LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

T1 task- update Mike Plissi. 2 Collaboration Groups actively involved INFN-VIRGO MAT IGR-Glasgow Groups that have expressed interest INFN-AURIGA CNRS-LKB.
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
G D LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Dennis Coyne Hannover LSC 19 August 2003.
G M LIGO Laboratory1 Overview of Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker PAC meeting, NSF Review 5 June 2003, 11 June 2003.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems Design & Interferometer Sensing & Optics Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 13 Meeting, 5 June 2003.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Overview of Research in the Optics Working Group Gregory Harry, on behalf of the OWG Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 LSC Meeting –
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker NSF LIGO Review 23 October 2002.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
David Shoemaker Aspen 3 February 03
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Advanced LIGO Status Report
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
G R Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker LLO LSC 19 Aug 2002.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Material Downselect Rationale and Directions Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Technology On behalf of downselect working.
NSF Annual Review of the LIGO Laboratory
Advanced Gravitational-wave Detector Technologies
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
Overview of Advanced LIGO
Advanced LIGO Research and Development
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Advanced Optical Sensing
Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Presentation transcript:

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Advanced LIGO David Ottaway, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Aspen Winter Conference Feb 2004 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Advanced LIGO LIGO mission: detect gravitational waves and initiate GW astronomy Next detector Should have assured detectability of known sources Should be at the limits of reasonable extrapolations of detector physics and technologies Must be a realizable, practical, reliable instrument Should come into existence neither too early nor too late Advanced LIGO LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Initial and Advanced LIGO Factor 10 better amplitude sensitivity (Reach)3 = rate Factor 4 lower frequency bound Factor 100 better narrow-band NS Binaries: Initial LIGO: ~20 Mpc Adv LIGO: ~350 Mpc BH Binaries: Initial LIGO: 10 Mo, 100 Mpc Adv LIGO : 50 Mo, z=2 Known Pulsars: Initial LIGO: e 3x10-6 Adv LIGO e 2x10-8 Stochastic background: >> Initial LIGO: Ω~3x10-6 >> Adv LIGO: Ω~ 3x10-9 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Design features 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 180 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM PRM Power Recycling Mirror BS Beam Splitter ITM Input Test Mass ETM End Test Mass SRM Signal Recycling Mirror PD Photodiode LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration So what changes … Subsystem Initial LIGO Advanced LIGO Interferometer Power recycling Power and Signal Recycling Output RF read-out DC read out with output mode cleaner PSL 10 Watt MOPA 180 W Injection-Locked Oscillator P/P ~ 10-8 1/Hz at 100 Hz  P/P ~ 2 10-9 1/Hz at 10 Hz Input Optics 300 g single suspension 3 Kg triple suspensions Adaptable optics, better isolators and EOMs Core Optics Fused Silica (10 Kg) Sapphire / Fused Silica Optics (40 Kg) g1 g2 = (0.71)(0.43) = 0.3 g1 g2=(1-4/2.08)(1-4/2.08)=0.85 Coatings Phi ~4 10-4 Si O2/Ta O5 Phi ~ 5 10-5 Coating material TPD Seismic Passive attenuation Active 6 dof system with HEPI (Init. LIGO extra) Suspensions Single loop wire Quad Suspensions with fused silica fibers ATC Added later ? Full thermal compensation system LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration System prototyping Initial LIGO experience: thorough testing off-site necessary Very significant feature in Advanced LIGO plan: testing of accurate prototypes in context Two major facilities: MIT LASTI facility – full scale tests of seismic isolation, suspensions, laser, mode Cleaner Caltech 40m interferometer – sensing/controls tests of readout, engineering model for data acquisition, software Support from LSC testbeds Gingin – thermal compensation Glasgow 10m – readout Stanford ETF – seismic isolation GEO600 – much more than a prototype! LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Anatomy of the projected Adv LIGO detector performance 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10-22 10-23 10-24 10-21 Newtonian background, estimate for LIGO sites Seismic ‘cutoff’ at 10 Hz Suspension thermal noise Test mass thermal noise Unified quantum noise dominates