Special Education District Profile:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Environments Data Collection for Children Ages 3 through 5 RI Department of Education August 22, 2006.
Advertisements

Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
April 2009 Copyright © 2008 Mississippi Department of Education Instructional Programs and Services Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) April.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Children Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
School for Early Development and Achievement Kim Johnsen SPE 644.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
Kari Radzik Summer SPE 644. Who are we?  Randall Consolidated is a grade K-8 school that is located in southwestern Kenosha County, in Twin Lakes, WI.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Closing the Educational Gap for Students with Disabilities Kristina Makousky.
National, State and Local Inclusion Data: Accessing and Using Data to Increase Inclusive Opportunities Debbie Cate, IDC, ECTA
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
Individual Family Service Plans vs
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Understanding the IEP Process
Proposed Significant Disproportionality New Data Collection Presenters: Robert Trombley, Richelle Davis.
ARC Chairperson Training
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What is “Annual Determination?”
Appleton Area School District
Milwaukee School District
Randall Consolidated School District
SPECIAL EDUCATION A REVIEW OF: CHILD FIND/ SPED PROCESS
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
Understanding Data Reporting Requirements for Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to.
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
SPECIAL EDUCATION REQUIRED TRAINING
ARC Chairperson Training
Blackhawk School District
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Least Restrictive Environment
IMS Data Summary Third in a series November 2010
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Module 4: Early Childhood (ages 0-5)
Understanding Data Reporting Requirements for Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Data Reporting Requirements for Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Least Restrictive Environment
Module 6: Parental Placement
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality
Presentation transcript:

Special Education District Profile: Port Edwards School District Port Edwards, WI Cara Christy, Elementary Principal

Overview of Port Edwards School District Port Edwards is located in Central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River between Wisconsin Rapids and Nekoosa. Port Edwards has approximately 375 students 4K-12. There are four high schools within a 10-mile radius: Wisconsin Rapids, Port Edwards, Nekoosa, and Assumption. Port Edwards is the smallest of these districts. All four districts have students open enrolling in each other’s schools. Therefore, it is very important that our special education services are top-notch in order to retain students.

Overview of Port Edwards School District Port Edwards School District students had the highest Badger Exam scores in both reading and math in our Central Wisconsin Conference, as well as Wood County. Port Edwards School District students had the highest ACT Scores in our conference and second highest in Wood County. PESD District Testing Results

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Since our school district is so small, much of our performance report has data that has been redacted. According to WISEdash redaction is “the process of masking data. . . to protect student privacy” (WISEdash, 2016). Redacting data is important in order to avoid direct or indirect disclosure. Direct Disclosure reveals a student’s identity when a group of students is so small that it would be easy for someone to figure out which specific student the data was referring to. Indirect Disclosure reveals a student’s identity based on secondary information that leads to a small subset of students.

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Data must be redacted in order to follow state and federal student privacy laws. At the state level, student data is protected by Wisconsin State Statute 188.25 that states, “All pupil records maintained by a public school shall be confidential.” This includes any data that could be disclosed due to a small subset of students. At the federal level, student data is protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). This is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records.

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District The following indicators have been redacted from the Port Edwards Special Education Profile: Indicator 1: Graduation Rate Indicator 2: Dropout Rate Indicator 3: Assessment targets and participation by students with disabilities Indicator 4: Suspension and Expulsion Information Indicator 14: Post High School Outcomes The following indicators are not required to be reported and/or have no data: Indicator 8: Parent Involvement Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Indicator 5: School Age Educational Environment Local State Target A. Percent of children with IEPs age 6-21 served inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day. 53.85% 65.10% At or above 63.6% B. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6-21 served inside the regular class less than 40% of the day. 2.56% 9.56% At or below 9.5% C. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6-21 served in separate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/hospital placements. 0.00% 1.43% 1.4%

Indicator 5 Assessment STRENGTH WEAKNESS RECOMMENDATION Only 2.56% of children with IEPs aged 6-21 are served inside the regular class less than 40% of the day. 53.85% of children with IEPs age 6-21 are served inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day. When considering the number of special education students in our small district, one child can make a huge difference in percentages. However, IDEA states that children must have the least restrictive environment and be included in the regular classroom setting “to the maximum extent appropriate”. Our district needs to re-examine some IEPs of students who are inside the regular classroom less than 80% of the day to make sure they are truly in the least restrictive environment. (U.S. Department of Education, Sec. 300.114, 2004).

