Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
December 3, Performance Appraisal for Experienced Teachers WCDSBandOECTA.
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Implementing the Revised TPA Process for Experienced Teachers
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
1 Implementing the Revised TPA Process for Experienced Teachers Core Module Two: The Annual Learning Plan.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
District Training Assembly
Performance Management
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Polices, procedures & protocols
TOPS TRAINING.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Esther Bushell – School Governance and Workforce Adviser
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation System
Performance Evaluation
T.O.P.S
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Performance Review for County Educators
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Human Resources Management: Module 2
State Board of Education Progress Update
Performance Review for County Educators
Teacher Evaluation Process
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Roles and Responsibilities
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Roles and Responsibilities
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Prizmah Day School Conference March 2019
Providing feedback to learners
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

The Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Experience in Thames Valley District School Board Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources NAEN CONFERENCE March 2017

Ontario Ministry of Education documents guide TPA process New Teacher Induction Program - Manual for Performance Appraisal of New Teachers (2010) Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers - Technical Requirements Manual (2010)

Guiding Principles Support for teacher professional growth and development Improved student outcomes Strengthened collaboration between teachers and their principals through ongoing professional dialogues

Guiding Principles (cont’d) Appraisal situated in the context of school and system learning communities Increase capacity for principals in their role as instructional leaders Transparency and accountability

Overall Goal of the TPA Foster teacher development Provide meaningful appraisals that encourage continuous professional learning and growth Identify opportunities for additional support where required

Roles and Responsibilities Teachers, vice principals, principals and supervisory officers all play key roles in TPA process Essential to these roles is collaboration, mutual respect and shared responsibility These standards create a climate within which teachers learn, plan, prepare, and pursue individual and shared goals and strive to be successful in bringing about high levels of student achievement

Overview of Components Five year evaluation cycle Two satisfactory appraisals in first year for new teachers One appraisal in an evaluation year for experienced teachers Pre-observation meeting, classroom observation, post-observation meeting

Overview of Components (cont’d) One “Summative Report” form 8 competencies based on five domains for new teachers 16 competencies based on five domains for experienced teachers

Overview of Components (cont’d) Look-fors provided as a resource Annual Learning Plan (ALP) requirements Due process for unsatisfactory performance

Summative Form allows principals to: Comment on identified and other observed competencies (identified in discussion with the teacher) as the focus of the teacher’s performance appraisal and/or observed in the TPA

Features and Requirements of Summative Report In preparing the report the principal must: Consider all competencies in assessing the teacher’s performance Provide comments regarding the competencies identified in discussions with the teacher as the focus of the performance appraisal

Features and Requirements (cont’d) Provide overall rating of the teacher’s performance Recommend professional growth goals and strategies for the teacher to take into account in developing, reviewing and updating teacher’s Annual Learning Plan

Features and Requirements (cont’d) Principals collect evidence to support their appraisal of teacher appraisal Teachers also collect evidence to support their performance appraisal

Working with the Summative Report Throughout the appraisal process, respect and trust are integral elements of a successful appraisal The rapport between the principal and teacher will contribute to the success of the pre-observation meeting as they discuss the competencies that form the basis of the performance appraisal and establish which competencies could be the focus of the classroom observation

Working with the Summative Report (cont’d) Classroom Observation Formal classroom observation is one part of a comprehensive TPA For some competencies, evidence for assessment purposes may be obtained in other ways

Working with the Summative Report (cont’d) The Post-Observation Meeting Because the TPA process happens only once in a five year cycle, it is vital that it is a constructive experience for both teacher and principal

Writing Comments that Motivate The summative report is an important tool for providing feedback and direction in a manner that motivates the teacher to a higher level of performance Teachers refer to the information in the report for guidance as they move towards their learning and improving goals

Suggestions for Professional Growth and Development To be practical and constructive, professional goals and strategies should align with the competencies, build on the professional goals and strategies in the teacher’s ALP, and support school improvement goals when possible

When a TPA is heading towards an unsatisfactory rating or is unsatisfactory Document, document, document Follow appropriate polices/procedures Don’t wait just for classroom visit observation Visit classroom on regular basis Document specific concerns/evidence/supports/next steps Provide specific feedback regularly verbally and in writing

When a TPA is heading towards an unsatisfactory rating or is unsatisfactory (cont’d) Communicate, communicate, communicate Early No surprises Specific concerns/next steps/supports Teacher/union/Human Resources personnel Be proactive

When a TPA is heading towards an unsatisfactory rating or is unsatisfactory (cont’d) Process, process, process Clear Transparent Follow policies/procedures Follow timelines - long process from start to finish Supports/Guidance/Mentoring Prioritize

Where two consecutive ratings are unsatisfactory All previous steps have been followed Teacher placed on review status

Where two consecutive ratings are unsatisfactory (cont’d) If at any time during the 120 days starting with the day on which the teacher is advised that they are on review status, principal and supervisory officer jointly determine that the delay necessitated by conducting a third performance appraisal is not in the best interests of the students, they shall not conduct the appraisal and shall promptly send a joint written recommendation to the Board of Trustees that the teacher's employment should be terminated.

Where two consecutive ratings are unsatisfactory (cont’d) Recommendations must include a statement that in the opinion of the principal and supervisory officer the delay necessitated by a third performance appraisal is inconsistent with the protection of the best interests of the students.

Procedures followed by Boards on receiving a recommendation to terminate Teacher's employment Pending Board’s decision on whether to terminate a teacher’s employment, the Director of Education must suspend the teacher with pay or reassign the teacher to duties that are not in the school. A Board that receives a recommendation to terminate a teacher’s employment must make a decision by a majority vote on whether or not to do so, and this vote must take place within sixty days of receiving the recommendation.

Procedures followed by Boards on receiving a recommendation to terminate Teacher's employment (cont’d) If the teacher’s employment is not terminated, his or her assignment to other duties ceases and unless the Board and teacher agree otherwise, the teacher resumes his or her former position.

Procedures followed by Boards on receiving a recommendation to terminate Teacher's employment (cont’d) Where a Board terminates a teacher's employment, it must promptly file a complaint with the Ontario College of Teachers regarding the conduct or actions of the teacher that relate to the termination.

Procedures followed by Boards on receiving a recommendation to terminate Teacher's employment (cont’d) Where a teacher employed by the Board resigns while he/she is on review status, a complaint must be promptly filed with the Ontario College of Teachers regarding the conduct or actions of the teacher that relate to the teacher have being placed on review status.

TVDSB Stats Between January 2014-2016, 3 recommendations for termination have been made to the Board for unsatisfactory performance. In all cases, the terminations were approved by the Board of Trustees.

Unsatisfactory Teacher Performance Appraisals in TVDSB 2015-2016: 14 2014-2015: 12 2013-2014: 2 (Bargaining year) 2012- 2013: 8

Key Tips Communication, documentation, process Ongoing training for principals and vice principals Human Resources and supervisors need to be in the loop as soon as possible and provide support and guidance right from the beginning Union involvement

IT IS WORTH IT FOR OUR STUDENTS !!!!

Questions?