 Core 24.2 2.98x10-3 21.3 6.89 x10-3 Sec2 Core 26.3 3.83 x10-3 23.8 8.88 x10-3

Longitudinal Reinforcement Steel fy (MPa) E0 (MPa) B Longitudinal Reinforcement Steel 420 2x105 0.00225

Material properties variation The steel yielding strength been assumed to be normal distributed and 250 displacement time series has been calculated (with example3.3 from openSees manual)

Load 3 intensities and 3 distances are used Intensities: M1=5.5 M2=6.5 M3=7.5 Distances:R1=20 km R2=40 km R3=80 km For each of these nine combinations 10 time series has been generated.

Conclusions The software PreOpenSeesPost developed for calculating vulnerability functions in 2D and 3D is almost finished. More functions to interact with the user needs to be developed. More complex structures should be tested More structural element types as masonry has to be implemented