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Indicator 6: Preschool Educational Environment Local State Target A. Percent of children with IEPs age 3-5 attending a regular early childhood program and receiving the majority of special education and related services in the regular early childhood program. 16.67% 35.16% At or above 35.5% B. Percent of children with IEPs aged 3-5 attending a separate special education class, separate school, or residential facility. 18.53 At or below 21.25%

Indicator 6 Assessment STRENGTH WEAKNESS RECOMMENDATION According to the Individual Student Enrollment System (ISES), the 16.67% is only one child. Due to small numbers in our district, one child can count for a very large percentage compared to larger districts. This isn’t a weakness as much as a data issue. Make sure that people understand the data and how the percentages reflect a district of our small size.

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes Local State Target A. Positive social-emotional skills. 100% 64.55% At or above 73% B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills. No students in this category 53.2% At or above 61.2% C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. 75.41% At or above 81.7%

Indicator 7 Assessment STRENGTH WEAKNESS RECOMMENDATION 100% of students met the indicator and exceeded the target. Due to small numbers in our district, we couldn’t assess areas because there were no students that were included in that category. Just as one student can make a huge difference in a percentage, no students give us no data. Once again, we need to make sure that people understand the data and how the percentages reflect a district of our small size.

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Indicators 9 and 10: Disproportionate Representation in Special Education, Related Services, and Specific Disability Areas Local State Target Disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education, related services, or specific disability areas that is the result of inappropriate identification. NO 0%

Indicators 9 and 10 Assessment STRENGTH WEAKNESS RECOMMENDATION We have absolutely no disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education in our district. None We must always make sure that no student is ever disproportionately represented by race or ethnicity. The State of Wisconsin will not allow disproportionate representation at all. In addition to IDEA, States have a separate obligation, under 20 U .S.C. 1418(d) and 34 CFR §300.646. This means they must collect and examine data to determine whether significant disproportionality based on race or ethnicity is occurring in the State.

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition Local State Target Percent of children referred by Birth to 3 agency prior to age 3 who were found eligible for special education and related services by a local education agency, and who had an IEP developed and implemented by their 3rd birthday. 100% 98.85%

Indicator 12 Assessment STRENGTH WEAKNESS RECOMMENDATION We work very closely with our Head Start and Birth-3 programs to communicate needs in order to give our students the early childhood accommodations needed to make sure they are successful from a young age. Although we work closely with these agencies, we have no ultimate say over which students the agency identifies or qualifies for services. This is not a weakness, but something to understand that will be included in our district profile. Continue to maintain relationships with local agencies and communicate as often as possible in order to ensure all children are receiving proper services.

Special Education in the Port Edwards School District Indicator 13: Transition Goals Local State Target Percent of youth 16 and up with an IEP that includes post-secondary goals and transition services. 100% 99.65%

Indicator 13 Assessment STRENGTH WEAKNESS RECOMMENDATION Our LEAs and Special Education teachers do an excellent job preparing our students for the post-secondary transition. We need to continue this path; however, we need to include even more options for students and make sure they are transitioning to a logical and fitting post-secondary plan. Look for more opportunities in our community for students to gain post-secondary experiences while still in high school in order to make the transition even smoother.

Summary of Port Edwards School District Special Education District Profile I am very fortunate to work in a district that is pro-active and makes sure our special education students receive the best services in the least restrictive environment. Although we aren’t perfect and can always do better, I am very proud of our profile overall. I would like to see us improve in the area of offering more services within the regular classroom setting. This is something I plan to address with our Pupil Services Director in the near future. We should always be looking for ways to keep students with IEPs in an inclusive environment. Overall, our profile was very interesting to read. I would have liked to see more of the data that has been redacted due to our small size, and I plan to find it in my records here at school so I can make sure we are doing our best in every area, not just the ones that can be legally published.

REFERENCES: Building the Legacy of IDEA 2004. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from U.S. Department of Education, http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,statute,I,B,612,a,5 Code of Federal Regulations. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from U.S. Government Publishing Office, http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div5&node=34:1.1.1.1.33 Legal Information Institute. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from Cornell University Law School, https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/300.646 Port Edwards School District. (2016). Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.pesd.k12.wi.us Special Education District Profile. (2015). Retrieved July 26, 2016, from Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, https://apps4.dpi.wi.gov/SpedProfile Wisconsin State Legislature: 118.125. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from State of Wisconsin State Legislature, http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/118/125