Intercity Passenger Rail and its Return on Investment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCRRP 03-01: Intercity Passenger Rail Service and Development Guide Curtis Morgan Program Manager Rail Research Program, Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
Advertisements

Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC COUNCIL Economic Benefits of Solar and Renewable Energy PRESENTED BY BARRY BROOME, GPEC PRESIDENT AND.
Innovative Finance for Passenger Rail through Transportation Oriented Development September 24, 2013www.forestcity.net presented by James H. Richardson,
Act 44 Transportation Funding John Dockendorf Pennsylvania Department of Transportation November 2007.
Economic Development Benefit/Cost Transit Slides.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Westshore Corridor Transportation Project Kickoff Meeting August 26, 2010.
1 SCORT 2010 September 21, 2010 David Valenstein Federal Railroad Administration State Rail Planning.
3 rd Annual California Passenger Rail Summit Innovative Transportation Financing Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public Transportation Association.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
California State Rail Plan Overview Presentation Tribal Informational Meeting – March 1,
Future of Freight Rail National Association of Counties 2011 Rail Conference Commissioner Francis P. Mulvey April 28, 2011.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
2013 Industry Panel: Job Growth... fact or fiction? Thanks to sponsor Alex Hayden ’95 CEO, Cushman and Wakefield and Chair of Career and Industry Partnerships,
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
The Environment and Cost Benefit Analysis in Feasibility Studies
INVESTING IN FAMILIES National Economic Development and Law Center INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR BUILDING PROSPEROUS COMMUNITIES CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES.
East-West Gateway Council of Governments February 25, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Transportation Elements.
First Discussion of Climate Change Steering Committee Recommendations to COG Board of Directors Agenda Item #6 February 27, 2008.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
QGET -- Scenarios Analysis Quality Growth Efficiency ToolsNovember 14, 1998 November 15, 1999 Strategy Analysis Prepared for: Envision Utah Prepared by:
A M O T I A A N N U A L M E E T I N G 2 3 S E P T E M B E R N A S H V I L L E, T N 1 A View from the State DOTs Joung H. Lee Associate Director.
HIGH SPEED RAIL Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009.
Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance Management Director, Missouri DOT February 23,2009 AASHTO.
Surface Transportation Authorization AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley SCOH Subcommittee on Construction Chicago, Illinois August 4, 2009.
September 19 & 20, 2007 Items 4.11a,b, & c Tabs 15, 16, & 17 Proposition 1B Intercity Rail Bond Program.
Chapter 6: The Economic Contribution of Hospitals.
Economic Impact on Georgia of the Georgia Tech Packaging Research Center Presented at the 2005 Joint AEA/CES Conference Toronto, Canada, October 26-29,
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
GO TO 2040 Comprehensive Regional Plan Overview and Implementation Strategies Northwest Indiana Regional Planning Commission November 30, 2010 Matt Maloney.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
1. New Starts Program Debate Preserving the American Dream Conference Washington, DC October 27, 2013 Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public.
2012 NORTHEAST BRITISH COLOMBIA COMMUNITY COAL AND ENERGY FORUM Ann Marie Hann President, Coal Association of Canada OCTOBER 11, 2012.
1 ISA&D7‏/8‏/ ISA&D7‏/8‏/2013 Project Planning Activities Project Schedule Risks Management and Project Feasibility Financial Calculations Tangible.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
CHOICE NEIGHBORHOODS FY2014 PLANNING GRANTEE WEBCAST U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | February 24, 2015.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security TRANSIT BUS SAFETY AND SECURITY PROGRAM Mike Flanigon Federal Transit Administration U.S./
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Government Investments
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance December 16, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Amy Inman Planning and Mobility Programs Administrator Department of Rail and Public Transportation.
Making the Job-Infrastructure Connection CALCOG Region Issues Forum Darin Chidsey.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.
Beyond the Crossroads James Stem National Legislative Director United Transportation Union May 27, 2009.
Rail Planning Efforts and Lessons Learned Nicole Katsikides Acting Director, Office of Freight & Multimodalism Maryland Department of Transportation Presentation.
TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION Proposed 2009 Budget. 2 Proposed 2009 Budget Schedule 2009 Budget Distributed to BOC and Public: 2009 Budget Distributed to BOC.
Budget Forum 6:30 P.M., May 25, 2017.
PrESENTED BY Stanley G. Feinsod
Regional Roads Committee
City of Rialto Midyear Changes Budget-Fiscal Year 2008/2009
American Public Transportation Association’s High Speed & Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Organizational Diagram APTA Board of Directors Chair Mike.
Mark J. Ryan, Deputy Director Independent Fiscal Office
Policy Making In the Public Interest
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Aviation
Joint Subcommittee to Evaluate Tax Preferences
California High-Speed Rail
Harrisburg Business Alliance
The HSR Tipping Point Background and Context
Environment Committee November 29, 2016
Fundamentals of Investing
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Intercity Passenger Rail and its Return on Investment The APTA High Speed & Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Seminal ROI Study Presentation to AASHTO SCORT, October 6, 2016 Chicago, Illinois

