Chuck Cousino, REHS Onsite Wastewater Program Coordinator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Robert A. Tardif, P.E., Administrator Subsurface Systems Bureau New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services.
Advertisements

Geothermal Alliance of Illinois Getting it Right the First Time.
Drip System Approvals: County Perspective October 19, Onsite Water Conference Anne Lowry, REHS Chatham County Environmental Health.
Land Use Program Septic System Overview Scott Weldon
WASTEWATER DISPOSAL WITH SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION Donald R. McDonald AgTech Pacific.
LOADING RATES Sara Heger
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 4: Design and Plan Review— Conventional Systems Part.
HOUSE BILL 89 ONSITE WASTEWATER STAKEHOLDER MEETING 2 nd meeting September 8, 2011 Crystal Lovett, MO DNR Facilitator, and DNR-DHSS Panel.
Basic Installer Course. AOWA:Basic Installer Course Square foot.
Waste treatment. WASTEWATER (Chapter 22) Sewer – Sanitary waste Generated from buildings –Liquid discharged from plumbing fixtures Carried by sanitary.
Garfield County Temporary Employee Housing May 3 rd, 2007 Energy Advisory Board.
Operation & Maintenance Requirements: Tips for Keeping Your Agency in Compliance Kristin Kerr, P.E., QSD EOA, Inc. New Development Workshop May 22, 2013.
Rural, Onsite & Small Community Wastewater & Waste Engineering Designing Soil Based Systems.
SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN. SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN Ken Stratton.
Flow Equalization Tanks Presented by Keith Surface.
The New Mexico Environment Department The Department’s Mission is to provide the highest quality of life throughout the state by promoting a safe, clean,
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Alabama Dept of Public Health New Onsite Regulations Overview of Permitting Requirements.
3rd Annual Harris County On-site Wastewater Seminar
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Conservation Planning Existing Center Pivots Illinois NRCS Training December 6, 2011 Springfield, Illinois Runoff Assessment CPNozzle.
Geothermal Alliance of Illinois February 28-29, 2012 Dave Johnson, P.E. Illinois Department of Public Health.
Physical Properties of Soils GES175, Science of Soils.
Design Considerations for High Strength Wastewater
USING THE NEW REGULATIONS DESIGNING OWTS… Prepared for the Colorado Professionals in Onsite Wastewater (CPOW) 2014 Conference by Roger J. Shafer, P.E.
Susan Harwood Program Grant – The University of Texas at Arlington Thanks to the Susan Harwood Program Grant.
SITE EVALUATION BASICS OF THE TRADE. Ken Stratton.
Learning Objective 1 Explain the ways water supply system components are used by firefighters.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 5: Design and Plan Review— Non-Conventional Systems.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 7: Existing Septic Systems: Inspections and Corrective.
Alternative Onsite Sewage Systems: New Regulations & Issues for Localities Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 7, 2011 Thomas E. Crow, Director Division.
My septic system is working just fine! New State Wide Rules Began 1 st of 2015 replacing the 1977 code Goals Update system designs to currently available.
Amendments to Orange County Code Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County BCC June 16, 2015.
BASIC INSTALLERS COURSE. SHARED RESPONSIBILITY  SOIL TESTER SITE EVALUATION ○ PERCOLATION ○ OTHER  PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTALIST PLAN REVIEW INSPECTION.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 3: Site Evaluation and Selection 1 MA PHIT- Wastewater.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 4: Design and Plan Review— Conventional Systems Part.
ITEM 6.a AT GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE City Council – August 25, 2009.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION CENTER ON-LOT SYSTEMS AND SMALL FLOW TECHNOLOGIES DELAWARE VALLEY COLLEGE DOYLESTOWN, PA Project Funding Provided by: Pennsylvania.
Soil Nature’s dirty little secret. Soil is… July 22, 2012Footer text here2 Detritus from rock or - sand, Or silt and clay particles along with decomposed.
GEOTHERMAL WELLS What is Geothermal Heating and Cooling? Conventional heating and cooling systems use air to transfer heat into and out of buildings. Geothermal.
SENECA COUNTY GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT 2015 Real Estate Inspection Seminar February 18, 2015.
Soil Considerations for Utilization of Drip Dispersal in Tennessee Division of Ground Water Protection TN Department of Environment and Conservation.
Septic System Overview
Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation
OWTS Design Considerations Under Reg. 43
Cross Connection Survey Training
REGULATION 43 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
David Kurz, P.E. Lead Wastewater Engineer
Soil Properties Unit 5.02.
Colorado Onsite Regulations …Vision 2010
Homeowner Responsibility
What is an on-lot sewage system?
Soil Texture.
BRENT LAWSON STATE PLUMBING INSPECTOR SUBSURFACE WASTEWATER
Investigation of District Package Treatment Plants
Tuscarawas County Health Department Operation Permit
Private Septic Systems
Physical Properties of Soils
Physical Properties of Soils
Private Septic Systems
Presented by: Jon Bellamy
Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
Completion Report Summary
Homeowner Responsibility
BAT Work Group.
Olusola Ayilara, P.E., P.G. PST-DCRP Section, Remediation Division
Starting a campground.
On-site wastewater treatment system repairs
Presentation transcript:

Regulation 43; Local Regulation Revisions; Product and Technology Status Chuck Cousino, REHS Onsite Wastewater Program Coordinator Water Quality Control Division CPOW Annual Conference January 16, 2014

Local Regulation Adoption Process Current Local Regulations in Use Until New Local Regulations Become Effective Effective Date of Local Regs. Must Be By June 30, 2014 Back-Calculate Calendar to Be Sure You Have Enough Time Your Board of Health Process State Review Process Allow for Possible Revisions And, most importantly… The Unexpected

Suggested Regulation Approval Process Submit Regulations to WQCD: Feb. 15 – March 15, 2014 (30 Prior to Public Hearing) Provide Public Notice of the Hearing: (20 Days Prior to Public Hearing) Hold Public Hearing; Final Adoption: March 15 – April 15, 2014 Resubmit Final Adopted Regulation to CDPHE within 5 Days Local Regulation Becomes Effective: April 30, - May 30 (45 Days; unless CDPHE review defines issues) Effective Date Requirement per Reg. 43: June 30, 2014 Last drop dead date for reg. submittal is April 15

Local Decision Points for OWTS Regulations: Listed and need to be defined on “Local Regulation Review Submittal Form” Are your local regulation more stringent than Reg. 43? Flow rates, 75 or 100 gal./person/day? Will you be licensing installers and/or pumpers? Will you be allowing variances? Occupancy; follow Reg. 43, or 2 persons/bdrm for all? Will you define unfinished areas as additional bedrooms, or just those noted on the building permit? Will you be requiring the use of effluent filters? Will you restrict the length of distribution lines to 100’?

Local Decision Points, Continued: Listed and need to be defined on “Local Regulation Review Submittal Form” Are inspection ports at the initial end of the system required? Are new or existing vault privies allowed? Are new or existing pit privies allowed? Are slit trenches allowed? Are beds wider than 12’ allowed with HLT? (O/M Req’d) Will you have an oversight program for HLT systems? (Allowing reductions in STA and separation distances) Will you have a Transfer of Title inspection program? Will you have a Renewable Permit program?

If Adopted, Procedures to be Defined within Local Regulation: Licensing Installers and Pumpers Must define the application and certifications process Note requirements for certification and decertification Costs and timeframes; renewals Variances: Must define what types of variances will be heard Must define what types of variances will require a Public Hearing Must define application procedures and costs Must define timeframes and notifications procedures

Additional Decision Points Criteria: Oversight program for inspections, maintenance, record keeping and enforcement: Requirements are defined in Sec. 43.14 of Reg. 43 Applications, certifications, maintenance frequency, permits sampling, reporting, etc… Tracking Transfer of Title Inspection Program: Requirements are defined in Sec. 43.4.M of Reg. 43 Applications, certifications, minimum OWTS standards, acceptance, denials, etc… Renewable Permits: Requirements are defined in Sec. 43.4.N of Reg. 43 Must define the “purpose” of the renewable permit

Additional Decision Points Requiring Definition within Local Regulation. (if chosen) The LPHA may chose to prohibit the issuance of OWTS permits in defined areas. Will need to define. The LPHA may chose to identify soil types for which different procedures will apply. Will need to define. The LPHA may chose to require percolation tests to remain open until after their evaluation. Will need to define.

Local Decision Points for OWTS Regulations: Form Provided Pages 2 & 3 requires that you provide a “cross-walk” to your local citation for your “Decision Points Summary” Page 4 requires that you list all items that are “more stringent” than Reg. 43 Pages 5 & 6 requires that you provide a “cross-walk” to your local citation vs. each citation in Reg. 43

How do we go about writing our Regs.? Where do we start? Will this be you?????????

