Grid Soil sampling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Core Training Feb 9th In-Service
Advertisements

 Wheat Lots of $ › Sprayer, No-till/Air seeder, GPS, Yield Monitor, Combine,  Wheat a little $ › Grid, Veris, GPS Yield Monitor, Nrich and GS  Corn.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Sorghum Fertility Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences.
What is the purpose of this presentation? n Provide a better understanding of site specific yield information and the value that it can bring to your.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.
Stimulating Interest in and Adoption of Precision Agriculture Methods on Small Farm Operations A Discussion of the Jefferson County Experience National.
Alfalfa Fertility Brian Arnall Soil Ferity Extension OSU.
On-Farm Response Tests for P & K Peter Scharf University of Missouri Plant Sciences.
 Errors or differences in Soil samples ◦ Collection method > laboratory ◦ Environment > laboratory  Field Variability ◦ Composite sample no matter area.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations Soil Education Short Course.
2014 Agronomy Seedsmanship Conference Precision Farming Technologies Overview Dr. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Total Number of Samples Tested.
Soil Fertility Considerations Part of the Ruminant Livestock: Facing New Economic Realities Meetings.
Spatial Variability in Precision Agriculture What is it? What is it? – Precision n. The quality or state of being precise. Used or intended for precise.
1413 E. Poplar St. Algona, IA Ph:
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
 Part of › Amino Acids: Building blocks of proteins › Enzymes: responsible for all biological process › Nucleic Acids › Cholorphyll  Needed for Carbohydrate.
The Glory of the farmer is that, in the division of labors, it’s his part to create. Emerson Help farmers make some money, and they will share it with.
Chapter 3: Soil Sampling And Soil Sensing
Agronomy Consulting and Soil Sampling in Precision Ag. By Josh Pittman.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Katlynn Weathers Soil 4213 April 10,  What is precision agriculture?  What makes it so special?  How can grid soil sampling help?
 Part of › Amino Acids: Building blocks of proteins › Enzymes: responsible for all biological process › Nucleic Acids › Cholorphyll  Needed for Carbohydrate.
Delineating Zones for Variable rate Seeding a Fertility Mgt. Chad Godsey Godsey Precision Ag.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
No-till Oklahoma Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Through Use of Optical Sensors Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University
Need for Soil Testing? By Drew Mosburg Soil
Soil pH P & K N & S Secondary & Micros Multi- Nutrient Variable Application In-Season Cues  Much like a Ladder › One Step at a Time.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
OSU Soil Fertility Crop absorption of immobile nutrients (P and K). Absorption is from just a thin cylinder of soil around each root.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Soil Fertility in Muskogee County
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
Components of a Variable Rate Nitrogen Rec
Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Corn Production
High Rock Lake Watershed:
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Grid Soil Sampling Brian Arnall.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Sorghum Production (bushels)
Multi-year Experience with Yield Monitoring
Spatial Variability in Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Precision Agriculture
Lesson 4 – Fertilizing Soils
MK MINERALS MK Minerals' Pelletized Calcium Rate and Application Timing Study on Established Alfalfa 04-MKM Yield – Tons/Acre Tons Per ACRE.
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2017
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
Cost Conscious Wheat Production
Zones Grids and EC.
Oklahoma State University February 2002
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
STP 75% suff 90% Suff STK 80-90%.
Manure’s Fertility Value
In-Field Soil Sampling
Jamie long, C.C.A. Josh Gunther, C.C.A.
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2014
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
Grid Sampling: Point vs. Random
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016
Fertilizer Price: per lb of N
Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences
Presentation transcript:

Grid Soil sampling

Multi- Nutrient Variable Application Soil Fertility Issues Soil pH P & K N & S Secondary & Micros Multi- Nutrient Variable Application In-Season Cues Much like a Ladder One Step at a Time.

Are you thinking about it? What field? When? What resolution/size? How often?

111.58 acre field

Composite pH 4.8 Buffer Index 6.7 Soil Test P: 68 ppm (136 STP) 1.2 Lime Rec ton ac-1 (1.4 & 155 ton) 133 tons $3325 Soil Test P: 68 ppm (136 STP) Soil Test K: 113 ppm (226 STK) Soil Test S: 12 (YG of 120 bpa)

Soil Type

Soil pH

Buffer Index

pH Buffer Index

VRT Lime Map

Lime VRT lime (wheat rec) 149 tons on 111 acs 4 acres Zero Rec. 26 acre with .5 ton rec 25 acre with 1 ton 44 acre with 1.7 ton 12 acre with 3 ton. Under applied on 56 over applied on 30.

