ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Neutronics Analysis on a Compact Tokamak Fusion Reactor CREST Q. HUANG 1,2, S. ZHENG 2, L. Lu 2, R. HIWATARI 3, Y. ASAOKA 3, K. OKANO 3, Y. OGAWA 1 1 High.
First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.
Neutron Wall Loading Profile Using CAD/MCNP Interface and (progress report) Mengkuo Wang ARIES Meeting June 16-17, 2004 University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Neutron Wall Loading Profile Using CAD/MCNP Interface Mengkuo Wang ARIES Meeting Sep 16, 2004 University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
Poloidal Distribution of ARIES-ACT Neutron Wall Loading L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Proposals for Next Year’s MFE Activities C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Sept. 24, 2000.
Development of the New ARIES Tokamak Systems Code Zoran Dragojlovic, Rene Raffray, Farrokh Najmabadi, Charles Kessel, Lester Waganer US-Japan Workshop.
Progress on Engineering and Costing Algorithms for ARIES Systems Code Zoran Dragojlovic, Rene Raffray, Chuck Kessel and Leslie Bromberg ARIES Project Meeting.
AN UPDATE on DIVERTOR DESIGN and HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau (UCSD) H. McGuinness (RPI), D. Steiner (RPI) A.R. Raffray (UCSD), X. Wang (UCSD), A. Grossman.
MCNP/CAD Activities and Preliminary 3-D Results Mengkuo Wang, T. Tautges, D. Henderson, and L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin.
Status of 3-D Analysis, Neutron Streaming through Penetrations, and LOCA/LOFA Analysis L. El-Guebaly, M. Sawan, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, G.
10/04/ D Source, Neutron Wall Loading & Radiative Heating for ARIES-CS Paul Wilson Brian Kiedrowski Laila El-Guebaly.
June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
Tissue inhomogeneities in Monte Carlo treatment planning for proton therapy L. Beaulieu 1, M. Bazalova 2,3, C. Furstoss 4, F. Verhaegen 2,5 (1) Centre.
APPLICATION: The first real application of the CAD-MCNP coupling approach is to calculate the neutron wall loading distribution (Γ) in the Z and toroidal.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Minimum Radial Standoff: Problem definition and Needed Info L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With Input from:
TSC time dependent free-boundary simulations of the ACT1 (aggr phys) plasma and disruptions C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Jan 23-24, 2012, UCSD.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Photon Beam Transport in a Voxelized Human Phantom Model: Discrete Ordinates vs Monte Carlo R. A. Lillie, D. E. Peplow, M. L. Williams, B. L. Kirk, M.
Bohm 1 Preliminary Neutronics Analysis of 3x2 Toroidal and Poloidal Legs of ELM Coils Tim Bohm and Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin 7/22/2010.
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
Neutronics Analysis for K-DEMO Blanket Module with Helium coolant June 26, 2013 Presented by Kihak IM Prepared by Y.S. Lee Fusion Engineering Center DEMO.
Three-Dimensional Nuclear Analysis for the US DCLL TBM M. Sawan, B. Smith, E. Marriott, P. Wilson University of Wisconsin-Madison With input from M. Dagher.
Accuracy Based Generation of Thermodynamic Properties for Light Water in RELAP5-3D 2010 IRUG Meeting Cliff Davis.
1 Everyday Statistics in Monte Carlo Shielding Calculations  One Key Statistics: ERROR, and why it can’t tell the whole story  Biased Sampling vs. Random.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
Systems Code – Hardwired Numbers for Review C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, July 29-30, 2010.
EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,
Lesson 4: Computer method overview
ARIES- ACT, 21-22May 2013, Germantown, MD Page 1 L. Waganer Consultant for ARIES Project / UCSD / DOE ARIES Project Meeting May 2013 Hampton Inn,
1 Neutronics Assessment of Self-Cooled Li Blanket Concept Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
Stabilizing Shells in ARIES C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, 5/28-29/2008.
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
1 Neutronics Parameters for the Reference HAPL Chamber Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Progress of ARIES Systems Code Development Zoran Dragojlovic A. René Raffray Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES-“TNS” Project Meeting June 14 and 15, 2007 General.
Systems Analysis Development for ARIES Next Step C. E. Kessel 1, Z. Dragojlovic 2, and R. Raffrey 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 University.
Development and Scope of ARIES Systems Code Zoran Dragojlovic A. René Raffray Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES-“TNS” Project Meeting April 3 and 4, 2007 University.
Required Dimensions of HAPL Core System with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst. Rene Raffray UCSD HAPL Project.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
1 Impact of Sample Estimate Rounding on Accuracy ERCOT Load Profiling Department May 22, 2007.
Neutron Wall Loading Update L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, A. Robinson, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Comments on ARIES-ACT 1/2011 Strawman L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison
Engineering models in the ARIES system code, Part II M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, et al. ARIES Project Meeting January 2011.
Uncertainty quantification in generic Monte Carlo Simulation: a mathematical framework How to do it? Abstract: Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is the capability.
