Suicide Prevention in School Settings:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Research Findings and Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling Up: Training & Supporting Personnel and Program Wide Implementation
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
A Brief Description of Maine’s Program, Lessons Learned, and Resources 5/07.
Evidence-Based Bullying Prevention Program RISCA Annual Conference Bryant University April 9, 2011 Karen Carnevale, Elementary School Counselor Leslie.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
A Guide to Raising Resilient Children 1. 2 Is There a Need?  3 rd leading cause of death in adolescence  2 nd leading cause of death in college students.
Suicide Prevention Education. Why are we here? Suicide is the third leading cause of death in young people between the ages of 15 and 24. Every 16 minutes.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
1 Social Work Services Program Department Building Inclusive Catholic Communities Revised July 2010.
Using Technology to Engage School and Community Mental Health Personnel in Addressing Students in Distress Yolanda Jenkins, Carolyn Givens, Yvette Jackson,
School Psychological Services in High Schools: Responding to Teachers’ Needs Presented by Kari Sears, Ed.S., NCSP, Patricia Warner, Ph.D., NCSP, Tammy.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Collaborative Closing the Gap Action Plans: School Counselors, School Social Workers and School Psychologists Working to Close the Gaps.
Promoting School- Based Mental Health Through a Countywide Summer Institute Keri Weed, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of South Carolina Aiken.
Transition Planning: The Role of the CCBDD Behavior and Health Supports Department Richard Cirillo, Ph.D. Chief Clinical Officer Cuyahoga County Board.
Suicide Prevention Education a collaboration of the Mississippi Department of Education/Office of Healthy Schools Mississippi Department of Mental Health.
Nevada Counselor / Psychologist Survey Data Prepared for the Legislative Committee on Education July, By Marina McHatton CTE Counseling and Assessments,
Pinellas Safe Start Evaluation Prepared by Sandra Ortega For the 2004 Cross-Site Meeting Baltimore, MD November 2004.
Recruiting and Retaining Good Citizen Review Panel members The South Dakota Perspective.
MSU Extension 4-H Field Staff Perceptions of Area of Expertise Teams Elizabeth Scott Doctoral Candidate Agriculture and Extension Education.
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services – Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery - PRI One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life.
(YOUR SCHOOL) COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM Compiled by: South Dakota School Counselor Association.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Safe Schools/Healthy Students 2005 New Hanover County Schools School-Wide Survey Prepared by the UNCW Evaluation Team February 2005.
EBSCC 2016 DOLLARHIDE & DOGAN 1 Dr. Colette Dollarhide and Soon-to-be Dr. Sabri Dogan The Ohio State University.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
NYU Child Study Center: Bridges Program Caring Across Communities: Annual Grantee Meeting April
Results Conclusions Students had positive views of statements in the interprofessional teamwork and team-based practice and patient outcomes from collaborative.
Police Perceptions and Rule Rejections By: Chad Roberge Advisors: Ellen S. Cohn, Ph.D. & Alexander Blandina, M.A. Hypothesis Results Discussion Method.
Loudoun County Public Schools SUICIDE PREVENTION Town Hall on Teen Suicide John Champe High School 1.
Conducting Suicide Risk Assessments in Clinical and School Settings Unique Challenges Associated with the Assessment of Suicide Risk in School Settings.
Make a Move: An Intervention to Reduce Childhood Obesity Kimberly Nerud, PhD, RN International Rural Nursing Conference Rapid City, South Dakota July 19,
Self Efficacy of Communication Skills in Difficult Patient Encounters: An Interdisciplinary Collaboration Rachel Bramson, M.D., M.S. Kimberly L. van Walsum,
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
School Learning Support Officers Working with the Primary Teacher
Show Me the Money: Family Engagement in Family Financial Literacy
Does All this work?.
Coordination of Services Team
American Evaluation Association Conference November 10, 2010
Maureen Gecht-Silver OTR/L, MPH UIC Department of Family Medicine
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
APHA 135th Annual Meeting and Expo November 3-7, 2007 Washington, DC
Lisa Weiss, M.D. Brian F. Pendleton, Ph.D. Susan Labuda Schrop, M.S.
Designing Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers
FAMILY EMPLOYMENT AWARENESS TRAINING (FEAT) FEAT Format and Content
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
Leadership and Collaboration in School Counseling
Brotherson, S., Kranzler, B., & Zehnacker, G.
The Significance of Follow Up Post Discharge
School-Based Behavioral and Mental Health Supports and Services
Parent & Staff Survey Results
ACL Teen Centers School-Based Health Centers serving
Mental Health First Aid Training for Advisory Agents Working with Farmers A/Prof Don Gorman Dr Delwar Hossain Dr Rob Eley Dr Jeff Coutts.
Introduction To the Suicide Prevention Online Learning Center
Suicide Prevention in School Settings:
TAPS Academy Evaluation
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
WELCOME BACK PARENT COFFEE
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Collaborative Efforts in California to Prepare for the HPV Vaccine
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
House Select Committee on School Safety - Student Behavior and Interventions Subcommittee Recommendations Ryan Brimmer, Division of Legislative Services.
GREATER ESSEX COUNTY PARENT INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE
GREATER ESSEX COUNTY special education advisory committee
Suicide Prevention Education
Presentation transcript:

