Using insight to support tribunals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
User Satisfaction Why? User Satisfaction Surveys are conducted to ensure we receive feedback from our customers in order to gauge.
Advertisements

HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
YJB TOOLKITS: Disproportionality YJB owner: Sue Walker Dept: Performance May (2011) Version 1.0.
SEN and Disability Green Paper Pathfinders March 2012 Update.
Impact assessment framework
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
SEN and Disability Green Paper: Update March
Public Protection Service 2008/9 Charter Mark and Electronic Data Management System (EDMS) Improve performance and efficiency together with improving customer.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
© Nano Time Limited – October 2008 Source Planning What –Analytical process that for creating procurement and supply strategies for key categories Wh y.
‘How and where should financial brands focus their digital attention?’ January 2014.
Top Tips Localism In Action Tip 1: Getting Started Use existing links to build a strong localism partnership across the CA area Be proactive,
Delivering value to the NHS Customer Satisfaction.
People lives communities Supported employment for disabled people Commissioning and Contracting Training Conference 12 September 2014 Rich Watts, NDTi.
Schools as Organisations
Greater Manchester: a snapshot picture
Building Business Transformation Capabilities Our perspective on the building blocks, structure and critical success factors to impact change Gillian.
LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Information Pack 2017 National Student Housing Survey  
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
SCEL Framework for Educational Leadership
The Australian Priority Investment Approach
Information, Information, Information The Review of NSS and Unistats
Innovation Ecosystems Fellowship Overview
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Salford’s Market Position Statement
Who we are We work for well run evidence based public care
Candidate Pack HEO Vacancy November 2016.
Beyond 2018 | Consultation timeline Board agrees creation of a new plan New strategic plan launched Board sign-off Summit17 Jan - Mar 17 Sept - Oct.
RSS Conference, 6 Sept 2016 One structure – Two Brands
Person Centred Care in NHS Wales
Kate Yorke, Project Manager – MECC
The Nature of Qualitative Research
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Conty Context Housing Finance Ltd
Kate Yorke, Project Manager – MECC
The Q Improvement Lab August 2017.
What is an integrated care system
CHIPS for schools NSW Education Complaint Handling Improvement Program
CEF Valuation Sub-Group Societal Valuation Programme Update
Partnerships and networks
Sustainability & Transformation Plans (STP)
Public engagement strategy
Scotland’s Digital Health and Care Strategy
Chair of Lancashire Children and Young People’s Trust
The Hub Innovation Program Evaluation Plan
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Portfolio, Programme and Project
A Model for Academic Engagement
Research funding application process
Recruitment Information Pack
Regulating digital health and care
Director Be Birmingham Third Sector Assembly, Annual Conference
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
TECHNOLOGY EXPLOSION TECHNOLOGY EXPLOSION. TECHNOLOGY EXPLOSION TECHNOLOGY EXPLOSION.
Overview of assessment approach
Investing in Data Management Capabilities
Creating an Innovation and Culture Change Plan
Director Be Birmingham Third Sector Assembly, Annual Conference
Planning for Success Jenny Fish – Funding Officer, South West Regional Team June 2018.
Job Title: Process Analyst
Evaluating Community Link Working in Scotland: Learning from the ‘early adopters’ Jane Ford, NHS Health Scotland Themina Mohammed & Gordon Hunt, NSS Local.
Creating Health Communication Campaign
Workplace Wellbeing Programme
Improving data on homelessness in New Zealand
Hazel Benza Employability and Third Sector Secondment Overview.
Workbook for Progressing Strategic Priorities at Local Level
Aspire 2.0 Cohort 2 - North West
Presentation transcript:

Using insight to support tribunals HMCTS Customer insight

The Customer Insight team has been set up to improve the customer experience by delivering usable insights on our customers The Customer Insight Team leads on what we know about our customers. The team will gather and communicate data, research and insight about customers in a way which helps colleagues to make decisions about how we develop and deliver our services. The team takes a multi-disciplinary approach and has a wide range of expertise including in research methods, market research, behavioural science, and data analysis. Business Priority in 16-17 Success Factor(s) Improve the customer experience Improvements in service with positive feedback from customers Begin to deliver usable insight on our customers and users Insight function established and delivering usable insight Gain access to insights from outside the organisation including from sector experts External insights driving service improvements Deliver regular products distilling key insights about our customers which underpins improvements to the customer experience User/customer experience improvements, change programme benefits & minimised user/business costs Ensure we have access to a small amount of expert insight resource (e.g. data and behavioural science) that can be deployed on priority projects Resource in place and successfully influencing projects Ensure our insight function jointly supports with others the creation of an effective data strategy for HMCTS Data strategy agreed with partners