at most frequencies for full power, broadband tuning Initial LIGO Advanced LIGO NS-NS Tuning LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Baseline plan Initial LIGO Observation at design sensitivity 2004 – 2006 Significant observation within LIGO Observatory Significant networked observation with GEO, VIRGO, TAMA Structured R&D program to develop technologies Conceptual design developed by LSC in 1998 Cooperative Agreement carries R&D to Final Design Now: Proposal is for fabrication, installation positively reviewed “…process leading to construction should proceed” Long-lead purchases planned for 2004, real start 2005 Sapphire Test Mass material, seismic isolation fabrication Prepare a ‘stock’ of equipment for minimum downtime, rapid installation Start installation in 2007 Baseline is a staggered installation, Livingston and then Hanford Coincident observations by 2010 Optimism for networked observation with other ‘2nd generation’ instruments LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Significant Occurrences in 2003/04 (Probably not covered by other talks) Advanced LIGO proposal was submitted Thermal noise in coatings Dominant loss mechanism in Initial LIGO coatings is Tantalum Direct measurement of coating thermal noise by two groups New materials – Hafnia, Titania, Alloys DC readout chosen for baseline design readout Started construction of Advanced LIGO Seismic prototypes Intensity Stability at 10-8 level at 10 Hz Radiation pressure instability realized (Seidels and Sigg) Advanced LIGO will use near concentric cavities Radiation pressure instability occurs at 200 kWs circulating power LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Beyond Advanced LIGO Advanced LIGO has a large potential for incremental improvement Large areas of strain frequency space can be improved without complete reconstruction of the detector Some potential improvement areas Thermoelastic and thermal noise ( flat top beams) Optical Noise (QND) Gravity gradient noise (Feed forward subtraction) Tunability (Variable reflectivity signal recycling mirror) LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Flat-Topped Beams Improve detector performance by reducing the effect of thermo-elastic noise Achieved by flattening the intensity of the light field Proposed by Thorne et al. Very near flat cavities unstable for high power operation Preliminary experiment being organized at Caltech LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Flat Topped Beam Effects Sapphire Mirror Substrates Thermoelastic Noise OBJECTIVE: Reduce Thermoelastic Noise in LIGO-II, to Take Advantage of the Low Optical Noise LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration QND and Squeezing Inject squeezed vacuum into the dark port Need 10dB of squeezing at 100 Hz Amplitude filtering using mode cleaner cavities (Corbitt et al.) Short filter cavities to vary the squeeze angle (Buanno et al.) Vacuum tanks are already in place Plot courtesy of Thomas Corbitt LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Variable Reflectivity SRMs Signal recycling adjustment allows instrument to be tuned for different searches Tunable SRM allows rapid changes in search strategy Multiple approaches being researched Thermally tuned etalon (GEO 600) Suspended cavity or Michelson (ANU) 10-23 10-24 10-25 10-22 100 1K 10 K Frequency (Hz) Thermoelastic Detuning = 0.12, SRM Ref. = 0.93 Detuning = 0.025, SRM Ref. = 0.93 Detuning = 0.025, SRM Ref. = 0.99 Detuning = 0.12, SRM Ref. =0.99 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Gravity Gradient Subtraction Gravity gradient noise caused by local variations in the density of surrounding earth Dominant contribution is surface waves Test Mass Array of accelerometers Vertical accelerometers used to monitor motion and infer density changes Need to be spaced ~ ¼ wavelength apart => ~ 4 m at 20 Hz LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Advanced LIGO Advanced LIGO promises exciting astrophysics Advanced LIGO has been proposed and is in an advanced state of research and development Advanced LIGO should bring maturity to the science of Gravitational Wave Detection The baseline design will allow incremental improvements to be added when cutting edge technology becomes more available and reliable A broad community effort with significant international support LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Laser 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Pre-stabilized Laser Require the maximum power compatible with optical materials Three approaches studied by LSC collaboration – stable/unstable slab oscillator (Adelaide), slab amplifier (Stanford), end-pumped rod oscillator (Laser Zentrum Hannover (LZH)); evaluation concludes that all three look feasible Baseline design continuing with end-pumped rod oscillator, injection locked to an NPRO 2003: Prototyping well advanced – ½ of Slave system has developed 87 W f 2f