Defining an Occasion of Sensemaking

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
MYP (Middle Years Programme).  m7oU.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Reading and Writing in Science: Multiple Text Types in Scientific Literacy Learning Elizabeth Birr Moje LeeAnn M. Sutherland Tanya Cleveland Mary Heitzman.
Supporting Teachers to Learn the Practice of Ambitious Mathematics Teaching Summer Learning Institute Teacher Education Workshop July 17, 2011.
Project Instrument Development funded by the National Science Foundation Paper Presented at the 2009 AERA Annual Meeting by: Dr. Mary Hobbs, P.I. and Amy.
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
To Think Or Not To Think: That Is The Question Abstract Year after year, teachers recognize that many of their students lack critical thinking skills or.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
West Virginia University Academic Innovation Next Generation Mathematics Communities of Practice Greg Strimel.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
SOCCIAL STUDIES MATTERS New High School Social Studies Curriculum Phase 1 Implementation August 28, 2014.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
1 The Power of Portfolio Hosted by BC Ministry of Education Harold Krische Langley School District.
Lincoln Park High School IB Programme Expansion December 17,2012.
March 5th, 2015, SITE 2015, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Challenges and Trade-offs in Measuring the Outcomes of NSF’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: Lessons from four years on the learning curve.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Situating Teacher Learning in the Practice of Science and Mathematics Teaching Monica Hartman University of Michigan Pre-Oral Defense Meeting May 3, 2004.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
Tri-State Consortium Social Studies Visit Report April 19, 2016.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
21st Century Pilot for System Learning
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Designing a Three-Dimensional Curriculum for Climate Change Education Informed by Learning Progression Research Hannah K. Miller, Johnson State College.
Assessment That Transforms Teaching
Assessment That Transforms Teaching
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Curiosity and Principles in Carbon TIME Classrooms
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Connected Mathematics Program
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005
EDU 675Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
INTASC Standards By: Maddie Gonsalves.
NJCU College of Education
Teachers’ Sensemaking about Accountability and Assessment
(Michigan State University)
The Influence of Social Networks and Context on Teacher Agency
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Lecturette 2: Mining Classroom Data
EDD/581 Week 1.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
National Literacy and Numeracy Learning Progressions: Overview
Presentation transcript:

Defining an Occasion of Sensemaking Teachers’ Sensemaking About Implementation of an Innovative Science Curriculum Across the Settings of Professional Development and Classroom Enactment Elizabeth X. de los Santos and Charles W. Anderson Department of Teacher Education, Michigan State University Research Question How do teachers’ commitments to social relationships in various communities influence their sensemaking about implementation of Carbon TIME? Comparison of Mr. Ross and Ms. Nolan’s Sensemaking About Implementation of Carbon TIME Discussion Productive Sensemaking Productive sensemaking for teacher learning of rigorous and responsive science teaching practices requires: A supportive school context that aligns with Carbon TIME goals and purposes. Social commitments to their classroom communities, particularly students’ engagement in three-dimensional science learning. Critical noticing of interactions between students and the curriculum. The Case of Ms. Callahan Overall, Ms. Callahan’s sensemaking was productive for her own learning and her students’ engagement in three-dimensional science learning. Ms. Callahan was initially challenged by the Expressing Ideas Tool because she was not used to having students share their initial ideas about a phenomenon, and she believed that students wanted to know the right answer. However, after enacting the tool with her students three times and hearing from her case study coach that her students enjoyed being able to be “wrong” at the beginning of a unit, Ms. Callahan reflected that the Expressing Ideas Tool was a useful and important tool for teachers. Unproductive Sensemaking Unproductive sensemaking for teacher learning of rigorous and responsive science teaching can involve: A school context that places teachers in situations where they have to navigate among multiple PD initiatives. Social commitments to school communities such as colleagues and administrators in ways that enhance the status of the teacher within the school but do not necessarily align with students’ engagement in three-dimensional science learning. Critical noticing of interactions between students and the curriculum in ways that do not support students’ learning. The Case of Mr. Ross Overall, Mr. Ross’s sensemaking was unproductive for his own learning of rigorous and responsive science teaching practices related to Carbon TIME because he was trying to include all the initiatives at his school and focused on grading rather than assessment of students’ ideas. Conclusions Teachers’ social commitments to their school communities can either enhance or inhibit productive sensemaking depending on teachers’ goals and purposes for engaging in sensemaking about implementation of an innovative curriculum. The implication for science teacher educators is to support teachers in navigating between the PD and classroom enactment settings. Add POSOH logo, disclaimer gives credits to projects that have not been funding this work. Take off projects not funding this work. Mr. Ross Research Design Qualitative comparative case study design (Yin, 2014). Eight secondary science teachers in three states with 7-22 years of experience; teaching contexts range from a math and science magnet school to an urban school with a diverse student population. Case study teachers implemented at least three Carbon TIME units during the 2015-2016 school year and attended face-to-face and online PD. Data Sources: 40 teacher interviews, teacher-created artifacts, field notes of PD, video-recordings of classroom instruction. Data Analysis: identifying occasions of sensemaking; using discourse analysis, qualitative analysis, and sensemaking framework to identify outcomes of sensemaking, critical noticing, and drivers of sensemaking. Ms. Callahan Mr. Ross’s Sensemaking About the Pre- and Post-Tests: “Fitting It All Together” Mr. Ross was a teacher with 8 years of experience who taught in a suburban HS in the Midwest. He critically noticed his students’ interactions with the test questions and thought that students’ responses on the essays showed better understanding than the forced-choice questions. He decided to grade the short answer responses using LP levels and use the student assessment data to show student growth for his teacher evaluation. This occasion of sensemaking was embedded in Mr. Ross’s broader goal of fitting it all together, which was persistent over time. He was concerned with how to implement Carbon TIME while also meeting school and district requirements, including International Baccalaureate (IB) and claim-evidence-reasoning (CER) framework. Ms. Callahan’s Sensemaking About the Expressing Tool: “It’s Important for the Students” Ms. Callahan was a teacher with 13 years of experience who taught in an urban math and science magnet program in the Midwest. She critically noticed her students’ interactions with the Expressing Ideas Tool and believed that students were frustrated because they wanted to know the right answer. She decided to modify her enactment by having students look back at the tool at the end of a unit to see how much their ideas had changed over time. This occasion of sensemaking was embedded in Ms. Callahan’s broader goal of supporting students’ development of particular science, math, and technology skills. She believed that it was important for students to have ownership of their education, which included recognizing limitations of their knowledge and growth in learning over time as a result of engaging in Carbon TIME activities. Defining an Occasion of Sensemaking Critical noticing that involves action situated in context over time Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful for contributions from Drs. Alicia Alonzo, Corey Drake, Ken Frank, and William Penuel and graduate students Stefanie Marshall, Qinyun Lin, Brian Hancock, and Craig Kohn. Disclaimer: This research is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation: A Learning Progression-based System for Promoting Understanding of Carbon-transforming Processes (DRL 1020187), and Sustaining Responsive and Rigorous Teaching Based on Carbon TIME (NSF 1440988 ).