High Speed & Intercity Passenger Rail Committee of APTA Chair: Anna Barry, Deputy Commissioner, Connecticut DOT Vice Chair: Al Engel, Principal, Al Engel Consulting Sec/Treasurer: Jennifer Bergener, Managing Director, LOSSAN Rail Corridor Officer at Large: David Cameron, Teamsters, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Immediate Past Chair: Peter Gertler, Vice President, HDR

Study Sponsors APTA $50,000 APTA Business Member Activity Fund $25,000 Capital Corridor $25,000 HNTB $10,000 Mott McDonald $10,000 WSP/Parsons Brinckerhoff $10,000 Atkins Engineering $10,000 Quandel Consultants $5,000 HDR $5,000 Engel Consulting $1,000

APTA Technical Oversight Committee Charlie Quandel, Quandel Consultants Sharon Greene, HDR Dominic Spaethling, HNTB Ira Hirschman, WSP/Parsons Brinckerhoff Darnell Grisby, American Public Transportation Association

A Seminal Study is Needed to make the Business Case for Investment in HS&IPR Projects A Study that “monetizes” social and economic benefits that accrue to the public “but for” the construction of HS&IPR in terms of return on investment (ROI) A Study that provides indisputable evidence that the investment in HS&IPR yields returns well beyond the investment and any operating subsidies A Study that is independent and unbiased and can receive acceptance by both political persuasions that HS&IPR is needed

Study Goals Develop a consistent approach for quantifying and monetizing the economic impact of HS&IPR projects in terms of return on investment (ROI), Develop a consistent methodology for quantifying and monetizing the public (social) benefits of HS&IPR in terms of ROI, Demonstrate the economic and public benefits and the related overall ROI of selected HS&IPR projects using a consistent methodology, Provide APTA, other trade associations and public agencies with information that can be used to support federal, state, and local funding of HS&IPR projects.

Financial and Economic Benefits Improved safety, Travel time savings, Travel cost savings, Improved business and labor productivity, Reduced energy consumption, Reduced capital, operating and maintenance costs on other transportation systems, Improvements to freight distribution systems, Increased property values Environmental benefits

Employment Impacts Direct employment related to HS&IPR construction Direct employment related to HS&IPR operation In-direct employment impacts on other economic sectors during both construction and operation Discriminate between ‘jobs saved’ and ‘jobs created’ Describe the general character of the jobs created Estimate the expected duration (temporary vs. permanent) Identify the economic sectors that benefit from job growth or experience job loss

Tax Revenue Benefits Federal, state and local tax revenue Tax revenue related to HS&IPR construction Tax revenue related to HS&IPR operation Tax revenue related to indirect impacts during both construction and operation Sales tax and real estate tax revenue

Livability Benefits Accessibility to jobs, healthcare, education and other services Personal mobility especially for the transit dependent Public health Affordable housing Environmental quality

Team Selected to Conduct the APTA Study University of Illinois at Chicago Urban Transportation Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign –Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) Economic Development Research Group

Schedule for ROI Study Commencement of Study: February 2016 Substantial Completion: November 30, 2016 – APTA Rail Forum Completion of Study: February 2017

THANK YOU!

Why a “Return on Investment” Study? Proposals for implementing HS&IPR service have gained momentum in recent years. But estimates of public benefits and economic impacts prepared in support of these proposals may not have captured the full range of economic and public benefits associated with HS&IPR service