B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Advertisements

ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Fourth Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Stockholm 23 September 2001 P Eerola 1 Investigation of the decays B 0 d,s -> J/  in the ATLAS experiment at the LHC.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
G. Eigen, LISHEP2011, Rio de Janeiro, July 5 th, Outline Introduction Introduction ATLAS detector and performance Vertex and impact parameter resolution.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
1 Heavy Flavor Physics At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) Aspen Winter Conference Aspen, Colorado 13 February 2006.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
B hadrons Tevatron By Eduard De La Cruz Burelo University of Michigan On behalf of the CDF and D0 collaborations Lancaster University UK, 2-8.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Results and prospects for charm physics at LHCb Philip Hunt 1 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 1 University of Oxford, Particle Physics Kruger 2010:
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
K+e+γ using OKA detector
Latest CMS Results on ϕs
Results on B Lifetimes from DØ
Tagir Aushev For the Belle Collaboration (EPFL, Lausanne ITEP, Moscow)
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 20 Nov 2013
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
Muon momentum scale calibration with J/y peak
3rd Grenoble Top Workshop – October 25, 2008
Martin Heck, for the CDF II collaboration
ATLAS B-physics important periods
Time-dependent analyses at D0-D0 threshold
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Beauty 2005, Tania Moulik (KU)
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
LHCb Rare Decays Status
CMS Physics Analysis in China
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Latest results on CP violation in B-meson mixing
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects. R Jones for A. Dewhurst, Lancaster University

Talk Outline Early ATLAS measurements of lifetime and mass for Bs  J/(+-) (K+ K-) and Bd  J/(+-) K0*(K+ π-) decays - Stringent test of the alignment, magnetic field map and tracking Advanced studies of lifetime + lifetime difference in Bs  J/(+-) (K+ K-) - Go beyond results from current experiments Full parameter fit including CP violating phase - probe for new physics with high statistics

Reconstruction method Reconstruct Bs  J/(+-) (K+ K-), Bd  J/(+-) K0*(K+ π-) decays in several stages. Pairs of muons will be fitted to a vertex to make J/ candidates which will have to pass various cuts. Pairs of tracks fitted to make  or K0* candidates. Bs candidate vertices formed from J/ and K0* candidates. Best candidate per event selected (based on 2 per degree of freedom) Note we use, vertex, direction and mass constrained fits Note, light cuts but *no* lifetime cuts at this stage

Available Statistics Because of the di-muon trigger and reconstruction method, the main types of background will come from events with J/ +- in them. The table shows the number of candidates with a mass between 5 and 5.75 GeV for 100pb-1 Channel Signal Background 1 ppJ/X Background 2 bbJ/X Bd  J/(+-) K0*(K+ π-) 13 890 19 500 54 500 Bs  J/(+-) (K+ K-) 2 232 33 600 27 000

Simultaneous Mass & Lifetime fit At low luminosity it will be possible to use relatively loose cuts when selecting the B candidates. This allows a sensitive test of detector unbiased by lifetime Allow a relatively large number of background events  simultaneous fit to mass and lifetime to extract the physics For the Bd decay with 10pb-1 integrated luminosity: Fraction of signal events in fit: 16% Uncertainty in lifetime measurement: 5% Mass uncertainty 4MeV Good for alignment checks, improving the world knowledge beyond 100pb-1 For the Bs decay with 100pb-1 integrated luminosity: Fraction of signal events in fit: 1.8% Uncertainty in lifetime measurement: 11% Improving the world knowledge beyond 100pb-1 (but see later)

Physics behind the Bs decay Measured variables: three decay angles Bs proper decay time Tag decision 8 Theory parameters to fit: 4 parameters of 3 complex helicity functions: |A┴|, |A|||, ┴ , || 4 parameters of BS system: width difference S , mean width S , oscillation frequency mS , weak mixing phase S Note, mS is insensitive, effectively falls out The number of physics parameters it is possible to extract with the simultaneous fit depends on the available statistics

Bs Lifetime and Lifetime Difference (or  & ) If we want both the lifetime and the lifetime difference we must fix the other parameters in the fit for low-ish statistics. |A┴| and |A||| can be fixed by using the results from fits to Bd decays. mS will be measured in other experiments and due to insensitivity/high correlations will always be fixed. ┴ and ||, the strong phases have little correlation with the other parameters and can be fixed without significantly affecting the results. S , the weak phase is predicted to be small in the standard model and can be fixed at 0.04 (SM) for early measurements.

 & (2) It should be possible to perform the fit when there is at least 1fb-1 integrated luminosity available. Predicted statistical uncertainties for 1.8 fb-1 S uncertainty: 1.8% S uncertainty: 36% Correlation between parameters: -0.63 Results from Dø from Jan 2007 (1.1fb-1) S uncertainty: 5.3% S uncertainty: 67%

Measuring s The standard model predicts s to be 0.04. It is important to measure s because if it is found to be much larger than 0.04 it will be a clear indication of new physics. In order to measure s accurately it will be necessary to perform a fit to 5 parameters simultaneously. With 18fb-1 integrated luminosity it should be possible to measure s with an absolute uncertainty of 0.10. Note: we are working on improvements in statistics (via trigger) and tagging

Conclusions “Commissioning measurements” can remain as permanent sensitive tests alignment controls For 30fb-1 we can really test BSM effects in CP violating phase Note: in this phase, BSM in CPV & in rare decay modes become very competitive