Making sense of the existing evidence base is one of our wider team priorities and a review of the data on Tribunals is already underway We will create a series of products that will take into account the existing research and an analysis of internal data (e.g. complaints/call volumes). The images below are illustrative. Understanding our customers: SSCS Tribunals HMCTS Customer insight Understanding our customers: Employment Tribunals HMCTS Customer insight

Changes in Tribunal volumes have been driven by policy interventions Example CI pack slide Overview of the Tribunal System Changes in Tribunal volumes have been driven by policy interventions Key insight: Policy changes implemented by HMCTS, MoJ and other government departments have been the driving force behind the significant changes to tribunal volumes between 2013 and 2016 Implication for HMCTS: The Tribunal services teams need to be horizon scanning internally and across government departments for forthcoming policy changes as well as externally for trends that could impact the policy landscape (e.g. Brexit) if they want to understand future service demand. Changes to legal aid- MoJ Immigration Act- Home Office DWP Changes Appeals Process Changes to Employment Tribunal- HMCTS Changes to Fee Structures -HMCTS Fig. 1: All Tribunals Receipts and Disposals, 2009-2016. MoJ Published Statistics Findings Disposals declined 43% between 2009 and 2016 Receipts declined 49% between 2009 and 2016 Receipts and Disposals have remained relatively consistent since 2015/16 Receipt and Disposal declines appear related to policy activity Evidence Gaps A comprehensive view of forthcoming policy development across government that could impact Tribunals

The research to understand the Customer Experience will cover Employment and SSCS tribunals Internal scoping and sign off Project inception and design Qualitative research Quantitative research Analysis and reporting Six key research questions A combination of 48 depth interviews, 6-8 post hearing interviews and 8 reconvened triads to explore and understand different customer journeys in detail moving beyond what is already known and linking customer experience to specific aspects of their journey 1.What are the fundamental factors that drive customer experience? 2. How do these core factors manifest themselves and/or vary across different circumstances, journeys, stages, and customer types? 3. Which of these factors most influences customers’ levels of trust and confidence in the way the justice system is administered? 4. For those customers whose journeys involved a court or tribunal hearing, what influenced the decisions that took them that far? 5. What are the needs and expectations of customers who use courts and tribunal services and settings? 6. Which aspects of their experience do customers value most highly, across all jurisdictions, customer types, etc.? Oct 24th tbc Dec 5th A face to face survey of 1000 court and tribunal users to explore experiences, expectations and preferences throughout their journey. This will be used to unpick what matters most to customers and the relative importance of these aspects early Jan end Feb Bringing together the insights from the qualitative stage and the survey. Key driver analysis to understand drivers of experience. end March April/May

The Customer Insight team are delivering or scoping 8 projects to support Tribunals Description Benefits 1.Tribunals Customer Insight Bringing together, summarising and synthesising all the research available on Tribunal customers split by tribunal chamber. Including published research, OGD research and data, academic evidence, international evidence, internal systems data, complaints and contact data. An initial resource for HMCTS staff to better understand the Tribunals landscape and the evidence gaps, e.g. would ensure future digital design is more efficient. 2. Primary Research on Customer Experience Two objectives: 1) Understand the current customer experience and how a customers circumstances impact on that experience. 2) Understand the needs and expectations of current customers, i.e. what matters to customers. Prioritise our resources to improve our services where it matters most for customers. Identify where customers require better support to access our systems, e.g. to ensure processes are clear and effective and the system is available to all customers. 3. Drawing insight from international experience Review what leading nations are doing in the Tribunals space related to customer service and draw out insights and implications for HMCTS An opportunity to ensure that we're learning from the best international comparators. 4. Data from OGDs Extract data from OGDs about the Tribunals customer base, e.g. what does analysis of DWP data tell us about the customers appealing PIP decisions. Identify opportunities for service improvements and validate assumptions about future design. 5. Understand more about customer demographics Bring together what we know about customer demographics for each tribunal chamber, especially useful for SSCS? Fundamental intelligence to understand the customer base, especially useful for development of digital services. 6. ACAS analysis What does ACAS data tell us about the 17% of cases that can't be mediated and make their way to an employment tribunal? We'd know more about the customers in that part of the "funnel". Specifically why their issue couldn't be mediated. This would make service redesign more informed and built round user need. 7. Mental health tribunals workflow The volume of mental health appeals has increased 50% over the last 8 years, it would be useful to understand why and whether or not it's a customer related issue. Better forecasting of service demand. 8. User choice for paper vs. oral hearings What drives the user choice between paper and oral hearings, where currently in SSCS 16% choose paper and 84% oral and what are the implications for digital design. Improve digital design for customers.