IceCube Construction Endgame

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Experience with Management of Research Infrastructure
Advertisements

NSF Baseline Review February 10-12, 2004 Optical Module Production Phil Robl Physical Sciences Laboratory.
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
IceCube By:Nicole Baker ~Waterloo What is IceCube? IceCube is a one-cubic-kilometer international high- energy neutrino observatory being built and installed.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
October 22, 2003Advisory Committee for Business and Operations 1 Management of Large Facility Projects Within the NSF Mark Coles Deputy Director for Large.
IceCube System Testing
The HAWC ( High Altitude Water Cherenkov) Observatory.
November 24, 2004 Rolf Nahnhauer1 PROJECT : IceCube Digital Optical Module Production at DESY Zeuthen.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
Report to the collaboration Yifang Wang IHEP Progress of the construction –SSM: Valve box successful, magnet cool down in mid June –Mechanical structure.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck Deputy Director (Project Management)
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
High Energy - Engineering Working Group IceCube PY8 Spring Collaboration Meeting Apr 29, 2009 Jim Baccus.
Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee (AAAC) May 11, 2006 Vladimir Papitashvili Antarctic Sciences Section Office of Polar Programs National Science.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck NLSL II Deputy Director (Project Management)
Mark McKinnon EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Project Overview Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
Computing in IceCube Georges Kohnen, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium for the IceCube Collaboration The IceCube neutrino telescope.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update October 6, 2008 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information Management Objectives, Structure, and Operation.
Ruth Pordes November 2004TeraGrid GIG Site Review1 TeraGrid and Open Science Grid Ruth Pordes, Fermilab representing the Open Science.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review The IceTop component of IceCube Area--solid-angle ~ 1/3 km 2 sr (including angular dependence of EAS.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
David Seckel, IceTop Baseline Review, Madison, Dec. 4, 2003 IceTop Baseline Review Dec. 4, Madison WI.
Mark McKinnon NSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Baseline Project Definition Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
Status Organization Overview of Program of Work Education, Training It’s the People who make it happen & make it Work.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
COSMO Large Coronagraph Preliminary Design Review
Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
Homestake DUSEL Project Management and Systems Engineering Richard DiGennaro LBNL April 20, 2007.
European Spallation Source Overview and Status Technical Advisory Committee 1-2 April 2015 James H. Yeck ESS CEO & Director General
The ARA concept and history construction activities Future plans The ARA concept and history construction activities Future plans Kara.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Developmental Testbed Center: Governance highlights
Future high energy extensions of IceCube with new technologies: Radio and/or acoustical detectors Karle.
SAC/PAP Review UW-Madison March 1-2, 2007
WBS 1.03 Readout Systems Scope, Cost and Schedule
Concluding remarks E. Migneco
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
IceCube System Testing
Simulation in IceCube Science Advisory Committee Meeting Paolo Desiati
IceCube construction status
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
IC40 Physics Run Preparations
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Strategic Planning Update
Building ICECUBE A Neutrino Telescope at the South Pole
Retail Enterprise Orgnaizational Chart
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
ADTRAN: The Network Access Company
IceCube Construction and Analysis Report
Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager
EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad
X-Ray Endstations Update
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
Global Seismographic Network
Experimental Program and Endstations System (WBS ) J
M&O Homework Questions
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
LUSI Controls and Data Systems W.B.S. 1.6
Presentation transcript:

IceCube Construction Endgame Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director University of Wisconsin May 5, 2008 IceCube SAC Meeting May 2008

