Muon simulation status from Dubna

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Monte Carlo simulation of the background for the Drell-Yan COMPASS Marialaura Colantoni Laboratory of Nuclear Problems Dubna Marialaura.
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
 Improve lepton-photon-hadron separation in the FMS to do  Some examples  J/Ψ physics in pAu and pp at forward rapidities  current status from chris.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
ハイパー核ガンマ線分光用 磁気スペクトロメータ -SksMinus- 東北大学 大学院理学研究科 白鳥昂太郎 ATAMI.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Forum March 2003H.Taureg1 Magnetic Fields in ALICE Mapping and Monitoring.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
16 June, 2015 В.И. Тельнов 1 Two-photon experiments with detector MD1 at VEPP-4 Valery Telnov Budker INP and Novosibirsk St. Univ. PHOTON 2015, June 16,
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Ivan Vitev & The First Precise Determination of Quark Energy Loss in Nuclei Ivan Vitev (PI), Ming Liu (Co-PI), Patrick McGaughey, Benwei Zhang T-16 and.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
Spin Physics from COMPASS G. Mallot/CERN On Behalf of the Compass Collaboration Spin 2003, Seattle 4-7 August, 2003.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
FCAL Workshop Munich -17 October 2006FCAL Workshop Munchen -17 October 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Review and Perspective of Muon Studies Marco Destefanis Università degli Studi di Torino PANDA Collaboration Meeting GSI (Germany) September 5-9, 2011.
G.Alexeev for Dubna group ITEP, April 28, 2010 Muon System Status Report from Dubna Hardware : * Full Scale prototype - in preparation to be put in work.
1 Stop pair production in photon-photon collision at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig DESY (Zeuthen) A.N.Skachkova, N.B.Skachkov.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Dipole Magnetic Field Effect on the Antiproton Beam
Status of MEG-I physics analysis
PANDA Muon Group Meeting, Protvino 7 June 2011 G
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Status of the PandaRoot simulation of the Forward RICH
Propagation of Reconstructed Tracks
Dubna/JINR Status & Plans
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
LKr inefficiency measurement
Cross section of the process
Progress report since june 2010
G.Alexeev for Dubna group ITEP, April 28, Muon System Status Report from Dubna.
Tracking muons in Panda(Root)
Spectrometer Magnetic Field for Neutron Beta Decay at the SNS
Track Finding.
ITEP /4/2010 – II Panda Russia Meeting – Maria Pia Bussa
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Status report on CATA-01/POLA-01 coincidence measurements
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Muon simulation status from Dubna Valery Rodionov ITEP, April 28, 2010. Outlook: Muon system in PandaRoot MC: DY (-,+) registration efficiency by muon system as function of polar angle of DY effective photon: -- muon detectors only: with/without magnetic field -- full PANDA setup(material): with/without magnetic field -- how to improve acceptance MC: J/ (-,+) registration efficiency by muon system as function of polar angle of J/ XXXI Panda meeting, December 7-12, 2009

PANDA setup in PandaRoot Muon system in PANDA TS/barrel: 12 layers of MDT inside the yoke + “zero” bi-layer. TS/endcap: 5 layers MuonFilter: 4 x (60mm/Fe + MDT) FS: “zero” bi-layer+16 x(60mm/Fe +MDT)

DY (- , +) registration efficiency by muon system: selection criterion for (- , +) rejection: No hit (muon system) at least for one muon from pair. The point of study: the “cross”-like hole in Target Spectrometer. The fraction of muons from the DY pairs (one or both) are passing through the hole (Endcap+MuonFilter) without giving the hits in MDT’s.  The efficiency registration by Forward muon system. If we loose (no hits in muon system) at least one muon from the (- , +)  an event is rejected. The task: MC based registration efficiency estimation for such type events. MC: full setup calculation. The only muon system is shown. For demonstation: 80 (- , +) in one event; only - are visible

Geometrical acceptance of muon system in case of: muon detectors only (without Solenoid and Yoke). Pythia as event generator (40K DY events) + PandaRoot. Option: with/without magnetic field in Solenoid/Dipole. PANDA muon system. For demonstration the geometrical acceptance of muon system, the simulated 50 DY events are presented on the same figure.

Geometrical acceptance study of muon system in case of: full PANDA setup (material). Pythia as event generator (40K DY events) + PandaRoot. Option: with/without magnetic field in Solenoid/Dipole. Polar angle distribution of DY photons.

Current design: Endcap: 3 Layers with small hole + 2 Layers with holes for DC MF: 4 Layers with holes for DC An option: Endcap: 4 Layers with small hole + 1 Layers with holes for DC MF: 4 Layers with holes for DC Front and cut view of Endcap/MF. Left: current design. Right: Optional.

Geometrical acceptance study of muon system in case of: full PANDA setup (material). Pythia as event generator (40K DY events) + PandaRoot. Option: with/without magnetic field in Solenoid/Dipole. Option#1: 4 Layers with small hole + 1 Layers with holes for DC

Stopping in Dipole/Ecal(Forward) Geometrical acceptance study of muon system in case of: full PANDA setup (material). Pythia as event generator (40K DY events) + PandaRoot. Option#1: with magnetic field in Solenoid/Dipole. Finally: ~12% losses of DY events with selection criterion: no hits in muon system for at least one muon from DY (-,+). The relative loses for DY events in muon system 65% Forward region 5% “beam pipe” 30% Stopping in Dipole/Ecal(Forward) XXXI Panda meeting, December 7-12, 2009

Geometrical acceptance study of muon system in case of: full PANDA setup (material). Pythia as event generator (37K J/(-,+ events) + PandaRoot. Option: with/without magnetic field in Solenoid/Dipole. Polar angle distribution of J/.

Conclusion: The MC (PandaRoot) study of DY(-,+) and J/ (-,+) registration efficiency by muon system was started In current muon system design: a) the acceptance for DY pairs may be increased to ~ 88% by introducing minor changes in MDT layers design in Endcap  this is a point for further studies/discussions b) the acceptance for J/ looks better and less sensitive to magnetic field as compared to DY 3) In order to get more detailed results, we need the higher statistical samples (at least 1M events for each process  DY, J/ and D-mesons)