In vitro susceptibility of S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Management of COPD
Advertisements

25 MB of information … CONTENT OF THE CD-rom Learning appropriate use of antibiotics (PK/PD and guidelines): a CD-rom course for healthcare professionals.
Aims of study This surveillance study was performed to determine the in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and.
References Summary Background Quality Control Parameters for Omadacycline Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Susceptibility Tests Using Fresh Media.
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Polish invasive isolates of Neisseria meningitidis in the years Marcin Kadłubowski 1, Anna Skoczyńska.
Bacterial persistence
Isabelle K. Delattre, Françoise Van Bambeke and Paul M. Tulkens
Setting-up a model of intracellular infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the pharmacodynamic evaluation of antibiotic activity. J. Buyck1, O. Jolois2,
Activities of Daptomycin (DAP), Vancomycin (VAN) and Linezolid (LDZ) alone or in combination with Fusidic acid (FUS) in an in vitro dynamic model of.
A-052 Antibiotic (AB) activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) with Normal or Mucoïd Phenotypes in an Artificial Sputum Medium (ASM) in vitro Biofilm.
Activity of tobramycin in combination with clarithromycin
Introduction Results Aim of the study Methods References Conclusion
Comparison of the intracellular and extracellular activities of approved and novel antistaphylococcal antibiotics using a pharmacodynamic model exploring.
Antibiotic resistance and global overview of the use of fluoroquinolones against S. pneumoniae Paul M. Tulkens, MD, PhD * Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology.
In vitro pharmacodynamic models for the study of antibiotic activity against bacterial biofilms Françoise Van Bambeke, PharmD, PhD Pharmacologie cellulaire.
Frédéric Peyrusson, Françoise Van Bambeke, Paul M. Tulkens
Figure 1. Rate of antimicrobial resistance in S. pneumoniae
Acknowledgments/Funding
Wafi Siala1,2, Françoise Van Bambeke1 , Thomas Vanzieleghem2
Activity of 9 antibiotics against intracellular forms of S. pneumoniae
Expression of Efflux system
P 166 Introduction Description of the analyzed population
Introduction & Purpose Results Methods Conclusions Acknowledgments
8th International symposium on Antibiotic and Resistance,
Revealing moxifloxacin activity against biofilms of S
Can efflux confer high levels resistance to meropenem (MEM) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) clinical isolates? H. Chalhoub1, H. Rodriguez-Villalobos2,
Introduction & Purpose Results Conclusions
FUS, VAN and LZD injected twice (T0 and T12); DAP injected once (T0).
Number of S, I and R to six antibiotics
Gilles Moreau1, Michel Boutsen2, Paul M. Tulkens3
This poster will be made available for download after the meeting at :
Epithelial lining fluid penetration of temocillin administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Visée C.1a,
Influence of antibiotic treatments on gene expression of RND efflux pumps in successive isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from patients with.
Introduction Results Aim Methods References Conclusion
Co-medications Improve Moxifloxacin (MXF) Activity in Models of Pneumococcal Naïve and Induced Biofilms (BF) N. M. Vandevelde1, M. Van Obbergh1, P.M. Tulkens1,
Background and objectives
Comparative in vitro activity of temocillin and other β-lactams
Acknowldgments and Funding
Inhibitors of type three secretion system [TTSS] protect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa cellular toxicity by inhibiting the transcription of TTSS Mailing.
Mapping French population [1]
Table 2: Percentage of cross resistance among tested antibiotics
Julien Buyck, Paul M. Tulkens and Françoise Van Bambeke
18th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) Barcelona, Spain, April 2008 Oral presentation O249 – Sunday April.
Are Vitek2 system and E-test relevant and reliable for determining susceptibility to temocillin? Visée C.1, Frippiat F1, Descy J.2, Meex C.2, Melin P.2,
Julien Buyck, Paul M. Tulkens and Françoise Van Bambeke
Debaditya Das, Françoise Van Bambeke, Paul M. Tulkens
Extracellular activity Intracellular activity
Adapted from Jason Sello , Brown university, 2011
Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Abstract Results Methods Background Conclusions References
cellular accumulation (24h) Cstatic (LZD/RDZ ratio)
The machine and its calibration
Incubation (with antibiotic)
Of a Pig-related ST-398 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus (A-MRSA)
EV0626 Cellular pharmacokinetics of gepotidacin (GSK )
Difference log CFU from time 0
INTRODUCTION METHODS CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
Introduction Results Materials and Methods Conclusions
1200 Brussels - Belgium Temocillin is not substrate for OprD2 porin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa H. Chalhoub1,
Electron microscopy: intracellular infection of THP-1 by S. aureus
Log extracellular concentration (mg/L)
Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. a
R. Leclercq  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Activity of Moxifloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus in Models of Persistent Infections (Intracellular Survival, Biofilms) Mailing address: P.M. Tulkens.
Correspondence: Bactericidal Activity of Fosfomycin against NDM-1 producing Enterobacteriaceae M. Albur, A. Noel, K. Bowker, A.
D-735/178 50th ICAAC Sept , 2010 Boston
Antibiotics in 2005: Which one do we need to use and when ?