IceCube Construction and Operations Organization National Science Foundation International Oversight & Finance Group IceCube Collaboration & Collaboration Board Spokesperson, T. Gaisser Analysis Coordinator, G. Hill Executive Committee Science Advisory Committee Chair, M. Shaevitz UW Leadership Team Chair, J. Wiley IceCube Neutrino Observatory Principal Investigator, F. Halzen Director, J. Yeck Associate Director, A. Karle Associate Director, R. Paulos Software Coordinator, M. Merck Safety & QA Manager, M. Zernick UW IceCube Center Support Accounting & Purchasing Services (shared with KRC), R. Paulos (A) Education & Outreach, E. Malkus Human Resources, T. Wipperfurth Information Technology, M. Mueller Resource Coordinator, D. Laitsch Trigger, Filter, Transmit Board Chair, E. Blaufuss Project Controls, Engineering & Polar Support R. Paulos Drilling & String Installation T. Hutchings Instrumentation J. Haugen Data Infrastructure Construction G. Sullivan Detector Operations & Maintenance K. Hanson Computing Technology & Support D. Schneider Software & Data Processing M. Merck (A) Project Controls A. Peles Engineering R. Paulos Raytheon Polar Services Company S. Clapp Drill A. Elcheick String Installation T. Ham Logistics T. Hannaford Optical Modules J. Haugen IceTop T. Gaisser Cables/Special Devices J. Baccus Data Acquisition System K. Hanson Data Systems G. Sullivan Verification & Commissioning D. Cowen Pre-Operations J. Yeck Run Coordination A. Goldschmidt Operations & Maintenance M. Krasberg DAQ/Online Processing J. Jacobsen Monitoring I. Taboada Northern Data Center J. Richards Network Security P. Wisniewski Tier 0 (NPX) 2 S. Barnet South Pole System & Test System Maintenance K. Soundarapandian Data Transfer C. McKenzie Filtering & Software E. Blaufuss Primary Data Processing M. Merck (A) Data Integrity C. Rott Monte Carlo Production K. Hultqvist Calibration K. Woschnagg Legend Direction and Reporting Advice and Recommendations Project Support (A) Acting April 1, 2008

Original Detector Baseline 70 vertical strings plus surface stations 4,480 Digital Optical Modules (DOM) 60 DOM/string spaced between 1450 and 2450 meters 2 DOM/surface tank and 2 tanks at each surface location Integrate AMANDA Instrumented volume of ≤1 km3 of ice Software and computing required to commission and operate the detector May 5, 2008 IceCube SAC Meeting May 2008

Cost & Schedule Baseline Baseline (Hartill 02/04) Current (04/08) Cost: TPC $271.8 million $276.6 million NSF $242.1 million $242.1 million unchanged Foreign $ 29.7 million $ 34.5 million Earned Value: $220.0 million (83%) Contingency: $ 40 million (22%) $ 10.5 million (24%) Most of the Technical Risk Retired Schedule: 4th Quarter, 2010 2nd Quarter, 2011 May 5, 2008 IceCube SAC Meeting May 2008

2007/08 Season Excellent planning, shared commitment, and consistent positive results Solid basis for future planning 50% of total instrumentation installed M&O mode of operations Safety must continue to be the highest priority Opportunities for improvement will be pursued May 5, 2008 IceCube SAC Meeting May 2008

Installation Status & Plans AMANDA 21 30 29 40 50 39 38 49 59 46 47 48 58 57 66 67 74 65 73 78 56 72 40 strings IceCube string deployed 01/05 IceCube string deployed 12/05 – 01/06 IceCube string and IceTop station deployed 12/06 – 01/07 IceCube string deployed 12/07 – 01/08 IceCube Lab commissioned Planning for at least 16 strings in 2008/09 (16 + 3 + 1)

Drilling/Deployment Performance

String Installation Actuals & Plans IceCube Strings* 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Annual Baseline 1 8 13 18 16 12 Cumulative Baseline 9 22 40 56 68 80 Annual Goal 19 15 6 Cumulative Goal 59 74 Inner Core (AMANDA) Annual Baseline (Proposed) 1 5 Cumulative Baseline 6 * IceTop installation coupled to string installation plans

Cost & Schedule Performance

Contingency (% of Work-to-Go) May 5, 2008 IceCube SAC Meeting May 2008

Projected Contingency

M&O Funding & Tracking

Summary Construction project is ~83% complete (earned value) Confident in the quality of completion plans Conservative baseline plan for additional drilling years Materials and labor costs are well understood Continuous attention to safety and technical performance Operations formally underway Restoring strings as originally planned Plans in place for 80 Strings/IceTop Stations Plan to replace AMANDA with 6+ Strings May 5, 2008 IceCube SAC Meeting May 2008