Business Statistics, 4e by Ken Black

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP Statistics Tuesday, 15 April 2014 OBJECTIVE TSW (1) identify the conditions to use a chi-square test; (2) examine the chi-square test for independence;
Advertisements

1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western /Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Chapter 12 Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Contingency Analysis
Inference about the Difference Between the
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Cross Tabulation and Chi Square Test for Independence.
P Pathophysiology Calendar. SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday January 2012.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics
Chicas, este calendario si es pa' nosotras !!!!!.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
2007 Monthly Calendar You can print this template to use it as a wall calendar, or you can copy the page for any month to add it to your own presentation.
1 1 Slide © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Savings and Investment Unit Project Student Name.
 2 test for independence Used with categorical, bivariate data from ONE sample Used to see if the two categorical variables are associated (dependent)
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial Population Goodness of.
Chi-square test or c2 test
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Lecture 8 Chi-Square STAT 3120 Statistical Methods I.
WORD JUMBLE. Months of the year Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a february Click for the answer Next Question.
Learning Objectives Copyright © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning Statistical Testing of Differences CHAPTER fifteen.
1 1 Slide © 2009 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Chi-Square INCM Chi Square When presented with categorical data, one common method of analysis is the “Contingency Table” or “Cross Tab”. This is.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
Chapter 16: Analysis of Categorical Data. LO1Use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to analyze probabilities of multinomial distribution trials along.
Chapter 12 Chi-Square Tests and Nonparametric Tests.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics Section 11-3.
St. Edward’s University
Chi-square test or c2 test
5.1 INTRODUCTORY CHI-SQUARE TEST
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
Community &family medicine
Qualitative data – tests of association
Dictation practice 2nd Form Ms. Micaela-Ms. Verónica.
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
1   1.テキストの入れ替え テキストを自由に入れ替えることができます。 フチなし全面印刷がおすすめです。 印刷のポイント.
2017/18 Payment Calendar Due Date Cut-off Day 1st of every month
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Chapter 13 Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Contingency Analysis
Problem Gambling Clicks to Opgr.org
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
2300 (11PM) September 21 Blue line is meridian..
Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
1 - January - Sun Mon The Wed Thu Fri Sat
Proud As A Peacock! We are very proud of__________________
Teacher name August phone: Enter text here.
JANUARY 1 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
February 2007 Note: Source:.
Chapter 13 Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Contingency Analysis
MONTHS OF THE YEAR January February April March June May July August
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Production Month Sun Hours K Monthly Kwh Tou Peak Value After Kwh
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
E W ©
Presentation transcript:

Business Statistics, 4e by Ken Black Chapter 12 Analysis of Categorical Data Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons.

Learning Objectives Understand the 2 goodness-of-fit test and how to use it. Analyze data using the 2 test of independence. Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 2

2 Goodness-of-Fit Test The 2 goodness-of-fit test compares expected (theoretical) frequencies of categories from a population distribution to the observed (actual) frequencies from a distribution to determine whether there is a difference between what was expected and what was observed. Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 6

2 Goodness-of-Fit Test Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 7

Milk Sales Data for Demonstration Problem 12.1 Month Gallons January 1,610 February 1,585 March 1,649 April 1,590 May 1,540 June 1,397 July 1,410 August 1,350 September 1,495 October 1,564 November 1,602 December 1,655 18,447 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 8

Hypotheses and Decision Rules for Demonstration Problem 12.1 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 9

Calculations for Demonstration Problem 12.1 Month fo fe (fo - fe)2/fe January 1,610 1,537.25 3.44 February 1,585 1.48 March 1,649 8.12 April 1,590 1.81 May 1,540 0.00 June 1,397 12.80 July 1,410 10.53 August 1,350 22.81 September 1,495 1.16 October 1,564 0.47 November 1,602 2.73 December 1,655 9.02 18,447 18,447.00 74.38 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 10

Demonstration Problem 12.1: Conclusion 0.01 df = 11 24.725 Non Rejection region Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 11

Bank Customer Arrival Data for Demonstration Problem 12.2 Number of Arrivals Observed Frequencies 7 1 18 2 25 3 17 4 12 5 5 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 12

