Woods Hole Science Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deep Creek Lake Sediment Summary DCL Policy Review Board Meeting July 23, 2012 Deep Creek Lake Phase II Sediment Study: Progress Report.
Advertisements

Patch Testing HYPACK 2013.
Multibeam Sonar Operations and Applications 1994—2005 NOAA’s Experience.
HYSWEEP® SURVEY HYPACK 2013.
NVC0901 Maritime Alliance Symposium San Diego, August 2011 By: Michael Broadbent Fugro Pelagos Inc. Seafloor Mapping Technologies.
ADVANCES IN HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING* Houston Business Roundtable Forum - May 2013 Depth Sounding Fusion with Above-Water LIDAR Sidescan Sonar Imaging Sonar.
Instrumentation and Quantification of Tsunamis With an Emphasis on the Santa Barbara Channel.
Bathymetric Data Management Sujan Dahal Anni Karhunen Christian Koski Laura Leponiemi Sanna Makkonen Lucky Ogege Teemu Saloriutta Woong Shin Huang Ye.
1 Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project California Energy Commission Workshop Dr. Stuart Nishenko PG&E April 27, 2015.
Sonar Chapter 9. History Sound Navigation And Ranging (SONAR) developed during WW II –Sound pulses emitted reflected off metal objects with characteristic.
S. Jeffress Williams U.S. Geological Survey Woods Hole, MA Regional-scale understanding of the geologic character.
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
Cohort plc company SWATHplus Interferometric Sonar Co-registered Bathymetric Mapping and Seafloor Imaging 26 th May 2009.
What is Hydrography? – NOAA Hydro Training 2012 Surveying Puget Sound, 1927 What is Hydrography?
Ultrasonic Sensors for Planetary Exploration. What they are Ultrasonic: Sound at a higher frequency than can be heard by humans (> Hz) Sensors use.
GEO/OC 103 Exploring the Deep …. Today’s Tune “ Sink to the Bottom” Fountains of Wayne.
Mapping the Seafloor. Depth Soundings The earliest soundings were made with a hand line of rope weighted at one end. The earliest soundings were made.
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Multibeam echosounders: error modeling evolution Multibeam sonar workshop, 3-4 April 2005 St. Andrews, NB Rob Hare, P. Eng., C.L.S. Canadian Hydrographic.
What is Oceanography?. Marine Science Or oceanography is the study of the oceans, how they are formed, its associated life forms, the coastal interactions,
Geologic Sea-Floor Mapping: Marine Data Model Case Study Brian Andrews-USGS, Woods Hole, MA Seth Ackerman-CZM, Woods Hole, MA.
NOAA/UNH Joint Hydrographic Center Education and Research at the University of New Hampshire
U.S. Geological Survey Woods Hole Field Center Background, Data & Visualization Background, Data & Visualization Matthew Arsenault USGS Woods Hole Science.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Altimetric Bathymetry Model Excels Global bathymetry model combines depths.
Lesson 23: Technology II. Strides in underwater research Did you know that most of the ocean (>95%) still hasn’t been explored? Technologies developed.
30 July 2004USM 2004 Upper Pearl Survey1 Vertical Uncertainty Total Propagated Error –Error budget using Excel spreadsheets created for NAVOCEANO by Rob.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Shallow Water Hydrographic Surveying using a High Resolution Multibeam Echosounder Richard C. Wilson,
Labs Start Next Week Don’t forget your lab book!!!  Read through labs ahead of time  Exploring the Deep: GEO/OC 103 Lab Manual by Hall-Wallace et al.
NOAA National Geophysical Data Center & collocated World Data Centers, Boulder CO USA World Data Center for Marine Geology and Geophysics, Boulder, CO.
The Navigation Surface A New Approach to Multiple Product Creation from Hydrographic Surveys LT Shepard M. Smith, NOAA University of New Hampshire CCOM/JHC.
Interferometric Sounder
Chapter 4 The Sea Floor and Its Sediments. 4.1 Measuring the Depths Methods for measuring depths: Hand line and wire marked with fathoms, with a lead.
The Global Ocean The Vast World Ocean.
Department of the Interior uses NOAA Hydrographic Services data, products and services Susan Russell-Robinson Acting Program Coordinator, USGS Coastal.
Sea Floor Maps - Why do we care? Fisheries management, especially marine protected areas Characterization of benthic habitats and ecosystems.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
S-44 evolution Multibeam sonar workshop, 3-4 April 2005 St. Andrews, NB Rob Hare, P. Eng., C.L.S. Canadian Hydrographic Service Chris Howlett UK Hydrographic.
SIDE SCAN OVERVIEW. Sidescan Survey Overview A sidescan sonar can be used for a wide variety of survey operations. Search and recovery Geological Identification.
Unit 2.b. Phases of a Hydrographic Survey Captain M K Barritt RN.
Government Engineering college , Palanpur
ALEXANDRU – VLAD LAZAR 1, GHEORGHE – VIOREL UNGUREANU 1,2, ALEXANDRU – DAN IONESCU 1, ANDREI – DANIEL BALAHURA 1*, ROBERT LAZAR 1, ALEXANDRU MAGHER 1 1.
© 2002 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. BATHYMETRY New technology, such as this bathyscaphe, allows scientists to study deep-ocean basins.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
Bellringer Explain in complete sentences what are pros and cons of coal energy use.
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Marine Provinces Chapter 1 Clickers Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition Alan P. Trujillo Harold V. Thurman © 2014.
Statistical Analysis for Automated Seep Extraction in GIS
Measuring bathymetry Ocean depths and topography of ocean floor
High Resolution Marine Geophysical Services
USGS Science in Support of Coastal Issues
Mapping Technology.
MAPPING TECHNOLOGY NOTES
Bathymetry of the Sea Floor
Seafloor Mapping of Stellwagen Bank & Massachusetts Bay
Mapping the Seafloor.
Evaluating High-Density Swath Bathymetry Sonars Against IHO-S44 Specifications: Ping DSP 3D Sidescan, a case study David Dodd, IIC Technologies and University.
Seapix : an innovative multibeam multiswath echosounder
THE RELEVANCE OF SURVEY APPLICATION IN OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION
High-Resolution Marine Geophysical Surveys
Ocean Instrumentation
Understanding Earth Fourth Edition Chapter 17:
Mapping the Seafloor.
Depth range maximum value = 5m
Use of Kongsberg Extra Detections to Support Pipeline Inspection Surveys Bart-Jan Tijmes Hydro November 2017.
Depth range maximum value = 5m
LCDR John Hendrickson 17SEP2008
Experiences from the post processing of typical Finnish bathymetric data Jarmo Ahonen Shallow Survey 2008 Portsmouth, NH.
Marine Habitat Mapping, Applications for Fisheries Management
IHO-MSDIWG10 Busan, Republic of Korea (4-5 March 2019)
Moving from Data Aggregation to Decision-as-a-Service | US Hydro Conference | Wetherbee Dorshow & Guy Noll.
Presentation transcript:

Woods Hole Science Center Advances in Data Processing Techniques and Base Surface Generation: Interferometric Sonar and Multibeam Echo Sounders Title – Data processing techniques for interferometric sonars and multibeam echosounders. William Danforth, Tom O’Brien, Emile Bergeron, Chuck Worley, Barry Irwin U.S. Geological Survey Woods Hole Science Center

USGS Coastal & Marine Geology Program National Science Field Centers Woods Hole, Massachusetts (Woods Hole Science Center) Menlo Park / Santa Cruz, California (Western Coastal & Marine Geology) Describe national program; 3 offices throughout the US; small part of overall USGS St. Petersburg, Florida (Center for Coastal & Watershed Studies)

USGS Coastal & Marine Geology Program Mapping Activities: Lacustrine – Estuarine – Nearshore - Offshore * Habitat Geoscience * Coastal Erosion and Geologic Framework * Climate Change * Nearshore Sediment Dynamics * Ecosystems and Coastal Ground Water * Predicting Effluent Pathways * Coastal and Marine Sediment Contaminants * Gas Hydrates * Marine Aggregates (sand & gravel) * Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards Range of research within CMGP – onshore to offshore, show map with areas of study Talk about the predictability in this section…can we predict the vulnerability of coast to erosion? Predict response to sea-level rise? Effects on sea floor of continued use (mining, aggregates, effects to habitat)

Scientific & Technological WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Scientific & Technological Advances South Carolina (1999-2003) Continued focus geologic framework & nearshore surface processes Systematic Mapping of inner continental shelf Multibeam USGS/CHS/ UNB/NOAA (1994) Gulf of Farallones (1989) CMGP Research Deep to Shallow Significant system developments (expand shallow water capability) Now give a brief history of the build up of sea floor mapping technology the WHSC and how it has enabled expansion of our mapping capabilities, especially in shallow water / coastal environments. Brought in the SEA system in 1999 to augment the geologic interpretation of the geophysical data, NOT AS A CHARTING TOOL. R/V Rafael, Vans & Swath Bathymetry GLORIA (EEZ) Real-time Processing (1989) Digital Data Acquisition High-Resolution Data Acquisition Development & Growth of WHSC Sea Floor Mapping 1980 1990 2000 2008

Swath Bathymetric System WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Swath Bathymetric System Incorporation of high-resolution swath bathymetry augments geologic framework studies by defining sea floor morphology System operation: < 5 - 200 m water depth 5 15 meters R/V Rafael with bathymetric sonar deployed SEA, SwathPlus bathymetric sonar (117 kHz & 234 kHz) Angle Range θ

Swath Bathymetric System WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Swath Bathymetric System Shallow water surveying (< 30 m) Interferometric Sonar – wide swath system Multibeam Echo Sounder Interferometric Sonar Swath Width

Swath Bathymetric System WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Swath Bathymetric System SEA, Ltd’s SwathPlus Bathy Sonar Coverage Profile Targets Co-located bathymetry and backscatter. Huge data volume, generally collect 3072 samples / channel. How to clean this?