Options for Local Regulation Development Edit Reg. 43 using the word.doc provided (red-line) Follow your current format including all requirements of Reg. 43 (cross-walk) Utilize CDPHE Template (for those counties choosing to not allow reductions for HLT)

Rewrite example - redline 43.6 Wastewater Flow and Strength A. Wastewater Flows 1. A local public health agency may require the installation of a meter to measure flow into the facility or the OWTS. 2. Single Family Residential Homes: a. Flow per person shall be 75 100 gallons per day (gpd). b. A local public health agency may increase the wastewater flow per person to 100 gpd where justified. b. The minimum design flow for a new home shall be for a 2-bedroom house. The minimum design flow for the repair or replacement of an OWTS of an existing 1-bedroom home shall be 1-bedroom unless bedrooms are added. d. c. For homes up to and including 3 bedrooms, the number of persons per bedroom shall be 2. e. d. For homes with more than three bedrooms, the number of persons shall be six persons (first three bedrooms x 2 persons per bedroom) plus one additional person for each bedroom more than three bedrooms. f. A local public health agency may increase the number of persons per bedroom to 2 for all bedrooms.

Opt Out of “Opt Ins” - Reductions 43.14 Operation and Maintenance D. Permitting and Oversight of Maintenance for Soil Treatment Area Reductions and Vertical and Horizontal Separation Distance Reductions Based on Use of Higher Level Treatment, etc. 43.13.A. Reductions in Soil Treatment Area or Reductions in Vertical or Horizontal Isolation Distances is NOT Allowed.

Table 10-1. Soil Treatment Area Long Term Acceptance Rates Soil Type, Texture, Structure and Percolation Rate Range Long Term Acceptance Rate (LTAR); Gallons per day per square foot Soil Type USDA Soil Texture USDA Soil Structure-Shape USDA Soil Structure-Grade Percolation Rate (MPI) Treatment Level 11 Treatment Level 21 Treatment Level 2N1 Treatment Level 31 Treatment Level 3N1 Soil Type 1 with more than 35% Rock (>2mm); Soil Types 2-5 with more than 50% Rock (>2mm) -- Single Grain (0) <5 Minimum 3 foot deep unlined sand filter required2 MINIMUM 2 FOOT DEEP UNLINED SAND FILTER REQUIRED2 1 Sand, Loamy Sand 5-15 0.80 1.25 1.40 2 Sandy Loam, Loam, Silt Loam PR (Prismatic) BK (Blocky) GR (Granular) 2 (Moderate) 3 (Strong) 16-25 0.60 0.90 1.00 2A PR, BK, GR 0 (none) 1 (Weak) Massive 26-40 0.5 0.70 3 Sandy Clay Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam 2, 3 41-60 0.35 0.50 3A 61-75 0.30 0.40 4 Sandy Clay, Clay, Silty Clay 76-90 0.20 4A 91-120 0.15 5 Soil Types 2-4A Platy 1, 2, 3 121+ 0.10

Table 10-1, Soil Treatment Area Long Term Acceptance Rates; For LPHA which only allow Treatment Level; No oversight program Soil Type, Texture, Structure and Percolation Rate Range Long Term Acceptance Rate (LTAR); Gallons per day per square foot Soil Type USDA Soil Texture USDA Soil Structure-Shape USDA Soil Structure-Grade Percolation Rate (MPI) Treatment Level 11 Treatment Level 21 Treatment Level 2N1 Treatment Level 31 Treatment Level 3N1 Soil Type 1 with more than 35% Rock (>2mm); Soil Types 2-5 with more than 50% Rock (>2mm) -- Single Grain (0) <5 Minimum 3 foot deep unlined sand filter required2 MINIMUM 2 FOOT DEEP UNLINED SAND FILTER REQUIRED2 1 Sand, Loamy Sand 5-15 0.80 1.25 1.40 2 Sandy Loam, Loam, Silt Loam PR (Prismatic) BK (Blocky) GR (Granular) 2 (Moderate) 3 (Strong) 16-25 0.60 0.90 1.00 2A PR, BK, GR 0 (none) 1 (Weak) Massive 26-40 0.5 0.70 3 Sandy Clay Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam 2, 3 41-60 0.35 0.50 3A 61-75 0.30 0.40 4 Sandy Clay, Clay, Silty Clay 76-90 0.20 4A 91-120 0.15 5 Soil Types 2-4A Platy 1, 2, 3 121+ 0.10