Phos

Potassium

0-0-60

Potassium VRT k 96 ac Potential Yield loss at 60 bpa 2480 lb K20 approx. $1000. 40 ac 100% 0 lbs 40 ac 87% 30 lbs 32 ac 80% 40 lbs Potential Yield loss at 60 bpa 697 bushels @4.51 = $2,819

Sulfur

CEC

Field in the End Lime flat Lime VRT Flat K K VRT $3325 Lime VRT $3725 Flat K $0 input $2819 in loss yield K VRT $1000 ( add 800 for app) $1800 more. VRT spent +$400 on Lime, +1800 on K but made $1019 on P Would have cost $1,100 to $1,332. On this 111 ac Field 2.5 grid had a 1 yr net of -$600.

104 ac Field in Noble Co.

Composite pH 5.3 Buffer Index 6.6 Soil Test P: 40 Soil Test K: 356 Lime Rec 1.7 ton ac-1 166 tons $4,420 Soil Test P: 40 P2O5 Rec 20 lbs. 2,080 lbs $832 Soil Test K: 356 Soil Test S: 19 Soil Test, everything else- good.

pH

Buffer Index

pH Buffer Index

Lime Rec Ton/ac

Lime VRT lime 115 tons on 84 acs 20 acres Zero Rec. 2.6 acre with 3 ton rec 55 acre with 1 ton 25 acres about right.

Phosphorus

Pos Rec

Phos VRT P 96 ac Potential Yield loss at 50 bpa 3293 lb P205 approx. $1317. Over 30ac Under 52 8 ac 100% 0 lbs 22 ac 95% 10 lbs 22 ac 90% 20 lbs 14 ac 80% 40 lbs 20 ac 62% 50 lbs 18 ac 45% 60 lbs Potential Yield loss at 50 bpa 897 bushels @4.51 = $4,045

Field in the End Lime flat Lime VRT Flat P P VRT $4420 Lime VRT $2875 Flat P $832 input $4045 in loss yield P VRT $1837 ( add 520 for app) $1005 more. VRT saved $1545 on Lime, made $3040 on P Would have cost $1,155. On this 104 ac Field 2.5 grid had a net of $3430.

Hillsdale

Composite pH 5.8 Buffer Index 6.9 Soil Test P: 64 Soil Test K: 423 Lime Rec 1 ton ac-1 101 tons $3030 Soil Test P: 64 Soil Test K: 423 Soil Test S: 13 Soil Test, everything else- good.

Soil pH

Buffer pH

VRT Lime

Lime VRT lime 32 tons on 24 acs 1 ton/ac on 9 ac 1.5 ton/ac on 16 Over applied on 77 Under applied on 16

Phosphorus

VRT P

Phos VRT P 50 ac Potential Yield loss at 100bpa 1,350 lb P205 approx $1040 w/app. 15 ac 95% 13 ac 85% 13 ac 80% 5.5 ac 70% 4 ac 40% Potential Yield loss at 100bpa 935 bushels

Field in the End Lime flat Lime VRT Flat P P VRT $3030 Lime VRT $960 Flat P $0 input $4675 in loss yield P VRT $1040 VRT saved $2070 on Lime, made $3635 on P Would have cost $1010. On this 101 ac Field 2.5 grid had a net of $4695.

Deer Creek 75.3 Acres

On the Average Soil pH 5.3 Buffer Index 6.5 Soil Test P 48 Lime Rec ton/ac 2.2 Total Tons 166 Soil Test P 48 P Rec lb/ac 15 Total lbs 1130 Soil Test K 430 K rec lb/ac 0

pH

Thank you!!! Brian Arnall 373 Ag Hall b.arnall@okstate.edu 405-744-1722 b.arnall@okstate.edu Presentation available @ www.npk.okstate.edu Twitter: @OSU_NPK www.Facebook/OSUNPK YouTube Channel: OSUNPK Blog: OSUNPK.com www.Aglandlease.info