QR HR@1064 HT@808 YAG / Nd:YAG / YAG 3x 7x40x7 FI EOM NPRO 20 W Master BP High Power Slave modemaching optics YAG / Nd:YAG 3x2x6 output LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Pre-stabilized laser Overall subsystem system design similar to initial LIGO Frequency stabilization to fixed reference cavity, 10 Hz/Hz1/2 at 10 Hz required (10 Hz/Hz1/2 at 12 Hz seen in initial LIGO) Intensity stabilization to in-vacuum photodiode, 2x10-9 ΔP/P at 10 Hz required (1x10-8 at 10 Hz demonstrated) Max Planck Institute, Hannover leading the Pre-stabilized laser development Close interaction with Laser Zentrum Hannover Experience with GEO-600 laser, reliability, packaging Germany contributing laser to Advanced LIGO  LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Intensity Stabilization Our approach: Very low noise AC-coupled PD Low voltage low noise parts in the signal path Beam geometry stabilized by PMC LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Input Optics, Modulation 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Input Optics Provides phase modulation for length, angle control (Pound-Drever-Hall) Stabilizes beam position, frequency with suspended mode-cleaner cavity Matches into main optics (6 cm beam) with suspended telescope Design similar to initial LIGO but 20x higher power Challenges: Modulators Faraday Isolators LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Input Optics University of Florida leading development effort As for initial LIGO High power rubidium tantanyl phosphate (RTP) electro-optic modulator developed Long-term exposure at Advanced LIGO power densities, with no degradation Faraday isolator from IAP-Nizhny Novgorod thermal birefringence compensated Ok to 80 W – more powerful test laser being installed at LIGO Livingston LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Test Masses 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Test Masses / Core Optics Absolutely central mechanical and optical element in the detector 830 kW; <1ppm loss; <20ppm scatter 2x108 Q; 40 kg; 32 cm dia Sapphire is the baseline test mass/core optic material; development program underway Characterization by very active and broad LSC working group Low mechanical loss, high density, high thermal conductivity all desirable attributes of sapphire Fused silica remains a viable fallback option Full-size Advanced LIGO sapphire substrate LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Core Optics Compensation Polish Fabrication of Sapphire: 4 full-size Advanced LIGO boules grown (Crystal Systems); 31.4 x 13 cm; two acquired Mechanical losses: requirement met recently measured at 200 million (uncoated) Bulk Homogeneity: requirement met Sapphire as delivered has 50 nm-rms distortion Goodrich 10 nm-rms compensation polish Polishing technology: CSIRO has polished a 15 cm diam sapphire piece: 1.0 nm-rms uniformity over central 120 mm (requirement is 0.75 nm) Bulk Absorption: Uniformity needs work Average level ~60 ppm, 40 ppm desired Annealing shown to reduce losses before LIGO Scientific Collaboration after

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Mirror coatings 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION COATINGS QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Test Mass Coatings Optical absorption (~0.5 ppm), scatter meet requirements for (good) conventional coatings Thermal noise due to coating mechanical loss recognized; LSC program put in motion to develop low-loss coatings Series of coating runs – materials, thickness, annealing, vendors Measurements on a variety of samples Ta2O5 identified as principal source of loss Test coatings show somewhat reduced loss Alumina/Tantala Doped Silica/Tantala Need ~5x reduction in loss to make compromise to performance minimal Expanding the coating development program RFP out to 5 vendors; have selected 2 Direct measurement via special purpose TNI interferometer First to-be-installed coatings needed in ~2.5 years – sets the time scale Required coating Standard coating LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Thermal Compensation 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION COATINGS QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Active Thermal Compensation PRM SRM ITM Compensation Plates Optical path distortion 20 nm Shielded ring compensator test 0 5 mm 10 15 Removes excess ‘focus’ due to absorption in coating, substrate Allows optics to be used at all input powers Initial R&D successfully completed Ryan Lawrence MIT PhD thesis Quasi-static ring-shaped additional heating Scan to complement irregular absorption Sophisticated thermal model (‘Melody’) developed to calculate needs and solution Gingin facility (ACIGA) readying tests with Lab suspensions, optics Application to initial LIGO currently being installed on Hanford 4 km interferometer Thermal correction of a mirror achieved at GEO 600 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Seismic