Michelle Kershner (and Dan Kernler) Elgin Community College Elgin, IL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compass Math Test Validity April 2011 Mike Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College District 1.
Advertisements

Pedal to the Metal: Accelerating Developmental Math Students Lori Austin, Assistant Professor of Mathematics Raritan Valley Community College Branchburg,
Dual Enrollment Program October Dual enrollment is when students go to a local college/university to take college courses. In some cases.
Pierce College Elizabeth Atondo, Marco De La Garza, & Crystal Kiekel.
A Tale of Two Redesigns John Squires, Chattanooga State Community College.
Principles of Reform Bruce Vandal, Education Commission of the States April 12, 2012.
GATEWAY COURSE SUCCESS Gateway not “gatekeeper” Principles of Reform Gateway not “gatekeeper” Principles of Reform.
BENJAMIN GAMBOA, RESEARCH ANALYST CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE RESEARCHING: ALPHA TO ZETA.
Multiple Measures of Placement. Objectives Define Multiple Measures of Placement Gaston College Implementation Implementation.
Some Statistics Related to Placement Test Results and First Semester Math Grades at George Brown College.
MULTIPLE REGRESSION. OVERVIEW What Makes it Multiple? What Makes it Multiple? Additional Assumptions Additional Assumptions Methods of Entering Variables.
FOUNDATIONS EDUCATION at WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY.
June 17, % of our high school students indicate their intention to go on to college. - OUS Post High School Plan Survey, 2003.
Three Pathways aligned with K-12 Curriculum I. Cooperative Innovative High School Pathway II. Career and Technical Education Pathway leading to a certificate.
Class of 2020 High Ability Mathematics Parent Night.
Tyler J. Evans HSU Mathematics October 31, Outline  Overview of entry level mathematics curriculum at HSU  Current placement and goals for the.
Setting a college-readiness cut score for the CRMT CRMT Working Group August 19, :30-3:30  Background  Pilot test summary  Current MPT-I placement.
Evan Picton, Research Analyst Wenatchee Valley College.
1 Beginning & Intermediate Algebra – Math 103 Math, Statistics & Physics.
An Analysis of Successful Online Behaviors Across Disciplines Catherine Finnegan, University System of Georgia Libby V. Morris, University of Georgia Kangjoo.
Fall 2011NEnd of Fall 2011 GRCC GPA FTIACs with HS GPA 3.00 or higher 2, FTIACs with HS GPA below ,
Math SOL Test Changes School Board Work Session March 8, 2012.
 Involves multiple large enrollment courses  Impacts 75+% of the students in a department  This usually requires redesigning < 5 courses  Math  dev.
AMATYC Conference November 21, 2015 New Orleans, Louisiana Rita Eisele, Sylvia Walker, Janet Delgado, and Cathy Aguilar-Morgan New Mexico State University,
1 Making Better Decisions on Placement in Mathematics Courses W. Robert Stephenson Iowa State University.
How to find your placement results, Step 1 of 3 In your Student Center page on WISER, click “My Academics”
MATH 0099 Information Summer F.A.Q.S. Why do I have to take this class? – Low or No SAT or ACT scores – High School Deficiency in Math – Scored.
Multiple Measures Assessment Project (MMAP) Cañada Pilot Study December /09/2015CAÑADA COLLEGE 1.
English Assessment Validity February 2012 Michael Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang, Sheryl Queen Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College.
Math Placement Test Texas Tech University. Psychology Majors: Math Requirements Psychology majors must complete 6 hours of math. Students are required.
Likelihood of Completion Depends on Level of Unpreparedness Community College Pre-College Level Remedial Math Sequence.
Enrollment Management Predictive Modeling Simplified Vince Timbers, Penn State University.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND INNOVATION INSTITUTE, JANUARY 22, 2014 HAL HUNTSMAN, CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO FAUN MADDUX, WEST VALLEY COLLEGE REBECCA WONG,
MULTIPLE MEASURES, ASSESSMENT, AND THE RE-IMAGINATION OF STUDENT CAPACITY March 2, 2016 Loris Fagioli, PhD Research and Planning Analyst, Irvine Valley.
Strategy 2: Corequisite Remediation — English 1A + 1 unit co-req Josh Scott, English Instructor, BSI Coordinator.
Changes in placement in the California Community Colleges John J. Hetts Senior Director of Data Science, CalPASS Plus/Educational Results Partnership Former.
When Students Do Their Homework? Mustafa Demir Ioannis Souldatos Joint Mathematics Meetings San Antonio, TX January 2015.
Algebra Realignment Committee Report to the Math Department
AIM Accelerating Instruction in Mathematics October 7, 2016
Improving completion and equity in math at LMC
Should There be an Algebra Course for Non-STEM Majors?
Class of 2023 High Ability Mathematics Parent Night
Multiple Measures Pilot College Convening - North
Tutorial 8: Probability Distribution
Toward Multiple Measures for Math Placement at Mid Michigan Community College Peter Velguth, Ph. D. Scott Mertes, Brandon Kish, jessie Gordon, Brent Mishler,
Tim Johnston, Dean of Enrollment Services
Accelerated Pathway at Leeward CC: Early Results
Alternate Math Pathways
Update on Developmental Math Campus GPA Pilots
Becoming AB 705 Compliant Tammi Marshall, Cuyamaca College
Northwest RESA Principals’ Council December 7, 2011
The Impact, Costs, and Benefits of NC’s Early College Model
Creative Solutions for Fast-Tracking to College-Level Mathematics
Jeffrey Vetrano and Jennifer Nelson May 11, 2018
Why do I have to take it? What score do I need? What is on ACT math?
Hal Huntsman, City College of San Francisco
Multiple Measures Susan Barbitta Associate Director, Special Projects
Get to transfer level math in ONE SEMESTER
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Fall 2018 California State University Updates
Briana B. Morrison Adrienne Decker Lauren E. Margulieux
Understanding Your Transcript
Fall 2018 California State University Updates
ADVANCED PLACEMENT/DUAL CREDIT
Get to transfer level math in ONE SEMESTER
Math Placement Data Update
Maximizing Possibility
CCMR Dual Credit April 2019 Presented by: Diana Perez
Texas Success Initiative Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Michelle Kershner (and Dan Kernler) Elgin Community College Elgin, IL Predicting Success Michelle Kershner (and Dan Kernler) Elgin Community College Elgin, IL Dan Want to follow along on your device? Download the presentation: http://tinyurl.com/AMATYC-T1C

