Telehealth and Research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Strategies: Joining Deaf Educators Together Deaf Education Virtual Topical Seminars Donna M. Mertens Gallaudet University October 19, 2004.
Advertisements

Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
An Outline for: A User-Based Systems Approach to the Evaluation, Selection, and Institutionalization of Safer Medical Devices.
Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.
Early stages of research programmes: pilot and feasibility studies From Scoping to Activity Rehabilitation Conference A Byrne.
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2009.
1. 2 Implementing and Evaluating of an Evidence Based Nursing into Practice Prepared By Dr. Nahed Said El nagger Assistant Professor of Nursing H.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Copyright © 2013 Quintiles Quintiles Site Management Kim Davis, SSRM June 17, 2014.
STUDY PLANNING & DESIGN TO ENHANCE TRANSLATION OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR RESEARCH Lisa Klesges, Russell Glasgow, Paul Estabrooks, David Dzewaltowski, Sheana Bull.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
MAST: the organisational aspects Lise Kvistgaard Odense University Hospital Denmark Berlin, May 2010.
Operational Research in the 21 st Century. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) World’s oldest humanitarian organization.
Evaluating Dissemination of AHRQ CER Products Darren Mays, PhD, MPH Department of Oncology Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Comprehensive.
RE-AIM Plus To Evaluate Effective Dissemination of AHRQ CER Products Michele Heisler, MD, MPA September, 2011.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
The Use and Evaluation of Experiments in Health Care Delivery Amanda Kowalski Associate Professor of Economics Department of Economics, Yale University.
Overview of Evaluation Designs. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Explain evaluation design Describe the differences.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
Barbara Resnick, PhD, CRNP, FAAN, FAANP
Follow How to integrate evidence into practice and policy: Knowledge translation resources for practitioners with limited.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
Enhancing Equitable and Effective PTSD Disability Assessment (E3-PTSD) Ted Speroff, PhD, PI; TVHCS Patricia Sinnott, PT, PhD, MPH, co-PI;HERC.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Efficacy of a “One-Shot” Computerized, Individualized Intervention to Increase Condom Use and Decrease STDs among Clinic Patients with Main Partners Diane.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
1 YOUTHBUILD EVALUATION Building evidence about the effect of YouthBuild on the young people it serves August 17, 2011 Washington, D.C.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.
Private and confidential Community Pharmacy Future Four-or-more medicines support service Update on progress and next steps Approved18 th June 2012 This.
Supported by: Student Hubs is a registered charity in England and Wales, number Impact Measurement Proving and Improving your Social Impact.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Project monitoring and evaluation
TITLE Differentiated Care for People who inject Drugs, Men who have sex with men, Sex workers, Transgender people, Prisoners and other people living in.
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
HEALTH ECONOMICS BASICS
Overview of key findings from the MUNROS project
Front Line Innovation and Trials
How to Assess the Effectiveness of Your Language Access Program
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
Vikas Dhikav, PhD Clinical Trials Vikas Dhikav, PhD
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
Design and Critique of Grants for Implementation Research
Community Participation in Research
Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012.
Pre-implementation Processes Implementation, Adoption, and Utility of Family History in Diverse Care Settings Study Lori A. Orlando, MD MHS.
Randomized Trials: A Brief Overview
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Provincial Evaluation Plan By Kathleen Douglas-England
ACT Project Methodologies for assessment of coordinated care and telehealth - IFIC 2014 Cristina Bescos, Helen Schonenberg 9/22/2018 ACT Programme.
@hrbtmrn Intro and welcome.
# of Video's with Target Bx Functional Hypotheses Obtained?
Citizen, consumer, and patient roles in using publicly reported primary healthcare performance information Lessons from citizen-patient dialogues in three.
Evaluation Goal: Ensure learnings from the program are identified and recorded, in particular: What roles can CHCs best play in addressing SDOH? What types.
Pilot Studies: What we need to know
Quality Improvement Indicators and Targets
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluating FGM/C abandonment programs
Program Planning: Models and Theories
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Stakeholder engagement and research utilization: Insights from Namibia
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization’s Palliative Care Resource Series Best Practices for Using Telehealth in Palliative Care Vicki Wildman,
Remote Patient Management Programs
Presentation transcript:

Telehealth and Research Brandon M. Welch, MS, PhD Suparna Qanungo, PhD Brian E. Bunnell, PhD

Telehealth Research Need for Telehealth Research Research using telehealth Support clinical research with telemedicine technology Telehealth is a tool, NOT the intervention Research about telehealth

Clinical Research 101 Is better than ?

