MS4 Permit Compliance and EWMP Project Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
The coming storm: Managing Roanoke’s Stormwater Infrastructure Challenges Solutions for Roanoke’s future.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
The purpose of the San Dieguito Union High School District’s stormwater management plan is to comply with applicable stormwater regulations, educate.
1 World Water Congress and Exhibition - Montréal, Canada WATER AND POWER UTILITY PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCING Presented by: James B. McDaniel, Senior Assistant.
January 6,  INTRODUCTION  BACKGROUND  SUMMARY  QUESTIONS  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ◦ PROPOSED BUDGETS, LEVIES AND CIRCUIT BREAKER 2.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Los Angeles County Flood Control District Water Quality Funding Initiative Southern California Water Dialogue June 22, 2011.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Local Government Assistance Phase II Storm Water Rule Erie County Department of Environment & Planning.
2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING FOR SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Sam Sperry,
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board - March 16, 2006 Total Maximum Daily Loads for Trash.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant Program (IGIG) ABC’s and 123’s of Illinois EPA’s newest grant program Jan Carpenter Illinois EPA
Elizabeth Miller Jennings Office of the Chief Counsel State Water Resources Control Board Peter Bowes 5/20/2009 Flickr REGULATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGES.
Jennifer Fordyce State Water Resources Control Board – Office of Chief Counsel.
picture Renee Purdy, Environmental Program Manager Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Renee Purdy, Environmental Program Manager Los Angeles.
Tax & Business Licenses: A Case for City Business Licensing Prepared for GFOA – February 2016 Business and Financial Decisions.
Estimated Costs to Meet Permit MARY ANN LUTZ, GOVERNMENT LIAISON / POLICY ADVISOR CONGRESSWOMAN GRACE F. NAPOLITANO.
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
Mountain Regional Water Rules & Regulations Overview.
MS4 Permit – Meaning, History, and Annual Report Results Watershed Partners 4/13/
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II Community Development Districts CDD ORIENTATION CLASS February 28, 2011.
Stormwater 101 History of the Clean Water Act MARCH 22, 2016 WEST COVINA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
Why the Need for Increased Stormwater Funding? Citizens expect a higher level of protection from flooding Increased development.
Briefing regarding the new State General Stormwater Pollution Control Permit.
TMDL Implementation: Now What?
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Municipal Stormwater Permitting
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
Administrative Agencies
Waste Discharge Permit: Paradise Irrigation District
Creating Land Use Datasets for Storm Water Reporting
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Local Ordinance Considerations
Expenditure Limitation/Home Rule Option
Presentation to the Livingston City Council on the Phase II MS4 Permit
____________________________________________________ PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR (PCL) Presentation on the 2005/06 THETA Annual Report.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 UPDATE REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA VOTER PARTICIPATION RIGHTS ACT (CVPRA) AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S.
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Town of Melbourne Beach
Summit County MS4.
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Stormwater Management Program
WATER PORTFOLIO. WATER PORTFOLIO WATER RESILIENCY CHALLENGES Fractured Jurisdiction Pollution Climate Change Limited Infrastructure Reliance on Imported.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
MS4 = Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System
Managing urban watersheds
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Ballona Creek Bacteria Exceedances
Presentation transcript:

MS4 Permit Compliance and EWMP Project Overview City of Monrovia City Council Meeting March 1, 2016

What’s An MS4, And Why Do I Care? “MS4” is an acronym that stands for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System The acronym “MS4” is used by stormwater regulators In California, stormwater regulations are managed by the State Water Resources Control Board through nine (9) Regional Water Quality Control Boards Monrovia is governed by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) The RWQCB requires municipal jurisdictions to achieve specific stormwater standards through a permit called the MS4 Permit

What Does The MS4 Permit Require? The current MS4 Permit for LA County has been in effect since December 28, 2012 Based on the MS4 Permit, LA County municipal jurisdictions are required to do the following: Eliminate all non-stormwater discharges Implement best management practices (BMPs) to prevent / minimize stormwater pollution Enforce maximum stormwater pollutant limits through the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for 33 specific pollutants A TMDL establishes the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards In order to enforce TMDL limits, the MS4 Permit requires that LA County municipal entities either comply with established standards or develop and adopt either a Watershed Management Plan (WMP) or an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan (EWMP)