Elgin Community College (ECC) 16,128 students (2014-15) 71% part-time Average age is 27 Dan

Purpose Analyze GPA as a predictor for success Share our updated placement procedure Discuss early results Share your placement procedures that use multiple measures

Our Original Analysis (2010) Binomial logistic regression using COMPASS Algebra score as predictor for course success (C or better) Add ACT Math sub-score and HS Cumulative GPA to regression model Dan

Our Original Analysis (2010) COMPASS Algebra score was a statistically significant predictor. High school GPA significantly and dramatically increased the accuracy of the prediction of success. ACT Math sub-score did not have a unique contribution to the model. Dan

Success by COMPASS in Intermediate Algebra C or better 66% success D, W, or F 57% success Dan 49% success

Success by COMPASS in Intermediate Algebra 10% 30% 53% 81% 92% C or better D, W, or F Dan

Transfer Level Success Consider only introductory transfer level courses: Mth101 Quantitative Literacy Mth102 General Education Statistics Mth110 Math for Elementary Teachers I Mth112 College Algebra Focus on students with a COMPASS Algebra score only. Reported GPA in database (some are weighted)

Success by COMPASS & HS GPA Intermediate Algebra and Introductory Transfer Level Courses Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS Algebra Score 62-65 Transfer Level 58-61 54-57 50-53 Inter. Algebra 46-49 42-45 38-41 HS Cumulative GPA C or better D, W, or F 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Success by COMPASS & HS GPA Intermediate Algebra and Introductory Transfer Level Courses Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS Algebra Score 62-65 25% 30% 63% 83% Transfer Level 58-61 0% 64% 59% 78% 54-57 33% 44% 57% 82% 50-53 50% 69% 79% Inter. Algebra 46-49 17% 38% 88% 42-45 29% 47% 38-41 10% 26% 48% 61% 81% HS Cumulative GPA C or better D, W, or F 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

COMPASS CSEM COMPASS Reference Manual reports a conditional standard error of measurement (CSEM) Can be interpreted similarly to confidence intervals Measures the difference between actual score and expected score if the test were repeated Depends on the score and test (hence conditional) Dan

COMPASS CSEM Dan

COMPASS CSEM Dan

Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS CSEM Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS Algebra Score 62-65 25% 30% 63% 83% Transfer Level 58-61 0% 64% 59% 78% 54-57 33% 44% 57% 82% 50-53 50% 69% 79% Inter. Algebra 46-49 17% 38% 88% 42-45 29% 47% 38-41 10% 26% 48% 61% 81% HS Cumulative GPA C or better D, W, or F Dan 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS CSEM Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS Algebra Score 62-65 Transfer Level 58-61 54-57 50-53 Inter. Algebra 46-49 42-45 38-41 HS Cumulative GPA C or better +10 -10 D, W, or F GPA: 3.6 COMPASS: 50 Dan 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS CSEM Success Rates (C or better) COMPASS Algebra Score 62-65 25% 30% 63% 83% Transfer Level 58-61 0% 64% 59% 78% 54-57 33% 44% 57% 82% 50-53 50% 69% 79% Inter. Algebra 46-49 17% 38% 88% 42-45 29% 47% 38-41 10% 26% 48% 61% 81% HS Cumulative GPA C or better D, W, or F Dan 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Comb. Basic & Int. Algebra Adjusting Placement Two principles: Redefine “College Ready” Accelerate completion of the developmental sequence Basic Algebra Intermediate Algebra College Ready 0-32 38-54 55-100 33-37 Comb. Basic & Int. Algebra COMPASS Algebra Score College Ready Dan Combined Basic & Int. Algebra Cumulative HS GPA 2.5 3.0 2.0 3.5

Adjusting Placement College Ready (Eligible for Mth101, Mth102, Mth110, or Mth112) 55-100 College Ready* 38 - 54 Intermediate Algebra (Mth098) COMPASS Algebra Score 33 - 37 Combined Basic and Int. Algebra (Mth099) 0 - 32 Basic Algebra (Mth096) 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 High School Cumulative GPA * Assuming C or better both semesters of a second-year HS algebra course.

Adjusted Placement Results Fall 2014 – Spring 2016 (4 semesters) 178 students eligible for new rule enrolled 48% took advantage and moved up a level Of those, 76% were successful Interestingly, only 10% of the students eligible for the Combined Basic and Intermediate Algebra moved up Dan

Future Research Why aren’t more students moving up a level? We have recently switched to ALEKS (starting Spring 2017) – will we have similar results? Kris

Want a copy of this presentation? Questions? Want a copy of this presentation? http://tinyurl.com/AMATYC-T1C Want more information? dkernler@elgin.edu