HRM 28 Update 12/05/2016 F.L. Maciariello, F.-X. Nuiry, M. Butcher, K. Karagiannis, V. Kain, L. Mircea, M. Calviani, O. Aberle, S. Burger, T. Lefevre,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HiRadMat Beryllium thermal shock test Kavin Ammigan PASI 2 nd Annual Meeting RAL, UK April 2013 Contributors: P. Hurh, B. Hartsell.
Advertisements

SINTEF Petroleum Research The strength of fractured rock Erling Fjær SINTEF Petroleum Research 1.
Innovations in HMA Performance Testing John D’Angelo D’Angelo Consulting, LLC Canadian User Producer Group for Asphalt.
MERIT beam spot size (Saturations & projections) Goran Skoro 13 August 2008.
Low beam intensity (MERIT beam spot size – part II) Goran Skoro 30 June 2008.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Simulations of Pressure Waves induced by Proton Pulses In search of the answer to the fundamental question: are materials indeed stronger than what we.
EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF KEY PARAMETERS FOR MODELLING THE TENSILE AND COMPRESSIVE FATIGUE BEHAVIOUR OF NOTCHED GRP LAMINATES Bill Broughton, Mike.
TED Thermomechanical Analyses Esposito Raffaele EN-STI-TCD.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Glassy Carbon Tests at HiRadMat 14 March 2014 C. Garion2 Outline: Introduction Context: Transparent.
FAILURE INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND DISTANT HEATING PIPELINE
HMRT23: Overview of calculations performed HRMT23 Internal Review, 3/7/2014 F. Carra, M. Garlasché, P. Gradassi, G. Maitrejean, A. Salgado Paz EN-MME-EDS.
Recent Results from Dragonfire Armor Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, John Pulsifer UC San Diego HAPL Meeting, Naval Research Laboratory.
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
BNL E951 BEAM WINDOW EXPERIENCE Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Neutrino Working Group Brookhaven National Laboratory.
HRM Technical Board April 28 th, 2015 Fausto Lorenzo Maciariello, on behalf of many colleagues: F-X Nuiry, V. Kain, J. Uythoven, O. Aberle, R. Folch, R.
TCDIM François-Xavier Nuiry September 16 th 2015.
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998) MATERIALS SCIENCE &ENGINEERING.
HRM28-TCDI Updates June 24 th, 2015 Fausto Lorenzo Maciariello, F-X Nuiry, R. Ferriere, K. Karagiannis, M. Butcher, G. Vorraro, S. Le Fouest.
CERN-SLAC meeting June, The LHC Collimator Project LHC Collimators for Phase 1 CERN-SLAC meeting – June, Palo Alto, Ca Alessandro Bertarelli.
Results of microphone tests in HiRadMat Collimation WG Meeting Daniel Deboy on behalf of the Collimation team, thanks to A. Masi, J. Lendaro,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
P. 1Mario Deile – Meeting on Experiment Protection from Beam Failures Protecting TOTEM Mario Deile PH-TOT
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Engineering Department ENEN Collimator Robustness Studies with BCMS Beams Collimation Working Group F. Carra, A. Bertarelli, R. Bruce, P. Gradassi,
MKI failure event 17-April-11 Recall from logbook: MKI D (1st one seen by the beam) had a real flashover between the two sets of 36b during the 3rd 72b.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
High Intensity Beam Test of Beryllium for Target and Beam Window Applications Presented by: Brian Hartsell Contributors: Kavin Ammigan, Patrick Hurh NBI.
F.Staufenbiel / EuCARD 2 / Heat load and stress studies of the ILC collimator G. Moortgat-Pick 1;2 S. Riemann 2, F. Staufenbiel 2, A. Ushakov.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement EuCARD2 ColMat HDED.
Alessandro BertarelliTS department Seminar, 3 rd May 2006 EDMS Alessandro Dallocchio 1,2 Alessandro Bertarelli 1 1 TS department – Mechanical and Material.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
Energy deposition as function of intensity and emittance  The damage potential of a beam does not only depend on the total intensity Energy deposition.
TPSG4 Run 3 Konstantinos Karagiannis, on behalf of the TCD Team – January 20 th 2016.
HRM28-TCDI Updates October 28 th, 2015 Fausto Lorenzo Maciariello, on behalf of the TCD Team.
ISSUES TO ADDRESS... How do flaws in a material initiate failure? How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different material classes compare? How.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH Bolko Beutner, Winfried Decking,
Thermo-mechanical modeling of high energy particle beam impacts M. Scapin*, L. Peroni*, A. Dallocchio** * Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi,
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
Chiara Di Paolo EN-STI-TCD Material Choice for the Vacuum Window at the Exit of BTM.
on behalf of the Phase II Collimation Design team
STI test HRMT-35 and Collimator plans for 2017 Special ColUSM: Material and design readiness for LS2 productions 2th May 2017 I. Lamas Garcia,
TDI: to coat or not to coat?
Proposal TDIS-TZM WP14 TDIS jaw validation testing
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
TDI Coating test at HiRadMat Proposal 1605 HRMT-35 HiRadMat Technical Board Meeting 15th September 2016 EDMS I. Lamas Garcia, M. Butcher,
Materials for extreme thermal management (PowerMat)
Thermo-mechanical analysis of the D3 dump in the TT2 line (PS)
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
TCTW Collimator Design F. Carra1,2 A. Bertarelli, M. Garlasche, L
of secondary light ion beams
STUDIES OF THE STRIPLINE KICKER FOR BEAM EXTRACTION FROM THE CLIC DRs
TDI Coating test at HiRadMat Proposal 1605 HiRadMat Scientific Board Meeting 27th June 2016 I. Lamas Garcia, M. Calviani, R. Ferreire, A. Perillo-Marcone.
Federico Carra – EN-MME
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
LH Generated Hot Spots on the JET Divertor
Thursday morning – optics correction
Damage Levels V. Kain AB/Co
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
External Review of LHC Collimation Project Oliver Aberle 1th July 2004
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
VELA TDC: Bunch Length and Longitudinal Phasespace Measurements Update
FATIGUE FATIGUE Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq
First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH
Thu :00 Dumped beams, refill for Pb-Pb physics. No more protons in 2011… Some changes: Increase of flat top total voltage to 14 MV. Feed-forward.
Presentation transcript:

HRM 28 Update 12/05/2016 F.L. Maciariello, F.-X. Nuiry, M. Butcher, K. Karagiannis, V. Kain, L. Mircea, M. Calviani, O. Aberle, S. Burger, T. Lefevre, C. Bracco, A. Sounas, G. Trad.