How Is Monrovia Complying With MS4 Permit Requirements? Every city is located within a specific watershed Monrovia is located within the Los Angeles River Watershed Monrovia decided in 2013 to achieve compliance through development of an EWMP by partnering with several other local jurisdictions Given that our partners overlapped between the Los Angeles River and San Gabriel River Watersheds, the group formed the Rio Hondo / San Gabriel River Water Quality Group to develop our EWMP Member agencies include Arcadia, Azusa, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre, along with the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Our EWMP group has already committed to spending $3.2 million on consultant costs associated with MS4 Permit compliance efforts

Rio Hondo / San Gabriel River Water Quality EWMP Group

What Is An EWMP? An EWMP is one of the mechanisms through which compliance with the MS4 Permit can be achieved The EWMP is an overall plan that details specific projects to be implemented in order to achieve stormwater TMDL compliance limits The EWMP plans include best management practices, multi-benefit regional projects to retain stromwater runoff, and detailed analysis (known as a Reasonable Assurance Analysis) that illustrates how the projects would allow for compliance with TMDL limits

What Does Monrovia’s EWMP Require? The two major project components contained in our EWMP plan includes regional stormwater retention projects (known as Regional BMPs) and the development of green streets (known as Distributed BMPs) In addition to constructing 68 miles of green streets, Monrovia’s responsibilities include implementing regional stormwater retention projects at Recreation Park, Lucinda Garcia Park, Royal Oaks Trail, and Eisenhower Park

Regional Projects Examples Subsurface Infiltration Recreation Park Sierra Vista Park Royal Oaks Trail L. Garcia Park Eisenhower Park Subsurface Infiltration Encanto Park Memorial Park Royal Oaks Trail Baldwin Lake Arboretum of LAC Aboveground Infiltration LADWP Easement

Recreation Park Project Overview

Green Street Example

How Much Do Our EWMP Projects Cost? Our EWMP group has identified that 10 regional stormwater retention projects and 436 lane miles of green streets will keep us in compliance with the provisions of our MS4 Permit Regional Project Costs – $299.6 million Green Street Costs – $1.1 billion To build a green street costs around $2.6 million / lane mile To build a conventional street costs around $260k / lane mile The estimated construction costs for implementing the identified projects is $1.4 billion The estimated ongoing operating / maintenance costs for those projects is $13.2 million / year Monrovia’s proportionate EWMP estimated costs are: Total construction costs – $231.1 million Ongoing O&M Costs – $2.2 million / year Based on our MS4 Permit, the identified projects have to be completed by 2028

Wait… Do We Have $1.4 Billion? No... we do not have $1.4 billion between our EWMP cities, and Monrovia has not identified where we will get $231.1 million for our share of stormwater project costs In fact, at this point in time, we have no identified funding source for either the capital costs or the ongoing maintenance costs associated with our EWMP projects

But How Much Would This Cost Me? Staff conducted some financial modeling to illustrate how much it would cost residents in Monrovia to execute the $1.4 billion in projects identified by our EWMP On a per parcel basis, it is estimated that the per parcel cost in Monrovia would be $1,334 / year for 30 years The modeling estimates that a $1.4 billion bond issuance paid back over 30 years would require an annual debt service payment of $82.7 million Monrovia is responsible for 16% of the overall EWMP project costs, meaning our annual debt service costs would be $13.5 million There are an estimated 10,101 parcels in Monrovia

How Did This Happen? The Federal Clean Water Act was initially adopted in 1948 and reorganized in 1972 The California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Act) was adopted by the State in 1969 The Act authorized the State Water Resources Control Board and the nine (9) Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) to implement Federal and State water quality regulations RWQCBs have implemented Federal Clean Water Act mandates through MS4 Permits since 1991 Early MS4 Permits required implementations of programs such as street sweeping and public education programs The current MS4 Permit has included TMDL limits due to litigation brought by environmental groups in 1998 (Heal the Bay et al. v. Browner, No. C98-4825 SBA)

