HHRS Train-The-Trainer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
Advertisements

CDI Module 10: A Review of Effective Skills Training
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 1: Introduction to Student Growth Measures and SLOs.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
The EHFA Standards Council has developed a series of standards for several of the occupations in the fitness industry with job purpose as the foundation.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
2 ND EDITION JULY Health Systems Management A Senior Management Course for Health Managers in Kenya.
Employee & Organizational Development Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) Review “The PDQ and YOU” Human Resources The University of Tennessee
Kazakhstan Health Technology Transfer and Institutional Reform Project Day 2 Developing standardised patient roles.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Saudi Board FM Curriculum
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
1 Classify/Categorize Deficiencies into Hazards 1 M ODULE 3:
H EALTHY HOMES RATING SYSTEM. 2 C OURSE G OALS Enable students to: Interpret and apply the principles of the Healthy Homes Rating System (HHRS), Prioritize.
Program Approval Standard 22: Curriculum. Required Materials NAACLS Guide to Approval (add link) Section I: Core and Unique Standards For Approved Programs.
Modified & Track 4 Teachers Southeast Raleigh High School July 22nd, 2015 Office of School Performance Healthful Living Kickoff Meeting.
Subject specialist mentoring on the DET
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment
Criteria Rollout Meeting October 30, 2016
Fitness and Conditioning
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
Moderator Training – unitised assessment
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature
Healthy homes rating system
Module 3: Classify/Categorize Deficiencies into Hazards
TRAINERS AND TRAINING PROCESSES
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment
D2L Refresher Upload content into the Content section in a D2L course
Assessment of Learning 1
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Performance Assessment Development
Invest in Training and Professional Development
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING-I ACCT 2003
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
Designing and Implementing Local Faculty Development Programs
Foundation Degree IT Project
Web CPI Quick reference
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
The National Diploma in Teaching Adults
Determine appropriate actions
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Module 5: Determine appropriate actions
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
AET/515 Instructional Plan Template (Shirmen McDonald)
Instructor Led  Video Training
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Structure of learning content for AgriTeach 4.0
Shana Holden-Murphy District Data Specialist Karla Browning
Submitting an assessment after the course
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Providing feedback to learners
Web CPI Instructions for Student Rating - Quick reference
Welcome to the CSBM workshop:
Web CPI Instructions for Student Rating - Quick reference
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Introduction to Extended Reflection 1 Term 1, Development Day 1
Presentation transcript:

HHRS Train-The-Trainer Course Developer Meeting

Issues requiring clarification Pre-requisites for participants Qualifications of trainers teaching the Train-the-Trainer Skills assessment of participants Post-course requirements

Plan of action Review course approval form submitted to Curriculum Committee Review stated course objectives Discuss options for resolution of issues listed on previous slide

Some “T” terminology We are looking at the HHRS Train-the-trainer course approval submittal.. i.e., the HHRS “T3” Participants who complete the course should be able to train others on how to use the HHRS We are also identifying qualifications of people who can teach the Train-the-trainer course.. i.e., “T4” or Train the Train-the-trainer Trainers who meet these qualifications should be able to deliver the T3 course

HHRS train-the-trainer (t3) course: details from new course application form Issue #1: Pre-requisites for persons attending Train-the-Trainer (T3) Session 30 min. Issue #2: Qualifications of Trainers teaching the Train-the-Trainer (T4)

HHRS t3 course: details from new course application form Additional details cut off from 24a. Describe E-learning method: Delivery is synchronous, live, instructor led. First delivery used GoToMeeting, but future deliveries will use a platform such as GoToTraining to incorporate additional student participation. Issue #2: Qualifications of Trainers teaching the Train-the-Trainer (T4) – online delivery

HHRS t3 course: details from new course application form On following slides..

Course Goals Enable students to: Interpret and apply the principles of the Healthy Homes Rating System (HHRS), Choose appropriate corrective action options to eliminate or reduce hazards Communicate their findings in a HHRS Assessment Report Session 30 min.

Student Learning Outcomes Interpret housing-related health hazards using evidence-based likelihood and spread of harm data Calculate hazard scores and identify hazard bands Identify and prioritize effective corrective actions Produce a Healthy Homes Rating System Assessment Report Session 30 min.