D.E. Low  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Presentation transcript:

In vitro susceptibility of S In vitro susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to solithromycin (SOL) in collections with an elevated proportion of isolates resistant to levofloxacin (LVX) and moxifloxacin (MXF). Paul M. Tulkens1, Françoise Van Bambeke,1 Nathalie Vandevelde1, Raymond Vanhoof,2 & Mark van der Linden3 1 Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire & Centre de Pharmacie Clinique, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 2 Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium; 3 German Reference Centre for Streptococci, Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany. EV0153 Introduction Results There is currently an urgent need to develop new antibiotics active against strains resistant to currently used molecules. In the present context of respiratory tract infections, the main target organism, as far as resistance is concerned, remains Streptococcus pneumoniae, which has developed mechanisms conferring reduced susceptibility to β-lactams and full resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones (1). Solithromycin (SOL) is a novel fluoroketolide currently in Phase III of clinical development for respiratory tract infections in comparison with moxifloxacin (MXF). Our aim was to assess its in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae isolates collected from patients for whom resistance to β- lactams, macrolides and fluoroquinolones was expected to be higher than in the general population based on medical history of previous infections having necessitated multiple previous antibiotic treatments. Correlation with telithromycin (TEL), clarithromycin (CLR) and azithromycin (AZM) How to read and interpret these data ? Each black dot corresponds to a given test dilution (conventional log2 progress). The coloured lines show the proportion of strains at the corresponding MIC (from red [many] to blue [few]; dots not surrounded by a coloured line correspond to MICs with only a few isolates. See Table for MIC50 and MIC90 for each antibiotic. The oval green line surrounds 95% of all tested isolates. The slope of the correlation line gives an indication as how resistance to the comparator affects the MIC of SOL (cross-resistance) across all isolates. The Pearson's r coefficient gives an indication of the level of correlation (1 = perfect correlation; 0 = no correlation). Isolates with MICs for the comparator to the right of the dotted red vertical line must be categorized as resistant to the corresponding antibiotic (for example, very few isolates are resistant to telithromycin whereas a large proportion of isolates is resistant to clarithromycin; the Table shows the percentage of susceptible and resistant isolates). Pearson's r = 0.735 Pearson's r = 0.508 Pearson's r = 0.142 Materials and Methods Correlation with amoxicillin (AMX), ceftriaxone (CRO) and ceftaroline (CPT) 732 isolates were selected (i) in Belgium from patients with a clinically-confirmed diagnostic of community acquired pneumonia (CAP; n=336) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n=107) (see refs. 2 and 3 for the methods of collection of these samples), suffering from respiratory tract infection (RTI; n=186; selected amongst isolates received by the Belgian Institute of Public Health, Brussels), or diverse infections (n=14); and (ii) in Germany from patients with invasive pneumococcal infections (IPI; n=89) and for whom samples had been received by the German Centre for pneumococci (Aachen). MICs of SOL, MXF and other antibiotics currently approved for the treatment of respiratory tract infections and/or CAP were determined by microdilution in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with horse blood, using S. pneumoniae strain ATCC 49619 as quality control and with re-identification of each isolate by the optochin test. Categorization of strains as susceptible or resistant was made using EUCAST interpretive criteria for all antibiotics except for SOL for which no breakpoint has been set up so far. To gain insight into the potential cross-resistance between SOL and the other antibiotics, two-dimensional graphs were constructed and the correlation between SOL MICs and the MICs of each comparator assessed by linear fit, bivariate normal ellipse (0.95 overlap), and quantile density contour coincidence (0.1 to 0.9) analysis using JMP software (version 10.0.2; see ref. 4). Pearson's r = 0.419 Pearson's r = 0.337 Pearson's r = 0.321 Correlation with levofloxacin (LVX) and moxifloxacin (MXF) the vertical dotted red vertical line shows the R breakpoint of EUCAST for each comparator   mg/L (figures in bold red indicate MIC values > the "R" EUCAST breakpoint) SOL TEL CLR AZM AMX CRO CPT LVX MXF MIC50 0.0156 0.0625 0.125 0.0312 1 MIC90 64 2 0.25 16 4 Susceptible / Resistant (%) S 95.8 % 66.6 % 53.5 % 82.0% 86.3% 95.8% 88.4% 87.0% R 2.9% 29.8% 35.4% 5.0% 0.8% 4.2% 11.6% 13.0% Pearson's r = 0.208 Pearson's r = 0.161 References Acknowledgements Summary and Conclusions Van Bambeke et al. Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infections: current and future therapeutic options. Drugs. 2007;67:2355-82 Lismond et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in Belgium. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:208-16. Vandevelde et al. Characterisation of a collection of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: in vitro susceptibility to antibiotics and biofilm formation in relation to antibiotic efflux and serotypes/serogroups. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;44:209-17. Chalhoub et al. Avibactam confers susceptibility to a large proportion of ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:1596-8. NV was a doctoral fellow of the Belgian Fonds pour l'encouragement de la Recherche dans l'Industrie et l'Agriculture (FRIA). SOL was kindly provided by Cempra Pharmaceuticals. Virginie Mohymont and Pierre Muller provided dedicated technical assistance. In this collection of clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae enriched in strains resistant to antibiotics currently used to treat respiratory tract infections (or CAP), solithromycin shows no cross resistance with the comparators, except for telithromycin (but for which (i) resistance rates are very low, and (ii) MICs are usually 1 log2 dilution higher that those of solithromycin). Solithromycin may, therefore, stand as a potentially useful antibiotic to substitute for commonly recommended antibiotics in areas and/or environments where resistance of S. pneumoniae to these agents will limit their use. This poster will be available after the meeting at http://www.facm.ucl.ac.be/posters