Clinical Research 101 Outcomes vs Outcomes Evaluate a new methodology or treatment on real patients Hypothesis, control-intervention, compare outcomes

Clinical research process Recruit Screen Informed consent Baseline data Intervention Outcomes data Steps of clinical research Recruit Inform Consent Collect baseline data Provide intervention Retain Collect outcomes data Analyze Publish

Cost of pharma clinical trials http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1740774515625964

2% (35) of US population participates in clinical trials

Of those invited to participate, 21% show up for initial screening, 7% enroll and only 5% complete the trials

Of those invited to participate, 21% show up for initial screening, 7% enroll and only 5% complete the trials

Impact on clinical trials 80-90% Studies fail to recruit target number patients within allotted time 85% Studies fail to retain enough patients to continue Underpowered results → inconclusive results Convenience sample lacks diversity → not representative of population Waste of time, effort, and money 80-90% of trials fail to recruit the target number of patients within the allotted time 85% of clinical trials fail to retain enough patients to continue Getz K. The Gift ofParticipation: A guide to making informed decisions about volunteering for a clinical trial. Bar Harbor, ME: Jerian Publishing; 2007. http://cuttingedgeinfo.com/2011/clinical-trial-cost-drivers/ Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation, et al. Transforming Clinical Research in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary National Academies Press (2010) N.S. Sung, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise JAMA, 289 (2003), pp. 1278–1287 The average per-patient cost is about $5,500 for a Phase I trial; $6,500 for a Phase II trial; and more than $7,600 for a Phase III trial.²

Patient motivators to participate

Informed consent challenges Catch patient while at clinic Travel to get consent Scheduling to meet Remote site clinic staff must go through regulatory training Remote site increases errors and lost consent forms Disrupts clinic staff workflow

Telehealth as a solution Increase access to clinical trials Increase geographic diversity Make participation more convenient Streamline consent workflow Reduce consent burden on remote sites

Live demo

Telesurvey

Telesurvey

To do: Watch video Complete consent Next step: Start survey Start

Telesurvey To do: Watch video Complete consent Complete survey Start

Complete in waiting room prior to call Need help? We’re available by video call. Start call now

Complete in waiting room prior to call

Teleconsent Understand

To do: Watch video Next step: Complete consent Start Start survey

To do: Watch video Complete consent Start

To do: To do: Watch video Watch video Complete consent Start Start Complete consent

3 way teleconsent

Recruitment websites

Video call offline Video call online Video call online

Video call offline Video call online Video call online

Proposed features

Record Session Start recording?

Gina’s Face Gina’s ID

Digital Medical Devices

Research ABOUT Telehealth Build evidence base for funding and adoption You’re already doing telemedicine, so collect, analyze, and publish Qualitative methods (Suparna) Quantitative methods (Brian) How and where to publish

Assessing and Addressing Needs Needs Assessment What are the unmet needs? Mixed-methods approach Decide which needs you can meet with your program Clinical Trials P - Patient, Population, Problem I - Intervention C - Comparison O - Outcome

Progression of Clinical Research Development and Preliminary/Pilot Testing Feasibility and Acceptability Comparative Effectiveness/Efficacy Quality Metrics Cost Analysis Dissemination and Implementation

Efficacy and Effectiveness Open trial (50 pts get treatment) When? Testing feasibility/acceptability, established program at site, ethical considerations Pre and Post Data t Test (Paired-Samples) Compare against existing population metrics Randomized Clinical Trial (e.g., 50 pts get treatment, 50 get control) When? Testing feasibility/acceptability, establishing efficacy/effectiveness Analysis of Covariance - Compare post scores while co-varying for pre scores Repeated Measures ANOVA - Between- and within-group comparisons for each timepoint Inferiority, Equivalence, Noninferiority designs What if we already know that telehealth works?

Quality Metrics Contact success rate Patient satisfaction Telehealth Satisfaction Scale Technology Acceptability Questionnaire User experience (patient and provider) Outcome Measures Patient Engagement Readmission Rates Length of Stay ED and Observation Days Overall utilization rates

Cost Analysis Cost Benefit Analysis Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Do benefits outweigh costs? By how much? Effect is treated monetarily Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparison of relative costs and outcomes Cost per improvement in health (hours spent/1 point increase in mood) Economic Impact Analysis Estimate of change in economic activity after implementation of a program or policy Effect on revenue, profit, or jobs in a particular area (e.g., city, country, globe)

RE-AIM Framework RE-AIM element Definition Reach The number and percent of people from the target population who participate, and their representativeness. Effectiveness The change in outcomes observed over the duration of the intervention. Adoption The number and percent of settings and staff who are expected to use the intervention and who participate. Implementation The extent to which the intervention is delivered consistently and the time and costs associated with implementation. Maintenance The long-term effects on key outcomes, and the extent to which a program is sustained, modified, or discontinued after the initial trial phase. Agboola et al. JMIR Res Protoc 2014