Isolation 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION COATINGS QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Isolation: Requirements Render seismic noise a negligible limitation to GW searches Newtonian background will dominate for frequencies less than ~15 Hz Suspension and isolation contribute to attenuation Reduce or eliminate actuation on test masses Actuation source of direct noise, also increases thermal noise Acquisition challenge greatly reduced In-lock (detection mode) control system challenge is also reduced Seismic contribution Newtonian background LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Isolation: Two-stage platform Choose an active approach: high-gain servo systems, two stages of 6 degree-of-freedom each Allows extensive tuning of system after installation, operational modes Dynamics decoupled from suspension systems Lead at LSU Stanford Engineering Test Facility Prototype fabricated Mechanical system complete Instrumentation being installed First measurements indicate excellent actuator – structure alignment LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Isolation: Pre-Isolator External stage of low-frequency pre-isolation ( ~1 Hz) Tidal, microseismic peak reduction DC Alignment/position control and offload from the suspensions 1 mm pp range Lead at Stanford Prototypes in test and evaluation at MIT for early deployment at Livingston in order to reduce the cultural noise impact on initial LIGO System performance exceeds Advanced LIGO requirements LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Suspension 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION COATINGS QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Suspensions: Test Mass Quads Adopt GEO600 monolithic suspension assembly Requirements: minimize suspension thermal noise Complement seismic isolation Provide actuation hierarchy Quadruple pendulum design chosen Fused silica fibers, bonded to test mass Leaf springs (VIRGO origin) for vertical compliance Success of GEO600 a significant comfort 2002: All fused silica suspensions installed PPARC funding approved: significant financial, technical contribution; quad suspensions, electronics, and some sapphire substrates U Glasgow, Birmingham, Rutherford Quad lead in UK LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Suspensions: Triples Triple suspensions for auxiliary optics Relaxed performance requirements Uses same fused-silica design, control hierarchy Prototype of Mode Cleaner triple suspension fabricated Damping of modes demonstrated To be installed in MIT LASTI test facility in fall of 2003 Fit tests Controls/actuation testing LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration GW Readout 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION COATINGS QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration GW readout, Systems Signal recycled Michelson Fabry-Perot Offers flexibility in instrument response, optimization for technical noises, sources Can also provide narrowband response – ~10-24/Hz1/2 up to ~2 kHz Critical advantage: can distribute optical power in interferometer as desired Three table-top prototypes give direction for sensing, locking system Glasgow 10m prototype: control matrix elements confirmed Readout choice – DC rather than RF for GW sensing Offset ~ 1 picometer from interferometer dark fringe Best SNR, simplifies laser, photodetection requirements Caltech 40m prototype in construction, early testing Complete end-to-end test of readout, controls, data acquisition High-frequency narrowbanding Thermal noise Low-frequency optimization LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Scope of proposal Upgrade of the detector All interferometer subsystems Data acquisition and control infrastructure Upgrade of the laboratory data analysis system Observatory on-line analysis Caltech and MIT campus off-line analysis and archive Virtually no changes in the infrastructure Buildings, foundations, services, 4km arms unchanged Present vacuum quality suffices for Advanced LIGO – 10-7 torr Move 2km test mass chambers to 4km point at Hanford Replacement of ~15m long spool piece in vacuum equipment LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Upgrade of all three interferometers In discovery phase, tune all three to broadband curve 3 interferometers nearly doubles the event rate over 2 interferometers Improves non-Gaussian statistics Commissioning on other LHO IFO while observing with LHO-LLO pair In observation phase, the same IFO configuration can be tuned to increase low or high frequency sensitivity sub-micron shift in the operating point of one mirror suffices third IFO could e.g., observe with a narrow-band VIRGO focus alone on a known-frequency periodic source focus on a narrow frequency band associated with a coalescence, or BH ringing of an inspiral detected by other two IFOs LIGO Scientific Collaboration