Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aldwych Primary School – case study Information for presenters; Script is contained on the notes page Handouts required: Context Context extract Internet.
Advertisements

July 2013 End of Year 6 Results For the first time in 7 years, above the new government floor targets for Maths and Writing and in line for Reading (two.
Sue Rogers Director of Education KGA Presentation GCSE and Post 16 plus Closing the Gap.
Understanding School Performance Data (Secondary) to improve effectiveness John Mc Cann Assistant Director of Schools Diocese of Shrewsbury Department.
Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
1 Contextual Value Added and Data For Dummies The mystery explained.
FFT Data Analysis Project – Supporting Self Evaluation  Fischer Family Trust / Fischer Education Project Extracts may be reproduced for non commercial.
M.Greenaway. Analysing Data.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
BECTa ICT Research Conference – June 2002 Intro  Survey Details  Secondary Surveys conducted July 2000 and June/July 2001  Sponsored by Fischer Family.
Feyisa Demie Adviser for school self-evaluation and
Achievement Self-Evaluation - Achievement ACHIEVEMENT SATs 2014 Level READING 99% 94% 92%81% WRITING 98% 94% 89%79% ENGLISH O/A -
STATISTICS IN SCHOOLS Vinay Bhardwaj Kim Jackson Catherine Rich Amy Zaffarese.
Salford: How well are we doing?. Early Years Foundation Stage.
Educational Standards Cabinet January Early Years Performance  The percentage of pupils achieving the target expectations in the Early Years Foundation.
FFT Data Analysis Project © Fischer Family Trust, 2009 Using FFT Live 3.0 How FFT data can help your school improve Primary Schools (KS2) Fischer Family.
1 New Performance Tables: 2011 and Beyond… Cathy Christieson Head of School Performance Data Unit 13 th May 2011.
Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
Mike Treadaway Director of Research Fischer Family Trust Using FFT Live Secondary Schools.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-05 Workshop 3S (Secondary) Analysing progress data.
Margaret McMillan Primary School Whole School Data From RAISE online 2012 and LA data.
Mike Treadaway Director of Research Fischer Family Trust.
Joining the dots FFT aspire: an overview Anne Pepper FFT Associate 1 Essex LA – Schools Hands On June 2015.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness
Welcome to the Year 10 Information Evening Aims:  To give you a brief overview of the programme of study.  To explain the changes to GCSE assessment.
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
Updates Changes to the accountability measures for 2016 Pupil premium features in East Sussex secondary schools in 2013 Changes to RAISE for 2014 FFT developments.
RAISEonline 2011 The same broad approach to the new reports is used for both primary and secondary analyses.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
 DATA fit for purpose I am no EXPERT But we are trying to make targets SMART.
An introduction to SEN Data analysis The Research and Evaluation Unit.
Empowering Informed Decisions Using RAISEonline data to improve governor effectiveness Dave Thomson Head of Data Analysis, RM Education.
School Data Dashboard & RAISEonline Presentation for Governors Thursday 7 th May 2015 Yvonne Broadbent - Headteacher.
Understanding & Using School Governance ….data. Me 8.30ish finish 15 minute break Fire alarms/Loos Introduction to RAISEonline Working in groups Packs.
Data update Autumn Overview About the new targets progress attainment Raise On Line (ROL) data reports and analyses historic results future estimates.
Statutory Target Setting 2006 Governors’ Meeting 5 th December 2006 KS (Current Year 8) GCSE 2008 (Current Year 10) St John Plessington Catholic.
Key Stage Results 2004 South Tyneside MBC. Key Stages  Compulsory education is divided into four key stages in England: Key Stage 15-7 year olds Key.
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
FFT Data Analysis Project Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
Attainment, progress and context by disadvantage / pupil premium
The Village School Assessment Analysis
Analysing the Primary RAISE
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
Types of School Value-Added Reports
Welcome to the Year 10 Information Evening
Maximising Opportunities Conference
Teacher SLTs
Full Governors Meeting
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
Raise Online 2013 Grange Park Primary School
Sheffield Performance Overview
Teacher SLTs
Workshop 2S (Secondary)
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Resource Slides.
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Progress 8: an explanation
EVAAS Overview.
Targets, Data and Reporting
Life beyond levels Analysing school performance using scaled scores
Teacher SLTs
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
Understanding Progress 8
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Performance Measures 2016 and beyond
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

Who wants to be in the top 1 percent? Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 99 1000 pupils entitled to Free School Meals are in the top 5% of attainers at KS1. How many are still in the top 5% at the end of KS3? A 50 150 C B 250 500 D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 99 1000 pupils entitled to Free School Meals are in the top 5% of attainers at KS1. How many are still in the top 5% at the end of KS3? 150 C

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 95 On average, 32% of pupils with Level 3 in Maths at KS2 attain Level 5 at KS3. For pupils who just miss Level 4 (at KS2) by 1 mark the figure is? A 32% 40% C B 50% 60% D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 95 On average, 32% of pupils with Level 3 in Maths at KS2 attain Level 5 at KS3. For pupils who just miss Level 4 (at KS2) by 1 mark the figure is? 60% D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 90 100 pupils have an ESTIMATED KS3 level of 4.99 – of these, what proportion are likely to achieve Level 5 or higher? A 0% 25% C B 50% 75% D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 90 100 pupils have an ESTIMATED KS3 level of 4.99 – of these, what proportion are likely to achieve Level 5 or higher? B 50%

