the USR Wireless Docking Opportunity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /312r0 Submission July 2004 Yunpeng Zang, ComNets, Aachen University (RWTH)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /655r0 Submission May 2006 Slide 1Scott Lee, et al., Samsung Electronics Use Cases of WLAN for AV Streams Scott Seongwook Lee, Huai-Rong.
May 2015doc.: IEEE /624r0 SubmissionSlide 1 11ay Usage Model for Wearables Date: Authors: Kerstin Johnsson, Intel.
Doc.: IEEE /0685r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Channel Measurements Plan Proposal for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Channel Sounding for ay
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission December 2012 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 IEEE aj Usage Models Document Date: Authors/contributor:
Doc.: IEEE /1145r1 Submission November 2012 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 IEEE aj Usage Models Document Date: Author(s)/contributors:
Doc.: IEEE /2371r0 Submission September 2007 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Review of TGn’s Usage Models Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1160r0 Submission September 2014 Lei Huang, PanasonicSlide 1 Ultra Short Range (USR) Communications Usage Models for NG60 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0830r0 July 2015 Solomon Trainin et al, IntelSlide 1 Docking usage model Date: 11-Jul-15 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0795r0 Submission HEW Usage Scenarios Categorization July 2013 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission March 2009 Mark Grodzinsky, WilocitySlide 1 Amendment to WFA Usage Models Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0666r0 May 2016 SangHyun Chang, et al. (Samsung)Slide 1 Ultra Short Range (USR) Wireless Docking Usage Model Date: 2016/05/16.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0418r1 March 2016 SangHyun Chang, et al. (Samsung)Slide 1 Follow-up on the USR Wireless Docking Opportunity Date: 2016/03/17.
Doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1144 September 2015 Simulation Scenarios for TGay PHY Layer Evaluation Methodology Slide 1Alexander Maltsev, Intel Authors:
Projects with 5G Potential March 15, 2016 The Venetian Macau
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Wi-Fi Technology.
IEEE TGay Use Cases Date: Authors:
Gi-Fi Technology.
Mapping WFA Usage Models to Operating Bands
IEEE TGay Use Cases Date: Authors:
NG 60 Use Cases Date: Authors: doc.: IEEE /0840r0
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview
Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology
IEEE TGay Use Cases Date: Authors:
Device-To-Device (D2D) Communication in 5G Cellular Networks
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
Home use case addition proposal
Proposal for TGad Evaluation Methodology
Home use case addition proposal
Technology and Use Cases for TGac
160 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: March 2010
Projects with 5G Potential March 15, 2016 The Venetian Macau
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
VHT60 Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2008 April 2007
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
IEEE ay for Wireless VR Minseok OH, Namgi KIM Kyonggi University.
Potential TGbb task group documents
Submission Title: Usage Models for Personal Space Communications
IEEE ay for Wireless VR Minseok OH, Namgi KIM Kyonggi University.
Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
Defining Usage Models for ESS Mesh
Technology and Use Cases for TGac
VHT60 Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2008 April 2007
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Mesh Media Access Coordination Ad Hoc Group Report Out
VHT - SG Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Full Duplex Usage Model
June, 2006 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 June, 2006
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
October 11, 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
Experiments on Wireless VR for EHT
WiGig technologies IEEE ad/ay
Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology
Proposal for TGad Evaluation Methodology
WLAN Overlay with 60 GHz Channels
Multi-link Operation Framework
Multi-link Operation Framework
5G as a Social Infrastructure Chaesub LEE, Director, ITU
Proposed Merge of Simulation Scenarios
Multi-link Operation Framework
Presentation transcript:

the USR Wireless Docking Opportunity March 2016 Follow-up on the USR Wireless Docking Opportunity Date: 2016/03/16 Authors: SangHyun Chang, et al. (Samsung)

Recap: the USR Wireless Docking Use Case March 2016 Recap: the USR Wireless Docking Use Case We presented the Ultra-Short Range (USR) wireless docking usage model as a candidate mobile phone application, during the last F2F. 11-16-0084-00-00ay-The Ultra-Short Range Opportunity This use case can serve various every-day applications which include remote desktop, cloud PC, gigabit docking with wireless charging service, and interactive game docking station. Today, we will compare the requirements of this use case (USR wireless docking) with the USR Communications (Usage Model #1) and Office Docking (Usage Model #9) and highlight the difference. Samsung

