WP6. Quality Plan 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan Edited by September, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 DISSEMINATION AND VALORISATION PLAN First transnational workshop Manchester,
Advertisements

HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
The University of Priština, temporary settled in Kosovska Mitrovica (UPKM) Danijela Kulić, assistant lecturer, Faculty of Philosophy Nemanja Vasić, assistant.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Valencia, November 2006.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Further.
State of the Art in Theory and Practice of Rural Development Measures Partner 4: The University of Wales Aberystwyth.
Monitoring Policy Implementation Michelle Murton, School Nutritionist.
Qatar Planning Council 1 Best Statistical Information to Support Qatar’s Progress Statistical Capacity Building for Information Society in Qatar.
nd Management Meeting Project Overview & Progress EUN, Brussels, 30 September 2010 Caroline Kearney Knowledge-Building.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Evitherm MTR 07 Sept 04 Phill Giles Thermal Technology Consulting (TTC) Evitherm project mid-term review Work Package 2 Phill Giles Thermal Technology.
NORWEGIAN SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA SERVICES MADIERA Project Management.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions 4th SC Meeting Sarajevo, 4 th -7 th February 2014 EWG: Public Lighting.
Project acronym: TEACH Ref. Project: EACEA Harmonization of Preschool Teacher Education Curricula in Serbia.
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES Ensuring Ownership of PARSEL by Partners.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Florence, January 2008.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
SARMa project development WP1 Project management and coordination SARMa internal handbook Alianta d.o.o., Ljubljana Split, 4-5 February 2010.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
EU BON Meeting, Joensuu, March 2015 WP2 Task 2.3: Data sharing tools – Action Point MS232 : Technical workshop, review of documents, test versions of data.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Kick-off.
ENV-NCP-TOGETHER PARTNER MEETING WORK PACKAGE 3 02/03/2010 c Beta Technology.
Impact assessment and evaluation of ERA-NET effectiveness Juliana Zweifel, Bert Beck, Katrien Broekaert, Iver Thysen, Agris Nikitenko, Markus Loetscher.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Evaluation.
EMenthe workpackage 2 (TCD) The aim of this package was to identify key stakeholders perceptions of the required elearning components for advanced mental.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP DRAFT QUALITY & MANAGEMENT PLAN Budapest, June 2007.
ESPAQ - Enhancing Students Participation in Quality Assurance in Armenian HE “Workplan of WP4” Margarit Marukyan, ASUE Team Member.
Number: TR/06/B/F/PP/ WASTE-TRAIN VOCATIONAL TRAINING, EDUCATION, CONVEYING INFORMATION ON UP-TO-DATE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO DECISION MAKERS/STAFF.
ERA-PLANET KoM, Brussels February 2016 WP4- Follow-up and monitoring of projects Dr. Joan Masó Center of Research in Ecology and Forestry Application.
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
1 st Consortium Management Team Meeting University of Belgrade 27 th -28 th November 2014 WP8 - Management Progress Presentation (month 1- 12) Prof. dr.
BENCH-CAN Coordination
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Overview
ARIES WP2 Task 2.2 kick-off Coordination, support and enhancement of communication/outreach activities for accelerators in Europe Jennifer Toes (CERN),
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Good practices abroad / Cyprus case The OiRA implementation
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
Quality Control Plan: Introduction
Prof. Fahmi Abu Al-Rub, Project Coordinator, JUST
WP1. DEVELOPMENT OF TRAINING MATERIALS
Dr Sally Priest, Flood Hazard Research Centre
SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL FURNITURE NEW EUROPEAN SKILLS 2020
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
VTC WPs Status for the Monitoring Visit Presented by:
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
DIME Plenary Thomas Burg –Statistics Austria
Knowledge Translation
BioMedBridges – Work Packages 2 & 12
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Module 8 ACTION PLANS.
Good practice in preparing an application
The basics ESSnet on SDMX prepared in 2008/2009
Quality Control Plan: Introduction
Chapter # 8 Quality Management Standards
IENE – INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION OF NURSES AND MEDICAL STAFF IN EUROPE
17 April 2018 Progress report ccc General capacity requirements for SAIs for conducting IT audits.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Presentation title Conclusions of 13th meeting of lead reviewers of GHG inventories –follow-up 14th meeting of GHG Inventory Lead Reviewers Bonn, Germany,
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Task Force Peer reviews and quality Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

