Sponsor Ballot Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.
Advertisements

Overview of the IEEE Process IEEE P1620 Working Group Meeting 18 September 2002.
Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission November, 2013 Pat Kinney, Kinney ConsultingSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
IEEE P1850 IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot Primer 5 April 2005 Presented by Andy Ickowicz & Noelle Humenick IEEE Standards Activities.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.
Overview of the IEEE-SA Process Maintenance of IEEE standards Soo H. Kim, Program Manager, Technical Program Development NPEC Subcommittee SC-3 Jan 24,
Overview of the IEEE-SA Process
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
ASME C&S Training Module B5 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
The Standards Development Process IEEE Gary Hoffman April 13, 2015.
Submitting Your IEEE Standards Project for Approval Consideration RevCom Presentation PE/IC Meeting 9 November 2009 Prepared by Moira Patterson.
Networking the World TM TRANSFORMERSCOMMITTEE Standards Development And Maintenance Presented by: Tom Prevost Standards Coordinator October 15, 2001.
IEEE-SA Public Review IEEE/PES PE/SPDC Committee San Diego, CA May 2015.
Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July 2007 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Common Editorial Comment Resolution Process Date: Authors:
The IEEE-SA Standards Process Dr. Bilel Jamoussi IEEE Standards Education Committee.
Doc.: IEEE /1218r0 SubmissionBruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 1 +1 (321) Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, Name Company Address Phone.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: LB #1e Comment Summary Date Submitted: July, 2007 Presented at.
IEEE PCIC Standards Working Group Officers’ Workshop IEEE-SA Public Review Overview for Sponsor Chairs, Working Group Chairs and Ballot Designees Pat Roder.
Relevant Rules on Recirculation
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC
Revisions to Codes and Standards
Voting Procedures Committee Report
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Proposed P802.16s Amendment Extension Request to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot: Comment Resolution
IEEE 1914 NGFI IEEE RoE TF Opening Report
IEEE-SA: MyProject Training
The Standards Development Process
Standards Development: An Overview
1st Vice Chair Report Date: Authors: January 2012
IEEE P Motions at the July Plenary EC Meeting
New Participant Introduction
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
Specification on float equipment
IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot: Comment Resolution
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
Introduction to Sponsor Balloting using the myBallot™ system
Task Group G Report March 10, 2003
IEEE Motions at the November Plenary EC Meeting
Adaption PAR Process IEEE OpMan Section Process for adoption of non-IEEE Standards Sponsor identification A Sponsor, as defined by subclause.
Training Presentation Karen Evangelista RevCom Administrator
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r4 November 2010
NesCom PAR Review Period Comment Dialog
Title: LE TG Closing Report for Session #63
IEEE Motion at the July EC Closing Meeting
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
Title: LE TG Closing Report for Session #63.5
P Draft to Sponsor Ballot
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Meetings.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
IEEE Standards Development
802 Standards Process Information
Submission Title: [REVCOM Submission Information]
Overview of WG Letter Ballot Process
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
TGn Editor Report Sept 2008 Date: Authors:
EC LMSC Policy and Procedures Update
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2011
P802.11aq Waiver Request Introduction
IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Network
VOTING 101 -IFTA.
IEEE P Motions at the July Plenary EC Meeting
Title: LE TG Agenda for Session #63
P802.11j Sponsor Ballot Procedure 10
Reaffirmation Status Report
Presentation transcript:

Sponsor Ballot Process Overview Sponsor Ballot Process Name and title of the creator of the document goes here Welcome to the Overview of the Sponsor Ballot Process webinar. This webinar will cover the highest level of basics related to the IEEE Sponsor Ballot Process.

Standards Development Stages This circle represents the Standards Development Stages for IEEE Standards. In this webinar, we will review step 4 of the standards development stages “Balloting a Standard.”

Sponsor Ballot Overview The process through which consensus on a proposed standard is achieved The Sponsor Ballot process can be summarized as the process through which consensus on a proposed standard is achieved. Consensus (for IEEE requirements) means agreement among the majority. Consensus further implies that minority views have been heard, and therefore all comments provided by balloters must be given consideration.