Swath Bathymetric System and the Common Data Set WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Swath Bathymetric System and the Common Data Set OBJECTIVES: Map the common data set area using a 6x water depth trackline spacing (twice the IHO order 1 spec). Compare/contrast the resulting swath coverage and final grids with Multibeam Echo Sounder (MBES) coverage after using a single processing package on the raw data- CARIS. Attempt to streamline the data processing flow and DTM surface generation using new algorithms such as the Combined Uncertainty and Bathymetry Estimator (CUBE). Attempt to quantify Total Propagated Error (TPE) of the soundings using a preliminary sonar model for SwathPlus. Compare the TPE statistics with those of the MBES systems. Visually and statistically compare the SwathPlus surface to those created using the MBES data.

Data Acquisition, October 2007 WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Data Acquisition, October 2007 Survey Vessel R/V Rafael Sea SwathPlus 234 kHz transducers and data acquisition software Coda Octopus F180R MRU Ashtech RTK navigation Applied Microsystems SVP (both hand deployed and mounted at the head for SSV) Collected 6144 samples / swath

Common Data Set Processing Flow WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Common Data Set Processing Flow SwathPlus SXP data - 234 kHz Simrad EM3002D “raw.all” data - 307 kHz Reson 7125 XTF data - 400 kHz CARIS Create Vessel file for each data type Apply motion and nav if necessary Generate TPE sounding statistics for each line Incorporate lines into a CUBE surface using default settings Fledermaus Statistical and Visual comparisons

TPE Computation for Hz and Dp values WHSC Sea Floor Mapping TPE Computation for Hz and Dp values Takes into account: RP placement (usually the MRU) Offsets to sensors and transducers Mounting offsets Patch test results Accuracy of MRU and system timing Specifications from individual sonar models

Initial Grids using the TPE and CUBE approach WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Initial Grids using the TPE and CUBE approach Simrad EM3002D And there was NO swath editing performed!! Reson 7125

Initial Grids using the TPE and CUBE approach WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Initial Grids using the TPE and CUBE approach SwathPlus 234 kHz

Processing benefits using the TPE and CUBE approach WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Processing benefits using the TPE and CUBE approach Semi-automates the DTM generation using very dense data sets (Interferometric and MBES) Preserves significant bathymetric detail on a first pass Auxiliary outputs can be used for further editing decisions based on error analysis and hypothesis testing Helps to significantly reduce point by point editing traditionally used to eliminate spurious soundings

Further CUBE processing WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Further CUBE processing

WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Comparing TPE values IHO Order 1: 5 m horizontal 0.53 m vertical at 13.6 meters Depth = 13.6 m

Comparing SwathPlus soundings to the Simrad CUBE surface WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Comparing SwathPlus soundings to the Simrad CUBE surface

Comparing SwathPlus soundings to the Reson CUBE surface WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Comparing SwathPlus soundings to the Reson CUBE surface

Surface differencing: SwathPlus compared to Reson and Simrad WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Surface differencing: SwathPlus compared to Reson and Simrad

WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Drilling down….

Visual comparison: Profile over a small feature WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Visual comparison: Profile over a small feature Simrad EM3002D CUBE surface

Visual comparison: Profile over a small feature WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Visual comparison: Profile over a small feature Reson 7125 CUBE surface

Visual comparison: Profile over a small feature WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Visual comparison: Profile over a small feature SwathPlus 234 kHz CUBE surface

WHSC Sea Floor Mapping So what does all this tell us? Interferometric sonar data tend to have a higher standard deviation across the swath as compared to MBES systems, however the resulting bathymetric surface retains very closely the level of detail see in surfaces created using MBES data. Semi-automated processing and generation of bathymetric surfaces from interferometric sonar data is viable and preserves the true nature of the seafloor, thus significantly reducing the post processing effort and time sink required to generate a reliable bathymetric surface from these data. Where do we go from here? The advantages of interferometric methods in waters shallower than 20 meters are numerous, but the question of vertical resolution and target detection, especially for hydrographic surveys, still needs further study .. And maybe…

Interferometry on an ASV ??? WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Interferometry on an ASV ??? ASV: Autonomous Surface Vessel Shallow water Sidescan Sonar Edgetech Chirp (4 – 24 kHz) Single Beam EchoSounder ADCP Additional Sensors or Reconfigure Modular Numerous Sensors Easily Modified Autonomous or manual Integrated Systems

Sea Floor Mapping Systems WHSC Sea Floor Mapping Sea Floor Mapping Systems Surficial and Sub-bottom Systems Sidescan-sonar Seismic Reflection Swath Bathymetry Sampling Video/photography Core and Grab Samplers Navigation WAAS , DGPS, RTK