Session 30 min. Module 1: Describe the purpose of the HHRS List four steps included in the HHRS process Define four common HHRS terms Identify two important HHRS resources Module 2 Determine assessment purpose and goals Describe links between deficiencies and hazards Summarize detailed information to be collected Explain timeframe to be considered when evaluating deficiencies Identify currently available inspection methods Evaluate unique considerations for different dwelling types Session 30 min.

Module 3: Explain the importance of the following four terms to the HHRS: element, ideal, hazard, deficiency Use the 29 hazards chart and the Operating Guidance, identify vulnerable populations and explain their significance Describe the relationship between deficiencies and hazards using specific examples Module 4: Describe the purpose of using the HHRS rating system to rate hazards Determine the likelihood and spread of harm outcomes of a hazard Use the HHRS formula to determine the hazard score. Evaluate the severity of the hazard score to prioritize appropriate interventions

Submitted assessment and rating (Module 6) Use the hazard score to determine appropriate actions Provide justification for selected actions Submitted assessment and rating (Module 6) To complete the course successfully, do the following in the next 10 days: Inspect a property Complete the reporting form for this assessment Submit report to your trainer for his or her review Attain a score of 70% for the submitted report

Module 6: Evaluation criteria and percentage of points Description of property 10% List of deficiencies 15% List of hazards identified 20% Hazard rating and band 20% Justifications 25% Presentation 10%

Module 6: Re-take If you don’t reach a 70% score, do the following: Consult your trainer about problems with your first report Carry out an assessment and scoring of a second (different) property Submit a report for the second property within 10 days of consulting with the trainer Attain a mark of 70% for the second submission

Module 6: Other matters Trainers will score the submitted survey and assessment forms within 5 working days of receipt. Certificates will be issued within five days after scoring is completed.

HHRS t3 course: issues to resolve Pre-requisites for participants Qualifications of trainers teaching the Train-the-Trainer Skills assessment of participants Post-course requirements

T3 Participant Pre-requisites Options Steps / decision points Home Assessment experience Attended HHRS course Healthy Homes Specialist? Other professional designations? Years of experience or number of homes assessed? Attend HHRS and score minimum 90% on assessment Attend Essentials course Minimum 2 years involvement in home assessments (performing and/or teaching) Training experience NCHH courses HHRS course Other adult ed experience Minimum 2 years adult education experience Acceptable substitutions Training center partner involved in course development Professional certification and/or education in field will be considered in lieu of Essentials on case by case basis

T4 Trainer Qualifications Options Steps / decision points NCHH Involvement Training center partner who has attended a HHRS T3 course and/or participated in development of the HHRS T3 Approved by NCHH and Solutions

T3 Participant Skill Assessment Skills Steps / decision points 1 Train participants on how to recognize deficiencies Explain the methodology for identifying hazards using the operating guidance Clearly articulate the likelihood and spread of harms concepts Communicate effectively as an instructor Teachback during course or evaluate another participant’s teachback NEED TO PUT TEACHBACK INTO CURRICULUM ( CAN BE ONLINE) 3- Determine whether or not course participants can correctly calculate the hazard rating Evaluate a written justification provided by a participant Grade their student’s progress and implement corrective actions if needed Grade assessments as part of the course Understand the assessment evaluation process (2nd assessment if needed) Provide feedback to their students NEED ASSESSMENTS FOR GRADING EXERCISE NEED GUIDANCE FOR TRAINERS ON HOW TO SCORE PARTICIPANT AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK 2- Analyze the ability of the participants to choose appropriate corrective actions and modify the hazard rating Assess the effectiveness of the written report submitted by the participant Use the worked examples to choose interventions and rescore the hazard rating NEED EXERCISE WITH WORKED EXAMPLES

NEXT STEPS NEED ASSESSMENTS FOR GRADING EXERCISE – Jack/Susan/Erica will look in files and “clean up” assessments to use during exercise.. Pick some “bad” ones NEED EXERCISE WITH WORKED EXAMPLES – Participants will have to choose corrective actions for the assessments they evaluate and rescore NEED TO PUT TEACHBACK INTO CURRICULUM (CAN BE ONLINE) – Susan will look at how to incorporate into curriculum NEED GUIDANCE FOR TRAINERS ON HOW TO SCORE PARTICIPANT AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK – get templates from trainers that have been teaching the course and develop consensus