Scenarios framework – exploring ‘practice’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DT Coursework By D. Henwood.
Advertisements

TECHNOLOGY IN THE NEW ZEALAND CURRICULUM 2007 What does it all mean? 1.
Geography Subject leaders Training Exploring the content of the new National Curriculum.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
Look, no hands! Teaching qualitative research methods using problem based learning Sally Wiggins Dept of Psychology University of Strathclyde.
Research and Innovation Portfolio Research Support & Performance Team – Implementing Positioning for Growth Recommendations – Response to Staff Feedback.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Lead Practitioner (Safeguarding) Briefings Autumn 2013.
Step 2: Inviting to Challenge Group. DON’T! Before getting into the training, it’s important that you DON’T just randomly send someone a message asking.
Proposal in Detail – Part 1 Project Description, Timeframes and Risks.
GILDED wp2 – Comparative report. Comments Data correction and data amendment Maps – project map - case study areas maps – sources ????? Deadline ?
Innovative Schools toolkit STRATEGIC WORKSHOP 2 Exploring good practice case studies.
Marking and Feedback CPD Student approach to marking.
We don’t know who discovered the water, but we know it wasn’t the fish - McLuhan 182MC Critical Media Methods Ady Evans
Project Management What is a project? Project life cycle? Process Risk management Time management Why do projects fail? EXAMPLE Cartoon EXAMPLE Project.
A305: Week 5 Deep Learning in the Long Run. Goals for Today (+ Section) Understand/analyze/reflect: What conditions or experiences are needed to build.
Business Process Review Academic Registry Student Systems and Administration Business Process Review Team Karen Williams February 2008.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide The Quality Improvement Guide Insert Date here Presenter:
Milton Road LLF Design Engagement Paul van de Bulk 12 September 2017.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
Study Tips For A Great Education In Math.
What is research? Marie Hobson,
Specifying Repository Requirements
East of England In-House Programme Workshop 2/2
2nd Annual Growing School Mental Health Summit June 13, 2017
Developing effective faculty processes for quality assessment
Consultation: Your Say ….
Investment Logic Mapping – An Evaluative Tool with Zing
Implementing the NHS KSF Action Planning and Surgery Session
A new approach to regulating small firms
Site Update Action Teams
Preparing for a Job Interview 101
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING
Place Standard How Good is Our Place?
Friday 6 March 2015 etc. Venues Prospero House Conference Evaluation
- Where it comes from - How we use it
An introduction to middle leadership
Recap Normative Ethics
Release 3 Plan Options Decision
Update for Adult Leaders, Managers, Supporters and Young Leaders
L.O. – What do we have to do in Unit 25?
AESS Annual Assessment Process Workshop
Safe at heart: HS2 Together
Are you ready to become a Young Professional?
Psychology Life Hack of the Week
Choosing and using Outcome Mapping well
Your University logo goes here
GCSE Revision In response to a large number of Y11 students asking for advice on how to revise….. Introduction & revision planning Revision techniques.
Training of trainers, part 1
Quality Improvement Initiative Title Presenter Name(s)
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Evaluation of Research Training in Biochemistry
My Performance Appraisal How to write SMART objectives
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
INTRO TO ELA: Flipping the Script & Building a Culture of Collaboration, Part 2 Welcome! Yay! December! Final session!
Session Law Water Quality Permitting for Composters
Training of trainers, part 1
Programme planning FAME Business Planning
People Lead: This is the visual representation of our model. This model supports and reinforces our definition of leadership - achieving results, with.
Introduction to the Review of the SI MQs NatSIP Associate/Scrutiner
to the Camden Early Help Friends Workshop
A modest attempt at measuring and communicating about quality
WELCOME Welcome Thank you for coming
Project Lead Workshop 2 Leading for Impact
Consumer Conversations and Aged Care Standards
How to deliver a Microsoft Cloud Workshop
Madley Parish Council 2nd May 2019 Nick Pollock Head of Planning
Next steps for scenarios 9 February 2017
Programme planning FAME Business Planning
Presentation transcript:

