The changing ozone depletion potential of N2O in a future climate

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Findings since the 2006 Assessment SAP co-chairs 7th Meeting of the Ozone Research Managers Geneva, Switzerland May 19, 2008.
Advertisements

Effect of surfactants on N 2 O emissions from biologically productive regions Annette Kock, Jens Schafstall, Tim Fischer, Marcus Dengler, Peter Brandt.
Copyright © 2010 R. R. Dickerson & Z.Q. Li 1 AOSC 620 The Ozone Hole R. Dickerson.
Ozone and the Ozone Hole Heather Raven & Stefanie Spayd.
A science/policy success story: The world avoided by the Montreal Protocol Greg Bodeker Presented at A Silver lining Celebrating 25 years of the Montreal.
OZONE Stratospheric Tropospheric Summary Basics Issues ©2003, Perry Samson, University of Michigan The good, the bad & the ugly.
CAM-Chem and hemispheric transport of ozone and PAN Chemistry-Climate Working Group 15 th Annual CCSM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO June 29, 2010 Arlene M.
Biomarkers in Super Earth Atmospheres: Photochemical Responses John Lee Grenfell Zentrum für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Technische Universität (TU) Berlin.
Using global models and chemical observations to diagnose eddy diffusion.
METO 621 Lesson 23. The Ozone Hole Decline in mean October ozone levels over Halley Bay.
Next Two Weeks—Stratospheric Chemistry Mid-latitude Ozone Chemistry (and depletion) Polar Ozone Destruction (the Ozone Hole) READING: Chapter 10 of text.
Bay Area Earth Science Institute (BAESI)
. Sensitivity Studies of Ozone Depletion with a 3D CTM Wuhu Feng 1, M.P. Chipperfield 1, S. Dhomse 1, L. Gunn 1, S. Davies 1, B. Monge-Sanz 1, V.L. Harvey.
Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield
SETTING THE STAGE FOR: BIOSPHERE, CHEMISTRY, CLIMATE INTERACTIONS.
METO 637 Lesson 16.
STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.Review of stratospheric chemistry 2.Recent trends in stratospheric ozone and forcing 3.How will stratospheric.
Tomás Sherwen, Mat Evans, Lucy Carpenter Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, University of York, UK CAST Science team. Rainer Volkamer (c), Theodore.
CHAPMAN MECHANISM FOR STRATOSPHERIC OZONE (1930) O O 3 O2O2 slow fast Odd oxygen family [O x ] = [O 3 ] + [O] R2 R3 R4 R1.
Modeling and visualization software for the nowcasting of the middle atmosphere T. Egorova *, N. Hochmuth ***, E. Rozanov*, **, A.V. Shapiro *,**, A.I.
Effect of Stratospheric Water Vapor Change on Ozone Layer and Climate Wenshou Tian Martyn P. Chipperfield 1 Collage of the Atmospheric Science Lanzhou.
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science Representation of Middle Range Energy Electrons in the Chemistry-Climate Model SOCOL Pavle Arsenovic.
Influence of the sun variability and other natural and anthropogenic forcings on the climate with a global climate chemistry model Martin Schraner Polyproject.
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
Update on paleochemistry simulations Jean-François Lamarque and J.T. Kiehl Earth and Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Newly detected ozone-depleting substances in the atmosphere SAP Presentation OEWG, Paris, July 2014.
Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry Measurements-I John Ortega National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, USA National Center for Atmospheric.
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
Links between ozone and climate J. A. Pyle Centre for Atmospheric Science, Dept of Chemistry University of Cambridge Co-chair, SAP 7th ORM, Geneva, 19.