Field-on measurement of multiple scattering
Spatial analysis Measurements - Points: centroid, clustering, density
Paul P.H. Wilson UW-Madison Fusion Technology Institute
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
Improvements to power flow modeling in the ARIES system code
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation B
DCLL Blanket Analysis and Power Core Layout for ARIES-DB
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
Lecture 2 – Monte Carlo method in finance
Considering impacts of PEVs in planning optimal hybrid systems
Comments on ARIES-ACT 10/20/2010 Pre-Strawman
Updated DCLL TBM Neutronics Analysis
Systems analysis of ACT2 design space
Analysis of Technical and Programmatic Tradeoffs with Systems Code
Nuclear Analyses for two “Look-alike” HCPB Blanket Sub-modules for Testing in ITER Mahmoud Z Youssef UCLA Presented at ITER-TBM4 Meeting, UCLA, March 2-4,
ACT-1 design point definition
Approximate Mean Value Analysis of a Database Grid Application
Presentation transcript:

ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 A Study of the Effects of Source Sampling Methods on ARIES-RS NWL Profiles R.N. Slaybaugh, E.P. Marriott, P.P.H. Wilson, L. El-Guebaly Contributors: C. Kessel (PPPL), X. Wang (UCSD) ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Outline Introduction Past NWL Work (in 1996) with approximate neutron source distribution Present Work with exact neutron source distribution Comparison with DAGMC Results Recommendations Publications ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Introduction interim final Using 3-D MCNP code, El-Guebaly* determined neutron wall loading (NWL) distribution for interim design Final design was later determined Comparison of interim and final design cross sections Parameter Interim (Jan ‘96) Final (Aug ‘96) Power 1881.5 MW 2167 MW Major Radius 5.12 m 5.52 m Minor Radius 1.28 m 1.38 m Magnetic Shift 55 cm 33 cm Peak NWL (midplane) 5.3 MW/m2 5.6 MW/m2 (from ACS) *El-Guebaly, L.A., The ARIES Team. “Overview of ARIES-RS neutronics and radiation shielding: key issues and main conclusions.” Fusion Engineering and Design 38. (1997) : 139-158 ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Introduction We reexamined the NWL for ARIES-RS Different source sampling methods were used Effect on NWL distribution is analyzed FW segmented vertically (every 10-20 cm) to improve accuracy ARIES-RS cross section view with structural detail ARIES-RS cross section view with wall segmenting and 3 source regions shown ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Past Work Used standard MCNP source definition 3 regions were created in the plasma zone They were weighted to represent the actual source distribution, provided by C. Bathke Each region was sampled uniformly Angular distribution was isotropic NWL results from 1997 report ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Present Work For interim ARIES-RS design, NWL was computed using 3 source distributions: one uniformly sampled region (basic) 3 uniformly sampled regions (this is what was done before) Sampling of actual source distribution provided by C. Kessel These results will be compared to assess the accuracy of each method. ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Present Work (cont.) Plasma parameters provided by C. Kessel Provided on R-Z grid in standard output format from plasma physics simulation Generate a source density distribution on R-Z grid, S(R,Z) Source probability density function (PDF) derived by volume weighting PDF = 2πR*dR*dZ*S(R,Z) Cumulative distribution function is created by summing over R and Z ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Present Work (cont.) Source mesh cell is selected by: Linear search through Z from distribution function Linear search through R from distribution function Toroidal angle is sampled randomly from a uniform distribution The source mesh cell is then sampled uniformly in volume; the size is obtained from the R-Z grid The source is emitted isotropically ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Comparison of Inboard NWL results by source, native geometry ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Comparison of Outboard NWL results by source, native geometry ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Comparison of Divertor NWL results by source, native geometry ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Comparison to DAGMCNPX Calculations repeated with DAGMCNPX Previous results used “native” MCNP geometry DAGMCNPX was developed at UW and performs transport directly on the CAD geometry file The results from the native and DAGMCNPX geometries will be compared ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Results Comparison of DAGMC and native geometry for Inboard NWL , actual source ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Results Comparison of DAGMC and native geometry for Outboard NWL , actual source ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Results Comparison of DAGMC and native geometry for Divertor NWL , actual source ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Native Geometry (actual source) Results one uniform region 3 uniform regions actual distribution Peak Inboard Γ 3.2 MW/m2 3.8 MW/m2 4.1 MW/m2 Peak Outboard Γ 4.8 MW/m2 5.3 MW/m2 Average* Γ 3.1 MW/m2 Native Geometry (actual source) DAGMC (actual soruce) Peak Inboard Γ 4.1 MW/m2 Peak Outboard Γ 5.3 MW/m2 Average* Γ 3.1 MW/m2 ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 * Average Γ = Neutron Power / FW area including divertor Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Results Source Comparison: Outboard and divertor cases: the 3 region source matched the actual quite well Inboard case, the 3 region source was ~8% lower at the midplane shallower curvature, and >10% higher near the top/bottom DAGMC comparison: For the actual source, all results within 4% For 3/45 cases with >1% discrepancy had a statistical error of the same magnitude Ssimilar results for both other source types ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Recommendations The 3 region source captures many of the effects of the real source However, due to the slight disagreement for the inboard results (+/- 10%), the actual source should be used DAGMC is also an appropriate choice for these kinds of calculations Sensitivity to actual source resolution should be studied ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile

Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile Publications UW-FDM Report: A Study of Effects of Source Sampling Methods on ARIES-RS NWL Profile. R. N. Slaybaugh, E. P. Marriot, P. P. H. Wilson, L. El-Guebaly SOFT 2008: R.N. Slaybaugh, P.P.H. Wilson, L. El-Guebaly, E.P. Marriott “A Monte Carlo Sampling Method for an Arbitrary Toroidal Source” ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08 Impact of Source Sampling on NWL Profile