Suicide Prevention in School Settings: Sources of Strength and Creating Suicide Safety in Schools Evaluating the Impact of the CSSS Workshop on School Preparedness for Suicide Prevention Dana E. Boccio, Ph.D. Adelphi University Garden City, NY NYS Suicide Prevention Conference September 12-13, 2016 Albany, NY

Anticipated Direct and Indirect Effects Participation in CSSS workshop Changes in attitudes, knowledge, perceptions of administrative support, and feelings of empowerment Improvements in school suicide safety practices Pre-test Post-test 6-Month Follow-Up

Participant/School Demographics 93 participants (87 from New York, 6 from Arkansas); 86.5% Female, 13.5% Male; 64.4% School Counselors School Level % Elementary School 21.1 Middle School 16.7 High School 36.7 Multiple Levels 22.2 District Admin/Central Offices 2.2 Community 1.1 Community Type Urban 85.4 Suburban 3.4 Rural 7.9 Combination 3.3 Socioeconomic Status % Low 48.3 Medium 10.1 High 2.2 Mixed 39.3 School Affected by Suicide 25.3 Had Previous Training 63.3 # in Attendance 1 64.1 2 20.5 3 11.5 4 3.8

Impact on Attitudes Pre Post Item M (SD) df t p   Pre Post Item M (SD) df t p Youth suicide is a significant public health problem. 4.56 (0.71) 4.77 (0.59) 79 3.19 .002* Schools should play an important role in youth suicide prevention. 4.58 (0.75) 4.81 (0.55) 3.46 .001*   Pre Post Composite M (SD) df t p Attitudesa 9.13 (1.33) 9.58 (1.08) 79 4.11 .000* Items were rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). *p < .05 aAttitude Composite – possible scores range from 2 to 10.

Impact on Knowledge Item M (SD) df t p Pre Post 3.52 (0.95)   Pre Post Item M (SD) df t p I have the knowledge I need to help a student at risk for suicide. 3.52 (0.95) 4.12 (0.58) 77 6.70 .000* I have the knowledge I need to respond after a suicide death or attempt affects my school. 3.30 (0.89) 3.94 (0.75) 5.49 I know of some specific evidence-based suicide prevention programs for schools. 2.93 (1.04) 4.17 (0.66) 76 9.37 I know how to judge school-based suicide prevention/intervention programs against best practice standards. 2.78 (0.88) 3. 82 (0.83) 9.42 I am familiar with some free or low-cost resources that could be used to enhance suicide safety at my school. 2.90 (1.10) 3.98 (0.73) 75 8.55   Pre Post Composite M (SD) df t p Knowledgea 15.30 (3.64) 20.01 (2.78) 70 10.98 .000* Items were rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). *p < .05 aKnowledge Composite – possible scores range from 5 to 25.