Standards Development - Process Flow Idea for New Standard Project Authorization Request (PAR) Standard Draft Development By the Working Group Sponsor Ballot Standards Association Standards Board Approval Standard Document Publishing Revise Standards Withdrawn Standards Archive Maximum of 10 years Maximum of 4 years This chart illustrates the standards process in simplified form. Note – The Sponsor Ballot process is only one phase of the full standards life cycle. Other elements of the standards process include: Idea: The idea for a standard is usually developed by a group of individuals or entities, and the responsibility for the idea is assumed by the sponsor. The sponsor is usually a society or an existing standards committee. – Note, if a sponsor has not yet been identified, IEEE-SA staff can assist. Project Approval Process: This idea is then transferred into a Project Authorization Request (PAR) and submitted to the New Standards Committee (NesCom) in the myProject system for approval. Develop draft standard: The draft is then developed and revised by the working group (either entity or individual). Ballot draft (which is our focus today): When the draft work is finalized, the sponsor forms the balloting group (made up of either individuals or entities) and ballots the standard. Standards Board Approval: After the ballot has achieved consensus, the draft then goes to the Review Committee (RevCom) and if recommended for approval by RevCom, is then forwarded to the Standards Board for approval. Publish Standard: The draft is then edited and formatted by an IEEE Project Editor and published. The standard is valid for 10 years. However, in order to keep the standard active, a maintenance action must completed prior to the 10 year mark.

Agenda Invitation Stage Initial Ballot Stage Public Review Comment Resolution Stage Recirculation Stage Submit to RevCom Stage Additional Resources In this webinar, we will review the following 6 stages of the Sponsor Ballot Process, from Invitation stage through submission to RevCom. We will also provide links to additional resources for the Sponsor Ballot Process.

Standards Development – Balloting Process Start Here This chart illustrates the steps involved in the sponsor ballot process. In the “Form the Ballot Group” rectangle: The WG Chair, and ultimately the sponsor, are responsible for forming the balloting group. According to IEEE-SA policies, one primary concern is achieving a balance of interests in the balloting group. In the “ballot the document” rectangle: Most ballots are usually conducted for 30 days. Balloters are expected to return their ballots with one of three votes—approve, disapprove, or abstain. In the “75% response” triangle: The primary goal is to see if at least 75% of the ballot group members return a vote. Otherwise, the ballot fails and has to start over. In the “75% Affirmative Vote” triangle: If you have a 75% return, your next goal is to see if you have a 75% approval on your return, and address comments, if any. In the “resolve/rebut comments” rectangle: If resolved comments cause changes to the draft or if negative comments marked “must be satisfied” are received, you must recirculate the document. This process continues until no new negative comments are received and the working group wishes to make no further changes to the draft. In the “draft standard standards board approval process” rectangle: When 75% affirmative ballots are received without new negative votes, the sponsor is encouraged to send the draft to the Standards Board for approval.

Invitation Stage A balanced ballot group is formed using an electronic balloting system called myProject™. Invitation is typically open for 30 days. To achieve balance, no one interest group can be more than 1/3. Composition of the balloting group shall not change after the ballot invitation closes. Now we will go through each stage in detail. For the Invitation Stage, The ballot group is formed through the electronic balloting system called myProject™. The working group chair initiates an invitation to form the ballot group. The ballot group must be balanced where no one interest group can be more than 1/3. The common categories for the interest groups are producer, user, and general interest categories Those who sign up during the invitation period constitute the ballot group and the composition of the group cannot change once the ballot begins.

Initial Ballot Stage A sponsor ballot is initiated with the draft of the standard, to be reviewed, commented, and voted on by the ballot group. 75% return response rate from the ballot group, and 75% affirmative (approve) votes are required for the ballot to successfully progress The sponsor ballot process is the means by which consensus is achieved on the proposed IEEE Standard. A project or draft standard is ready for a Sponsor Ballot when it has completed its working group development and a balance ballot group is formed. The sponsor ballot is initiated through myProject and the ballot group is also informed. During sponsor ballot period, the ballot group is able to review the document, submit comments, and cast a vote. Such process is the means by which consensus is achieved on the proposed draft standard. A initial sponsor ballot is usually conducted for a minimum of 30 days, however this period is flexible and can be extended. The goal of a ballot is to have a 75% return response rate on a ballot. Anything less, the ballot fails. Once a 75% return response is achieved, the chair should examine the approval rate. Consensus means agreement among the majority. It does not mean unanimity. A balloting group does not need to achieve 100% approval, or even 95% or 90%. According to IEEE rules, consensus is defined as a minimum 75% return of ballots from the balloting group, and a 75% approval rate from that 75% return group. If this is reached, then consensus has been achieved.

