D1 and D2 powering and protection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Advertisements

MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
1 Quench Protection and the Power Supplies for the MICE Focusing and Coupling Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkley Laboratory 10 February 2005.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
CLIQ Coupling Loss Induced Quench Magnet protection system for HQ test Overview 1) CLIQ system overview 2) Adding lead to pizza box 3) remote triggering.
PF Coils Quench Protection Design of EAST Superconducting Tokamak Oct. 5, 2005 PF power supply team Institute of Plasma Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
E. Todesco HL-LHC: OUTLOOK ON PROTECTION FOR IR MAGNETS (WP3) E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 23 rd April 2015 MPE meeting.
Superconducting IR Magnets CHEN, Fusan May 11, 2007.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
Becoming familiar with QPS systems in the LHC (incl. EE) Presentation 02 Sept PART 1 of 3. Part 1: General layouts and principles Presentation of.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
Simulation results for powering serial connected magnets Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Serial configuration of full rated converters.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
Circuit Protection: Progress and Challenges at HL-LHC B. Auchmann (WP 7) on behalf of many people in WPs 3, 6, 7, 11 and Mr. Circuit.
Actual Circuit Total inductance:15.4 H (154x0.1H) Total resistance:1 m  RB output current:13 kA RB output voltage:190 V Main Power Converter RB circuit.
D1/D2 Circuit Baseline Update Rationales for Baseline Discussion B. Auchmann, F. Rodriguez Mateos, A. Verweij, D. Wollmann CERN, TE-MPE.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
QPS Signal Analysis Case studies from MPP and QPS Bob Flora.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
J.C. Perez, S. Izquierdo Bermudez 11T Dipole models instrumentation.
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit protection point of view Arjan Verweij, CERN, TE-MPE with input from M. Prioli, R. Schmidt, and A. Siemko A.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
TEST FACILITY STATUS FOR TESTING CERN Marta Bajko WP10. EUCARD 2 Task 4 - HTS Magnet Tests, June 2015.
The most likely cause of death for a superconducting magnet Input data for thermal modeling of Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Magnets by Andrew Davies Find the.
Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
09/05/ Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project 2 nd Workshop of the Spanish Traineeship.
Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project
S. Feher MICE Magnet Readiness Review RAL, June 28th, 2016
Considerations from machine protection and the ELQA teams
MQY-30 Test Result Report
STEAM Applications Part I The circuit point of view
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
State of discussions in preparation for the HL-LHC Circuits Review
Superconducting Circuits, a generic view
Circuits description and requirements
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
Circuit-protection aspects of different preliminary magnet-design options
Powering the LHC Magnets
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
Concepts for magnet circuit powering and protection M
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit-protection point-of-view
Dipole circuit & diode functioning
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Status of studies on FCC magnet circuit architecture and protection
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Quench detection electronics for the HL-LHC magnet circuits of the LHC
3 issues identified in review
WP3 Meeting – December the 10th 2015 H. Prin
Hilumi WP3 meeting, 1 October 2014
MQXFS1e – PH-to-Coil hipot tests
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
ECR on pole order of the HL-LHC IT circuit and resulting implications
Electrical integrity of magnets and coils
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

D1 and D2 powering and protection B. Auchmann, A. Fernandez Navarro, F. Rodriguez Mateos, A. Verweij, D. Wollmann

Overview 1 or 2 circuits? Warm bypass diodes? Heaters and/or CLIQ? Heater redundancy Detection method

Criteria

1 or 2 Circuits The proposed single-circuit configuration differs from a two-circuit solution only on the warm side. A change between configurations is possible. The powering through a single 13-kA PC brings substantial cost savings. No trims are necessary (E. Todesco). Warm bypass diodes decouple D1 and D2 (heaters only fired in quenching magnet). There are no unprotected cold busbar segments/splices. PC with crowbar Warm bypass diodes Warm bridge SC Link D1/Triplet SC Link D2/Q4

Warm Bypass Diodes Warm bypass diodes decouple the protection of D1 and D2. Protection is activated only in the quenching magnet. Reduces cryogenic load. Without bypass diodes, both magnets are heated and small differences in protection efficiency make one magnet absorb stored energy of the other magnet. Tests on individual magnets are, therefore, representative for the operational scenario. In failure scenarios, diodes reduce voltages to ground. In case of FPA protection in both magnets must still be activated. The warm bypass diode represents a new critical protection element that needs to be developed and tested with its heat sink and leads.

Heaters or CLIQ? Both systems effectively and redundantly protect the magnet. Being single-layer coils, the difference between CLIQ and heaters in terms of hot spot temperature is small (~270 K hot spot in D1, lower in D2). Voltage to ground during nominal operation is higher with CLIQ (~700 V). Heater power-supply failures lead to comparable voltages to ground. Main difference between CLIQ and heaters is that CLIQ is a new system. We propose redundant heater-protection, the installation of CLIQ leads, and high-voltage reception tests compatible with the use of CLIQ. Heaters with optional non-redundant CLIQ. Fully redundant CLIQ-only protection

Heater Redundancy (Very) worst case assumptions: up to two heater power-supply per magnet might fail during operation. heater strips might fail due to open-circuit or short to ground. During operation 4 high-field heater circuits per magnet are needed, with 2oo4 enough for protection. Low-field strips to provide redundancy. As an alternative to the low-field circuits, CLIQ could be connected. Nominal heater-circuit configurations D1 D2 1 circuit per HF pair of heaters on either side of each aperture. (Same as MB.) 1 circuit per HF heater or HF and LF heaters in series.

Quench Detection D1 being a single-aperture dipole, it cannot be protected from (top/down-) symmetric quenches by comparison of pole voltages. A combination of pole voltages and an induction-compensated detector are proposed, i.e., two fully independent systems. A high-current dI/dt sensor needs to be developed / procured. Note that, if CLIQ leads are installed, all voltage taps can be on the warm side of the circuit.

Summary We tend towards a single circuit with warm bypass diodes (to be developed), 4 (+4 spare) heater circuits per magnet, CLIQ leads for unforeseen events on heaters and/or tests of CLIQ-only protection in an accelerator environment, and a dual quench detection (comparison and active inductive compensation).