Recap: USR Wireless Docking Requirements March 2009 September 2012 July 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0866r0 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0301r1 March 2016 Recap: USR Wireless Docking Requirements Interactive Game Docking Station Latency: ≤ 10ms (E2E) Data rate: ≥ 1Gbps (low latency codec w/ compression rate 1/3~1/4) Remote Desktop/Cloud PC Latency: ≤ 50ms (E2E) Data rate: ≥ 1Gbps (visually lossless for text/line) Traffic: bi-directional (Mobile Phone ↔ Peripheral) Gigabit Docking w/ Wireless Charging Service Alignment-free placement on the pad Low Power Consumption ≤ 200mW for peak data rate ≤ 0.5mW for discovery phase Form Factor Close to today’s NFC Range ≤ 0.1 m Wireless Docking Pad (Monitor/Keyboard/Mouse/LAN) Wireless Cloud Office Samsung Page 3 Stephen McCann, RIM Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Requirements Comparison September 2012 March 2009 July 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0301r1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0866r0 March 2016 Requirements Comparison Usage Model #1 (USR Comm.) USR Wireless Docking Usage Model #9 (Office Docking) Network Topology P2P primarily P2P P2P/P2MP Range ≤ 0.1 m ≤ 3 m Power Consumption ≤ 400 mW ≤ 200 mW Not Available Traffic Unidirectional Bi-directional Latency < 100 ms < 10 ms Samsung Page 4 Stephen McCann, RIM Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Potential Simplifications for USR Docking (1/2) March 2016 Potential Simplifications for USR Docking (1/2) Beamforming support For such ultra-short range communications, beam forming may not even be required. Simpler PHY Preamble For USR communications, the current 802.11ay preamble under discussion may be an overkill We can explore a “new” PHY mode with a simpler preamble Simplified Modulation Scheme To lower the power consumption, we can explore the use of simpler (primitive) modulation schemes, such as OOK. Explore Simplifications for Channel Estimation/Equalization for USR May be able to simplify the signaling deployed for channel estimation Samsung

Potential Simplifications for USR Docking (2/2) March 2016 Potential Simplifications for USR Docking (2/2) Simplified Attach Procedure For such an ultra short range communications mode where BF may be avoided, we may not need to go through the Sector Level Sweep SLS phase for the initial attachment Non-EDCA mode for USR? With primarily a P2P support, we can explore whether EDCA mode is really needed to support USR communications. … Leading to a simplified overall architecture Samsung

March 2016 Appendix (Part of 15/0625r3) Samsung

Usage Model 1: Ultra Short Range (USR) Communications Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Usage Model 1: Ultra Short Range (USR) Communications Pre-Conditions: User has WLAN connectivity between a portable/mobile device (e.g., tablet, smart phone) and a fixed device (e.g., tollgate, kiosk). Application: Users can download mass data (e.g. video/audio clip, e-magazine, picture library etc.) from a fixed device. 100 jpeg (picture) files of 5MB takes 0.6 second over a single hop 10Gbps link. Jitter is not critical. The key metric is the user’s time spent to do a transfer. Less than 1 second is acceptable. 1-5 seconds may be acceptable. More than 5 seconds may not be acceptable. Environment: Environments can be variable, e.g., crowded public space such as train stations, airports, shopping mall, office. Link distance can typically be up to 10 cm. Typically transmissions are Line of Sight. All devices will typically be stationary during usage. Traffic Conditions: Only a single portable/mobile device can access to a fixed device at a time with simply best-effort rates. There is typically minimum interference from other mm-wave links due to ultra short link distance. Traffic is unidirectional. Use Case: User places a portable/mobile device in a definite position relative to a fixed device. Secure pairing between the portable/device device and the fixed device is completed without user configuration. The pre-selected application is launched and the pre-selected task (e.g., download video clip) is started. The application exits when task is complete. John Doe, Some Company

Usage Model 1: USR Communications Rapid content transfer between a portable /mobile device (e.g., tablet, smart phone) and a fixed device or between two portable/mobile devices within a ultra short separation Assumption: 1:1 Fast link setup: < 100msec Transaction time: <1sec Ultra short link distance: <10cm Very low power consumption for portable/mobile device: < 400mW Target data rate: 10 Gbps @ 70% MAC-App efficiency Size 11ay Device 11ad Device 4K UHD movie 60 GB 1.1 min @ 10Gbps 11.4 min@1Gbps HD movie 5 GB 5.7 sec @ 10Gbps 57.1 sec @ 1Gbps SD movie 1.5 GB 1.7 sec @ 10Gbps 17.1 sec @ 1Gbps Picture library 1 GB 1.1 sec @ 10Gbps 11.4 sec @ 1Gbps 4K movie trailer 1.2 GB 1.4 sec @ 10Gbps 13.7 sec @ 1Gbps HD movie trailer 100 MB 0.1 sec @ 10Gbps 1.1 sec @ 1Gbps E-magazine 250 MB 0.3 sec @ 10Gbps 2.8 sec @ 1Gbps Video/audio clip, magazine, newspaper, etc. Train Station Kiosk Movie, video/audio clip, magazine, newspaper, etc. Movie, video/audio clip, picture library, etc.