WP6. Quality Plan 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan Edited by September, 2017

Lead Organisation: Split Co-Lead: AUA, CRE.THI.DEV Participating Organisation: All partners

Project Quality Management Tasks – deliverables: 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan 6.3 Progress reports 6.4 Hire External Monitor

Project Quality Management Quality Committee establishment Kickoff meeting (February 2017) decision:

Project Quality Management Tasks – deliverables: 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan 6.3 Progress reports 6.4 Hire External Monitor

6.2 Develop a Monitoring, Evaluation, & Quality Plan

Project Quality Management The quality plan contains the milestones of the project as well as the means and the indicators for the evaluation of the project progress and project’s results. It is the roadmap for the evaluation of the quality of the project. For internal use by the project team and will act as a guide for the internal quality management of the Project.

Quality Plan Aims and Objectives To clearly define the content, format, review and approval process of the project deliverables To define the responsibilities of the project partners regarding those deliverables To identify all the different tools and means to be applied throughout the project duration To provide guidelines for adequate implementation and thereby assure that certain quality standards in the performance of our tasks are fulfilled. To define the quality requirements that must be obtained throughout the project lifecycle, those that the deliverables, actions and results must conform to.

Quality Plan Objectives To define: Content Format Review and approval process 1. PROJECT DELIVERABLES’ 2. RESPONSIBILITIES of the project partners 3. THE QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for DELIVERABLES, ACTIONS AND RESULTS 4. THE DIFFERENT TOOLS AND MEANS for the achievement of the requirements To assure that certain quality standards in the performance of our tasks are fulfilled.

Project Quality Assurance Through the monitoring and evaluation of the quality of the Project Deliverables Project Processes

Project Quality Assurance Quality of the project processes Questionnaire with an assessment of the performance of the consortium and of the current state of the partnership Internal evaluation Every 18 months: Next evaluation April 2018 Online survey, with the participation of all Satisfaction survey with threshold of approval: More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

Quality of Project Deliverables Quality of the project deliverables For every key FoodQA deliverable, consisting of the results of the Work Packages, there is a monitoring/evaluation process and relevant quantified quality indicators Deliverables categorisation: Tangible : Documents, etc Intangible : Meetings/Events Other Intangible : Websites, platforms etc

Quality of the project deliverables Tangible or document deliverables undergo a peer review process of evaluation by nominated reviewer(s), internal or external. Internal review/evaluation process for document deliverables Some deliverables, such as the E-book (WP1) , the training courses (WP2) will also be validated by external stakeholders. Author submits "draft" deliverable to WPL WPL forwards draft deliverable to reviewer(s) Reviewer(s) evaluate(s) deliverable and sends evaluation to author & WPL Author accepts/rejects suggestions, makes changes, returns deliverable and eval. to WPL WPL gives final approval

Quality of the project deliverables Internal review evaluations should include the following information: General comments: Thoroughness of contents Correspondence to project objectives Specific comments: Relevance Format (layout, spelling, etc.) Suggested actions: Changes that should be implemented Missing information Further improvements

Quality of the project deliverables Meeting and event evaluations Internal evaluation – after the implementation of a meeting or event Meetings: Meeting Evaluation Questionnaire, circulated by the QM in online form Events: Event Evaluation Questionnaire, by all partners, paper form, translated in all languages. Results tabulated sent to the QM for analysis. Both are satisfaction surveys, with threshold of approval: More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

Quality of the project deliverables Training Evaluation Questionnaire after the end of the trainings/seminars using hardcopies of the standard document More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

Quality of the project deliverables Other intangible deliverables such as: - the e-library and - the FoodQA web portal, will be evaluated, with a focus on the overall quality of the deliverable and the usability and the added value to the final users.

Project Quality Management Tasks – deliverables: 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan 6.3 Progress reports 6.4 Hire External Monitor Presentation by Prof. Fahmi Abu Al Rub

Lina Tsakalou CRETHIDEV Thank you for your time! Lina Tsakalou CRETHIDEV