Core Values For a Good Long Term Care System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Illinois Illinois Department on Aging.
Advertisements

The Future of Social Care Rebecca Matthews, Policy Manager - North of England, Social Care & Partnerships 25 April2013 DH – Leading the nation’s health.
March 15, 2012 The Long-Term Services and Supports Addressing the Boomer Challenge 2012 Health Policy Roundtables 1.
Overview of Nursing Facility and Elderly Waiver/Assisted Living Funding in Minnesota Health and Human Services Committee Minnesota Senate Tuesday, January.
Jane Jobarteh Midlands and East May 2013 The Future of Social Care Patients First and Foremost.
ULTCBC CONSUMER DIRECTION WORKGROUP WORKGROUP RECOMMENDATIONS Presented by Workgroup Facilitators: Roger Fouts, ODJFS Sue Fredman, ODJFS.
Single Point of Entry A System For The Future. Help! I need Help! For whatever reason, people may face a need for care beyond what they can provide for.
The Rehabilitation in the Community of Persons with Mental Disabilities Law of Israel: Challenge and Opportunity in a Changing Mental Health Service System.
Core Values For a Good Long Term Care System Persons with disabilities and their families are entitled to maximum feasible choice/participation in selecting.
Michigan Long Term Care Conference March 23, 2006  Choosing from the Array of Long- Term Care Supports and Services.
Older Americans Act Reauthorization 2011 Julie Jarvis Director, Program Development and Planning Karen Webb Manager of Older Americans Act Programs June.
Affordable Care Act Aging Network Opportunities Judy Baker Regional Director Health and Human Services October 18, 2010.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 10 Continuum of Care in Gerontological Nursing.
1 Long-term Care Vermont’s Approach Individual Supports Unit Division of Disability and Aging Services Department of Disabilities, Aging & Independent.
Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Arkansas Association of Area Agencies on Aging Presentation to Legislative Health Reform Task Force AUGUST 19-20,
Terence Ng MA, Charlene Harrington, PhD Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences University of California, San Francisco 3333 California Street, Suite.
Health Care Facts and Guiding Principles for Health Care Reform Public Employees Union, Local #1.
Cover slide Aging & Disability Resource Connection Cheryl Harris Division of Aging Services Georgia Department of Human Services.
Medicaid Managed Care Program for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Pamela Coleman Texas Health and Human Services Commission January 2003.
State of Maine Long-term Care Reform Presented by Mollie Baldwin Bureau of Elder and Adult Services July 26, 2001.
Single Points of Entry Robert Mollica March 2006
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
Reed 1 Managing Demand for Long Term Care Services During Times of Economic Crisis Charles A Reed Former Deputy Secretary Washington Department of Social.
Defining and Achieving Quality Michigan’s Long-Term Care Conference Troy Hilton March 23, 2006 Alison Hirschel, Esq., Michigan Poverty Law Program Pam.
Core Values For a Good Long Term Care System Persons with disabilities and their families are entitled to maximum feasible choice/participation in selecting.
1 CHOICES FOR CARE Blazing the Trail to Real Choices Joan K. Senecal, Commissioner Vermont Department of Disabilities, Aging and Independent Living
New York & Veterans Directed Home and Community Based Services Program Philip McCallion & Lisa A. Ferretti, Center for Excellence in Aging Services
Oregon: A Leader in Long-Term Care Reform Kathy Wilson, MS, MBA University of Massachusetts Boston American Public Health Association Conference November.
Jacqui Downing, RN Program Manager Long Term Care Services Office of Aging and Disability Services May 24, 2016 State of Maine Long Term Care Services.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
House Finance Committee September 2013 Division of Senior & Disabilities Services Duane Mayes SDS Director 1.
1 South Carolina ACCESS Plus (ARDC) Planning Retreat Susan C. Reinhard, R.N., Ph.D. Co -Director Rutgers Center for State Health Policy.
Governance: No Wrong Door State of Connecticut. “ ” Governance determines who has power, who makes decisions, how other players make their voice heard.
The FlexiCare Grant. Content Objectives for Flexicare Background and rationale How Flexicare will work FAQs.
THE LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM IN SOUTH CAROLINA Posted 11/7/05.
Lynn Kellogg, CEO Region IV Area Agency on Aging St. Joseph, Michigan February 24, 2009 – Boston, MA Setting the Stage for Veteran Directed Home and Community-Based.
Home & Community-Based Services Policy Forum March 17, 2015 Peter Notarstefano, Director of HCBS.
Ri Home and Community Care Services to the Elderly
Getting Prepared October 2016 District Meetings
The Medicaid waiver program
Regional Center Services for Consumers with Developmental Disabilities James F. Huyck Public Benefits Consultant/Advocate (916)
Community Based Care Services
The Moment to Explore Strategic Partnerships: Adapting to Change
Learning disabilities and behaviour that challenges
Who pays for today’s healthcare?
The 2011 Colorado Health Report Card
The Importance of A Balanced Long-Term Care System in Health Reform
South Carolina ACCESS Plus (ARDC) Planning Retreat
Housing, Wellbeing & the Care Act Integrated approaches to prevention
Community First Services and Supports (CFSS)
National Adult’s Commissioning and Contracting Training Conference Programme 24th November 2016 Margaret Willcox ADASS Vice President.
Section 125 Flexible Benefit Plans
Community Services Proposed 2017 Budget August 23, 2016
AIBT Nassau Conference Bootcamp Family Offices
Beyond One Size Fits All
Chapter 34 Long-Term Care
Section 125 Flexible Benefit Plans
Networks and/or Provider-based care Financial Performance
Preparing for transition housing
Advocacy to Improve Care, Dignity, and Accountability
Dudley Telecare Service Crystal Award Shortlisted
Mental Health and SUD: Opportunities in Health Reform
Nicole Khaner, Consumer Services Director
Trends & Transitions: Future for Long Term Care
Mark Trail, Managing Principal
Second Medicaid Congress June 14, 2007
Home and Community Services Social Services Programs
Individualized Support Options
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
Presentation transcript:

Core Values For a Good Long Term Care System Persons with disabilities and their families are entitled to maximum feasible choice/participation in selecting care settings and providers. Persons with disabilities have the right to expect “quality of life”, personal dignity, maximum feasible independence, health, security and quality of care. Everyone has an opinion about… Bedroom Bathroom What time you get up or go to bed What you watch on TV What you have for breakfast….when you have breakfast

Persons with disabilities have the right to choose and/direct a care plan involving “managed risk”, in exchange for the advantages of personal freedom. The array of public service options and individual client choices may be bonded by reasonable considerations of cost-effectiveness.

Three Tenets of a Balanced LTC System Choice is most important with quality being a close second

No One Service is Most Important Washington provides an array of services– the most important service is the one the client needs . Nursing home Adult family home Boarding home Personal care in-home Assisted Living Supportive services such as adult day health, respite, client training, skilled nursing, home delivered meals, etc. The ARRAY is what is important It is an ARRAY not necessarily a Continuum

A Good Long-Term Care System…… Supports family caregivers as primary resource for long term care Consolidates a full array of options: in-home, community residential, nursing home Controls & coordinates entire LTC budget (nursing home, home & community, AOA/AAA funding) Controls and coordinates residential care QA and regulatory compliance Families should care for loved ones. However, Should not be legislated A system needs to be developed not just individual services. Services need to be accessible to be viable. Quality assurance and enforcement is important. Consumers are very vulnerable Important to regulate and hold people accountable

Core Values for a Good Long-Term Care System Persons with disabilities and their families are entitled to maximum feasible choice/participation in selecting care settings and providers. Persons with disabilities have the right to expect “quality of life” including personal dignity, maximum feasible independence, health and security and quality of care. All component parts in one administrative structure. Assessment and Eligibility issue done timely Quality and Regulation -----Nursing home shut down Rate setting—Get what you can pay for

Who has the front door to the system is important Debate between state employees and AAA. Nether one going away. Divide labor What are the results?

Nursing Home Caseload 1972-2005 One time high of over 17, 000 now around 12,000

Estimate of number of Nursing Facility Clients if Washington Had not done LTC Reform What would have happen if had not done something?

Washington Home and Community LTC Caseload Trend Community side of the system allowed to grow. More preferred, cost less than nursing home services

Give Consumers what they want and it will probably save money. Over the past 12 years, Washington LTC reform policy encouraging development of client-preferred home and community based options has resulted in an annual reduction of 401 clients per year and allowed community placements to increase by an annualized caseload of 1,309 clients. If Washington had not reformed its’ LTC system it is projected that the NF caseload today would be over 24,000 instead it is less than 13,000

An additional 14,000 consumers have been served in HCBS settings. The cost to serve this increased HCBS population has been paid in large part with savings from the nursing home budget. Start summary. Number of consumers by service

What it takes for a good long-term care service system… Summary

What it takes to have a good State Long-Term Care System. A clear State Vision that consumer choice should drive the long-term care system. A belief that quality of life is as important as quality of care. A belief that no one service is more important than another. The most important service is the one the consumer wants and needs. Consumer Choice is critical. Decision about who to share a bedroom. Many lose the opportunity to choose Stanley story with Hospice and bath Quality of life is what most people care about, rather than the size of the windows in the nursing home or weather or not spoons are lined up.

The Ideal State Long-Term Care System A single organizational unit in State Government to plan, develop and operate the long-term care system. A single budget with flexibility and authority to spend on a varied array of long-term care services to meet consumer needs and preferences. A single organizational unit in government most important. Only way to become efficient enough to plan, develop and operate an efficient long-term care system.

Fair rate setting and contracting process for providers. A single point of entry with a fast, timely and standardized automated way to access financial and functional eligibility and collect data. A case management system with capacity to provide assistance and oversight for consumers. Fair rate setting and contracting process for providers. Prompt eligibility critical for potential consumers to have any real choice. Good case management is critical to assist consumers and control cost. Fair rates are necessary for quality, However, not direct correlation between rates paid and quality.

A process for assuring quality oversight throughout the system. A process for resource development that meets consumer demand. A well organized articulate, sophisticated group of consumers/families who advocate for the long-term system. Enforcement must be part of quality assurance. If a provider does something wrong there should be a consequence . Development of resources must be ongoing. Good example is assisted living. No one service is the most important. Consumers are the best advocates. Must be organized and sophisticated. Silver haired legislature does not work.