Do We Really Have To Comply? Federal and State law allows Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) to levy fines for non-compliance The RWQCB has notified cities that failure to comply with the provisions of the MS4 Permit could result in the following non-compliant fines $10,000 per pollutant for each day of violation, and $3,000 per violation per day in mandatory minimum State penalties Furthermore, violations of Federal Clean Water Act can be enforced by US EPA and by environmental groups Federal penalties could reach $37,500 / day In addition, local jurisdictions such as LA County have been sued in federal court by environmental groups such as the National Resources Defense Council and LA Waterkeeper over water quality level exceedances

Real Life Stormwater Lawsuits Between 2003-2013, there were 16 lawsuits throughout the State brought against local agencies for stormwater / NPDES permit violations 12 of those cases have concluded via settlements / consent decrees Those settlements / consent decrees have resulted in payment of $19.2 million in mitigation / penalty costs, $3.5 million in plaintiffs’ attorneys fees, and $209k in additional monitoring costs In 2012, the City of Malibu settled with Santa Monica Bay Keeper and the National Resources Defense Council for stormwater runoff violations Malibu paid $6.6 million ($5.6 million infrastructure upgrades, $750k in legal fees, $250k for an ocean health assessment) as part of that settlement

Why Haven’t We Heard Of These Issues Before Now? Throughout California, only LA County has a MS4 Permit that includes compliance limits for 33 TMDLs through the establishment of WMPs and EWMPs However, the State Water Resources Control Board stipulated the following in State Water Board Order WQ 2015-0075: “WE DIRECT ALL REGIONAL WATER BOARDS TO CONSIDER THE WMP / EWMP APPROACH TO RECEIVING WATER LIMITATIONS COMPLIANCE WHEN ISSUING PHASE I MS4 PERMITS GOING FORWARD…”

What Should Our Approach To This Issue Be? As staff has assessed the overall EWMP issue, we believe that the City needs to engage in a three pronged approach Prong 1: Public Education Prong 2: Advocate For Policy Change Prong 3: Work Towards Compliance

Prong 1: Public Education Given the complexities and bureaucracy surrounding stormwater regulations, the issues have not been thoroughly discussed with the public In addition, stormwater is such an esoteric topic that even municipal management practitioners have found it difficult to engage in the subject In order to effectively operate within State and Federal stormwater mandates, a coordinated public education effort is needed It will be important to articulate both the importance of stormwater management, and also the impracticality of current regulatory requirements

Prong 2: Advocate For Policy Changes While no one disputes the need for clean water, it is unrealistic to expect our EWMP group to complete $1.4 billion worth of stormwater improvement projects by 2028 Furthermore, it is unrealistic to expect that property owners in Monrovia would approve a $1,334 / year tax increase to fund stormwater projects While the issue is important, funding for stormwater initiatives cannot come at the expense of every other public improvement project To facilitate a more realistic approach, a coordinated lobbying effort advocating for stormwater policy changes is needed Regional Water Quality Control Board State Water Quality Control Board State Legislative Representatives, including the Governor’s Office

Prong 3: Working Towards Compliance While we work to share information regarding EWMPs and as we lobby for policy changes, it will also be important to demonstrate that we are working towards compliance with MS4 Permit regulations Compliance activities that we can engage in concurrent to our other efforts include: Working to establish a special district or joint powers authority comprised of members of our EWMP group Given the way that currently proposed projects fall across jurisdictional boundaries, it would be prudent to consider forming a separate entity that would be responsible for building / maintaining EWMP stormwater projects Continuing to engage in stormwater quality monitoring activities Applying for State and Federal stormwater grant funding

Special Note – Proposition 218 Implications Pursuant to Proposition 218, any new or increased property-related fee / general tax must be approved by a majority of impacted voters Proposition 218 includes an exemption to the voter approval requirement for utility-related fees (i.e., water / sewer fees) Some have argued that stormwater should be classified as a utility, however, a 2002 appellate court decision held that stormwater related fees were not exempt from Proposition 218 voter requirements As a result of that ruling, public entities considering new or increased stormwater fees must first obtain voter approval from either property owners or registered voters

Next Steps Our EWMP is currently being reviewed by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and approval / adoption of the plan is expected in April 2016 Once the EWMP is approved, there is an Adaptive Management Process that will allow for the project listing to be further refined as we take into consideration water quality monitoring data and overall program effectiveness In the interim, it will be important for our EWMP group to simultaneously work towards compliance while also engaging in efforts to ensure that the implementation process is reasonable

Questions?