Europe and children: from invisible barriers to melting pot

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHILD-FRIENDLY JUSTICE GUIDELINES. Getting there (1) Gaps between law and practice CRC and ECHR Resolution No. 2 on Child-Friendly Justice (25-26 Oct.
Advertisements

Rev. 2/05. For Use in Law Enforcement Training Only This training program was developed by the New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice This training program.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
U.S. Vs. Nixon Michael and Ryan Fischer. Watergate Scandal Major political scandal that occurred in the United States in the 1970s as a result of the.
The Brussels II Regulation The jurisdiction of courts.
UNIT 6.- The Judge and Family Law in the EU.
Regional conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, February, Belgrad,Serbia Albania’s Challenges.
Child-friendly justice system. Parallel civil and administrative proceedings in Estonia Leanika Tamm, civil judge Viru County Court, Estonia Tallinn 2015.
1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention and Brussels II bis Interaction within the EU and beyond Prof. Dr. Marta Pertegás First Secretary Hague Conference.
High Court & Family Court
The Spanish Public Prosecution Service. INDEX 1.Functions Objetive functions: defence of legality Constitutional legality Ordinary.
Filing of Complaint Caparell & DiGregorio will file your complaint and related documents with the Plymouth Probate and Family Court which, in turn, assigns.
Dennis C. K. Ho Solicitor, Hong Kong Macau, 25 June 2015
The Role of Family Consultants in the Family Court- A Guide for the Effective Solicitor.
Towards the Best Interests of the Child in Cross- Border Situations - Singapore’s Experience- District Judge Joyce Low Director, Planning, Policy and Administration,
The Hague Child Abduction Convention 1980 Hong Kong SAR Experience Applied to Hong Kong in September 1997 Given force by Child Abduction and Custody Ordinance,
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
Application of rules on child abduction of Brussels IIbis Regulation and 1980 Hague Convention in the courts of Latvia Agris Skudra Representative from.
Capacity Building of Public Procurement Review Body Seminar in Kyiv March /14/
Mediation in the application of the 1980 Convention Regional Conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
+ High Court & Family Court The Federal Courts. + Federal Courts The Federal courts include; - High Court - Federal Court - Family Court - Federal Magistrates’
Victims Rights and the Standing of victims in criminal procedures Focus in judicial cooperation lies traditionally on the investigating authorities and.
The Hague Child Abduction Convention and Domestic Violence Nicolas Sauvage, Legal Officer Hague Conference on Private International Law.
Transfrontier contact concerning children Regional Conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Belgrade,
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
Return Orders and Enforcement Regional Conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Belgrade, Serbia 3-4.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
© Hague Conference on Private International Law THE 1996 HAGUE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CHILD PROTECTION & THE BRUSSELS IIa REGULATION The Right to.
International Social Service German Branch Establishing effective cooperation in international cases concerning child-protection and family conflicts The.
Hague Convention Procedure in Canada Japan’s Ratification of the Hague Convention on Child Abduction and its Implications Yuji Matson, DLA Piper (Canada)
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
The Judicial Branch “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from.
The Court System The United States has a federal court system as well as state court systems. Tribal court systems exist to settle disputes on Native.
The Hague Convention On the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
Victorian Courts Mapping the Court Process
“INTERNATIONAL FAMILIES” UNDER EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
Georgetown, Guyana 14, 2016 Ignacio Goicoechea
Intro to Virginia’s Judicial System
Access to environmental justice in Spain: State of the art
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY MEDIATION - Central Contact Points
The Court System Chapter #2.
Investigation & Prosecution in Switzerland
Presentation on “ Juvenile Justice System in Cambodia” in The 1st Meeting of the ASEAN Juvenile Organizing Committee (Bangkok from 1st- 4th.
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
How does a case move from local courts to the U.S. Supreme Court?
“INTERNATIONAL FAMILIES” UNDER EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
The Court System Street Law.
Part A-I The Economic Theory of Legal Process
Facts which need not be proved by evidence
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Unlocking Children’s Rights
NC Government The 3 branches.
Private International Law
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
      Financed by the Justice Programme of the European Union STRENGTHENING LAWYERS LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND COOPERATION WITH PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES,
Financed by the Justice Programme of the European Union
Child Abduction Prosecutions
Judicial Powers of Case Management
At Adelaide Family Lawyers we understand that going through a family breakdown is an emotionally difficult time and that it is important to put your family.
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch.
THE ROLES OF: Courts and dispute resolution methods
UNICEF Diversion & Alternatives Toolkit 2009
Presentation transcript:

Europe and children: from invisible barriers to melting pot María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

procedure PROSECUTOR (ALWAYS) COURT (WHERE THE CHILD IS) 6 WEEKS NOT ACTION BY THE DEFENDANT 5 DAYS TRIAL  RESOLUTION (2 días) ACCEPT TO RETURN TRIAL ACT  RESOLUTION OPPOSITION TRIAL (5 días) EVIDENCES  3 DAYS RESOLUTION María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia RETURN RESOLUTION RESOLUTION: NO PROVISIONAL EXECUTION (525LEC) APPEAL SUSPENSE EFECTS 3 DAYS TO APPEAL – 3 DAYS TO OPPOSITE THE APPEAL APPEAL RESOLUTION 20 days María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

Suspension of the execution of the decree of return RESOLUTION: NO PROVISIONAL IMPLEMENTATION (525 spanish Procedure codification) APPEAL SUSPENSIVE EFFECTS 3 DAYS AFTER RESOLUTION RESOLUTION APPEAL  20 days resolution. Single effect María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia Hearing the child In family proceedings In general: Children are heard (Judge and Public Prosecutor) when: They have sufficient maturity for it, Procedural Law  minimum of 12 years. In practice: Judges don’t like (as possible)  if the minor does not go to the court, he is being preserved from a traumatic situation. Other mechanisms to listen to the child in less shocking situations: Psicologic technical team In abduction procedures, the child is always listened to. Unless: age and maturity do not advise recorded in the resolution and in a motivated way. María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia 3.      In which ways do the courts of your country hear the child in the international abduction proceedings? and in family proceedings (separation, divorce, regulation of natural filiation) In family proceedings in general, children are heard (Judge and Public Prosecutor) when they have sufficient maturity for it, establishing the Procedural Law that must have a minimum of 12 years. In abduction procedures, the child is always listened to, unless age and maturity do not advise, a situation that must be recorded in the resolution and in a motivated way. In practice, in family proceedings in general, Judges are reluctant to listen to the minor unless they consider it relevant in their interest, since it is considered that if the minor does not go to the court, he is being preserved from a traumatic situation. In these procedures, there are other mechanisms to listen to the child and to know their status by the Judge in less shocking situations, such as interviews with the (psicologic) technical team. Art. 13 §1 and 2 Convention Le Hague 1980: (founded risk of child due to the return and opposition of the child to the return) Cooperation between the Central and Administrative Authorities of the requested State and the requesting State (habitual residence of the minor). Must provide all the follow-up and file that exists about the situation of the child's vulnerability or risk in the event that it occurs. Laws of protection of the state minor Spain: Country-general- Law (Law 1/1996) and autonomic one (for example, Catalunya has its own law in this respect - LDOIA 14 / 2010)). María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia Average duration of the proceedings ex Convention Le Hague 1980 (really six weeks?) The procedure does not last 6 weeks (except in exceptional circumstances). When Spain is a requesting country, the procedures usually take an average of 4 years. (In some cases, 2, and in others, reach 6 and even 8). Spain has only 1 person in charge of the Central Authority, which sometimes does not only have assistants. When Spain is a requested country, excess workload that exists in our Justice Administration (Courts, ) a family procedure in the first instance has an average duration of 9 to 18 months. In cases of urgency as abduction, it is true that the Court prioritizes and advances the agenda but only in the bureaucratic procedures of admission to processing the complaint, and notification / summons to the defendant, 4 to 8 weeks have already been lost. Exceptional cases works mostly out of court, Central Authority and the device that is deployed with the police authorities; locating the abductor, and explaining him/her the situation, giving him/her the option from the beginning to be able to solve this situation in a friendly way, warning him/her of the procedure that has been initiated (order of the Central Authority). MEDIATION. In Spain is not developed as a specialty, and the parties are referred to a general mediation service. Parents sometimes have lawyers who mediate and negotiate the return of the child (through a modification of measures, or waivers of criminal actions for kidnapping by the injured parent). The resolution of mediation in international child abduction procedure can only establish the return of the child (or not return). The rest of the pacts being private between the parties if there is no interposition The corresponding judicial action (we will explain cases). María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

Ways and timing of execution of the repatriation decree. The resolution itself has to explain the form and the execution time of return. It is advisable to request it in the judicial request, to avoid conflicts. Support of police authorities. Measures to avoid new abduction (duanes, airports…). María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia   Case studies of the application of art. 11 §8 Reg. EU 2201/2003: denial of return by the requested State and subsequent decision which orders the return by the Judge of the habitual residence. It does not work properly. Court ruling issued by the Court of habitual residence expressly stating that "the habitual residence of the minor is Spain", and in the requested country has not had probative force to obtain a return resolution María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com SGS Abogados Derecho de Familia

MUCHAS GRACIAS SGS Silvia Giménez-Salinas Abogados Derecho de Familia C/ Casp 31, Principal 08010 Barcelona c/ Claudio Coello 33, bajo D 28001 Madrid María Giráldez de Luis mg@silviagimenezsalinas.com MUCHAS GRACIAS