Table 10-1 For Septic Tank Effluent Similar to ISDS Guidelines Soil Type, Texture, Structure and Percolation Rate Range Long Term Acceptance Rate (LTAR); Gallons per day per square foot Soil Type USDA Soil Texture USDA Soil Structure-Shape USDA Soil Structure-Grade Percolation Rate (MPI) Treatment Level 11 Soil Type 1 with more than 35% Rock (>2mm); Soil Types 2-5 with more than 50% Rock (>2mm) -- Single Grain (0) <5 Minimum 3 foot deep unlined sand filter required2 1 Sand, Loamy Sand 5-15 0.80 2 Sandy Loam, Loam, Silt Loam PR (Prismatic) BK (Blocky) GR (Granular) 2 (Moderate) 3 (Strong) 16-25 0.60 2A PR, BK, GR 0 (none) 1 (Weak) Massive 26-40 0.5 3 Sandy Clay Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam 2, 3 41-60 0.35 3A 61-75 0.30 4 Sandy Clay, Clay, Silty Clay 76-90 0.20 4A 91-120 0.15 5 Soil Types 2-4A Platy 1, 2, 3 121+ 0.10

TABLE 7-2 OWTS DESIGN CONSIDERATION AND TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS – SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SOIL TREATMENT AREA* PRESSURE DOSING REQUIRED ITEM OWTS DESIGN CONSIDERATION Treatment Levels 1 and 2 Treatment Level 2N Treatment Level 3 Treatment Level 3N Horizontal Separation Distances 1 Distance from soil treatment area to on-site well Greater than or equal to 100 feet Greater than or equal to 75 feet1 2 Distance from soil treatment area to pond, creek, lake, or other surface water feature Greater than or equal to 50 feet Greater than or equal to 25 feet 3 Distance from soil treatment area to dry gulch or cut bank Greater than or equal to 10 feet Vertical Separation Distances 4 Depth in feet from soil treatment area infiltrative surface to restrictive layer or ground water 4 feet (3 feet with pressure dosing) Greater than or equal to 2 feet

*AGAIN, IF AND ONLY IF: (For TL 2, 2N, 3 & 3N) Mandatory Inspections and Maintenance Maintenance Oversight Program

TABLE 7-2 OWTS DESIGN CONSIDERATION AND TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS – SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SOIL TREATMENT AREA FOR TREATMENT LEVEL 1 (SAME AS TABLE 7-1) PRESSURE DOSING REQUIRED ITEM OWTS DESIGN CONSIDERATION Treatment Levels 1 and 2 Treatment Level 2N Treatment Level 3 Treatment Level 3N Horizontal Separation Distances 1 Distance from soil treatment area to on-site well Greater than or equal to 100 feet Greater than or equal to 75 feet1 2 Distance from soil treatment area to pond, creek, lake, or other surface water feature Greater than or equal to 50 feet Greater than or equal to 25 feet 3 Distance from soil treatment area to dry gulch or cut bank Greater than or equal to 10 feet Vertical Separation Distances 4 Depth in feet from soil treatment area infiltrative surface to restrictive layer or ground water 4 feet (3 feet with pressure dosing) Greater than or equal to 2 feet

Type of Soil Treatment Area Table 10-2 Size Adjustment Factors for Methods of Application in Soil Treatment Areas Accepting Treatment Levels 1, 2, 2N, 3 and 3N Effluent Type of Soil Treatment Area Method of Effluent Application from Treatment Unit Preceding Soil Treatment Area Gravity Dosed (Siphon or Pump) Pressure Dosed Trench 1.0 0.9 0.8 Bed 1.2 1.1

Table 10-3 Size Adjustment Factors for Types of Distribution Media in Soil Treatment Areas Accepting Treatment Level 1 Effluent Type of Soil Treatment Area Type of Storage/Distribution Media Used in Soil Treatment Area Rock or Tire Chips Manufactured Media Other Than Chambers Chambers Trench or Bed 1.0 0.9 0.7 Systems producing higher treatment level effluent will also use these storage distribution systems/media, but cannot apply these adjustment factors in addition to the reductions from higher level treatment.

The good news is….. We know that it can be done! Custer Ouray Weld Jefferson Garfield Fremont The counties have all submitted and have completed the pre-adoption review process

Product and Technology Acceptance “The Division must review proprietary products in these categories” Treatment Products Distribution Products Septic Tanks Incinerating Toilets, and… Others as needed

The submittal form for Septic Tanks has been developed and will be forwarded to tank manufactures by the end of the month Reg. 43 defines the requirements and the data that needs to be submitted for approval

The submittal form for Treatment and Distribution products is being developed; Early February is the goal for availability Requirements for approval will vary for those that had prior CDPHE approval and at least one system installed, compared to those with no prior approvals Requirements defined in Reg. 43

Questions and Comments Chuck Cousino 303-692-2366 chuck.cousino@state.co.us