Evidence-Based Medicine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEACHING ABOUT DIAGNOSIS
Advertisements

Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Evidence-Based Physical Therapy Han, Yueh-Chin Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy National Taiwan University 2004/11/1 -- Critical appraisal of diagnosis.
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
Is it True? Evaluating Research about Diagnostic Tests
Diagnostic Tests Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics.
Critically Evaluating the Evidence: diagnosis, prognosis, and screening Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management.
TUTORIAL SCREENING Dr. Salwa Tayel, Dr. A. Almazam, Dr Afzal Mahmood
EBM for Novice Maria Kwok, MD, MPH Assistant Clinical Professor Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis in Physical Therapy Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, ATC Department of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh.
Rapid Critical Appraisal of diagnostic accuracy studies Professor Paul Glasziou Centre for Evidence Based Medicine University of Oxford
Hypothesis Testing and Comparison of Two Populations Dr. Burton.
Making sense of Diagnostic Information Dr Carl Thompson.
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Stats Tutorial. Is My Coin Fair? Assume it is no different from others (null hypothesis) When will you no longer accept this assumption?
Diagnosis Articles Much Thanks to: Rob Hayward & Tanya Voth, CCHE.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Diagnostic Cases. Goals & Objectives Highlight Bayesian and Boolean processes used in classic diagnosis Demonstrate use/misuse of tests for screening.
EBMRC How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test Akbar Soltani. MD, Endocrinologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) Endocrine and Metabolism.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
Session 4: Assessing a Document on Diagnosis Peter Tarczy-Hornoch MD Head and Professor, Division of BHI Professor, Division of Neonatology Adjunct Professor,
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
Evidence Based Practice in Psychology – Lecture 3 May 31, 2007.
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Diagnosis: EBM Approach Michael Brown MD Grand Rapids MERC/ Michigan State University.
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
1 Risk Assessment Tests Marina Kondratovich, Ph.D. OIVD/CDRH/FDA March 9, 2011 Molecular and Clinical Genetics Panel for Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY III: JOURNAL APPRAISAL Group 3 February 11, 2010.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
1 Medical Epidemiology Interpreting Medical Tests and Other Evidence.
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
10 May Understanding diagnostic tests Evan Sergeant AusVet Animal Health Services.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Clinical Decision on A Diagnostic Test. Clinical Question In a middle aged man with primary gout and azotemia, can a urine uric acid to creatinine ratio.
Laboratory Medicine: Basic QC Concepts M. Desmond Burke, MD.
EBM Appraisal (Diagnostics). Clinical Scenario You are the duty resident at the traige on a Sunday afternoon when... a 3 year old Male came with a chief.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Sensitivity:DISEASE Specificity:PRESENTABSENT TEST RESULTS POSITIVEAbA+b NEGATIVECdC+d a+cb+da+b+c+d Lets recall the 2x2 contingency table Probability.
Role of Tests and Measures in Clinical Practice Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT Associate Editor, Tests & Measures, PTNow Associate Professor Physical.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
Performance of a diagnostic test Tunisia, 31 Oct 2014
Diagnostic Test Studies
When is the post-test probability sufficient for decision-making?
M. Lee Chambliss MD MSPH Associate Professor
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Diagnosis General Guidelines:
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Patricia Butterfield & Naomi Chaytor October 18th, 2017
The Fagan's nomogram. The Fagan's nomogram. For example: the MRI screening test for breast cancer in high-risk female patients has an estimated diagnostic.
Computation of Post Test Probability
The two-step Fagan's nomogram.
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Clinical Effectiveness: sensitivity, specificity and PPV
Presentation transcript:

Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnostic Studies Mindy Smith and Henry Barry

Objectives Formulate precise question Understand test characteristics Sensitivity and specificity Predictive values Likelihood ratios Critically appraise article

Sensitivity & Specificity true positive rate P(T+)|D+ Specificity true negative rate P(T-)|D-

2x2 table Se = a/(a+c) Sp = d/(b+d) Both are constant characteristics of the test

Practice case 500 patients with IBS and 500 normal volunteers have standing stool velocities. 400 IBS patients have abnormal SSV and 150 normal volunteers have abnormal SSV.

Practice 2x2 Se = ? Sp = ?

Practice 2x2 500 500 Se = 0.8 Sp = 0.7

Conundrums Requirement: to calculate sensitivity and specificity, you have to know beforehand who is diseased and disease-free We order diagnostic tests because we DON’T know if the patient is diseased!

What does all that mean? To interpret the results of a test, you have to know how likely the disease is in the first place pre-test probability disease prevalence positive and negative predictive value are dependent upon pre-test probability

Selecting tests Ruling in disease Ruling out disease

Rules of thumb SpPIn SnNOut a very Specific test, when Positive, rules In disease SnNOut a very Sensitive test, when Negative, rules Out disease

Critical Appraisal What are the ONLY things we ever need to know? (hint, three questions) are the results valid? what are the results? can you apply them?

Critical Appraisal: Validity Are the results valid? independent, blind comparison to gold standard spectrum of severity reference used in all patients

Critical Appraisal: Results What are the results? Sensitivity/specificity Likelihood ratios

Critical Appraisal: Applicability Available, affordable, accurate and precise Can you estimate pre-test probability? Will post-test probabilities affect your management? Do the consequences of the test help your patient?

Likelihood ratio LR+ LR- (probability of positive test in diseased subjects)/(probability of positive test in non-diseased subjects) se/(1-sp) or True positives/False Positives LR- (probability of negative test in diseased subjects)/(probability of negative test in non-diseased subjects) (1-se)/sp or False negatives/true negatives

LR 2x2 Table LR+ = ((a/(a+c))/((b/(b+d)) LR- = ((c/(a+c))/((d/(b+d))

Working with Likelihood Ratios Pretest probability = 10% LR+ = 11 What is the post-test probability?

An easier way

An easier way

Summary Post-test probability of disease is a function of pre-test probability Reverend Bayes Sensitivity and specificity have limited clinical utility SpPIn and SnNOut Likelihood ratios have more clinical utility

Teaching Points Very sensitive tests rule out disease when negative (SnNOut) Very specific tests rule in disease when positive (SpPIn)

More Teaching Points Key validity issues: independent and blind comparison to a gold standard, spectrum of illness severity Post-test probability depends upon the pre-test probability of disease Likelihood ratios tell by how much a given test will increase or decrease pre-test probability