Impact on Perceptions of Support   Pre Post Item M (SD) df t p My school has made suicide prevention a priority. 3.44 (1.00) 3.75 (0.88) 74 3.04 .003* My school values efforts at suicide prevention. 3.93 (0.79) 4.03 (0.76) 0.82 .418 I am part of a team that is working to improve suicide safety at my school. 3.83 (0.95) 4.01 (0.81) 72 1.99 .050* Our team has the support of our administration to work on improving suicide safety at our school. 3.99 (0.86) 4.08 (0.83) 73 1.56 .124 I have the support I need to help a student at risk for suicide. 3.79 (0.81) 4.01 (0.61) 2.97 .004* I have the support I need to respond after a suicide death or attempt affects my school. 3.64 (0.84) 3.94 (0.68) 75 3.49 .001*   Pre Post Composite M (SD) df t p Supporta 22.61 (3.93) 23.76 (3.65) 71 4.07 .000* Items were rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). *p < .05 aSupport Composite – possible scores range from 6 to 30.

Impact of Feelings of Empowerment   Pre Post Item M (SD) df t p I feel empowered to work collaboratively with my colleagues on implementing our next steps for improving our school’s suicide safety. 3.90 (0.87) 4.20 (0.68) 74 3.45 .001* Items were rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). *p < .05

Participants’ Satisfaction Ratings of CSSS Workshop % (n) Item Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The content of this workshop was relevant to my job. 0.0 (0) 18.8 (15) 81. 3(65) I learned a lot from this workshop. 2.5 (2) 31.3 (25) 66.3 (53) I found this workshop useful. 32.5 (26) 67.5 (54) I would recommend this workshop to others. 68.8 (55) A follow-up consultation would help in furthering suicide prevention efforts in my school. 15.2 (12) 26.6 (21) 58.2 (46)

Practice/Procedures Currently in Place in Participants’ Schools % (n) Yes Some Aspects are in Place, but More is Needed   No Don’t Know Curricula or programs related to building resilience and protective factors (e.g., healthy problem-solving) in students 21.6 (16) 67.6 (50) 5.4 (4) A school-wide screening procedure to identify students at risk for suicidal behavior 13.5 (10) 39.2 (29) 41.9 (31) Training for teachers/staff in how to recognize suicidal warning signs and how to respond 19.2 (14) 49.3 (36) 24.7 (18) 6.8 (5) Training for students in how to recognize suicidal warning signs 9.5 (7) 40.5 (30) 8.1 (6) Clear referral procedures for school personnel (i.e., teachers and staff know how and to whom they should refer students) 45.9 (34) 33.8 (25) Clear risk assessment procedures 32.4 (24) 44.6 (33) A standard protocol or assessment instrument for assessing risk (e.g., semi-structured interview) 28.8 (21) 15.1 (11) Clear procedures for collaborative safety planning 31.1 (23) 50.0 (37) Clear procedures for parental notification and involvement 47.9 (35) 38.4 (28) 4.1 (3) Clear procedures for referring at-risk students and their families to community agencies/resources 41.7 (30) 40.3 (29) 6.9 (5) 11.1 (8) A collaborative relationship (involving adequate communication) with nearby hospitals/community agencies 12.2 (9) A clear plan for assisting students with re-entry into school after discharge from a hospital/inpatient setting 29.7 (22) 14.9 (11) A crisis plan for responding to suicide deaths and suicide attempts 28.4 (21) 47.3 (35) Procedures for coordinating school and community support services in the aftermath of a suicide or attempt 18.9 (14) 52.7 (39)

Summary of Results so far… Pre-test to post-test improvements in: Attitudes toward the importance of suicide prevention Knowledge of best practices and available resources Perceptions of school-based support to improve suicide safety Feelings of empowerment to move forward with suicide safety measures Attendees with and without prior training were similarly likely to benefit from workshop Individual and group attendance both resulted in benefits High satisfaction with workshop/attendees likely to recommend to others

Next Steps… 6-month follow-up assessment: Are schools enacting improvements to their suicide safety procedures subsequent to completion of the workshop? What barriers to implementation of suicide safety practices are being encountered?