North Allegheny School District’s Screening Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The State Mandate: The State Board of Education shall, through its departments of education, determine eligibility criteria and assist school districts.
Advertisements

Informational GATE Meeting Topic: Identification (LAUSD Policy) Thursday, October 3, 2013.
Kindergarten Selection Process for the DISD Gifted Program.
Gate Ten: Gifted and talented services for Lovejoy K – 5 th grade students Who is it for? How do they get in? (Qualify) What do they do?
AIG Local Plan Parent Informational Meeting
Academically Gifted and Talented Program for Greenwood District 50 By: Cathy S. Chalmers Initial Creation July 2008 Revised July 2014 Contact Information:
Anamosa Community Schools Linda Mazunik Katy Kash February, 2012.
What is “Gate Ten”? Who is it for? How do they get in? (Qualify) What do they do? For more information, please see the Kindergarten brochure found on the.
The Child Study Team and Prereferral Strategies Chapter Six.
Academically Gifted and Talented Program for Greenwood District 50 By: Cathy S. Chalmers Toni Justus Harold Moffitt Pacquitta Welton-Wideman Revised July.
Gifted Education in the Elementary Schools Swarthmore-Rutledge School E.
AIG Local Plan Parent Informational Meeting
What is “Gate Ten”? Who is it for? How do they get in? (Qualify) What do they do?
Erin Puhl Resource Teacher for the Gifted Tuckahoe Elementary School January 28, 2014 Overview of Identification Process.
Academically Gifted and Talented Program for Greenwood District By: Cathy S. Chalmers Toni Justus Harold Moffitt Pacquitta Welton-Wideman Initial.
Gifted and Talented Education Neil Cummins School Larkspur School District
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Identification and Assessment of Talented Learners What is identification of the gifted? A process by which educators attempt to become aware of students.
Understanding the AIG Program Acceleration Challenge Honors Innovation Enrichment Visionary Excellence PCS Parent/Guardian Meeting October 10, 2011 PCS.
Advanced Academics Northwest ISD. Advanced Academics The Advanced Academics Department provides direction, leadership and support to K-12 programs that.
Amber Narczewski & Holly Kent ECED Purpose of the Assessment: Helps educators identify students who may need additional literacy instruction.
 Greg Chapuis Resource Teacher for the Gifted Oakridge Elementary School February, 2014.
COLLABORATION FOR EFFECTIVE DIFFERENTIATION Classroom Teacher Resource Teacher for Gifted Student Presented by Wendy Cohen, Resource Teacher for Gifted.
Vocabulary for Academic Success! 8 th Grade. Academic Vocabulary Required Course A course that must be taken in order to graduate. Elective Course A.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Understanding the AIG Program Acceleration Challenge Honors Innovation Enrichment Visionary Excellence PCS Parent/Guardian Meeting November 4, 2010.
KRISTIE WOOD EDU /26/15 Birth-Second Grade Teacher  Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators  Praxis Content Area Test  Hold a bachelor's degree.
B E S T S.  Opportunity for students to take part in an enjoyable and stimulating experience to learn more about their academic strengths  Chance for.
CMS Gifted Identification & Assessments for 2 nd Grade Students
Welcome. Overview Introductions Brian Johnson, Director Amy Basket, Program Manager Programs the Gifted & Talented Offer The Identification Process Questions.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students, Basic Education Circular, and Legal Decisions January 11 & 12, 2007.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
November 16, 2015 Presented by: Guinevere E. Maximo, Supervisor of Special Education and Pupil Services Sharon Kroll, Master Teacher of the Gifted Support.
Wake County Public School System Academically Or Intellectually
CogAT & the WS/FCS Academically/Intellectually Gifted Program
AS YOU COME IN… Find Common Ground
Academically/Intellectually Gifted
Resource Teacher for the Gifted Oakridge Elementary School
DeSoto County Schools’ Intellectually Gifted Mission Statement
Dixie Canyon Community Charter Gifted/Talented Programs (GATE)
Council Rock High School North
Marshall Public Schools Assessment Update
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
HIGHLY CAPABLE PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE
Pacquitta Welton-Wideman
Linda J. Deal Penn Manor School District
Student Assessment Parent Forum
The New Role of the AIG Coach
Advance Academic Program (AAP)
Highly Capable Education
Academically Intellectually Gifted Program
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
Identifying and Assessing students in the Douglas County School System
Allegheny-Clarion Valley School District Comprehensive Planning Meeting October 30, 2013.
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
WCPSS 3rd Grade Explorers
Wake County Public School System Academically Or Intellectually
Council Rock High School North
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
Parent Informational Meeting
Wake County Public School System Academically Or Intellectually
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Academically/Intellectually Gifted
The Middle School Transition
The Middle School Transition
Wahluke School District Highly Capable Information Night
Appling County System Elementary Gifted Program
Presentation transcript:

North Allegheny School District’s Screening Process November 15, 2016 Presented by: Guinevere E. Maximo, Supervisor of Special Education and Pupil Services

Agenda Provide the historical information on the GOAL Program Review Understand the development process of the screening tools Review the qualification data

Recommendation #2: Identification Process Refine current matrix to improve the accuracy of screening requirements for testing of students who are “thought to be gifted.” Research and review Response to Instructional Intervention (RTII)/Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) model to develop common curriculum-based assessments as part of the screening process at the elementary level.