QUESTIONS 1.Based on the major source of OH described last class where do you expect OH formation to be high? 2.Why don’t reactions of hydrocarbons deplete.
Analysis of a simulation with prognostic ozone in ARPEGE-Climat Jean-François Royer, Hubert Teysseidre, Hervé Douville, Sophie Tyteca Meteo-France,
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 5: Atmospheric Structure / Earth System Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
© 2012 W. H. Freeman & Co.. Skin cancer © 2012 W. H. Freeman & Co.
IAC ETH, 26 October 2004 Sub-project: Effects of Solar irradiance variability on the atmosphere (steady-state sensitivity study) Progress report (final)
4/20/2006Ga Tech - EAS Air Chemistry Group Presentation 1 A Hydrogen Economy’s Potential Environmental Impacts Chun Zhao Evan Cobb.
Recent Trend of Stratospheric Water Vapor and Its Impacts Steve Rieck, Ning Shen, Gill-Ran Jeong EAS 6410 Team Project Apr
1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
TOSCA workshop, Berlin, 15 May 2012 Comparison of the SSI data sets using observed and simulated evolution of the middle atmosphere during A.
The impact of volcanic aerosols on stratospheric chemistry with implications for geoengineering Simone Tilmes WACCM team, Doug Kinnison,
Short term variability of the ozone and other species simulated using LYRA data Tatiana Egorova *, Eugene Rozanov *,**, Werner Schmutz * Ingolf Dammash.
Study of the Atmospheric Degradation, Radiative Forcing and Global Warming Potentials of CH 2 FCH 2 OH, CHF 2 CH 2 OH and CF 3 CH 2 OH S. R. Sellevåg a,
Constraints on the Production of Nitric Oxide by Lightning as Inferred from Satellite Observations Randall Martin Dalhousie University With contributions.
The Influence of loss saturation effects on the assessment of polar ozone changes Derek M. Cunnold 1, Eun-Su Yang 1, Ross J. Salawitch 2, and Michael J.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 14: Methane and CO Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
Arthur N. Samel Chair, Department of Geography Bowling Green State University & Chief Reader, Advanced Placement Environmental Science Program.
Nowcasting of the middle atmosphere state based on the reconstructed SSI data T. Egorova *, E. Rozanov *,**, N. Hochmuth ***, A.I. Shapiro *, A.V. Shapiro.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
The Atmosphere: One component of the climate system Composition / Structure Radiative transfer Vertical and latitudinal heat transport Atmospheric circulation.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Chloromonoxide
GMI Capabilities Sarah Strode, Jose Rodriguez, Steve Steenrod, Junhua Liu, Susan Strahan, Eric Nielsen.
ATS 621 Fall 2012 Lecture 11.
A. R. Ravishankara, John S. Daniel, Robert W. Portmann (2009)
Mingwei Li Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences
Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone
Greenhouse Effect Presented By: Janet Fang Sam Atwood EESC W4400.
Percent of Global GHG Emissions 14%
Variability of CO2 From Satellite Retrievals and Model Simulations
Atmospheric Chemistry
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Variability of CO2 From Satellite Retrievals and Model Simulations
Introduction to Chemistry
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Limitations of Single-Basket Trading:
Asian outflow and chemical evolution of ozone and nitrogen oxides over the Pacific Mathew Evans, Daniel Jacob, Harvard Group, TRACE-P Science Team et al.
Percent of Global GHG Emissions 14%
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