Hypotheses and Decision Rules for Demonstration Problem 12.2 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 13

Calculations for Demonstration Problem 12 Calculations for Demonstration Problem 12.2: Estimating the Mean Arrival Rate Number of Arrivals X Observed Frequencies f f·X 7 1 18 2 25 50 3 17 51 4 12 48 5 5 192 Mean Arrival Rate Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 14

Calculations for Demonstration Problem 12 Calculations for Demonstration Problem 12.2: Poisson Probabilities for  = 2.3 Number of Arrivals X Expected Probabilities P(X) Frequencies n·P(X) 0.1003 8.42 1 0.2306 19.37 2 0.2652 22.28 3 0.2033 17.08 4 0.1169 9.82  0.0838 7.04 Poisson Probabilities for  = 2.3 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 15

2 Calculations for Demonstration Problem 12.2 Number of Arrivals X Observed Frequencies f Expected nP(X) (fo - fe)2 fe 1 2 3 4 5 7 8.42 18 19.37 25 22.28 17 17.08 12 9.82 5 7.04 84 84.00 0.24 0.10 0.33 0.00 0.48 0.59 1.74 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 16

Demonstration Problem 12.2: Conclusion 0.05 df = 4 9.488 Non Rejection region Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 17

Using a 2 Goodness-of-Fit Test to Test a Population Proportion Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 18

Using a 2 Goodness-of-Fit Test to Test a Population Proportion: Calculations   2 33 16 167 184 18.0625 + 1.5707 19.6332      o e f = fo fe Defects Nondefects 200 n = Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 19

Using a 2 Goodness-of-Fit Test to Test a Population Proportion: Conclusion 0.05 df = 1 3.841 Non Rejection region Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 20

Qualitative Variables 2 Test of Independence Qualitative Variables Nominal Data Used to analyze the frequencies of two variables with multiple categories to determine whether the two variables are independent. Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 21

2 Test of Independence: Investment Example In which region of the country do you reside? A. Northeast B. Midwest C. South D. West Which type of financial investment are you most likely to make today? E. Stocks F. Bonds G. Treasury bills Type of financial Investment E F G A O13 nA Geographic B nB Region C nC D nD nE nF nG N Contingency Table Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 22

2 Test of Independence: Investment Example Type of Financial Investment E F G A e12 nA Geographic B nB Region C nC D nD nE nF nG N Contingency Table Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 23

2 Test of Independence: Formulas   ij i j e n N where  : = the row the column the total of row i of column of all fr equencies 2    o f df (r - 1)(c 1) r the number r of rows c r of columns Expected Frequencies Calculated  (Observed ) Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 24

2 Test of Independence: Gasoline Preference Versus Income Category Type of Gasoline Income Regular Premium Extra Less than $30,000 $30,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,000 At least $100,000 r = 4 c = 3 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 25

Gasoline Preference Versus Income Category: Observed Frequencies Type of Gasoline Income Regular Premium Extra Less than $30,000 85 16 6 107 $30,000 to $49,999 102 27 13 142 $50,000 to $99,000 36 22 15 73 At least $100,000 23 25 63 238 88 59 385 Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 26

Gasoline Preference Versus Income Category: Expected Frequencies Type of Gasoline Income Regular Premium Extra Less than $30,000 (66.15) (24.46) (16.40) 85 16 6 107 $30,000 to $49,999 (87.78) (32.46) (21.76) 102 27 13 142 $50,000 to $99,000 (45.13) (16.69) (11.19) 36 22 15 73 At least $100,000 (38.95) (14.40) (9.65) 23 25 63 238 88 59 385   ij i j e n N  11 12 66 24 46 40 . Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 27

Gasoline Preference Versus Income Category: 2 Calculation   2 88 66 15 16 24 46 6 40 102 87 78 27 32 13 21 76 36 45 22 69 11 19 38 95 23 14 25 9 65 70      o e f . Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 28

Gasoline Preference Versus Income Category: Conclusion 0.01 df = 6 16.812 Non rejection region Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 29