Authors: Machado, R.; Marangoni, C.; Miotto, F.; Querino, M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Advertisements

Dynamic modeling, optimization and control of a CO 2 stripper Marie Solvik Supervisors : Sigurd Skogestad and Marius Støre Govatsmark.
Ref.1: Mokhatab et al, Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing, Gulf Publishing Com., 2006, Chapter 3. Ref.2: Sloan, Clathrate hydrates of.
Vapor and Combined Power Cycles
Production of Synthesis from Natural Gas by Steam Reforming Hysys Simulation Presented By : Presented By :  Beshayer Al-Dihani  Hessa Al-Sahlawi  Latifa.
Multi-component Distillation Prepared by Dr
Computer Assisted Process Design---HYSYS Bo Hu. Introduction HYSYS is only one process simulation program out of a number. Steady State Processes ASPEN.
INTRODUCTION Air at lower temperatures (-196 o C) becomes in liquid and so can do the distillation of air to its components. Distillation of air is currently.
Exergy analysis of an LNG boil-off gas reliquefaction system
Chemical Engineering Plant Design
1 Active constraint regions for optimal operation of a simple LNG process Magnus G. Jacobsen and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU.
A performance evaluation approach openModeller: A Framework for species distribution Modelling.
SAFETY ANALYSIS WITH MODEL-BASED DYNAMIC SIMULATION ON MOBILE DEVICES Mordechai Shacham and Michael Elly Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva,
Held by Faragostaran Co. Presented to Gas refinery plants of Asalouyeh, Iran By: Ali Akbar Eftekhari.
Title: SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF AXISYMMETRIC CAVITATOR IN PARTIALY CAVITATING FLOW Department of Mechanical Engineering Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Presented.
Overview of Methanol Model
Chemistry XXI The central goal of this unit is to help you understand and apply basic ideas that can be used to distinguish the different substances present.
Done by: Esraá Hajjeyah Supervised by: Prof. M.Fahim Eng. Yusuf Ismail.
7th International Scientific Conference on “Energy and Climate Change”
Dr Saad Al-ShahraniChE 201: Introduction to Chemical Engineering  Separation operations are subject to the conservation of mass  Separation of components.
Chemistry XXI The central goal of this unit is to help you understand and apply basic ideas that can be used to distinguish the different substances present.
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
College of Engineering and Petrolume Chemical Engineering Department
LOGO Plantwide Control Structure Design of Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) Process Thitima Tapaneeyapong and Montree Wongsri Department of Chemical Engineering.
Title of Article : The influence of formal controls on customer interactivity in new product development Author :Joseph M. Bonner Journal :Industrial Marketing.
Experiment 6: Rankine Cycle Yvette Triay Reporter Group 3.
FLASH EMISSIONS JIM COOPER, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION.
CFD Simulation & Consulting Services Hi-Tech CFD | Voice: Optimizing Designs of Industrial Pipes, Ducts and.
Oil and Gas Technology Program Oil and Gas Technology Program PTRT 1317 Natural Gas Processing I Chapter 6A Intro to Refrigeration.
Coordinator MPC with focus on maximizing throughput
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 2 Process Plant Design – Part III
RESERVOIR ENGINEERING
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE DAHOD
-Definition of Pure Substance
by Lars Erik Øi and Vladyslav Shchuchenko
Natural Gas Production Chapter 5 Dehydration of Natural Gas
CHEM-2002 SIMULATION LAB SHEET-2 Example-1 Ammonia Recovery
ERT 213 INTRODUCTION TO PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION
Impact of Impurities on Formation of CO2 Hydrates
TOPIC:- VAPOUR CYCLES CREATED BY:
John Edwards, P&I Design Ltd
The Water Cycle.
Natural Gas Processing I Chapter 9 Fractionation
Simulation Of Gas Sweetening Process
Gas Properties & PVT Tests
The Water Cycle The continuous process of water evaporating, condensing, returning to the earth as precipitation, and returning to a water resource.
SCIENCE JOURNAL 10/9/2012.
Start HYSYS then choose “File, New, Case”
Systems Thinking – Modeling a System
Exercise 1 HYSYS Review 11/12/ Design & Analysis II.
9 CHAPTER Vapor and Combined Power Cycles.
Petroleum and Gas Processing(TKK-2136)
LINAC Heat Management A New Approach
Fig. 2 Conversion Equations.
Introduction to Aspen Plus
Refinery: Separation units
CCE and CVD results The usual PVT measurements on gas condensates are
Introduction to Aspen Terry A. Ring.
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Stathis Skouras and Sigurd Skogestad
Start HYSYS then choose “File, New, Case”
CCE and CVD results The usual PVT measurements on gas condensates are
Introduction to Aspen Terry A. Ring.
Separation Columns (Distillation, Absorption )
Conversion Processes: Cracking
The Water Cycle By Jennifer Williams.
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Thermodynamic Analysis of Vortex Tube using User-Friendly VBA Model
Phase behavior of multicomponent systems
RMSoEE, IIT Kharagpur, India
Presentation transcript:

Authors: Machado, R.; Marangoni, C.; Miotto, F.; Querino, M. Evaluation of Condensate Stabilization Plant through Static and Dynamic Process Simulation Authors: Machado, R.; Marangoni, C.; Miotto, F.; Querino, M.

Today’s Agenda: Introduction Objective Methodology Results and Disscussion Conclusion References Acknowledgements

Introduction Condensate is the liquid formed by the condensation of a gas, specifically, the hydrocarbon liquid separate from natural gas because of changes in temperature and pressure when the gas from the reservoir was delivered to the surface separators. Such condensate remains a liquid at atmospheric temperature and pressure. Condensate stabilization is the removal of light components from hydrocarbon liquid to lower its vapour pressure to a desired level. Stabilization may be used to meet a required pipeline sales contract specification or to minimize the vaporization of the hydrocarbon.

Introduction How can this be done?

Introduction Three Stage Separation 600 psi 300 psi 65psi Source: Mokhatab, Poe and Speight (2006)

Objectives Based on actual plant data in the literature, it carried out a simulation using Aspen HYSYS® software to predict the opposite process behavior on some proposed amendments (Rahmanian, Ilias and Nasrifar, 2015). In the static software module, changes in temperature, pressure and flow of plant behavior were evaluated. In the dynamic software module, a control system was tested and configured to stabilize disturbances in the model.

Methodology In this work we use the software Aspen Hysys® version 8.6 Fluid-package: Peng-Robinson Feed condition

Methodology Process Flow Diagram for the Condensate Stabilization

Results and Discussion For the Static Process Simulation

Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion

Conclusions The simulation performed for the condensate stabilization provided specification of the products like the RVP criteria, were presented in this work similarly to all changes programmed into the system. The changes in the feed stream (temperature, pressure and flow) influenced product quality. It is necessary to set other process specifications to simulate the conditions of condensate stabilization. It was possible to develop dynamic models for the process with added columns for regeneration of MEG and for separating the final product. The adjustment of the controllers is essential to the stabilization of the dynamic models.

References Peng D. and Robinson D. A new two-constant equation of state. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 15, 59-64, 1976. Mohaktab, S.; Poe, W.; Speight, J. Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing. Gulf Professional Publishing 672, 2006. Rahmanian, N.; Ilias, I.; Nasrifar, K. Process simulation and assessment of a back-up condensate stabilization unit. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 26, 730-736, 2015. Rahmanian, N. et al. Simultation and optimization of a condensate stabilization process. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 32, 453-464, 2016.

Acknowledgements mvquerino@gmail.com