Public Review The IEEE-SA utilizes a Public Review process and application that allows systematic feedback on initial IEEE-SA sponsor ballot drafts. This is a 60-day process that runs in tandom with the Sponsor Balloting Process. Support material is available in the help tab within the Public Review application (FAQs, Video Tutorials, User Guide, Support Center) Initiated December 2014, the IEEE-SA Public Review Process is a 60-day public review which allows IEEE to demonstrate how it meets the principles of the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards.

Comment Resolution Stage All balloter comments shall be given consideration A reasonable attempt shall be made to resolve all negative votes that are accompanied by comments. Revised draft and comments shall be recirculated According to the Standards Board Operations Manual: Section 5.4.3.2 “Resolution of comments, objections, and negative votes” The Sponsor shall consider all comments and objections received before the close of ballot; and make a reasonable attempt to resolve all negative votes that are accompanied by comments. Comments that advocate changes in the document, whether technical or editorial, may be accepted, revised, or rejected. Comments addressing grammar, punctuation, and style, whether attached to an affirmative or a negative vote, may be referred to the publications editor for consideration during preparation for publication. It should be borne in mind that documents are professionally edited prior to publication.

Recirculation Stage If substantive changes have been made to the draft, a recirculation will be necessary. The recirculation should be open for at least 10 days Ballot Pool members may only comment on the changed portion of the draft. Recirculations continue until no further changes are made to the draft. During comment resolution, if substantive changes have been made to the draft, a recirculation will be necessary. A good rule of thumb is, if in doubt, recirculate. The purpose of a recirculation is to give balloters the opportunity to review what has been changed and either comment further on changes or not, and possibly change a disapprove vote to an approve vote. Usually recirculation are open for at least 10 days. The only material open for vote/comment by balloters is the changed portion of the draft. Recirculations will continue until no further changes are made to the draft.

Submit to RevCom Stage Submit the final draft standard to Standard Review Committee (RevCom). RevCom reviews the submitted documents and materials, and makes a recommendation to IEEE-SA Standards Board for an approval of the draft standard. IEEE-SA Standards Board reviews the recommendation and approves the draft standard. Publish Standard Complimentary copies sent to the WG. The approval of the IEEE draft standard is achieved by submitting the document and supporting materials to Standard Review Committee (RevCom). RevCom determines whether or not the principles of consensus, due process, openness, and balance are maintained throughout the project development, and makes a recommendation to IEEE-SA Standards Board for an approval. The IEEE-SA Standards Board approves or disapproves standards based on the recommendation of its Standards Review Committee (RevCom). This committee makes sure working groups follow all procedures and guiding principles in drafting and balloting a standard. As with PARs, completed draft standards come before the Board four times a year or during the continuous approval process. After approval, the standard is edited by an IEEE-SA editor, given a final review by the members of the working group, and published. A standard is valid for ten years from its approval date. During this time, a working group can develop and ballot revisions or extensions to the standard, which are appended as amendments. After ten years, a standard is revised or withdrawn. When your standard has been approved, the last step is to go though the final editing for publication. The approved standard will receive a thorough, detailed edit from a professional IEEE standards editor. It is not an editor's role to make any changes that affect the technical meaning of the standard. The editor also ensures that the document meets the rules for IEEE standards style manual. After the publication of the standard, a complimentary copy is sent out to the working group members. The published standards are then available to the user. A copy of the standard can be obtained for purchase from IEEE –Shop.

Sample Sponsor Ballot Process Timeline This table summarizes the sponsor ballot process timeline, along with the duration for each step. *Note to facilitator: review steps & duration as a webinar summarization* **This would be great as a Gantt chart: see table below…some durations are averaged or indicated as the longest of a possible duration** # Stage Duration Dependancy 1 Invitation 30 2 MEC 3 Initial Ballot 1,2 4 Public Review 60 5 Comment Resolution 6 Recirculation 10 7 8 Submit to RevCom 9 SASB Approval Publication 90

Standards Development – Balloting Process This process flow chart serves as a summary of what we have reviewed today, from forming the ballot group, through submitting the draft standard to the IEEE-SA Standards Board for approval. *Note to facilitator: review steps as another webinar summarization*

Additional Resources IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/ IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/ IEEE-SA Website http://standards.ieee.org/index.html Public Review http://standards.ieee.org/develop/publicreview.html myProject https://development.standards.ieee.org/my-site IEEE-SA Style Manual https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/draft/styleman.pdf The following resources are available through our Web Site: http://standards.ieee.org/.

Thank You! Thank you for your time today, as we reviewed the steps for balloting a standard, in the IEEE-SA Standards Development Lifecycle.