Gifted Screening and Identification Subcommittee Committee Members: Two Elementary School Counselors Three School Psychologists Two Secondary School Counselors Highly Talented Elementary Mathematics Teacher Communication Arts Plus Elementary Teacher Supervisor of Special Education Committee Topics Chapter 16 Regulations and Guidelines Gifted Report Stats Overview of identification and evaluation process at North Allegheny School District

Chapter 16 Screening Medical History/Health Records Readiness/Developmental Tests *Achievement Tests Ability Tests *Group IQ Tests Anecdotal Information Portfolio/Subject Assessments Syllabus-based Examination CBA’s College Aptitude Test PSAT/SAT Extra-Curricular Academic Performance *Rating Scales Interest Inventories Cumulative Records Enrollment Records Parent Inventories *Report Cards *current NA screening areas

Gifted Screening/ Identification Kindergarten (September-February)

Gifted Screening/ Identification Kindergarten through First Grade (March-June)

Gifted Screening/ Identification Second Grade through Fifth Grade

Gifted Screening/ Identification Grade Six through Grade Twelve

GOAL Report Identification Data YEAR TOTAL NUMBER REFERRED QUALIFIED DID NOT QUALIFY PERCENTAGE QUALIFIED 2007-2008 223 122 101 55% 2008-2009 277 166 111 60% 2009-2010 267 134 133 50% 2010-2011 201 94 107 47% 2011-2012 181 83 98 46% 2014-2015 170 88 82 52% 2015-2016 137 59 78 43% Average

Screening Measures Identify students who require further assessment Incorporate District assessment data as screening criteria Generate positive outcomes (accurately identifies students without consuming resources that could be put to better use) To increase the qualification rate to above 70% (previous average qualification rate – 52%)

Student Performance Data Measurement Grade Level Administration Cognitive Abilities Test (CogATs) Grades 2 and 4 Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test – 2nd Edition (K-BIT2) Grades 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) Grades 2 through 7 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8

Student Performance Data Measurement Grade Level Administration Keystone Algebra I Exam As available Keystone Literature Exam Keystone Biology Exam English Language Arts Plus (ELAP) Grades 1 through 5 Advanced Academic Mathematics Program Grades 2 through 5 Mathematics Grade Acceleration (M4) Grades 4 and 5 Grades Grades 6 through 12

North Allegheny Multi-Criterion Screening and Identification Processes http://www.northallegheny.org/Page/18819

2015-16 Grade Level Analysis* * Reported from last day of the 2015-16 school year to June 6, 2016) 2009-10 Total # Tested 2010-11 2011-12 2014-15   2015-16 Kdg 18 6 4 3 1 44 51 37 31 2 54 36 43 41 13 40 27 22 28 19 35 5 23 15 20 16 10 8 17 7 11 9 14 --- 12 TOTAL 267 201 182 170 137

2015-16 Grade Level Analysis Grade 2009-10 % Qualified 2010-11 2011-12 2014-15   2015-16 Kdg 72% 50% 75% 67% 100% 1 70% 68% 71% 2 39% 44% 37% 38% 3 53% 41% 46% 32% 4 43% 20% 5 29% 35% 13% 40% 6 56% 25% 57% 7 36% 45% 8 17% 9 --- 10 0% 11 12

2015-16 Referral Source Analysis Building Total Parent Referrals %Qualified Parent Referrals Total Screening Referrals % Qualified Screening Referrals BWE 12 25% --- FES 11 73% 5 20% HES 8 4 50% IES 63% 2 100% MCK 75% 13 33% MES 15 3 67% PES 6 17% CMS 55% 1 IMS MMS 22 45% NAI 9 NASH 0% TOTAL 114 23

2016-17 Preliminary Analysis 2016-17 Preliminary Analysis* * Reported from June 7, 2016 to November 1, 2016) Total Screened Parent 137* 107 30 QUALIFICATION RATE Total Screened Parent 58/137(42%) 49/107 (46%) 9/30 (30%) * Out of 137 students that were evaluated, 42% qualified for gifted services.

Questions

Contact Information Guinevere E. Maximo, Supervisor of Special Education and Pupil Services 412.635.4108 gmaximo@northallegheny.org