This presentation is best viewed in Slide Show mode

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fit to Learn Using the Employability Skills Framework to improve your performance at College The Employability Skills Framework has been developed by business.
Advertisements

Part 2 Analyzing an Advergame. Critical = criteria-based. In other words, a list of “things” that you will use to judge a “Text” by.  Critical thinking.
Computer Systems Week 3: Social Issues Alma Whitfield.
Outcome: Talking The candidate will: Take part in straightforward interactions, by: Select ideas and content using a format and structure appropriate to.
Presentation Skills The ‘Three’ Stage Process
Persuasion and writing winning proposals Logos, ethos, pathos.
Learning Objective To know how to write for different purposes.
Learning Objective Chapter 6 Business Writing Copyright © 2001 South-Western College Publishing Co. Objectives O U T L I N E Developing Written Documents.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. 1 Software Testing 1 CSE 3411 SWE 5411 Assignment #1 Replicate and Edit Bugs.
HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR FORMAL ESSAY. WHY SHOULD YOU PLAN AN ESSAY? It helps you to remember details. You can organise your thoughts and work out what is.
Presentations and Reports. Third Week (2/2/12)  Meet at the Albertsons Library in room LIB 203  Beth Brin will demonstrate the use of several databases.
Quick Write Reflection How will you implement the Engineering Design Process with your students in your classes?
Students present information, concepts, and ideas to an audience of listeners or readers on a variety of topics knowing how, when and why to say what to.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Developing Proposals Winning Your Audience. Design Activities Need Recognition*Identify basic needs (purpose, reason for design) Problem definitionDefine.
Report writing skills A Trade union training on research methodology, TMLC, Kisumu, Kenya 6-10 December 2010 Presentation by Mohammed Mwamadzingo,
REPORTING YOUR PROJECT OUTCOMES HELEN MCBURNEY. PROGRAM FOR TODAY: Report Reporting to local colleagues Reporting to the Organisation Tips for abstract.
Reporting your Project Outcomes Helen McBurney. Program for today: Report Reporting to local colleagues Reporting to the Organisation Tips for abstract.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
Argumentative Evaluation and Writing
Revising Your Paper Paul Lewis With thanks to Mark Weal.
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
How to Write a Book Review. Before You Begin Remember, there is no right way to write a book review. Book reviews are highly personal and reflect the.
Critical thinking for assignments to get a better grade
The Essay: It is optional but your target school may require it!
This Week’s Agenda APA style: -In-text citation -Reference List
REPORT WRITING.
Analysis, Persuasion CV’s and Posters
Evaluating of Information
National 5 Critical Essays.
Writing your reflection in Stage 1 & 2 Indonesian (continuers)
To maximise your learning,
Reading Listening Speaking Writing Comprehension & Production Skills
Answering exam questions GCSE Physical Education
Evidence & Argument: Multiple Ways of Experiencing a Text
Liceo Scientifico Internazionale in collaboration with
MYP Descriptors – Essay Types & Rubrics
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Possible texts for writing
4 Criteria for Web Evaluation ELEMENTARY (BASIC)
Unit R006 – Creating Digital Images
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Research Report Writing and Presentation
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
LAW112 Assessment 3 Haley McEwen.
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
On-Demand Testing Prep Guide.
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
ACADEMIC WRITING in ENGINEERING PURPOSES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Year 10 Research Action Plan
AICE General Paper What IS this class?.
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
any rental, lease, or lending of the program.
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Liceo Scientifico Internazionale in collaboration with
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Zimbabwe 2008 Critical Thinking.
Lecture 1: General Communication Skills
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
9th Literature EOC Review
National 5 Critical Essays.
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
Presentation transcript:

This presentation is best viewed in Slide Show mode Read and think at your own speed by clicking on the Enter key to see each new point