The High Radiation to Matertials Test-Bench Graphite 2123 PT (Mersen) C/C A412 (Mersen) Particle Beam Graphite Sigrafine® R4550 (SGL) Sepcarb® 3D C/C (Safran-Herakles)

[7-04-2016] Measurements of the beam spot size + location (X and Y): BTV: Ok for 1 bunch nominal, problems in getting images with 12 bunches, BSRT, Ok, BPKG, Ok. The beam location was rather stable within the expected jitter of +/-0.15 mm. Set-up phase for the graphite jaws: Beam based alignment (1 bunch nominal, no BLM saturation), Graphite SGL jaw located at 1.5 sigma impact parameter. Vibrometer alignment: Horizontally scanning the beam with the 5th axis and looking for the strongest displacement signal on the vibrometer. During this phase  issues with the DAQ system (crashed few times) as well as the trigger (sometimes not seen by the DAQ).

Vibrometer Live Alignment X Beam Scan Direction Y Beam Position Theoretical Beam Initial Position of the Vivrometer = Theoretical Beam Real Beam In order to find the maximum displacements signal, a beam scan with the vibrometer was performed 8 9 6 11 1 2 4

High intensity shots on the SGL Graphite: Graphite jaw was impacted 2 times with 288 bunches beam, recorded with the HD and Radhard camera before and after each shot (internal cameras didn’t transmit any images even if they still have power). The DAQ system crashed both times, so no signal response from the vibrometer. 1 sigma impact parameter confirmed (Chiara). High intensity shots on Mersen Graphite: Positioning the jaw on 1.5 sigma impact parameter and impacting two times with 288 bunches beam. 3rd high intensity shot on SGL Graphite: In order to try to record data from the vibrometer a 3rd high density shot on SGL Graphite was done. The jaw was placed on 1.5 sigma impact parameter and it was impacted with a 288 bunches beam. The DAQ worked.

HRM28 Results 288 Bunches Impact 12 Bunches Impacts The results showed an outstanding agreement between the experimental measurements and the simulations The displacements increase linearly during the phase of load application (the beam pulse length lasts about 7.8 μs), then the surface smoothly tends to reach its initial position through small oscillations of about one micrometer of maximum amplitude 12 Bunches Impacts Exceptional repetitiveness of the results was also noticed

Strain Rate Behavior Dependency Before After No visual damages on the graphite The tensile limit of the graphite is higher with dynamic loads (strain rate: 5×102 s-1) than with static ones (strain rate: 0.5×10-4 s-1) [2]   Sigrafine® R4550 Max. temperature [ ̊C] 1348 Max. Principal Stress/ Tensile Strength [MPa] 40.1/30 Min. Principal Stress/Compressive Strength [MPa] -80/-118 Mohr-Coulomb Safety Factor 0.72 [2] “Investigation of Dynamic Fracture Behaviour of Graphite” Lorenzo Peroni, Martina Scapin, Federico Carra, Nicola Mariani, Departement of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino and CERN, Geneva Switzerland

Low Intensity Shots (12 bunches) Pulse Beam Location (BPKG) H[mm] x V[mm] 1 0.14 x 0.26 2 0.21 x 0.31 3 0.20 x 0.29 4 0.18 x 0.26 5 0.18 x 0.25 6 0.18 x 0.22 7 0.15 x 0.22 8 9 0.16 x 0.25 10 0.18 x 0.18 11 0.17 x 0.25 12 0.13 x 0.21 The beam location was rather stable within the expected jitter of +/-0.15 mm

High Intensity Shots (288 bunches) Pulse Intensity Beam Location (BPKG) H[mm] x V[mm] Beam Spot Size (BSRT) σx X σy [mm x mm] 1 3.235 E13 0.28 x 0.21 0.47 x 0.37 2 3.213 E13 0.28 x 0.23 0.44 x 0.38 3 3.263 E13 0.27 x 0.23 0.43 x 0.37 4 3.229 E13 0.26 x 0.21 0.45 x 0.37 5 3.178 E13 0.34 x 0.27 0.43 x 0.36 Suggested action: run a new simulation with the parameters measured

Actions taken so far [8-04-2016] Set-up phase for the 3D C/C jaws: Beam based alignment done. Few single bunch nominal intensity pulses needed before restarting (to check the beam location). Vibrometer alignment: Horizontally scanning the beam with the 5th axis and looking for the strongest displacement signal on the vibrometer. Not completed yet, we need to scan the jaw on the other direction as well.

Next actions … Vibrometer alignment: Vibrometer alignment on Herakles 3D C/C jaw with 12 bunches beam. High intensity shots on Herakles 3D C/C: Positioning the jaw on 1.5 sigma impact parameter and impacting two times with 288 bunches beam. Take pictures of the jaws before and after the shots. High intensity shots on Mersen 3D C/C: Positioning the jaw on 1.5 sigma impact parameter and impacting two times with 288 bunches beam.

!!! Thank You !!!