Usage Model 9: Office docking Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0830r0 Usage Model 9: Office docking Pre-Conditions: Office docking enables a wireless docking experience for office and home. Mobile device (Notebook, tablet, smartphone, small form factor) may communicate wirelessly with multiple peripheral devices - monitors, camcorders, web cameras, hard drives, printers, Internet AP/Router, etc. and/or another mobile device, Scenarios include a single device in a home scenario as well as in a dense office environment with multiple mobile devices where each mobile device has its own or shared dock/peripherals, or multiple mobile devices sharing a dock. A single wireless link that connects a mobile device with its dock, where the dock is wire-connected to multiple other devices, as well as multiple wireless links to connect the mobile with many devices should be supported. Application: Productivity applications Support of two monitors of 8K resolution Wireless support of USB devices with different traffic characteristics: isochronous, human interface and others Gigabit Ethernet Mass storage devices 3D webcams Dynamic composition Connecting mobile to 2-5 peripheral devices Mobile device should be able to sustain full working day w/o recharging battery Connecting multiple mobile source devices to dock Environment: Typical office scenarios - open space, cubicles, meeting room, and standalone home office usage. Range between mobile and dock and peripherals will typically be < 3m. Dense environment with multiple docking may or may not be wall isolated. Most of the devices are semi-static that may be moved intentionally or unintentionally. Traffic Conditions: Typically one to one and one to many links, many to one links (multiple source devices to one dock with shared peripheral devices) Multiple simultaneous high performance links, some with low latency requirements, others with best-effort rates. Some flows are unidirectional and others are bidirectional. - Multiple uncoordinated ad hoc networks Use Case: Mobile device is wirelessly connected to a docking station, and/or wirelessly connected to multiple wireless peripherals directly Mobile device may be wirelessly connected to other mobile devices separately or simultaneously with (1) Mobile device may be simultaneously connected to wireless LAN Devices may be simultaneously connected to Bluetooth and other radio Dense office environment with multiple mobile devices where each one may be docked simultaneously with different docks Some data flows have significant latency, throughput and QoS requirements (monitors under productivity applications, Dynamic composition, HID) Multiple mobile devices (for example a PC and a smartphone) wirelessly connected to a docking station and sharing the peripherals that are connected to dock. Solomon Trainin et al, Intel

Usage Model 9 : Office docking Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0830r0 Usage Model 9 : Office docking Per device wireless link Average throughput (Gbps) Peak throughput (Gbps) MAC/PHY Latency for productivity applications (ms) Monitor 4K lightly compressed 0.3 1.5 10 Monitor 5K lightly compressed 0.5 2.7 Monitor 8K lightly compressed 1.6 8.0 USB HID 0.1 USB total NA Ethernet 2.0 Mobile to mobile Combined wireless link Max Throughput (Gbps) Two Monitors 8K+USB+Ethernet 13.2 Solomon Trainin et al, Intel

Usage Model 9: Office docking exmples Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0830r0 Usage Model 9: Office docking exmples Open space example 2 Open space example 1 Dock Office docking with single wireless link Office docking with multiple wireless links Solomon Trainin et al, Intel

Applications and Characteristics Summary of Key metrics UC # Indoor (I)/ Outdoor (O) Environment Throughput Topology Latency Security Availability Applications and Characteristics LOS/ NLOS 1 I <10cm ~10Gbps P2P <100ms -Static,D2D, -Streaming/Downloading 2 <5m >28Gbps <5ms -Uncompressed 8K UHD Streaming 3 ~20Gbps -Low Mobility, D2D -3D UHD streaming 4 <10m P2P/P2MP C/I 99.99% -Indoor Backhaul with multi-hop* 5 <100m >20Gbps -Multicast - Dense Hotspot 6 I/O -Multi-band -Multi-RAT operation Hotspot 7 O <200m -Fronthauling 8 <1km with single hop <150m per hop with multiple hops ~2Gbps <35ms -Small Cell Backhauling - Single hop or multiple hop 9 <3m <10ms *: Multi-hop will build up on the scope of the DMG Relay defined in IEEE 802.11ad