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 80 What percentage of pupils with SEN Statements and Reading Level 2C progress to KS2 English Level 4+? A 15% 25% C B 35% 5% D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 80 What percentage of pupils with SEN Statements and Reading Level 2C progress to KS2 English Level 4+? B 35%

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 70 Calculating what you would expect a group of pupils to achieve, based upon the progress of similar pupils last year, is ? A A target An estimate C B A guess Daft D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 70 Calculating what you would expect a group of pupils to achieve, based upon the progress of similar pupils last year, is ? An estimate C

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 60 A statistical method often used in value-added calculations is called? A Regurgitation Repetition C B Replication Regression D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 60 A statistical method often used in value-added calculations is called? Regression D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 50 A score converted to a scale of 1 to 100 is called? A Mercantile Infantile C B Percentile Prehensile D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 50 A score converted to a scale of 1 to 100 is called? B Percentile

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 40 The difference between actual and expected attainment is called ? A A result A residual C B The rest A respite D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 40 The difference between actual and expected attainment is called ? A residual C

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 30 Data which aims to provide a measure of the socio-economic context of an area is called? A Geodemographic Geometric C B Geodesic Geopolitical D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 30 Data which aims to provide a measure of the socio-economic context of an area is called? A Geodemographic

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 20 When the average attainment of the intake to schools drops, their value-added tends to: A Stay the same Get worse C B Improve Not fit a pattern D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 20 When the average attainment of the intake to schools drops, their value-added tends to: B Improve

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 10 On average, 32% of pupils with Level 3 in Maths at KS2 attain Level 5 at KS3. For pupils who just get Level 3 (at KS2) the figure is? A 2% 5% C B 10% 20% D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 10 On average, 32% of pupils with Level 3 in Maths at KS2 attain Level 5 at KS3. For pupils who just get Level 3 (at KS2) the figure is? A 2%

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 5 The table shows each schools value-added rank over 3 years. Which of these schools has improved the most? School 2003 2004 2005 Swineshire 50 30 10 Upper Reaches 5 1 Dead End 99 90 80 Middle Earth 20 A Swineshire Upper Reaches C B Dead End Middle Earth D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 5 The table shows each schools value-added rank over 3 years. Which of these schools has improved the most? School 2003 2004 2005 Swineshire 50 30 10 Upper Reaches 5 1 Dead End 99 90 80 Middle Earth 20 B Dead End

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 Percentile Ranks 1-20 High rate of change 20-80 Low rate of change Presenter Background: Finally, the Analyses to Support Self-Evaluation look at trends over time, comparing the estimate/actual difference for each of three years. We only want to show the meaningful trends, where value-added has changed a great deal from one year to the next. In the example above, a school had very low value-added in the first year, and was ‘significantly below’. In the second year, the school was much improved, and it’s value-added was ‘in-line’. In the third year, the school improved again, but to a smaller degree, and it’s value-added was ‘significantly above’ We can say there was a significant change in value-added from the first year to the second, but not from the second year to the third. The trend would be represented by a up arrow for the change in value-added from the first year to the third. 80+ High rate of change

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 Significant Changes Value-added significantly above Value-added broadly in-line with other schools Value-added significantly below Yr 1 2  Significant Change  Change of Significant State  Significant Change  Change of Significant State Value-added significantly above Value-added broadly in-line with other schools Value-added significantly below Yr 1 2 This slide uses four schools to demonstrate changes in percentile ranks. The full range of value-added scores is represented. For some schools, their value-added is significantly below. For some schools, their value-added is significantly above. For the majority of schools, value-added is broadly average. The blue arrows show value-added for a school over three years, indicating how they compare to all other schools. The first school has improving value-added. Over the course of three years, its value-added is average, and the trend is upwards because of the significant change between Year 2 and Year 3. In the second school, value-added improved significantly each year, and is represented by two up arrows. Value-added over the course of three years is average. In the third school, over the course of three years value-added is significantly above, and hence gets a green box. However, the decline between Year 1 and Year 2 is represented by a green arrow. Though not a large change in percentile rank, it is a significant change of value-added. In the fourth school, over the course of three years value-added is average. There was a significant improvement between Year 1 and Year 2, but also a significant decline between Year 2 and Year 3. In this case, it gets an up and a down arrow, indicating the trend is varying.

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 1 On average, 65% of pupils with level 4 in each subject (APS=27) at KS2 attain 5 or more A*C passes at KS4. What is the %5AC for those with level 3 in English, 4 in Maths and 5 in Science (APS = 27). A 45% 55% C B 65% 75% D

Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 1 On average, 65% of pupils with level 4 in each subject (APS=27) at KS2 attain 5 or more A*C passes at KS4. What is the %5AC for those with level 3 in English, 4 in Maths and 5 in Science (APS = 27). A 45%

Impact of Variation between Subjects Fischer Family Trust - Data Analysis Projects - Overview 19/05/2018 Impact of Variation between Subjects …’similar’ pupils – KS2 APS=27 Pupils with ‘uneven’ patterns of prior-attainment are relatively small in number – but the progress made by such pupils can differ widely from others with the same ‘overall’ prior attainment scores. Within the ‘444’ group variations can be found in terms of pupils attainment within the level (derived from test marks). Value Added models, particularly when used to provide estimates, need to take into account variation between subjects as well as overall attainment. Source Data - KS2 to KS4 over 3 years