Evaluate the quality & relevance of information before you use it Consider quantity of evidence presented Do writing, formatting, referencing, etc facilitate communication? Evaluate the quality & relevance of information before you use it Be aware of any bias that you bring to the task You: the information user Consider quality of evidence presented Information Evaluation Are ideas & arguments developed logically? You: the information creator Evaluate the quality of information that you have created before you submit it Establish the credentials or expertise of the creators Are ideas & arguments presented clearly? By Sandra Cochrane (Engineering & Surveying Librarian)

This resource: Introduces criteria for information evaluation Applies the evaluation criteria to you (as an author) and the information source that you are creating (through your poster) → Q Applies the evaluation criteria to a journal article about sustainability to help you learn how to evaluate information to ensure that it’s worth using

A. Be aware of YOU and YOUR potential bias: We (as people) tend to seek information in places where we expect to find the information that confirms our existing views Unless we make special efforts to open our minds to alternative points of view, we tend to maintain our existing views no matter how much evidence to the contrary is presented to us Is there anything that you can do with your poster to make it as appealing as possible, and increase the chances of opening peoples’ minds to your messages/s? Q

B. Establish credentials or expertise of author/s To give your audience confidence in your work Make your authorship clear to your audience Provide your credentials (don’t under-value your student status – saying that you are an undergraduate Urban and Regional Planning student tells your audience a lot when they are judging the value of your work) Q What formatting options are best to demonstrate your ownership of the work and to let your audience easily see your credentials?

C. Ideas & arguments should be developed & presented logically & clearly Clearly articulating the purpose of your poster allows your audience to decide whether it is relevant to them Thoughtful use of images, diagrams and tables complements your text and expresses your work concisely Emotive language can make your audience suspicious of your intentions. Objective language allows the audience to critically analyse your work and demonstrates your professionalism Poster formatting helps your reader follow your rationale, and understand your message How do all of these presentation factors influence your poster planning, and have you been realistic about the amount of time it will take to address the presentation issues? Q

D. Quality of evidence presented: Your audience will be looking for information that is up-to-date (current) According to the assignment instructions, your poster has to describe or explain or identify specified elements Description, explanation and identification are different kinds and levels of information. Your audience will be expecting to see the appropriate information level applied to the appropriate element, and will judge the quality of your presentation and professionalism accordingly The information that you present should be based on sound sources of evidence rather than your opinion. In professional practice, objectivity is paramount and professional opinion should always be backed up with evidence Q Have you addressed all of the elements comprehensively yet concisely, and to the appropriate level?

E. Quantity of evidence presented To promote your position, your poster needs to present the right amount of information Your poster should not present too much information as this will detract from its visual appeal and, as a result, your ability to communicate through it Q How will you ensure that you create a solid and credible source of information for your audience whilst maintaining visual appeal?

F. Presentation mechanics Mistakes in grammar and spelling make information difficult to understand and apply to professional situations Complete and accurate referencing allows your audience to judge the sources of information on which you have relied Text size, dot points, images, tables, diagrams and colour schemes all influence the “readability” of your poster Q Do your spelling, grammar and formatting promote the communication of your message, and your professionalism?

Applying criteria to information that you wish to use: Your poster is an information source for someone else but, what if you want to use someone else’s information to help you develop your knowledge base? You apply the very same criteria to the work that you are considering using to build your knowledge base To see how to evaluate someone else’s work, read this article and then see how the evaluation criteria has been applied One more slide to go

These criteria have been adapted from: Flateby, T., & Fehr, R. (2008). Assessing and improving writing in the engineering curriculum. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 901-905. Retrieved from http://www.ijee.dit.ie Reference for article that we evaluated: Scoones, I. (2007). Sustainability. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 589-596. doi: 10.1080/09614520701469609 Handout version of this PowerPoint presentation (in pdf) Article to which evaluation criteria is applied & application of evaluation criteria to a journal article (both in pdf) Evaluation criteria template for you to use in the future (in Word) If you’re not sure how to describe, explain or identify, check out The Learning Centre’s online help – Analysing the question More poster presentation help available on the Planning Pages