The changing ozone depletion potential of N2O in a future climate Laura Revell1,2, Fiona Tummon2, Ross Salawitch3, Andrea Stenke2, and Thomas Peter2 1Bodeker Scientific, New Zealand, laura@bodekerscientific.com 2Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 3Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Maryland, US Revell et al., GRL, 2015, doi:10.1002/2015GL065702

Increasing CO2 and CH4 lead to less N2O-induced ozone destruction x x x Rate of NOx-induced ozone loss (10-14 molecules s-1) CH4 (ppb) x x x Results from the SOCOL chemistry- climate model: 9 year 2100 time-slice simulations based on RCP 6.0 x x x CO2 (ppm)

Increasing CO2 and CH4 lead to less N2O-induced ozone destruction x x x Rate of NOx-induced ozone loss (10-14 molecules s-1) CH4 (ppb) x x x x x x More CH4: OH + NO2 + M → HNO3 + M CO2 (ppm)

The ODP of N2O is sensitive to CO2 and CH4 concentrations 8.5 CH4 (ppb) Year 2100 ODPN2O 6.0 4.5 2.6 CO2 (ppm)

The ODP of N2O is sensitive to CO2 and CH4 concentrations 8.5 Year 2000 ODPN2O 0.015 SOCOL 0.017 Ravishankara et al., 2009 0.019 Daniel et al., 2010; Fleming et al., 2011 CH4 (ppb) Year 2100 ODPN2O 6.0 4.5 2.6 CO2 (ppm)

The ODP of N2O is sensitive to CO2 and CH4 concentrations 8.5 Year 2000 ODPN2O 0.015 SOCOL 0.017 Ravishankara et al., 2009 0.019 Daniel et al., 2010; Fleming et al., 2011 CH4 (ppb) Year 2100 ODPN2O Year 2100 ODPN2O RCP 2.6 0.024 RCP 4.5 0.022 RCP 6.0 0.019 RCP 8.5 0.016 6.0 4.5 2.6 CO2 (ppm)

The ODP of N2O is sensitive to CO2 and CH4 concentrations 8.5 Year 2000 ODPN2O 0.015 SOCOL 0.017 Ravishankara et al., 2009 0.019 Daniel et al., 2010; Fleming et al., 2011 ??? CH4 (ppb) Year 2100 ODPN2O Year 2100 ODPN2O RCP 2.6 0.024 RCP 4.5 0.022 RCP 6.0 0.019 RCP 8.5 0.016 6.0 4.5 2.6 CO2 (ppm)

The resulting change in global-mean total ODPs for N2O quantify ozone loss due to N2O, relative to ozone loss due to CFC-11 ODP N2O = m CFC11 × τ N2O × ∆ μ CFC11 ×[∆ O 3 ] N2O m N2O × τ CFC11 × ∆ μ N2O ×[∆ O 3 ] CFC11 Molecular mass Atmospheric lifetime Prescribed change in the surface mixing ratio The resulting change in global-mean total column ozone

The resulting change in global-mean total ODPs for N2O quantify ozone loss due to N2O, relative to ozone loss due to CFC-11 ODP N2O = m CFC11 × τ N2O × ∆ μ CFC11 ×[∆ O 3 ] N2O m N2O × τ CFC11 × ∆ μ N2O ×[∆ O 3 ] CFC11 Molecular mass Atmospheric lifetime Prescribed change in the surface mixing ratio The resulting change in global-mean total column ozone

Rate of chlorine-induced ozone loss Chlorine-induced ozone destruction slows with increasing CH4 and decreasing CO2 CH4 (ppb) Rate of chlorine-induced ozone loss (10-14 molecules s-1) More CH4: CH4 + Cl → CH3 + HCl CO2 (ppm)

Difference in rate of chlorine-induced ozone loss due to CO2 (%) The effect of CO2 on chlorine-induced ozone destruction varies with location Pressure (hPa) Difference in rate of chlorine-induced ozone loss due to CO2 (%) Latitude (°)

Uncertainties in atmospheric composition lead to ODPs for N2O differing by up to a factor of two CH4 (ppb) Year 2100 ODPN2O CO2 (ppm)

To conclude: N2O-induced ozone loss N2O-induced ozone destruction slows with larger CO2 and CH4 concentrations. CH4 CO2

To conclude: N2O-induced ozone loss N2O-induced ozone destruction slows with larger CO2 and CH4 concentrations. CH4 CFC-11-induced ozone loss CO2 CFC-11-induced ozone loss slows with larger CH4 and smaller CO2 concentrations. CH4 CO2

To conclude: N2O-induced ozone loss N2O-induced ozone destruction slows with larger CO2 and CH4 concentrations. CH4 CFC-11-induced ozone loss CO2 CFC-11-induced ozone loss slows with larger CH4 and smaller CO2 concentrations. CH4 ODPN2O CO2 CH4 Uncertainties in atmospheric composition lead to a wide spread of values for the ODP of N2O. CO2