Scenarios framework – exploring ‘practice’ 2 March 2017 workshop

Aim of today Recap on last meeting Brief look at revised scenario matrix Explore what is ‘improved’ and ‘water sensitive’ practice Looking ahead

Recap on last meeting Need to see how working group material fits in Fix up language bias Scenarios need to be able to be picked apart Make sure PT is transparent Provisional ‘proceed’ given

Revised scenario matrix Note handout Change in language Feedback is really welcome, but do so by coming to a PT member, or emailing us Now we’re going to look at some of the key questions in completing the scenarios

Handout you received last week shows this diagram These are the 3 key questions to answer so that we have completed scenario packages ready for the modellers by the end of March GO THROUGH THE QUESTIONS SLOWLY We’re looking for scenarios that are narrative but also specific and really reflect what you guys are interested in exploring Plenty of tasks within!

Three questions In order to complete scenarios: Today March 23rd For new urban, where is it? What kind of density?  2 For all land use change and practice, when does it occur? 3 For all areas, what is improved or water sensitive practice? 1 Today March 23rd Today we’re focusing on the first question – all about practice and how the material you guys developed in the working groups last year. Practice means the way we undertake or manage activities that impact water – whether these be in the urban areas, rurally, about asset management or land use – in other words, across all the activities you guys covered in the three working groups. Improved means better than today; water sensitive means really having water quality outcomes to the heart of decision making about management approaches and is a step up in effort from improved We’ve gots lots of material from the RI, SWWW and UD working groups to translate into this practice concept – the next bit of the presentation takes you through our proposal for how to do this. This will then be followed by a big workshop activity where you can really come to grips with how this might work.

Method behind today Modellers/PT/WWL meeting January For all areas, what improved or water sensitive practice? 1 Method behind today Modellers/PT/WWL meeting January Advice on suitability of options for modelling Work by PT since 9 February Sorting options into ‘improved’ and ‘water sensitive’ The recommendations for how your material maps onto the proposed framework came from two steps: Meeting with the modellers in January (as mentioned last meeting) where they identified that both all options made sense, but that some might need to be analysed outside of the scenario matrix framework Since the last meeting with the Committee, taking this material and sorting them against the Improved and Water Sensitive options to create the groupings that we’re presenting today

Sorting the Rural Issues WG material For all areas, what improved or water sensitive practice? 1 Sorting the Rural Issues WG material At this point, grab the handouts on the desk. These show… Explain each category Talk through hand out Note forestry to be confirmed still

Sorting the Stormwater and Wastewater WG material For all areas, what improved or water sensitive practice? 1 Sorting the Stormwater and Wastewater WG material Talk through each grouping I and W categories are effectively the same as for the Rural Issues work New “I + W” category means could use this option in both (or either) depending on the level at which its undertaken. An example of this is for the management options around wastewater overflows. For these, the Project Team would like to come back to you with options for how to put this together. Two other categories too: WWTP – recommend we analyse this outside the big framework because – very important (particularly re cultural and social values) but don’t think the information we have is useful for modelling the impacts of the discharge, how it mixes etc ‘Other’ – these management options are probably too hard to put into integrated scenario packages (lack of knowledge, novel approaches etc), but it would still be really useful to have information around what they might be able to achieve and cost

Sorting the Urban Development WG material For all areas, what improved or water sensitive practice? 1 Sorting the Urban Development WG material Use narratives relating to practice: Improved = Best practice Water sensitive = ‘Better than best practice’ Technical input to further tease out practices

A Integrated scenarios B Separate analyses Analysis of stormwater management options: First flush diversion Brake pads Improving compliance on industrial/trade sites Wastewater network overflow reduction options Wastewater treatment plant impact analysis Water take and use analysis Integrated scenarios A Separate analyses B

From here: Workshop practice material today PT revise, based on today’s discussion Request advice from technical experts on finer detail, including getting Committee/ modellers together PT recommendations for how these could come together Bear with us, there’s a lot of tasks within!